ABSTRACT
No intuito de oferecer para a laqueadura tubária uma alternativa menos invasiva e com menos complicações, foi desenvolvido o dispositivo Essure®, aplicado ao método da esterilização histeroscópica, além de ter utilidade nos quadros de hidrossalpinge com indicação de fertilização in vitro (FIV). Este artigo, por meio de uma revisão de literatura, teve como objetivo reunir dados acerca do uso do Essure®, incluindo resultados obtidos com o dispositivo, bem como comparações em diversos aspectos com outras metodologias de esterilização. Foram utilizados os bancos de dados PubMed, Lilacs e Scielo, no período entre 1970 e 2016. Foram pesquisados os termos "hysteroscopic contraception"; "Essure"; "definitive tubal sterilization; "sterilization"; "contraception". A literatura demonstrou se tratar de um dispositivo de fácil e rápida inserção, e com bons resultados para anticoncepção. Porém, devido a complicações como perfuração tubária, implante peritoneal e aborto, bem como para avaliar seu custo financeiro ao sistema de Saúde, mais estudos prospectivos são necessários.(AU)
In order to provide a less invasive and harmful technique compared to the tubal ligation, the Essure® device was developed, applied to the hysteroscopic sterilization method. It is also used in cases of hydrosalpinus and indication of in vitro fertilization (IVF). This article, through a literature review, aimed to gather data about the use of Essure®, including results obtained with the device, comparing different aspects with other methods of sterilization. For this purpose, PubMed, Lilacs and Scielo databases were used, with results from 1970 to 2016. The keywords searched were "hysteroscopic contraception", "Essure", "definitive tubal sterilization". The literature has shown that it is a quickly and easily inserted device with good results for contraception. However, due to complications such as tubal perforation, peritoneal implantation and abortion, as well as to evaluate its financial cost to the health system, more prospective studies are needed.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Sterilization, Reproductive/methods , Sterilization, Tubal/instrumentation , Sterilization, Tubal/methods , Hysteroscopy/instrumentation , Databases, Bibliographic , Contraception , Costs and Cost Analysis , Therapeutic OcclusionABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate results of early tubal occlusions performed by hysteroscopy (Essure®). Methods This prospective study included 38 patients, 73.7% of them were white, mean age 34.5 years, they have had on average 3 pregnancies and 2.7 of deliveries. A total of 86.8% of patients previously prepared the endometrium. All procedures were carried out at outpatient unit without anesthesia. Results Insertion rate of the device was 100% at a mean time of 4 minutes and 50 seconds. Based on the analogical visual scale, average pain reported was three, and 55.3% of women did not report pain after the procedure. After 3 months, 89.5% of patients were very satisfied with the method. Simple radiographs of the pelvis showed 92.1% of topical devices, and one case of unilateral expulsion had occurred. A four years follow-up did not show failure in the method. Conclusions Tubal occlusion through hysteroscopy at outpatient unit and without anesthesia was a quickly and well-tolerated procedure. No serious complications were seen, the success rate was high, and patients were satisfied.
RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar os resultados das primeiras oclusões tubárias realizadas pela via histeroscópica (Essure®). Métodos Estudo prospectivo com 38 pacientes, sendo 73,7% caucasianas, com média de idade de 34,5 anos, e com 3 gestações e 2,7 partos em média. Do total, 86,8% das pacientes fizeram preparo prévio do endométrio. Todos os procedimentos foram ambulatoriais e sem anestesia. Resultados A taxa de inserção do dispositivo foi de 100%, com tempo médio de 4 minutos e 50 segundos. Segundo a Escala Visual Analógica, a dor média obtida foi de três, e 55,3% das mulheres não referiram qualquer dor após o método. Ocorreu um caso de reflexo vagal e 89,5% das pacientes retornaram às atividades normais no mesmo dia. Após 3 meses, 89,5% das pacientes encontravam-se muito satisfeitas com o método. A radiografia simples da pelve evidenciou 92,1% de dispositivos tópicos, ocorrendo um caso de expulsão unilateral. Após 4 anos de seguimento, não houve falha do método. Conclusão A oclusão tubária por via histeroscópica em regime ambulatorial e sem anestesia foi um procedimento rápido, bem tolerado, isento de complicações graves e com alta taxa de sucesso e satisfação das pacientes.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Sterilization, Tubal/methods , Hysteroscopy/methods , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/methods , Sterilization, Tubal/instrumentation , Pain Measurement , Hysteroscopy/instrumentation , Prospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Objetivo: Comparar la efectividad en la detección y control del dispositivo intratubario (DIT) Essure por medio de la radiografía abdominopélvica y el ultrasonido. Método: Control de los primeros 5 casos de esterilización tubaria ambulatoria con Essure, después de 1 y 2 años de su inserción, mediante radiografía abdominopélvica y ecografía transvaginal. Resultados: Ambos exámenes de imágenes permitieron corroborar la presencia del dispositivo Essure en las 5 pacientes, al completar su primer y segundo año desde su inserción. Conclusión: Tanto la radiografía abdominopélvica como la ecografía transvaginal, permiten detectar y controlar la presencia del DIT Essure. El ultrasonido realizado por el ginecólogo en la consulta, puede reemplazar a la radiografía simple, como método de detección y control de los dispositivos intra-tubarios (Essure). Las ventajas comparativas permiten concluir que el ultrasonido, no irradia a la paciente y permite explorar el resto de la anatomía de los órganos sexuales internos durante el mismo procedimiento. Sin embargo, es de mayor costo que la radiografía.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness in the detection and control of Essure by pelvic radiography and ultrasound. Method: Control of the first 5 cases of ambulatory sterilization with Essure after 1 and 2 years. Detection and control by pelvic x-ray and transvaginal ultrasonography. Results: Both methods allowed corroborating the presence of the Essure device in the 5 patients, when completing their first and second year from the insertion. Conclusion: As much the pelvic x-ray as the transvaginal ultrasound allows to detect and check the presence of the Essure device. The transvaginal ultrasonography can replace the x-ray like method of detection and check of the Essure devices. The comparative advantages allow concluding that the ultrasound usually is available for the gynecologist, does not radiate the patient and allows exploring the internal sexual organs anatomy during the same act. Nevertheless, it is of greater cost than x-ray.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Sterilization, Tubal/instrumentation , Intrauterine Devices , Radiography, Abdominal/methods , Ultrasonography , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Sterilization, Tubal/methods , VaginaABSTRACT
RESUMEN. Procedimiento de contracepción quirurgica, que facilitará la reversibilidad de la permeabilidad tubárica dejando ambos extremos casi de igual calibre. Total 90 casos en 18 años, hasta 1993; sin complicaciones ni fracasos.
Subject(s)
Microsurgery , Contraception/methods , Contraception , Sterilization, Tubal/instrumentation , Sterilization, Tubal/methods , Sterilization, Tubal , Family Development Planning/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the Songkla uterine manipulator (SUM) and the Hulka controlling tenaculum for manipulation of the uterus for laparoscopy. METHOD: Forty women scheduled for laparoscopic tubal ligation were randomized to the SUM group (n=20) or the Hulka group (n=20) as uterine manipulator. Laparoscopic evidence of antevertion and lateral uterine movements and organ exposure was video recorded. Assessment of organ exposure and degree of lateral uterine deviation were subsequently evaluated. RESULTS: The characteristics of the women were similar in both groups. Right, left and range of lateral uterine motion were greater in the SUM group than the Hulka group (59 vs 42 degrees, 60 vs 47 degrees, and 118 vs 89 degrees, respectively, p<0.0001). The SUM group had 2.4 times better cul-de-sac exposure than the Hulka controlling tenaculum (95% CI: 0.51-11.51, p= 0.475). The SUM exposed fallopian tubes better than the Hulka tenaculum (p=0.022) but other structures were not significantly better visualized. There were no complications in the SUM group but two had cervical bleeding in the Hulka group. CONCLUSION: The SUM has advantages over the Hulka controlling tenaculum in giving a wider angle of lateral uterine deviation and better exposure of the fallopian tubes.
Subject(s)
Adult , Fallopian Tubes/surgery , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy , Sterilization, Tubal/instrumentation , Uterus/surgeryABSTRACT
En este estudio de 59 pacientes que solicitaron ser esterilizadas por laparoscopia con la aplicación del anillo de Yoon, sólo 44 pacientes se les pudo practicar la técnica; el resto no se le práctico por varias causas de origen patológico, entre ellas: hidrosalping y slpingitis como las principales. El método permitió hacer el diagnóstico de dichos cuadros clínicos. Se demostró con el presente trabajo que la experiencia de esterilización por laparoscopia utilizando el anillo de Yoon, presenta el menor riesgo para la paciente, tanto quirúrgicamente, como para prevenir con mayor efectividad los embarazos no deseados
Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Female , Sterilization, Tubal/instrumentation , Sterilization/methods , LaparoscopyABSTRACT
De 1,135 pacientes sometidas a obstrucción tubaria bilateral; en 1,129 pacientes el procedimiento fue eficaz; de estas pacientes, 1,111 (98%) fueron sometidas a obstrucción tubaria bilateral con el método de Pomeroy. Y en 19 pacientes (2%) se utilizaron anillos de Yoom con buenos resultados