Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Rev. salud pública ; 22(3): e406, May-June 2020.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1150182

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN El dolor de los pacientes de cáncer ha sido descrito como dolor total. Tanto en la literatura científica, los libros de texto, así como en informes y directrices de la Organización Mundial de la Salud, el concepto de dolor total ha servido de trasfondo para promover la atención multidisciplinaria de pacientes cuyo dolor involucra también aspectos psicológicos, emocionales, espirituales y sociales. El objetivo de este artículo es proponer una caracterización del concepto de dolor total de manera tal que continúe jugando un papel central en la promoción de la atención multidisciplinaria propia de los cuidados paliativos. Primero, se presenta un bosquejo del concepto y de los diferentes usos en la literatura. Segundo, se hace un contraste con la definición del dolor de la Asociación Internacional para el Estudio del Dolor (IASP) para establecer la naturaleza y referente del concepto de dolor total. Tercero, se muestra cómo esta caracterización del concepto disuelve algunas tensiones en la literatura respecto a su uso adecuado. Se plantea que el concepto de dolor total hace referencia a aquellas relaciones causales entre el dolor y los estados psicológicos, emocionales, espirituales y sociales que han sido Identificadas como susceptibles de ser intervenidas por el modelo de atención paliativa multidisciplinar. Como conclusión, se recomienda no vincular el concepto de dolor total con el padecimiento de una enfermedad en particular, ni con qué tan limitante para la vida es la enfermedad; tampoco para referirse a la "experiencia global" del paciente, ni como un punto muy alto de una escala.(AU)


ABSTRACT The pain suffering in cancer patients has been described as "total pain". The concept of "total pain" plays a key role in the promotion of the multidisciplinary nature of palliative care. In palliative attention, suffering is conceptualized as an addition of physical, psychological, emotional, spiritual and social aspects. In this paper, I offer a characterization of the concept of "total pain", one which preserves its key role in palliative care promotion. First, I sketch the concept and some different usages found in the literature. Second, I establish the nature and referent of the "total pain" concept by means of showing the contrast between it and the pain definition provided by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). Third, I propose that the concept of "total pain" refers to the relevant causal chains identified by the palliative care research as elements susceptible of intervention for the purpose of alleviating patient's suffering. These causal chains feature and link physical, psychological, emotional, spiritual and social aspects of the patient's suffering. As conclusion, I add the recommendation to not associate the concept of "total pain" with any particular diagnostic or disease or any particular prognosis, neither to the global experience of the patient, nor treat it as a high point on a scale.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Palliative Care/psychology , Pain Management/methods , Cancer Pain/therapy , Palliative Medicine/trends
2.
Geriatr., Gerontol. Aging (Online) ; 12(4): 206-214, out.-dez.2018. tab
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-981850

ABSTRACT

INTRODUÇÃO E OBJETIVO: Apesar da grande interface entre cuidados paliativos (CPs) e geriatria, ainda não há propostas de currículos de competências de medicina paliativa (MP) para geriatra no Brasil. Diante disso, objetivou-se desenvolver uma matriz de competências de medicina paliativa para o geriatra (MCMPG), especialmente para aquele em formação. MÉTODO: A primeirafase consistiu na elaboração da matriz piloto. Para se determinar o consenso, um grupo de geriatras com certificação de área de atuação em MP de todas as regiões do país foi convidado a opinar sobre as competências elencadas na matriz piloto. Foram duas etapas (2ª e 3ª fases) de metodologia Delphi modificada para se obter o consenso (nível de concordância maior que 50 e 80%, respectivamente, na 2ª e 3ª fases). E, por fim, realizada a fase de consulta pública no XXI Congresso Brasileiro de Geriatria e Gerontologia e via site da Academia Nacional de Cuidados Paliativos. RESULTADOS: Dezenove experts em MP e Geriatria avaliaram a MCMPG. O nível de concordância de todas as áreas temáticas foi maior que o determinado, exceto a sedação paliativa (20% discordância). A MCMPG finalizou com 13 áreas temáticas, 105 competências, sendo 11 de pré­requisitos, 52 essenciais, 24 desejáveis e 18 avançadas. CONCLUSÃO: Definiu-se uma matriz de competências de CPs que pode ser integrada à educação médica, especificamente à pós-graduação em Geriatria. Propõe-se que os serviços de residência em Geriatria ofereçam, pelo menos, o treinamento das competências "essenciais", nas áreas temáticas propostas fortalecendo a educação em CPs de forma homogênea em todo o país.


INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Despite a great interface between palliative care (PC) and geriatrics, there are currently no curriculum proposals of palliative medicine (PM) competencies for geriatricians in Brazil. Thus, the aim was to develop a competency framework of palliative medicine for geriatricians (CFPMG), especially for those under training. METHOD: The first phase consisted of preparing a pilot framework. To reach a consensus, geriatricians with expertise in the field of PM from all Brazilian regions were invited to express their opinions on the competencies listed in the pilot framework. A modified Delphi method was used in the 2nd and 3rd phases to obtain a consensus (level of agreement greater than 50% and 80%, respectively). Finally, a public consultation phase was conducted in the 21st Brazilian Congress on Geriatrics and Gerontology, and via Brazilian National Academy of Palliative Care website. RESULTS: Nineteen experts in PM and geriatrics evaluated the CFPMG. The level of agreement in all thematic areas was greater than that required, except for palliative sedation (20% of disagreement). The CFPMG concluded with 13 thematic areas and 105 competencies, including 11 prerequisite, 52 core, 24 desirable, and 18 advanced competencies. CONCLUSION: The defined competency framework of PC may be integrated into medical education, specifically into geriatric medicine training. Our suggestion is that residency programs in geriatrics provide training at least in the core competencies from the proposed thematic areas, thereby strengthening PC education homogeneously across the country.


Subject(s)
Competency-Based Education/organization & administration , Competency-Based Education/trends , Palliative Medicine/trends , Geriatrics/education , Palliative Care/trends , Consensus , Geriatricians/education
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL