Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J. appl. oral sci ; 24(6): 582-589, Nov.-Dec. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-841150

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective Halitosis can be caused by microorganisms that produce volatile sulphur compounds (VSCs), which colonize the surface of the tongue and subgingival sites. Studies have reported that the use of natural products can reduce the bacterial load and, consequently, the development of halitosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia on the growth and volatile sulphur compound (VSC) production of oral bacteria compared with chlorhexidine. Material and Methods The effects of these substances were evaluated by the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) in planktonic cultures of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Porphyromonas endodontalis. In addition, gas chromatography analyses were performed to measure the concentration of VSCs from bacterial cultures and to characterize M. alternifolia oil components. Results The MIC and MBC values were as follows: M. alternifolia - P. gingivalis (MIC and MBC=0.007%), P. endodontalis (MIC and MBC=0.007%=0.5%); chlorhexidine - P. gingivalis and P. endodontalis (MIC and MBC=1.5 mg/mL). M. alternifolia significantly reduced the growth and production of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) by P. gingivalis (p<0.05, ANOVA-Dunnet) and the H2S and methyl mercaptan (CH3SH) levels of P. endodontalis (p<0.05, ANOVA-Dunnet). Chlorhexidine reduced the growth of both microorganisms without altering the production of VSC in P. endodontalis. For P. gingivalis, the production of H2S and CH3SH decreased (p<0.05, ANOVA-Dunnet). Conclusion M. alternifolia can reduce bacterial growth and VSCs production and could be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine.


Subject(s)
Sulfur Compounds/metabolism , Porphyromonas gingivalis/drug effects , Tea Tree Oil/pharmacology , Melaleuca/chemistry , Porphyromonas endodontalis/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Sulfur Compounds/analysis , Time Factors , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Cells, Cultured , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Porphyromonas gingivalis/growth & development , Porphyromonas gingivalis/metabolism , Porphyromonas endodontalis/growth & development , Porphyromonas endodontalis/metabolism , Bacterial Load/drug effects , Halitosis/metabolism , Halitosis/microbiology , Halitosis/prevention & control , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
2.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-51518

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial and antifungal efficacy of commercially available gutta-percha containing tetracycline on some potential endodontic pathogens. The test microorganisms were Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Porphyromonas endodontalis, and Candida albicans . Tetracycline-integrated gutta-percha (TGP) cones, tetracycline disc, and conventional gutta-percha cones of the same size were placed on the inoculated plates. The plates were incubated at 37 degrees C aerobically or anaerobically. Growth inhibition zones on each plate were inspected at 24, 48, and 72 h. Tetracycline disc and TGP cones inhibited all the tested bacterial strains, however the greatest antimicrobial effect was seen on S. aureus. Tetracycline disc and TGP seemed less effective on E. faecalis and P. aeruginosa. However, all tested treatments were unable to affect C. albicans . Based on the results of this study, it seems that TGP offers an antimicrobial advantage over conventional gutta-percha.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Candida albicans/drug effects , Enterococcus faecalis/drug effects , Gutta-Percha/chemistry , Porphyromonas endodontalis/drug effects , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Root Canal Filling Materials/chemistry , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Tetracycline/pharmacology , Time Factors
3.
Braz. dent. j ; 18(4): 294-298, 2007. graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-474467

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to assess the in vitro the antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate gel as an endodontic auxiliary chemical substance compared to sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine gluconate solution. The antimicrobial efficacy of the tested substances was evaluated using the agar diffusion test. The growth inhibition zones produced by 0.2 percent, 1 percent and 2 percent chlorhexidine gel were evaluated against 5 facultative anaerobic bacteria and 4 pigmented Gram-negative anaerobes, and compared to the results obtained by NaOCl and chlorhexidine solution. The largest growth inhibition zones were produced when the test bacteria were in contact with 2 percent chlorhexidine gluconate gel (11.79 mm), being significantly different (p<0.05) from the growth inhibition zones produced by all NaOClconcentrations, including 5.25 percent (9.54 mm). However, there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between the growth inhibition zones obtained with equal concentrations of chlorhexidine solution and gel. The results of this study indicate that, as far as its antimicrobial properties are concerned, chlorhexidine gel has a great potential to be used as an endodontic auxiliary chemical substance.


O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar in vitro a atividade antimicrobiana do gluconato de clorexidina gel, como irrigante endodôntico, comparando-o ao hipoclorito de sódio (NaOCl) e ao gluconato de clorexidina líquido. A atividade antimicrobiana das substâncias testadas foi avaliada pelo teste de difusão em ágar. As zonas de inibição de crescimento bacteriano produzidas pela clorexidina gel a 0,2 por cento; 1 por cento e 2 por cento foram observados frente a 5 espécies de bactérias anaeróbias facultativas e 4 espécies de anaeróbios estritos, Gram-negativos e produtores de pigmento negro; e comparados com os resultados obtidos pelo NaOCl e pela clorexidina líquida. As maiores zonas de inibição foram produzidas quando as bactérias testadas ficaram em contato com a clorexidina a 2 por cento em gel (11,79 mm), apresentando diferença estatisticamente significante (p<0,05) quando comparados às zonas de inibição de crescimento bacteriano produzidas por todas as concentrações avaliadas de NaOCl, incluindo 5,25 por cento (9,54 mm). No entanto, não houve diferença estatisticamente significante (p>0,05) comparando as zonas produzidas por concentrações equivalentes de clorexidina líquida ou gel. Os resultados indicaram que a clorexidina em gel tem grande potencial para ser usada como substância química auxiliar quanto às suas propriedades antimicrobianas.


Subject(s)
Humans , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Dental Disinfectants/pharmacology , Root Canal Irrigants/pharmacology , Sodium Hypochlorite/pharmacology , Actinomyces/drug effects , Colony Count, Microbial , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Dental Disinfectants/administration & dosage , Enterococcus faecalis/drug effects , Gels , Materials Testing , Porphyromonas endodontalis/drug effects , Porphyromonas gingivalis/drug effects , Prevotella intermedia/drug effects , Prevotella/drug effects , Root Canal Irrigants/administration & dosage , Solutions , Sodium Hypochlorite/administration & dosage , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Streptococcus sanguis/drug effects , Streptococcus sobrinus/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL