Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Rev. otorrinolaringol. cir. cabeza cuello ; 78(2): 141-146, jun. 2018. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-961606

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Introducción La bola fúngica (BF) es una sinusitis fúngica no invasiva, con acumulación extramucosa de conglomerados densos de hifas de hongos en cavidades paranasales (CPN), afectando generalmente a mujeres inmunocompetentes. Objetivo Describir la presentación cínica, diagnóstico y tratamiento de una serie de pacientes con diagnóstico de BF de CPN. Material y método Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo de pacientes con diagnóstico histopatológico de BF sometidos a cirugía endoscópica nasal (CEN) en nuestra institución entre 2010 y 2016. Resultados Se incluyeron 20 pacientes (15 mujeres, 5 hombres), con edad promedio al diagnóstico de 64 años (35-86 años), la mayoría inmunocompetente (85%). El síntoma más frecuente fue dolor facial (8/20). Todos los pacientes fueron estudiados con tomografia computarizada (TC) de CPN, presentando calcificaciones en 70%. La ubicación más frecuente fue el seno maxilar (12/20) y luego esfenoidal (6/20). Se realizó CEN en todos los pacientes, combinándolo con Caldwell Luc en 3 de ellos. Los cultivos intraoperatorios resultaron negativos en el 75% de los pacientes. Conclusión La BF tiene presentación cínica inespecifica. Se sospecha en base a hallazgos imagenológicos en la TC de CPN y se confirma histopatológicamente, dado el bajo rendimiento de los cultivos. La CEN es la herramienta diagnóstico-terapéutica de elección, con baja tasa de recidiva local.


ABSTRACT Introduction A fungus ball (FB) is a non-invasive fungal sinusitis, consisting of extramucosal accumulation of dense fungal hyphae conglomerates, located in paranasal sinuses. It generally affects immunocompetent women. Aim To describe the clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment in a series of patients diagnosed with FB of paranasal sinuses. Material and method Retrospective descriptive study regarding all patients with a histopathologic diagnosis of FB, who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in our institution between 2010 and 2016. Results Twenty patients (15 women, 5 men) were included, with a mean age at diagnosis of 64 years (35-86 years). Most were immunocompetent (85%). Facial pain was the most frequent symptom (8/20). All patients were studied with a sinus CT, finding paranasal calcifications in 70%. It predominantly involved the maxillary (12/20), and sphenoid sinus (6/20). All patients were treated with ESS, with a combined Caldwell Luc approach in only 3 of them. Intraoperative cultures were negative in 75% of patients. Conclusions Sinus FB has a non-specific clinical presentation. CT findings help suspect it, and it is confirmed with a histopathological study, given the poor efficiency of cultures. ESS is the diagnostic-therapeutic procedure of choice, with a low local recurrence rate.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Maxillary Sinusitis/epidemiology , Maxillary Sinusitis/diagnostic imaging , Sphenoid Sinusitis/epidemiology , Sphenoid Sinusitis/diagnostic imaging , Paranasal Sinus Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Facial Pain/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Maxillary Sinusitis/surgery , Sphenoid Sinusitis/surgery , Chile/epidemiology , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Headache/etiology
2.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 83(1): 88-93, Jan.-Feb. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-839412

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction Onodi cells are the most posterior ethmoid air cells and extend superolateral to the sphenoid sinus. These cells are also intimately related with the sphenoid sinus, optic nerve, and carotid artery. Radiologic evaluation is mandatory to assess for anatomic variations before any treatment modalities related to the sphenoid sinus. Objective To evaluate the effect of Onodi cells on the frequency of sphenoiditis. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed in 618 adult patients who underwent high-resolution computed tomography between January 2013 and January 2015. The prevalence of Onodi cells and sphenoiditis was evaluated. Whether the presence of Onodi cells leads to an increase in the prevalence of sphenoiditis was investigated. Results Onodi cell positivity was observed in 326 of 618 patients and its prevalence was found to be 52.7%. In the study group, 60.3% (n = 73) were ipsilaterally (n = 21) or bilaterally (n = 52) Onodi-positive, whereas 39.7% (n = 48) were Onodi-negative (n = 35) or only contralaterally Onodi-positive (n = 13). Of the control group, 48.3% (n = 240) were Onodi-positive and 51.7% (n = 257) were Onodi negative. The co-existence of Onodi cells ipsilaterally was observed to increase the identification of sphenoiditis 1.5-fold, and this finding was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion The prevalence of sphenoiditis appears to be higher in patients with Onodi cells. However, it is not possible to state that Onodi cells are the single factor that causes this disease. Further studies are needed to investigate contributing factors related to sphenoiditis.


Resumo Introdução As células de Onodi são as células etmoidais mais posteriores, que se prolongam superolateralmente ao seio esfenoidal. Essas células também se encontram em íntima relação com o seio esfenoidal, o nervo óptico e a artéria carótida. Para análise de variações anatômicas antes da implantação de qualquer modalidade terapêutica relacionada ao seio esfenoidal, a avaliação radiológica é obrigatória, Objetivo Nosso objetivo foi avaliar o papel das células de Onodi na frequência de esfenoidite. Método Em nosso estudo, foi feita uma análise retrospectiva em 618 pacientes adultos que se submeteram à tomografia computadorizada de alta resolução entre janeiro de 2013 e janeiro de 2015. Avaliamos a prevalência de células de Onodi e de esfenoidite. Investigamos se a presença de células de Onodi leva a um aumento na prevalência de esfenoidite. Resultados A positividade para células de Onodi foi observada em 326 de 618 pacientes e sua prevalência foi de 52,7%. No grupo de estudo, 60,3% (n = 73) eram CO-positivas: ipsilateral (n = 21) ou bilateralmente (n = 52); e 39,7% (n = 48) eram CO-negativas (n = 35) ou apenas contralateralmente CO-positivas (n = 13). No grupo de controle, 48,3% (n = 240) eram CO-positivas; e 51,7% (n = 257) eram CO-negativas. Observamos que a coexistência de CO ipsilateralmente aumentava em 1,5 vez a associação com esfenoidite e esse achado foi estatisticamente significante (p < 0,05). Conclusão A prevalência de esfenoidite parece ser maior em pacientes com células de Onodi, mas não é possível afirmar que elas são isoladamente o fator causador dessa doença. Novos estudos precisam ser feitos para uma investigação dos fatores contributivos relacionados à esfenoidite.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Sphenoid Sinusitis/diagnostic imaging , Paranasal Sinuses/physiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Retrospective Studies
3.
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol ; 1999 Jun; 17(2): 69-76
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-37026

ABSTRACT

Paranasal sinus disease and bronchial asthma are frequently associated. Computed tomography imaging is currently the most reliable method for confirming the diagnosis of sinusitis. Due to the cost and amount of radiation during computed tomography, our aim was to analyze whether standard radiography, under computed tomography-control, had a reasonable degree of confidence in the diagnosis of sinusitis. Fifty-three asthmatic patients (42 males and 11 females) with a mean age of 9 years (range 4-14) were enrolled. We evaluated the maxillary sinuses, ethmoidal sinuses, frontal sinuses, and sphenoidal sinuses using standard radiography (Waters' view, Caldwell view, and lateral view) and compared with computed tomography (coronal views), the latter served as a standard. Computed tomography (CT) showed paranasal sinusitis in 58% (31/53) of the asthmatic children. Compared with the results of computed tomography, standard radiography revealed a sensitivity of 81.1% and a specificity of 72.7% for maxillary sinusitis. The sensitivity and specificity for ethmoidal, frontal, and sphenoidal sinusitis were 51.8%, 84.8%; 47.3%, 87.2%; and 40.8%, 93.3%, respectively. In 21 (40%) of the 53 patients, discrepancies were seen between the interpretations of standard radiography c and those of CT scans. In patients with maxillary sinusitis, the correlation between standard radiography and CT was good. However, ethmoidal, frontal, and sphenoidal sinusitis were poorly demonstrated using radiography. Standard radiography can be recommended as a screening method for maxillary sinusitis, but it is not recommended for the diagnosis of other paranasal sinusitis.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Asthma/complications , Child , Child, Preschool , Ethmoid Sinusitis/diagnostic imaging , Female , Frontal Sinusitis/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Maxillary Sinusitis/diagnostic imaging , Paranasal Sinus Diseases/complications , Sensitivity and Specificity , Single-Blind Method , Sphenoid Sinusitis/diagnostic imaging , Taiwan , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL