ABSTRACT
ANTECEDENTES: Las unidades de Cardiología intervencional han evidenciado un número creciente de procedimientos, cada vez más variados y complejos, lo cual podría eventualmente generar daños a los profesionales ocupacionalmente expuestos a radiaciones ionizantes (POEs) de no contar con los adecuados elementos de radioprotección y un uso correcto de ellos. OBJETIVO: Caracterizar la disponibilidad y utilización de los elementos de radioprotección y dosimetría de unidades de cardiología intervencionista de centros Sudamericanos. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó una encuesta autoaplicada a 139 POEs, de ambos sexos de 7 países, a través de una plataforma on-line, se les consultó sobre características demográficas, dosimétricas y de radioprotección. RESULTADOS: Los elementos de radioprotección más tradicionales; delantales y cuellos plomados se utilizaron un 99,5 % y 98,4 % respectivamente, aquellos elementos más recientes como gafas, gorros y paños plomados solo alcanzaron un 36,8 %, 6,8 % y 34,2%, de utilización respectivamente, en cuanto a la utilización de los dosímetros, solo un 7,9 % lo hace apegado a las normas de la Organización Internacional de Energía Atómica (OIEA). CONCLUSIÓN: Se constató en la muestra analizada una falta de elementos de radioprotección y un uso inadecuado de ellos, urge realizar intervenciones educativas y técnicas para mejorar estos datos.
BACKGROUND: Due to the increasing number of interventional cardiology procedures currently performed, health professionals (POE) are exposed to ionizing radiation unless adequate protective elements are used. AIM: to describe the use of radioprotection elements and dosimetry in interventional cardiology laboratories in South America. METHODS: A self-administered survey was performed on 139 POE of both sexes and 7 countries using an online platform. Demographic data, dosimetry and characteristics of radioprotection analyzed. RESULTS: Commonly used radioprotective elements (lead aprons and collars) were used in 99.5% and 98% respectively. Recently introduced protection elements like lead goggles, caps and drapery were used in 36.8, 6.8 and 34.2% , respectively. Dosimetry according to the International Atomic Energy Commission (OIAE) was performed in only 7.9% of the procedures. CONCLUSION: there is a severe lack of adequate radioprotection during interventional cardiology procedures. Urgent measures, including technical implementation and educational interventions are needed to improve radioprotection in interventional cardiology.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Cardiology Service, Hospital , Radiation Dosage , Radiation, Ionizing , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/statistics & numerical data , South America , Pilot Projects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Self Report , Personal Protective EquipmentABSTRACT
El objetivo de este articulo fue entregar una guia con recomendaciones para mejorar la Seguridad Radiológica durante los procedimientos de intervencionismo cardiológico. Se describe la clasificación de los efectos causados por las radiaciones ionizantes a los pacientes y personal médico. Se recomienda la aplicación de un programa de Garatia de Calidad, el cual implicará tantos gastos, como mayores beneficios. Como parte de este programa, se sugiere la implementación de un programa de Protección Radiológica, que incluya al personal, monitoreo de la radiación, blindajes y entrenamiento del personal. Se deben establecer acciones permanentes en cada laboratorio de hemodinamia para gestionar de la mejor forma posible las dosis de radiación antes, durante y después de la intervención. Finalmente, para avanzar en la implementación de estas recomendaciones, creemos que un paso fundamental es la revisión de nuestro marco juridico en el ámbito de la Seguridad Radiológica, donde resultan imprescindibles aspectos como la implementación de programas de Garantia de Calidad y Protección Radiológica, junto al establecimiento de Niveles Referenciales de dosis para pacientes.
In this paper we present guidelines aimed to improve radiation safety during invasive cardiovascular procedures. Unwanted effects upon patients and medical personnel are conventionally classified. A program of Quality Assurance is proposed, an aspect of which is a program for radiologic protection, including operator protection, radiation monitoring, shielding and personnel training. Permanent and specific actions should be taken at every cardiovascular lab, before, during and after interventions. In order to implement these guidelines and actions, a fundamental step is a review of current legislation. Specific programs for quality control and radiologic protection along with a definition of acceptable radiation exposure doses are required.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cardiology/methods , Radiation Protection/standards , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Quality Control , Radiation Exposure , Radiation Injuries/etiologyABSTRACT
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is closely associated with the mortality of hospitalized patients and long-term development of chronic kidney disease, especially in children. The purpose of our study was to assess the evidence of contrast-induced AKI after cardiac catheterization in children with heart disease and evaluate the clinical usefulness of candidate biomarkers in AKI. A total of 26 children undergoing cardiac catheterization due to various heart diseases were selected and urine and blood samples were taken at 0 hr, 6 hr, 24 hr, and 48 hr after cardiac catheterization. Until 48 hr after cardiac catheterization, there was no significant increase in serum creatinine level in all patients. Unlike urine kidney injury molecule-1, IL-18 and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, urine liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) level showed biphasic pattern and the significant difference in the levels of urine L-FABP between 24 and 48 hr. We suggest that urine L-FABP can be one of the useful biomarkers to detect subclinical AKI developed by the contrast before cardiac surgery.
Subject(s)
Child , Female , Humans , Male , Acute Kidney Injury/blood , Biomarkers/urine , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins/urine , Heart Defects, Congenital/complications , Iohexol/adverse effects , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Background: It is not known whether leaded glass goggles with 0.25 mm Pb equivalency, used in interventional cardiology procedures, attenuate radiation below the levels established by the latest recommendation of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Aim: To assess ifthe degree of attenuation of the secondary ionizing radiation achieved by the use of 0.25 mm Pb leaded glass goggles, in occupationally exposed workers in interventional cardiology procedures, meets the latest ICRP recommendations. Material and Methods: A prospective investigation was carried out to compare the eye exposure to secondary ionizing radiation received by occupationally exposed personnel in a 9 months period. A set of two thermo luminescent dosimeters was arranged in the front and back of leaded glass goggles in a cohort ofseven members of an interventional cardiology service, exposed to 1057 consecutive procedures. Results: The monthly dose equivalent measurement performed in front ofthe goggles ranged between 1.1 and 6.5 mSv, for paramedics and interventional cardiologists. The radiation measured in the back of the glass varied between 0.66 and 2.75 mSv, respectively. The degree of attenuation of the dose at eye level ranged from 40% to 57.7%, respectively. The projected annual exposure would reach 33 mSvfor the interventional cardiologist. Conclusions: With a similar load ofwork and wearing 0.25 mm Pb equivalent glass goggles, interventional cardiologists will exceed the crystalline equivalent dose limit recommended by the ICRP (20 mSv/year averaged over the past 5 years).
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Cardiology , Eye Injuries/prevention & control , Eye Protective Devices , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , International Agencies , Prospective Studies , Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Interventional/methods , Reference Standards , Statistics, NonparametricABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To study the accuracy and safety of CT guided and unguided transthoracic fine needle aspiration biopsy in diagnosis of lung lesions. METHOD: The study was carried out in 79 hospitalised patients during the period 1997-1999. In 52 patients having peripheral and large sized lung lesion (> 5 cm in diameter) in chest X-ray unguided FNAB was performed and in the rest 27 patients having relatively central and small sized lesion (< 5 cm). CT guided FNAB was performed. Also in 15 patients having two times failed unguided aspiration, CT guided FNAB was performed. RESULTS: The diagnostic yield of unguided aspiration was 71.1% (37 out of 52). Out of 37 patients 29 (78.3%) had malignant lesion and eight (21.6%) non-malignant lesion. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting malignancy was 90.6% and 100% respectively. Complications were seen in 10 patients (19.3%). Diagnostic yield of CT guided FNAB was 95.2% (40 out of 42), 33 (82.5 %) had malignant lesion, seven (17.5%) had benign lesion. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting malignancy was 97.1% and 100% respectively. Minor complications were seen in three patients (7.1%). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that CT guided