Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Article in English | AIM | ID: biblio-1258707

ABSTRACT

Introduction :Finding journal open access information alongside its global impact requires access to multiple databases. We describe a single, searchable database of all emergency medicine and critical care journals that include their open access policies, publication costs, and impact metrics.Methods:A list of emergency medicine and critical care journals (including citation metrics) was created using Scopus (Citescore) and the Web of Science (Impact Factor). Cost of gold/hybrid open access and article process charges (open access fees) were collected from journal websites. Self-archiving policies were collected from the Sherpa/RoMEO database. Relative cost of access in different regions were calculated using the World Bank Purchasing Power Parity index for authors from the United States, Germany, Turkey, China, Brazil, South Africa and Australia.Results:We identified 78 emergency medicine and 82 critical care journals. Median Citescore for emergency medicine was 0.73 (interquartile range, IQR 0.32­1.27). Median impact factor was 1.68 (IQR 1.00­2.39). Median Citescore for critical care was 0.95 (IQR 0.25­2.06). Median impact factor was 2.18 (IQR 1.73­3.50). Mean article process charge for emergency medicine was $2243.04, SD = $1136.16 and for critical care $2201.64, SD = $1174.38. Article process charges were 2.24, 1.75, 2.28 and 1.56 times more expensive for South African, Chinese, Turkish and Brazilian authors respectively than United States authors, but neutral for German and Australian authors (1.02 and 0.81 respectively). The database can be accessed here: http://www.emct.info/publication-search.html.Conclusions:We present a single database that captures emergency medicine and critical care journal impact rankings alongside its respective open access cost and green open access policies


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Cross-Sectional Studies , Journal Impact Factor , Open Access Publishing , Periodicals as Topic/economics , Periodicals as Topic/organization & administration
5.
Ciênc. Saúde Colet. (Impr.) ; 20(7): 1997-2006, 07/2015. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-749936

ABSTRACT

Resumo Os editores da Revista de Saúde Pública descrevem o perfil editorial da revista e discutem os desafios da publicação científica na área. É apresentada uma síntese histórica dos quase 50 anos da revista, com a projeção temporal de seus indicadores bibliométricos. São relacionados parâmetros qualitativos e quantitativos de seu perfil editorial e indexações. São discutidas as restrições orçamentárias e as ações que vêm sendo tomadas para enfrentá-las. Também se discute a dificuldade na alocação de revisores para os manuscritos submetidos ao processo de avaliação editorial; uma questão que afeta a publicação científica em muitas áreas de conhecimento. Em especial, buscou-se refletir sobre a proposição de medidas que visem dinamizar o processo editorial, atenuando a escassez de revisores e suas possíveis consequências prejudiciais para o processo editorial.


Abstract The editors of the Revista de Saúde Pública describe the journal's editorial profile and discuss the challenges of scientific publication in the area. A historical overview of almost 50 years of the journal is reported, with the temporal projection of their bibliometric indicators. Qualitative and quantitative parameters of its editorial profile and indexes are also reported. Budget constraints and the actions being taken to address them are discussed. The difficulty in allocating reviewers for manuscripts submitted to the editorial process is also discussed; an issue that affects scientific publication in many areas of knowledge. In particular, we sought to reflect on the proposal of measures to boost the editorial process by alleviating the shortage of reviewers and their possible harmful consequences for the editorial process.


Subject(s)
Periodicals as Topic , Public Health , Editorial Policies , Periodicals as Topic/economics , Periodicals as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Publishing/statistics & numerical data , Brazil , Peer Review, Research
11.
Rev. saúde pública ; 46(6): 1090-1110, Dez. 2012.
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-667621

ABSTRACT

A publicação em revistas de acesso aberto cresceu expressivamente nos últimos anos. As publicações de acesso fechado, por sua vez, têm custo de acesso cada vez mais elevado, por se beneficiarem de um modelo econômico peculiar: o trabalho relevante e os insumos essenciais são entregues gratuitamente a fornecedores que contam com um mercado cativo, praticamente sem concorrência. O mercado editorial é altamente oligopolizado, característico de indústrias que trabalham com o regime de copyright. Isso contribui para a elevação dos preços de seus produtos. Políticas mandatórias de acesso aberto, como a determinada pela agência National Institutes of Health, constituem-se em ameaça a esse modelo de negócios e são enfrentadas pela indústria em várias frentes, incluindo a passagem de legislação para sabotar tais iniciativas. O objetivo deste comentário foi apresentar alguns aspectos principais desse enfrentamento e sugerir possíveis estratégias de incremento da publicação de acesso aberto em nosso meio.


Open-access journal publishing has significantly grown in recent years. Restricted access publications have, in turn, increasing access costs as they benefit from a unique economic model in which relevant work and essential inputs are provided free of charge to vendors who have a captive market that has almost no competition. An additional issue typical of industries that work under the copyright regime is that the oligopoly market structure of the publishing industry which in turn further contributes to increase their products' prices. Mandatory open-access policies, as determined by the NIH, constitute a threat to this business model and are being challenged by the industry on several fronts, including the passage of legislation to undermine these initiatives. The purpose of this commentary article was to review key aspects of this confrontation and to suggest potential strategies for encouraging open-access publishing in Brazil.


La publicación en revistas de acceso abierto creció expresivamente en los últimos años. Las publicaciones de acceso cerrado, por su parte, tienen costo de acceso cada vez más elevado, por beneficiarse de un modelo económico peculiar: el trabajo relevante y los insumos esenciales son entregados gratuitamente a los proveedores que cuentan con un mercado cautivo, prácticamente sin concurrencia. El mercado editorial es altamente monopolizado, característico de industrias que trabajan con el régimen de copyright. Esto contribuye a la elevación de los precios de sus productos. Políticas obligatorias de acceso abierto, como la determinada por el National Institutes of Health, constituyen amenazas a este modelo de negocios y son enfrentadas por la industria en varios ángulos, incluyendo el paso de legislación para sabotear tales iniciativas. El objetivo de este comentario fue presentar algunos aspectos principales de este enfrentamiento y sugerir posibles estrategias de incremento de la publicación de acceso abierto en nuestro medio.


Subject(s)
Humans , Access to Information , Periodicals as Topic/economics , Publishing/economics , Brazil , Editorial Policies , Public Health , Publishing/trends
13.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 140(2): 266-270, feb. 2012.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-627636

ABSTRACT

Medical journals are published by scientific societies, universities, publishing agencies and other for-profit or non-profit organizations. The traditional way to cover the expenses in printed journals has been a "subscribers pay" model. The rise of electronic versions in the internet, either together with the printed version or replacing it entirely, plus a progressive adherence to an "open access" for electronic versions, has created financial difficulties. Therefore, the "authors pay" model has been added. Both models can be subsidized by commercial or institutional advertising, but still a main source for financing relies either in subscriptions or in authors' payments. A small source of income that helps to cover publishing costs is a "charge for manuscript reception", currently applied by several journals. Those authors whose work has institutional or external support can use their grants to cover any charges, but the situation is more difficult for those who do not have such support. Since 1872, Sociedad Médica de Santiago-Chilean Society of Internal Medicine, owner and publisher of Revista Médica de Chile, has employed the "subscribers pay" model, subsidized by commercial advertising and temporary sponsors (Chilean government and others). The printed journal is reproduced in an open access electronic version, in www.scielo.cl. The increasing cost of both publications systems demands a time for reflection.


Subject(s)
Humans , Authorship , Fees and Charges , Periodicals as Topic/economics , Publishing/economics , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Chile
16.
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL