ABSTRACT
Abstract The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the effect of different forms of periodontal diseases on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL). Fifty-two patients with Aggressive Periodontitis (AP) or Chronic Periodontitis (CP) were included: nine patients with Localized Aggressive Periodontitis (LAP), thirty-three patients with Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis (GAP) and ten patients with Generalized Chronic Periodontitis (GCP). Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaires (OHIP-14) were distributed after a clinical examination that measured the following periodontal parameters: tooth loss, bleeding on probing (BoP), probing depth (PD), gingival recession (REC) and clinical attachment level (CAL). The global OHIP-14 score means were 10.6 for LAP, 16.5 for GAP, and 17.5 for GCP. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.01) was observed between the LAP group and the other two groups. There was significantly less bleeding and recession in the LAP group than in the patients with the generalized forms of periodontitis. LAP, GAP and GCP have an impact on patient quality of life when measured using the OHIP-14. Patients with GAP and GCP had poorer OHRQoL than LAP patients.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Aggressive Periodontitis/physiopathology , Oral Health/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Age Factors , Analysis of Variance , Chronic Periodontitis/physiopathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Gingival Recession/physiopathology , Periodontal Attachment Loss/physiopathology , Periodontal Index , Reference Values , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Sickness Impact Profile , Statistics, Nonparametric , Tooth Loss/physiopathologyABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Analisar a densidade mineral óssea sistêmica (DMO) e a situação periodontal em mulheres na pós-menopausa, visando compreender o papel da osteoporose como um fator de risco à doença periodontal. MÉTODOS: A amostra da pesquisa foi constituída por 47 mulheres na pós-menopausa, que foram divididas em três grupos: 14 com osso normal (G1), 17 no grupo com osteopenia (G2) e 16 pacientes com osteoporose (G3), através da avaliação da densidade mineral óssea (DMO), aferida pela absormetria de dupla emissão com raios-X na área lombar (L1-L4). A condição periodontal foi avaliada pelo índice gengival (IG), índice da placa (IP) e o nível de inserção clínica (NIC). Os resultados tabulados foram analisados e submetidos ao tratamento estatístico, através do teste ANOVA a um critério (α=0,05) e o teste de correlação de Pearson (α=0,01). RESULTADOS: Verificou-se não haver diferenças significativas na situação periodontal em mulheres na pós-menopausa, através das variáveis IG, IP e NIC. Observou-se correlação significativa entre os parâmetros periodontais IG, IP e NIC entre si (p<0,001), contudo não foi detectada correlação significativa entre os parâmetros periodontais (IG, IP, NIC) e a condição sistêmica do osso das mulheres na pós-menopausa, avaliada através da DMO (p>0,01). CONCLUSÃO: A situação periodontal em mulheres na pós-menopausa não depende da massa óssea sistêmica, não havendo correlação significativa entre DMO e os parâmetros periodontais, sendo necessárias pesquisas longitudinais para considerar a osteoporose como um fator de risco à doença periodontal.
OBJECITVE: To assess the systemic bone mineral density (BMD) and the periodontal situation in postmenopausal women, to understand the possible role of osteoporosis as a risk factor for periodontal disease. METHODS: The sample was comprised of 47 postmenopausal women, divided into 3 groups: 14 patients with normal bones (G1), 17 with osteopenia (G2) and 16 patients with osteoporosis (G3). Data was obtained using bone mineral density (BMD), obtained by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the lumbar area (L1-L4). Periodontal condition was evaluated by Gingival Index (GI), Plaque Index (PI) and Clinical Attachment Level (CAL). Results were analyzed and submitted to statistical treatment, through the One Way ANOVA: (α=0.05) test and the Pearson's Correlation test (α=0.01). RESULTS: GI, PI and CAL variables did not disclose a significant difference in the periodontal situation of postmenopausal women A significant correlation between periodontal parameters GI, PI and CAL (p<0,001) was observed, however no significant correlation was detected between periodontal parameters (GI, PI and CAL) and systemic bone condition of postmenopausal women, evaluated by BMD (p>0.01). CONCLUSION: The periodontal situation of postmenopausal women does not depend on the systemic bone mass and there is no significant correlation between BMD and periodontal parameters. However, further longitudinal surveys are required to understand osteoporosis as a risk factor of periodontal disease.
Subject(s)
Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Bone Density/physiology , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/complications , Periodontal Diseases/etiology , Postmenopause/physiology , Analysis of Variance , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/complications , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/diagnosis , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/physiopathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dental Plaque Index , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/physiopathology , Periodontal Attachment Loss/diagnosis , Periodontal Attachment Loss/physiopathology , Periodontal Diseases/diagnosis , Periodontal Diseases/physiopathology , Periodontal Index , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Principios de regeneración guiada de tejidos fueron usados con el objetivo de conseguir eliminación de bolsa periodontal persistente luego de procedimientos de raspaje y aplanamiento radicular en área de incisivos centrales superiores. Durante la cirugía de este caso clínico se usó membrana de colágeno y hueso liofilizado bovino; fue lograda la eliminación de la bolsa así como una considerable ganancia de inserción, durante un período de observación clínica y radiográfica de 8 meses. Junto con el relato del caso clínico, se discuten las indicaciones de este tipo de cirugía en áreas de comprometimiento estético