ABSTRACT
The cuboid facet of the navicular bone is an irregular flat surface, present in non-human primates and some human ancestors. In modern humans, it is not always present and it is described as an "occasional finding". To date, there is not enough data about its incidence in ancient and contemporary populations, nor a biomechanical explanation about its presence or absence. The aim of the study was to evaluate the presence of the cuboid facet in ancient and recent populations, its relationship with the dimensions of the midtarsal bones and its role in the biomechanics of the gait. 354 pairs of naviculars and other tarsal bones from historical and contemporary populations from Catalonia, Spain, have been studied. We used nine measurements applied to the talus, navicular, and cuboid to check its relationship with facet presence. To analyze biomechanical parameters of the facet, X-ray cinematography was used in living patients. The results showed that about 50 % of individuals developed this surface without differences about sex or series. We also observed larger sagittal lengths of the talar facet (LSAGTAL) in navicular bones with cuboid facet. No significant differences were found in the bones contact during any of the phases of the gait. After revising its presence in hominins and non-human primates, and its implication in the bipedalism and modern gait, we suggest that cuboid facet might be related with the size of talar facet and the position of the talonavicular joint. However, other factors such as geographical conditions, genetics and stressful activities probably affect its presence too.
La faceta cuboídea del hueso navicular es una carilla plana e irregular, presente en primates no humanos y en algunos de nuestros ancestros. En humanos modernos, no siempre está presente y es descrita como "un hallazgo ocasional" por la bibliografía. Hasta la fecha, no hay suficientes datos acerca de su incidencia en poblaciones antiguas y contemporáneas, ni una explicación biomecánica sobre su presencia o ausencia. El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue evaluar la frecuencia de la faceta cuboídea en poblaciones recientes y antiguas, su relación con las dimensiones de los huesos tarsales y su rol en la biomecánica de la marcha. Fueron estudiados 354 pares de naviculares y otros huesos del tarso provenientes de colecciones osteológicas de Cataluña, España. Aplicamos nueve medidas aplicadas al talus, navicular y cuboides para corroborar su relación con la presencia de la faceta. Para analizar sus parámetros biomecánicos, se empleó X-ray cinematography en pacientes hospitalarios. Los resultados mostraron que alrededor de un 50 % de los individuos desarrollaron esta carilla, sin diferencias entre sexos o series. Además, observamos que la longitud sagital de la faceta talar (LSAGTAL) es mayor en aquellas muestras con faceta cuboídea. No hay diferencias significativas en el contacto de los huesos en ninguna de las fases de la marcha. Después de revisar su presencia en primates no humanos, su implicancia en el bipedismo y en la marcha moderna, sugerimos que la faceta cuboídea podría estar relacionada con el tamaño de la faceta talar y la posición de la articulación talo-navicular. Sin embargo, otros factores como las condiciones geográficas, genética y stress ocupacional también podrían afectar su presencia.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Tarsal Bones/anatomy & histology , Tarsal Bones/physiology , Gait/physiology , Population , Biomechanical Phenomena , Supination , Biological EvolutionABSTRACT
Intra carpal, cubital and tarsal tunnel pressures were measured with open bore needle technique in 170 normal subjects. The pressure in carpal tunnel with wrist in neutral position was between 2.75 to 4.46 mm Hg which increased to 20-30 mm Hg. during flexion and extension of wrist. Pressures recorded in cubital tunnel were 2-5 mm Hg with full extended elbow and rose to 10-15 mm Hg and 20-28 mm Hg during 90 degrees flexion and full flexion of elbow respectively, pressures in tarsal tunnel were between 4-7 mm Hg in neutral position of ankle joint and with dorsi and plantar flexion of ankle it rose to 15-20 and 10-15 mm Hg respectively. There was no significant pressure difference between either sides and sexes; ages and proximally situated tunnel with distaly situated tunnel in same limb (Carpal tunnel Vs. Cubital tunnel). There was significant pressure difference between Carpal tunnel and Tarsal tunnel with wrist and ankle in their anatomical positions respectively.