Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
2.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 13(4): 304-310, Aug. 2009. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-539769

ABSTRACT

The road to the discovery of a vaccine for HIV has been arduous and will continue to be difficult over the ensuing twenty years. Most vaccines are developed by inducing neutralizing antibodies against the target pathogen or by using attenuated strains of the particular pathogen to engender a variety of protective immune responses. Unfortunately, simple methods of generating anti-HIV antibodies have already failed in a phase III clinical trial. While attenuated SIV variants work well against homologous challenges in non-human primates, the potential for reversion to a more pathogenic virus and recombination with challenge viruses will preclude the use of attenuated HIV in the field. It has been exceedingly frustrating to vaccinate for HIV-specific neutralizing antibodies given the enormous diversity of the Envelope (Env) glycoprotein and its well-developed glycan shield. However, there are several antibodies that will neutralize many different strains of HIV and inducing these types of antibodies in vaccinees remains the goal of a vigorous effort to develop a vaccine for HIV based on neutralizing antibodies. Given the difficulty in generating broadly reactive neutralizing antibodies, the HIV vaccine field has turned its attention to inducing T cell responses against the virus using a variety of vectors. Unfortunately, the results from Merck's phase IIb STEP trial proved to be disappointing. Vaccinees received Adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) expressing Gag, Pol, and Nef of HIV. This vaccine regimen failed to either prevent infection or reduce the level of HIV replication after challenge. These results mirrored those in non-human primate testing of Ad5 using rigorous SIV challenge models. This review will focus on recent developments in HIV vaccine development. We will deal largely with attempts to develop a T cell-based vaccine using the non-human primate SIV challenge model.


Subject(s)
Animals , Humans , AIDS Vaccines/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , HIV , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Viral Load/immunology , HIV Infections/immunology , Macaca mulatta , SAIDS Vaccines/immunology , Simian Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Simian Immunodeficiency Virus/immunology
3.
Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz ; 103(2): 119-129, Mar. 2008. ilus, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-480638

ABSTRACT

The only long-term and cost-effective solution to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic in the developing world is a vaccine that prevents individuals from becoming infected or, once infected, from passing the virus on to others. There is currently little hope for an AIDS vaccine. Conventional attempts to induce protective antibody and CD8+ lymphocyte responses against HIV and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) have failed. The enormous diversity of the virus has only recently been appreciated by vaccinologists, and our assays to determine CD8+ lymphocyte antiviral efficacy are inadequate. The central hypothesis of a CTL-based vaccine is that particularly effective CD8+ lymphocytes directed against at least five epitopes that are derived from regions under functional and structural constraints will control replication of pathogenic SIV. This would be somewhat analogous to control of virus replication by triple drug therapy or neutralizing antibodies.


Subject(s)
Animals , Humans , AIDS Vaccines/immunology , /immunology , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/immunology , Simian Immunodeficiency Virus/immunology , DNA, Viral/drug effects , DNA, Viral/immunology , Drug Design , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Immune Tolerance , Macaca mulatta , Simian Immunodeficiency Virus/drug effects , Time Factors , Viral Load , Virus Replication/drug effects , Virus Replication/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL