Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Hist. ciênc. saúde-Manguinhos ; 27(4): 1245-1263, Oct.-Dec. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1142993

ABSTRACT

Resumen El objetivo es comprender la aparición y propagación de locuras puerperales en Argentina y Colombia, a finales del siglo XIX y principios del XX, así como su decadencia o desvanecimiento hacia la década de 1940-1950. Investigación histórico-hermenéutica, según los conceptos de "campo de visibilidad" y "nicho ecológico" de una enfermedad transitoria. No existió correlación entre embarazo, parto y puerperio con el estado delirante que motivaba la internación, atribuido a factores predisponentes y, asimismo, tuvieron una autonomía nosográfica en virtud de etiopatogenias singulares. Al tiempo que empezó a emerger el tipo clínico locura puerperal, se entrecruzaron el campo disciplinar de la obstetricia con el alienismo, con una mayor preponderancia del primero.


Abstract Our goal is to understand the appearance and spread of forms of puerperal insanity in Argentina and Colombia in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, as well as their decline or disappearance around the 1940s. This is a historical and hermeneutical study, which uses the concepts of "field of visibility" and "ecological niche" for a transitory disease. There was no correlation between pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium and the state of delirium that led to commitment, which was attributed to predisposing factors; furthermore, forms of puerperal insanity were nosographically distinct due to their unique etiopathogeneses. As clinical cases of puerperal insanity started to emerge, the disciplinary field of obstetrics converged with psychiatry, with the former exerting more weight.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Puerperal Disorders/history , Puerperal Infection/history , Mental Disorders/history , Argentina , Puerperal Infection/psychology , Colombia , Parturition/psychology
2.
Hist. ciênc. saúde-Manguinhos ; 25(4): 921-941, Oct.-Dec. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-975433

ABSTRACT

Abstract This article explores women's reproductive health in early twentieth-century Rio de Janeiro, showing that elevated and sustained stillbirth and maternal mortality rates marked women's reproductive years. Syphilis and obstetric complications during childbirth were the main causes of stillbirths, while puerperal fever led maternal death rates. Utilizing traditional sources such as medical dissertations and lesser-used sources including criminal investigations, this article argues that despite official efforts to medicalize childbirth and increase access to clinical healthcare, no real improvements were made to women's reproductive health in the first half of the twentieth century. This, of course, did not make pregnancy and childbirth any easier for the women who embodied these statistics in their reproductive lives.


Resumo O artigo aborda a saúde reprodutiva das mulheres no Rio de Janeiro do início do século XX, mostrando que taxas elevadas de mortalidade materna e de contínua natimortalidade marcavam os anos reprodutivos das mulheres. As principais causas de natimortalidade eram sífilis e complicações obstétricas, enquanto febre puerperal encabeçava as taxas de morte materna. Utilizando fontes tradicionais como teses doutorais e fontes como investigações criminais, o artigo discute que, apesar dos esforços oficiais para medicalizar o parto e aumentar o acesso aos serviços de saúde, nenhuma melhoria real foi feita na saúde reprodutiva das mulheres na primeira metade do século XX. Isso, certamente, não facilitou a gravidez e o parto das mulheres que compunham as estatísticas em suas vidas reprodutivas.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , History, 20th Century , Maternal Mortality/history , Women's Health/history , Delivery, Obstetric/history , Stillbirth , Reproductive Health/history , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/history , Puerperal Infection/history , Brazil , Syphilis/complications , Syphilis/history , Cities , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects
3.
Rev. peru. med. exp. salud publica ; 30(3): 512-517, jul.-sep. 2013. ilus, graf, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, LIPECS | ID: lil-688055

ABSTRACT

La fiebre puerperal es una enfermedad que asume carácter epidémico en el siglo XVIII como consecuencia de dos factores: las masas trabajadoras urbanas generadas por la revolución industrial, y la progresiva hegemonización y medicalización de la atención del parto en grandes hospitales públicos. La mortalidad materna institucionalizada alcanza cifras superiores al 30%, en tanto con la atención por parteras es menor al 2%. Semmelweis, médico húngaro, postula que los médicos contaminaban a las parturientas por insuficiente higiene luego de realizar necropsias, e implanta medidas profilácticas en el Hospital de Viena, las cuales reducen dramáticamente la mortalidad, pero sus ideas son rechazadas por que afectan el proceso de institucionalización de la medicina basado en el altruismo y honor, por los que supuestamente era imposible que causen daño a sus pacientes. Es obligado a retirarse del Hospital de Viena, y continua su lucha en Budapest, pero el rechazo y la incomprensión de sus colegas por su doctrina afecta su salud mental. Muere en un asilo, pocos años antes que Pasteur y Koch demuestren las bacterias causantes de enfermedades como la fiebre puerperal.


Puerperal fever is a disease that becomes epidemic in the eighteenth century as a result of two factors: the urban working masses generated by the industrial revolution and the progressive hegemonization and medicalization of birth care in large public hospitals. Institutionalized maternal death reached figures above 30%, while in the case of birth care provided by midwives, it was than 2%. Semmelweis, an Hungarian physician, sustained that physicians contaminated women in labor due to insufficient hygiene after performing necropsies and established prophylactic measures in the Vienna Hospital that reduced mortality dramatically. However, his ideas were rejected because they affected the institutionalization process of medicine, based on altruism and honor, which would make it impossible to cause harm to patients. He was forced to leave Vienna Hospital and he continued his struggle in Budapest, but the rejection and disagreement of his peers with his doctrine affected his mental health. He died in an asylum, a few years before Pasteur and Koch proved the existence of the bacteria that caused diseases such as puerperal fever.


Subject(s)
Female , History, 19th Century , Humans , Cross Infection/history , Iatrogenic Disease , Maternal Death/history , Puerperal Infection/history , Cross Infection/mortality , Fever/history , Fever/mortality , Hungary , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Puerperal Infection/mortality
4.
Rev. chil. infectol ; 25(1): 54-57, feb. 2008. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-473652

ABSTRACT

Ignaz Semmelweis was a Hungarian obstetrician who in the nineteenth century, preceding the discoveries of Pasteur and Lister, proposed the infectious etiology of puerperal sepsis. With a simple antiseptic procedure, he achieved marked reduction of the prevalence of this disease. However, he needed to fight against the reluctancy of his colleagues who didn't accept his observations although they were for the first time in the history of Science, supported by statistical significance analysis. This report describes biographical data of this revolutionary physician and the circumstances of his strange death based on information not often revealed.


Ignaz Semmelweis, fue un obstetra húngaro que a mediados del siglo XIX, precediendo los hallazgos de Pasteur y Lister, logró descubrir la naturaleza infecciosa de la fiebre puerperal, logrando controlar su aparición con una simple medida de antisepsia. Debió luchar con la reticencia de sus colegas que no aceptaron sus observaciones que, por primera vez en la historia, fueron apoyadas con datos estadísticos. Esta comunicación describe datos biográficos de este trascendente científico y las circunstancias que rodearon su extraña muerte, apoyada en información infrecuentemente divulgada.


Subject(s)
History, 19th Century , Asepsis/history , Hand Disinfection , Obstetrics/history , Puerperal Infection/history , Hungary , Portraits as Topic , Puerperal Infection/etiology
8.
In. Fernandes, Antonio Tadeu; Fernandes, Maria Olívia Vaz; Ribeiro Filho, Nelson; Graziano, Kazuko Uchikawa; Cavalcante, Nilton José Fernandes; Lacerda, Rúbia Aparecida. Infecçäo hospitalar e suas interfaces na área da saúde. Säo Paulo, Atheneu, 2000. p.91-128, ilus, tab.
Monography in Portuguese | LILACS, SES-SP | ID: lil-268032
9.
Perinatol. reprod. hum ; 13(3): 238-45, jul.-sept. 1999. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-266615

ABSTRACT

Se conoce en la historia de la ciencia y el desarrollo del conocimiento muchos casos de mujeres y hombres cuyos descubrimientos y aportaciones fueron rechazados inicialmente y reconocidos hasta después de su muerte. Ignaz Phillip Semmelweis es uno de estos casos en la medicina. Su aportación, no obstante, tuvo un impacto trascendental en la práctia de la obstetricia y en el control de las infecciones hospitalarias. A poco más de 150 años de la investigación realizada por Semmelweis sobre la "etiología y profilaxis de la fiebre puerperal", es pertinente hacer una relfexión sobre aquellos aspectos que aún hoy en día mantienen su vigencia en la búsqueda de explicaciones a los retos de la práctica médica y la investigación en salud. La época en que vivió Semmelweis estuvo marcada por una gran convulsión social en toda Europa y en el terreno de las ideas y la ciencia se experimentaron cambios que marcan aún hoy nuestro pensamiento


Subject(s)
Humans , Famous Persons , Puerperal Infection/etiology , Puerperal Infection/history , Research/history , Maternal Mortality , Technical Cooperation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL