Sclerotherapy of hydroceles and spermatoceles with alcohol: results and effects on the semen analysis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the success rates of sclerotherapy of the tunica vaginalis with alcohol for the treatment of hydroceles and/or spermatoceles, as well as, evaluation of pain, formation of hematomas, infection and its effects in spermatogenesis . MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 69 patients, with offsprings and diagnosis of hydrocele and/or spermatocele, were treated during the period from April 2003 to June 2007. Semen analysis was obtained from patients who were able to provide us with samples. The sclerotherapy with alcohol at 99.5 percent was undertaken as outpatient procedure. RESULTS: The average volume drained pre-sclerotherapy was 279.82 mL (27 to 1145). The median follow-up was 43 months (9 to 80). A total of 114 procedures were performed on 84 units, with an average of 1.35 procedures / unit and an overall success rate of 97.62 percent. Of the 69 patients, 7 (10.14 percent) reported minor pain immediately after the procedure, 3 (4.35 percent) moderate pain and 2 (2.89 percent) intense pain. Post-Sclerotherapy spermograms revealed reduction of the parameters regarding: concentration, motility and morphology up to 6 months post procedure , with return to normal parameters 12th months after procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Sclerotherapy of hydroceles and spermatoceles with 99.5 percent alcohol is an efficient procedure that can be perormed without difficulties, cost-effectiveness, with few side effects and which may be performed in patients who wish fertility.

Tumours and tumour-like conditions of the para-testicular region--a study of morphological features.

Twenty two patients with tumours or tumour-like conditions of the para-testicular region (PTR) were diagnosed over a 5 year period. Of these, 16 (73%) were benign with only one true neoplasm (papillary cystadenoma). The tumour-like conditions were comprised of 6 cases of adenomatous hyperplasia of epididymis, 4 cases of spermatic granuloma, 2 cases each of spermatocele and nodular-fibrous proliferation and one mesothelial cyst. Three patients with spermatic granuloma gave a history of trauma. No case of adenomatoid tumour was encountered. Six malignant neoplasms were diagnosed (27%) all of which were sarcomas. Five were primary to the PTR and one was a metastatic deposit from a primary leiomyoblastoma of the mesentery. Among the 5 primary sarcomas were 2 cases each of rhabdomyosarcoma and leiomyosarcoma, and 1 case of liposarcoma. The patient with leiomyoblastoma presented first with a measenteric mass which was followed a month later by a rapidly growing mass in the scrotum. Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) and Electron microscopy (EM) were done in this case. Intra-cytoplasmic myofilaments as well as desmosomes were observed. The patients ranged from 14 to 65 years of age and most presented with painless mass in the scrotum. Follow-up was not possible due to practical difficulties.