Internações sensíveis à atenção primária específicas de mulheres / Sensitive female-specific hospitalization in primary care

Objetivou-se analisar as internações por condições sensíveis à atenção primária (ICSAP) específicas em mulheres e os fatores que determinam ou influenciam a ocorrência dessas internações (fatores socioeconômicos, sociodemográficos e controle de saúde) por meio de um inquérito de morbidade hospitalar realizado com amostra de 429 mulheres internadas em hospitais conveniados ao Sistema Único de Saúde. O percentual de ICSAP foi 49,42% (n = 212), com destaque para as internações específicas do sexo feminino 19,35% (n = 83). Associaram ao risco de internar por CSAP: idade superior a 60 anos, baixa escolaridade, internação prévia, realização de controle regular de saúde, falta de vínculo com a Estratégia Saúde da Família (ESF) e ser gestante. As causas evidentes foram as condições relacionadas à gravidez, ao parto e ao puerpério e às inflamações nos órgãos pélvicos femininos. Os resultados sugerem falhas no atendimento ambulatorial que deveria ser oportuno e resolutivo no contexto da saúde da mulher.

The scope of this paper was to analyze female-specific sensitive hospitalization occurring in primary care conditions and factors that determine or affect the occurrence of such hospitalizations (social, economic and demographic factors; health control). Analysis was performed by surveys on hospital morbidity with a sample of 429 females attended in Unified Health System (SUS) contracted hospitals. The sensitive hospitalizations percentage in primary care reached 49.42% (n = 212), highlighting female-specific hospitalization at 19.35% (n = 83). Hospitalization risks comprised elderly people over sixty, low schooling, previous hospitalizations, normal health control, lack of association with the Family Health Strategy and pregnancy. Evident causes were related to conditions of pregnancy, childbirth, post-partum and inflammations of the female pelvic organs. Results suggested flaws in outpatient attendance that should be adequate and provide solutions in women’s health.

Impacto económico de la introducción de la vacuna inactivada inyectable contra la poliomielitis en Colombia / Economic impact of introducing the injectable inactivated polio vaccine in Colombia

OBJETIVOS: Evaluar la relación costo-efectividad de la introducción de la vacuna inyectable contra la poliomielitis (VIP) en Colombia con respecto al sistema actual basado en el empleo de la vacuna oral (VOP). MÉTODOS: Se diseñó un modelo de Markov basado en una cohorte hipotética de recién nacidos que recibiría la VIP o la VOP con un seguimiento de dos años y estimaciones mensuales del número de casos de poliomielitis paralítica asociada con la vacuna (PPAV). El análisis del costo se realizó desde la perspectiva del asegurador (costos a lo largo de la vida) y la sociedad (casos de PPAV evitados y años de vida ajustados por discapacidad [AVAD] evitados). RESULTADOS: Entre 1988 y 1998 se aplicaron en Colombia 22,5 millones de dosis de la VOP y se detectaron nueve casos de PPAV, para una tasa de 4,0 ¥ 10-7 por dosis. Según el modelo, se podrían esperar entre 2 y 4 casos de PPAV en los dos años de seguimiento. El costo de tratar los casos de PPAV sería de US$ 302 008, con costos de vacunación con la VOP de US$ 737 037 y de US$ 5 527 777 con la VIP. La vacunación con la VIP permitiría evitar 64 AVAD con un costo de US$ 71 062 por AVAD evitado; evitar un caso de PPAV mediante la sustitución de la VOP por la VIP costaría entre US$ 1,8 millones y US$ 2,2 millones. CONCLUSIONES: La sustitución de la VOP por la VIP no es una medida efectiva en función del costo en Colombia, incluso si se sustituyera la vacuna celular contra la tos ferina, actualmente en uso, por una vacuna acelular combinada con una VIP.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing the injectable inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) in Colombia versus the current system based on the use of the oral vaccine (OPV). METHODS: A Markov model was designed, based on a hypothetical cohort of newborns that would receive the IPV or the OPV vaccine, with a two-year follow-up and monthly estimates of the number of cases of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) that would emerge. The cost was analyzed from the perspective of the insurer (costs throughout life) and society (cases of VAPP and disability-adjusted life years [DALYs] prevented). RESULTS: From 1988 to 1998, some 22.5 million doses of OVP were administered in Colombia and nine cases of VAPP were detected, for a rate of 4.0 ¥ 10-7 dose. According to the model, 2 to 4 cases of VAPP could be anticipated in the following two years. The cost of treating the VAPP cases would total US$302 008, with the cost of vaccination with OPV coming to US$737 037 and with IPV, US$5 527 777. Vaccination with IPV would prevent 64 DALYs, at a cost of US$71 062 per DALY prevented; preventing one case of VAPP by substituting OPV with IPV would cost between US$1.8 and US$2.2 million. CONCLUSIONS: Substituting OPV with IPV is not a cost-effective measure in Colombia, even if the cellular vaccine against whooping cough currently in use were replaced with an acellular vaccine combined with an IPV.

Vacunación antipoliomielítica en niños de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires / Antipoliomyelitic vaccination in children living in Buenos Aires City

A raíz de la presentación de un caso confirmado de poliomielitis paralítica por virus Sabin derivado (VSD) en niños de 15 meses se analizó la cobertura de vacunación antipoliomielítica en niños residentes en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, durante el trienio 2006/2008. Se observó una mejora a lo largo del período analizado, pero sólo hubo valores superiores al 95 por ciento para la primera dosis. Aumentó la proporción de vacuna inactivada (IPV) en desmedro de la vacuna oral viva (OPV); en 2008, la cobertura con IPV primera dosis fue del 37,64 por ciento y del 19,48 por ciento para el ingreso escolar. La falta de inmunidad intestinal que se presenta en los niños vacunados con IPV, asociada a coberturas insatisfactorias condiciona un terreno propicio para la circulación de virus salvaje o VSD, lo cual favorece la aparición de casos de poliomielitis paralítica en niños no vacunados o inmunodeficientes.

Immunogenicity and safety of a pentavalent diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, inactivated poliovirus, haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate combination vaccine (pentaxim™) with hepatitis B vaccine.

Objective: To obtain immunogenicity and safety data for a pentavalent combination vaccine (diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, inactivated poliovirus, Hib polysaccharide-conjugate). Design: Multicenter, open, Phase III clinical study. A DTaP-IPV//PRP~T vaccine (PentaximTM) was given at 6,10,14 weeks of age; and Hepatitis B vaccine at 0,6,14 or at 6,10,14 weeks of age. Immunogenicity assessed 1 month post-3rd dose; safety assessed for 30 minutes by the investigator, then by parents and investigators to 8 days and 30 days post-vaccination. Setting: Tertiary-care hospitals. Participants/patients: 226 healthy Indian infants (6 weeks of age). Main outcome measures: Immunogenicity and safety. Results: Immunogenicity was high for each vaccine antigen, and similar to a historical control study (France) following a 2,3,4 month of age administration schedule. Post-3rd dose, 98.6% of subjects had anti-PRP ³0.15 mg/mL and 90.0% had titers ³1.0 mg/mL; the anti-PRP GMT was 4.1 µg/mL. Seroprotection rates for diphtheria and tetanus (³0.01 IU/mL) were 99.1% and 100%; and 100%,99.1% and 100%, for polio types 1,2 and 3 (³8 [1/dil]) respectively. Anti-polio GMTs were 440.5,458.9, and 1510.7 (1/dil) for types 1,2 and 3 respectively. The vaccine response rates to pertussis antigens (4-fold increase in antibody concentration) were 93.7% for PT and 85.7% for FHA; the 2-fold increase was 97.1% and 92.4%. Vaccine reactogenicity was low with adverse reaction incidence not increasing with subsequent doses. Conclusion: The DTaP-IPV//PRP~T vaccine, given concomitantly with monovalent hepatitis B vaccine, was highly immunogenic at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age in infants in India. The vaccine was well tolerated.

Sequential and combined immunization of infants with oral and inactivated poliovirus vaccines: controlled study of reactogenicty and immunogenicity

We conducted a clinical trial to assess an immunization schedule combining oral [OPV] and inactivated poliovirus vaccines [IPV] in infants residing four rural communities in Abu Homos district, Beheira Governorate, Egypt. Infants in group "A" received OPV during their first month and at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Infants in group "B" received OPV during their first month and 2 months followed by both OPV and IPV at 4 and 6 months of age [combined-schedule group]. The OPV vaccine is manufactured by Egyptian Organization for Biological Products and Vaccines [VACSERA] in Egypt while the IPV is a product of Pasteur Merieux [France]. Adverse events were monitored for three days after each dose. Blood was collected before immunization and 4 weeks after each dose to assess vaccine specific serological response. A total of 163 infants received 3 correct doses, had inter-dose intervals within the allowable range and provided 4 samples of blood, were included in the per protocol analysis [85 in group "A" and 78 in group "B"]. There was no statistically significant intergroup difference in the percentage of subject reporting the primary safety endpoint [diarrhea, vomiting, fever, irritability or local reactions at the site of IPV injection] during the 3-day after each dose. There was a statistically significant greater reporting of ill feeling in group "A" after dose I and II [p<0.001] compared to group "B". All infants in the two groups acquired protective immunity, determined as possession of neutralizing antibodies at titre > 1:8 after completing vaccination. However, the geometric mean titres to each poliovirus type were significantly higher in vaccinees in group B [p<0.001]. Seroconversion rates [> 4-fold rise in titre] to each poliovirus type were high in the two treatment groups after the last dose. Difference in seroconversion rates between the two treatment groups was not statistically significant. These finding demonstrated that the combined use of OPV and IPV didn't improve immunogenicity over the use of OPV alone. The study protocol and subject-informed consent were approved by independent Ethics Committee of the participating institution [VACSERA] and the National Organization for Drug Control and Research [Egyptian National Regulatory Authority]. The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization for Good Clinical Practice. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to conducting study-related procedures

Poliomielitis paralítica asociada a vacuna: presentación de dos casos / Vaccine associated paralytic poliomyelitis: report of 2 cases

Ante la erradicación de la poliomielitis y de la circulación del virus polio salvaje en América y su importante disminución en el mundo los casos de polio paralítica asociada a vacuna (PPAV), aunque poco frecuentes, adquieren gran relevancia. Se presenta dos casos diagnosticados en el Hospital Dr. E. González Cortés, en los años 1992 y 1997. Los grupos de mayor riesgo de PPAV son los receptores de vacuna polio oral, especialmente lactantes después de la primera dosis, en adultos en contacto con receptores de vacuna y personas immunodeficientes. Esto ha llevado a muchos países a modificar su esquema de vacunación, incorporando la vacuna polio inactivada (VPI), que tiene igual efectividad y no encierra el riesgo de PPAV. Se destaca la necesidad de disponer en nuestro país de vacuna VPI para los pacientes inmunodeficientes y sus contactos