ABSTRACT
FUNDAMENTO: A insuficiência cardíaca descompensada (ICD) é uma condição bastante prevalente e com alta mortalidade. O levosimendan está entre as novas drogas que têm sido testadas para o seu manejo. OBJETIVO: Realizar uma revisão sistemática da literatura e uma metanálise da redução de morbimortalidade associada ao levosimendan no tratamento da ICD. MÉTODOS: Foi feita uma pesquisa bibliográfica no Medline buscando todos os ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECRs) que avaliassem o uso do levosimendan na ICD. Os desfechos de interesse foram: morte por todas as causas, tempo de internação hospitalar e reinternação hospitalar por ICD. Todos os ECRs com desfechos de interesse foram incluídos. Critérios de qualidade metodológica, como cegamento e sigilo da lista de alocação, foram avaliados em análise de sensibilidade. O cálculo principal foi feito com efeitos randômicos. RESULTADOS: Dos 179 artigos identificados, 48 eram ECRs, sendo 19 com desfechos clínicos de interesse. Na comparação com placebo (7 ensaios clínicos, 1.652 pacientes), o risco relativo (RR) para morte total foi de 0,87 (intervalo de confiança [IC] 95 por cento: 0,65 - 1,18). Na comparação com dobutamina (10 ensaios clínicos, 2.067 pacientes), o RR foi de 0,87 (IC 95 por cento: 0,75 - 1,02). Três estudos tinham dados sobre tempo de internação, onde o levosimendan mostrou diminuição de 2,27 e 2,30 dias em relação ao placebo e a dobutamina, respectivamente (p < 0,05 para ambos). Nenhum artigo apresentou isoladamente dados sobre reinternação. CONCLUSÃO: As evidências disponíveis até o momento não mostram benefício em termos de mortalidade associada ao levosimendan, que apresentou benefício de pequena magnitude apenas no tempo de internação.
BACKGROUND: Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a rather prevalent condition with a high mortality rate. Levosimendan is one among the new drugs that have been tested for its management. OBJECTIVE: To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of the morbidity and mortality reduction associated with levosimendan in the treatment of CHF. METHODS: A bibliographic search was conducted in the Medline database for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the use of levosimendan in CHF. The outcomes were death from all causes, length of hospital stay, and hospital readmission for CHF. All RCTs with outcomes of interest were included. Methodological quality criteria, such as blinding and confidentiality of the list of allocation, were evaluated in sensitivity analysis. The main calculation was done with random effects. RESULTS: Of the 179 articles identified, 48 were RCTs, 19 of them with outcomes of interest. In the comparison with placebo (7 trials, 1,652 patients), the relative risk (RR) for overall death was 0.87 (95 percent confidence interval [CI]: 0.65 to 1.18). In comparison with dobutamine (10 trials, 2,067 patients), the RR was 0.87 (95 percent CI: 0.75-1.02). Three studies had data on length of stay, in which levosimendan showed a decrease of 2.27 and 2.30 days compared to placebo and dobutamine, respectively (p < 0.05 for both). No article presented data on readmission alone. CONCLUSION: The evidence available so far has shown no benefit in terms of mortality in association with the use of levosimendan, which only showed a small benefit in the time of hospitalization.
Subject(s)
Humans , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Hydrazones/therapeutic use , Pyridazines/therapeutic use , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Brazil/epidemiology , Heart Failure/mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hydrazones/adverse effects , Pyridazines/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vasodilator Agents/adverse effectsABSTRACT
El propósito de este trabajo fue observar los resultados hemodinámicos inmediatos (primeras 24 hs) en pacientes con mala función ventricular (< 40%), considerados de alto riesgo quirúrgico, en los cuales 24 a 48 hs antes de la cirugía recibían una infusión por 24 hs con levosimendan. Se incluyeron 4 pacientes de sexo masculino con edad promedio de 55.50 (+ 7.93 años) con una fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo de 31 (+ 5.47%), 2 de ellos sometidos a cambio valvular, otro a revascularización miocárdica y el cuarto se sometió a procedimiento combinado (revascularización + cambio valvular). El comportamiento de los parámetros hemodinámicos estuvo estable, sin necesidad de altas dosis de los inotrópicos y vasopresores clásicos en el postoperatorio. Conclusión: El levosimendan podría ser un inotrópico de gran aplicación en este grupo de pacientes debido a su novedoso mecanismo de acción y a sus sostenidos efectos hemodinámicos luego de terminada su infusión.
The purpose of this work was to observe the hemodynamic stability on the first 24 hours in 4 patients with ventricular dysfunction (Ejected Fraction < 40 %), considered of high surgical risk, in which 24 at 48 hr before the surgery received an infusion of Levosimendan for 24 hours. This 4 patients was male, with age 55.5 ± 7.9 years old, a left ventricle ejection of fraction (LVEF) of 31 ± 5.47%; Two of them was underwent to valve replacement, another one to coronary artery bypass graft and the last one patient underwent combined procedure (coronary artery bypass graft surgery and valve replacement). The behavior of the hemodynamic parameters was stable, without necessity of uses high dose of the inotropics and classic vasopresores in the postoperative. Conclusion: the Levosimendan could be an inotropic of great application in this group of patient due to its novel action mechanism and to its sustained hemodynamic effects after having finished its infusion.