Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 39(6): 749-758, June 2006. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-428285

ABSTRACT

Invasive bacteria can induce their own uptake and specify their intracellular localization; hence it is commonly assumed that proximate modulation of host cell transcription is not required for infection. However, bacteria can also modulate, directly or indirectly, the transcription of many host cell genes, whose role in the infection may be difficult to determine by global gene expression. Is the host cell nucleus proximately required for intracellular infection and, if so, for which pathogens and at what stages of infection? Enucleated cells were previously infected with Toxoplasma gondii, Chlamydia psittaci, C. trachomatis, or Rickettsia prowazekii. We enucleated L929 mouse fibroblasts by centrifugation in the presence of cytochalasin B, and compared the infection with Shigella flexneri M90T 5a of nucleated and enucleated cells. Percent infection and bacterial loads were estimated with a gentamicin suppression assay in cultures fixed and stained at different times after infection. Enucleation reduced by about half the percent of infected cells, a finding that may reflect the reduced endocytic ability of L929 cytoplasts. However, average numbers of bacteria and frequency distributions of bacterial numbers per cell at different times were similar in enucleated and nucleated cells. Bacteria with actin-rich tails were detected in both cytoplasts and nucleated cells. Lastly, cytoplasts were similarly infected 2 and 24 h after enucleation, suggesting that short-lived mRNAs were not involved in the infection. Productive S. flexneri infection could thus take place in cells unable to modulate gene transcription, RNA processing, or nucleus-dependent signaling cascades.


Subject(s)
Animals , Mice , L Cells/microbiology , Shigella flexneri/growth & development , Cytochalasin B , Cell Nucleus/microbiology , Cytoplasm/microbiology , Time Factors
2.
Hig. aliment ; 7(25): 5-11, mar. 1993.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-139820

ABSTRACT

Comenta-se nesta breve revisao a participacao e o significado de Shigella em processos de infeccao alimentar. Sao tambem abordados as caracteristicas do microrganismo, seus fatores de virulencia e determinancia genetica.Aspectos epidemiologicos da infeccao, bem como, condicoes de crescimento e metodos de deteccao em alimentos, sao tambem abordados


Subject(s)
Humans , Dysentery, Bacillary/diagnosis , Dysentery, Bacillary/epidemiology , Dysentery, Bacillary/pathology , Dysentery, Bacillary/prevention & control , Food Handling/methods , Shigella boydii/growth & development , Shigella boydii/pathogenicity , Shigella dysenteriae/growth & development , Shigella dysenteriae/pathogenicity , Shigella flexneri/growth & development , Shigella flexneri/pathogenicity , Shigella sonnei/growth & development , Shigella sonnei/pathogenicity , Virulence , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Food Hygiene , Food-Processing Industry/methods , Food-Processing Industry , Bacterial Infections/transmission , Intestines/pathology
3.
Acta bioquím. clín. latinoam ; 26(3): 311-7, sept. 1992. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-124819

ABSTRACT

El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar tres métodos utilizados en el control de calidad de medios de cultivo: a)el método original de Miles-Mirsa; b)el ecométrico y c)el método de estrías. Para comparar estos métodos, se evaluaron la productividad (crecimiento de un microorganismo que habitualmente se desarrolla en un medio de cultivo) y la selectividad (supresión del crecimiento de un microorganismo, que se espera sea inhibido en un medio de cultivo) de seis medios sólidos de cultivo usados para el aislamiento de Salmonella spp. y Shigella spp. Los resultados que se obtuvieron al comparar los 3 métodos, mediante la prueba de Chi2, reflejan que existe diferencia significativa (p<0.05) entre el método de estrías y los otros 2 en lo referente a la productividad, no existiendo diferencia significativa entre los 3 métodos, en cuanto a selectividad. De los 3 métodos ensayados, el ecométrico resultó el de más fácil y rápida ejecución


Subject(s)
Agar , Culture Media/analysis , In Vitro Techniques , Quality Control , Culture Media , Culture Media/classification , Escherichia coli/growth & development , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Salmonella typhimurium/growth & development , Salmonella typhimurium/isolation & purification , Salmonella typhi/growth & development , Salmonella typhi/isolation & purification , Shigella flexneri/growth & development , Shigella flexneri/isolation & purification , Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL