Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Indian J Exp Biol ; 1991 May; 29(5): 416-21
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-62609

ABSTRACT

Embryos (II day-old) of Australorp breed were inoculated via chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) with subgroup A Rous sarcoma virus, and hatched subsequently. The post-hatch survival period in chicks was recorded upto the last chick that died by virus-induced liver tumour, which had a range from 3 to 50 days with an average of 13 +/- 8.7 days. The survival potential of progency tested Australorp parents selected on the basis of negative CAM-infection and those selected on uninoculated embryos, differed significantly (P less than 0.01) while maintaining an inverse relationship between liver tumour mortality and degrees of infection of CAMs. The homozygous susceptibles lacking either ar1 or ar2 or both alleles of the tva (tumour virus a) locus died within 7 days of post-hatching, supporting thereby 4-allele genetic model of tva locus recently proposed for the control of LT- and CAM-infection phenotypes.


Subject(s)
Alleles , Animals , Chick Embryo , Chickens/genetics , Models, Genetic , Poultry Diseases/genetics , Sarcoma, Avian/genetics
2.
Indian J Exp Biol ; 1990 Sep; 28(9): 825-30
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-55876

ABSTRACT

A study was made using two strains of light breed (White Leghorn strains, A and B) and four heavy beeds (Rhode Island Red, New Hampshire, Australorp, Columbian) to evaluate the breed difference in survival potential of chicks that were infected as 11-day-old embryos via chorioallantoic membranes (CAMs) with a subgroup A Rous sarcoma virus. Of the 1185 chicks hatched over multiple hatch-replicates, 845 chicks died rapidly of a fibrosarcomatous liver tumour (LT) with a peak mortality about 74% attained by the second week, post-hatch, in the heavy breeds and more than 90% by the second week in the light breed. The breeds did not differ in induced LT mortality when the chicks hatched from eggs that had at least 25 pock counts on CAMs, apparently genetically susceptible, i.e. 25 biologically active virus particles were enough to induce an unpreventable fatal LT. However, low pock-count on CAMs did not act as a pointer for predicting genetic resistance to infection because about 23% of chicks developed from eggs that had no pocks on CAMs, apparently genetically resistant, also died of LT, requiring further studies.


Subject(s)
Animals , Avian Sarcoma Viruses , Chick Embryo , Chickens , Disease Susceptibility , Female , Genetic Markers , Immunity, Innate , Liver Neoplasms/genetics , Male , Sarcoma, Avian/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL