Evaluation of the benefit of addition of clidinium C to a Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen

This study aimed to evaluate the success of H.pylori eradication therapy in patients with dyspepsia by therapeutics regimes with and without clidinium C. Helicobacter pylori infections are reported in all parts of the world. Appropriate antibiotic therapy can treat infection. The ideal treatment regimen has not been specified. In a randomized, double blind clinical trials study, 250 patients with dyspepsia were enrolled. All patients were treated by Omeprazole, Metronidazole, Amoxicillin and Bismuth [OMAB] for two weeks. One tablet clidinium C before each meal was added to this regimen in the intervention group [A]. Urea Breath Test [UBT] was carried out after 8-12 weeks after treatment for evaluation of H.pylori eradication. 132 patients in the intervention group [A] and 118 patients in the control group [B] were enrolled to the study. The rate of eradication in group A was significantly higher than group B [62.1% vs. 50%, p=0.04]. The results supported the effect of clidinium C for increasing of helicobacter pylori eradication, but further studies need to be performed

Irritable bowel syndrome: therapeutic evaluation of indigenous drugs.

Among 169 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), standard therapy (with clidinium bromide, chlordiazepoxide and isaphaghulla), a compound Ayurvedic preparation (with Aegle marmelos correa plus Bacopa monniere Linn) along with a matching placebo were given in a double blind randomised trial for 6 wk. The Ayurvedic preparation in 57 patients was found effective in 64.9 per cent, while standard therapy (60 patients) was useful in 78.3 per cent. Patients on placebo (52 patients) showed improvement in 32.7 per cent only. Ayurvedic therapy was particularly beneficial in diarrhoea predominant form as compared to placebo. The standard therapy was more useful in the painful form of IBS as compared to placebo and Ayurvedic preparation. In gas predominant form the effect of standard as well as Ayurvedic therapy, was similar to placebo. Long-term follow-up (greater than 6 months) showed that both forms of therapy were no better than placebo in limiting the relapse.