Hemorragia digestiva alta / Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Introducción: La hemorragia digestiva alta tiene una elevada morbimortalidad. La endoscopía digestiva alta es el estudio de elección para su diagnóstico y tratamiento. Objetivo: Describir la conducta ante la hemorragia digestiva alta. Métodos: Para la revisión bibliográfica se consultaron artículos científicos indexados en idioma español e inglés, relacionados con la hemorragia digestiva, publicados en las bases de datos PubMed, SciELO, Medline y Cochrane, pertenecientes a autores dedicados al estudio de este tema. Desarrollo: La hemorragia digestiva alta se clasifica, según la etiología de origen, en variceal y no variceal. La mayoría de los pacientes con hemorragia digestiva alta el sangrado se autolimita. La causa más habitual es la úlcera péptica, pero en caso de sangrado masivo la etiología más frecuente es la variceal. El empleo precoz de la terlipresina en los pacientes con hemorragia digestiva alta variceal mejora el control del sangrado y disminuye la mortalidad. Se debe hacer uso de escalas validadas de estratificación del riesgo: escala de riesgo de Rockall (tiene como propósito principal predecir la mortalidad y riesgo de resangrado del paciente) y la escala de Glasgow-Blatchford). Conclusiones: Sospechar la presencia de hemorragia digestiva alta, estratificar su riesgo e instaurar el manejo inicial y apropiado constituye una prioridad para el médico de urgencia(AU)

Introduction: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding presents high morbidity and mortality. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is the study of choice for its diagnosis and treatment. Objective: To describe the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods: For the bibliographic review, the consultation was carried out of scientific articles indexed in Spanish and English, related to gastrointestinal bleeding, published in the databases PubMed, SciELO, Medline and Cochrane, belonging to authors dedicated to the study of this subject. Development: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is classified, according to the etiology of origin, into variceal and nonvariceal. In most patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding the bleeding as such is self-limiting. The most common cause is peptic ulcer; however, in the case of massive bleeding, the most frequent etiology is variceal. Early use of terlipressin in patients with variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding improves bleeding control and decreases mortality. Validated risk stratification scales should be used: Rockall risk scale (its main purpose is to predict patient mortality and risk of bleeding recurrence) and the Glasgow-Blatchford scale. Conclusions: Suspecting the presence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, stratifying its risk, as well as instituting initial and appropriate management, are a priority for the emergency physician(AU)

Effects of terlipressin on blood pressure and survival in septic mice following trauma and its mechanism / 中华危重病急救医学

OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the effects of terlipressin (TP) on blood pressure and survival in septic mice following trauma and its mechanism.@*METHODS@#(1) Survival experiment: 120 male C57BL/6 mice aged 6-8 weeks were enrolled, the posttraumatic sepsis mice model was reproduced by traumatic hemorrhage (bilateral femoral fracture + 45% of total blood loss) followed by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) after 8 hours. Intraperitoneal injection of TP was used for intervention. Sixty model mice were used to observe the effect of 0.05 μg/g TP at different intervention times (the drug was given immediately after traumatic hemorrhage + the administration was repeated after 6 hours, the drug was given immediately after traumatic hemorrhage + the administration was repeated every 6 hours until the end of the experiment, the drug was given at 4 hours after CLP + the administration was repeated every 6 hours until the end of the experiment) on 48-hour cumulative survival rate of mice with posttraumatic sepsis for finding the best intervention time of TP. The other 60 model mice were used to observe the effect of different TP intervention doses (0.01, 0.05, 0.25 μg/g) at the best intervention time on the 48-hour cumulative survival rate of mice with posttraumatic sepsis for finding the best intervention dose of TP. (2) Intervention experiment: the other 45 mice were enrolled, and they were randomly divided into traumatic hemorrhage + sham group (TH+sham group, only laparotomy without CLP), TH+CLP group, and TH+CLP+TP group (the best intervention time and dose of TP shown by survival experiment were used), with 15 mice in each group. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) of mice was monitored continuously. The orbital whole blood was collected at 2 hours after successful reproduction of the model, and the lung tissues were harvested at 12 hours and 24 hours, respectively. The pathological changes in lung tissue were observed with light microscope. The contents of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in serum and lung tissue were determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The expressions of IL-1β and TNF-α mRNA in lung tissue were determined by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The expressions of nuclear factor-κB p65 (NF-κB p65) in the nucleus and cytoplasm of lung tissue were determined by Western Blot.@*RESULTS@#(1) Survival experiment results showed that the 48-hour cumulative survival rate of mice was highest with TP intervention by 0.05 μg/g administration immediately after traumatic hemorrhage and repeated every 6 hours, which was the best intervention method of TP. (2) Intervention experiment results showed that the pulmonary alveolar wall fracture accompanied by inflammatory cell infiltration was found at 12 hours after the successful reproduction of traumatic sepsis model, and the pathological damage was gradually increased with time prolongation. MAP was decreased sharply after traumatic hemorrhage, and it was continued to decrease after two-hit of CLP. The contents of IL-1β and TNF-α in serum and lung tissue, the expressions of IL-1β and TNF-α mRNA in lung tissue, and expressions of NF-κB p65 protein in cytoplasm and nucleus of TH+CLP group were significantly higher than those in TH+sham group. Compared with TH+CLP group, the pathological changes in lung tissue were improved significantly, and the MAP was decreased gently after TP intervention, the levels of inflammatory mediators in serum were significantly decreased [IL-1β (pg/L): 164.32±25.25 vs. 233.11±23.02, TNF-α (pg/L): 155.56±31.47 vs. 596.38±91.50, both P < 0.05], and their expressions in lung tissue [IL-1β content (ng/mg): 262.68±16.56 vs. 408.15±17.85, IL-1β mRNA (2-Δ ΔCt): 2.63±0.68 vs. 6.22±0.74; TNF-α content (ng/mg): 311.07±17.35 vs. 405.04±24.83, TNF-α mRNA (2-Δ ΔCt): 2.04±0.62 vs. 5.32±0.55, all P < 0.01], and NF-κB p65 protein expressions were significantly down-regulated (gray value: 0.47±0.01 vs. 1.28±0.05 in cytoplasm, 0.45±0.02 vs. 1.95±0.06 in nucleus, both P < 0.01].@*CONCLUSIONS@#The continuous intervention with TP 0.05 μg/g administration immediately after traumatic hemorrhage and repeated every 6 hours could improve the MAP of mice with traumatic sepsis, and improve the prognosis. The mechanism may be related to alleviating the inflammatory response and inhibiting the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway in the lung tissue.

Noradrenaline vs terlipressin for hepatorenal syndrome (no to hepatorenal syndrome): A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a functional renal impairment associated with advanced cirrhosis. The best treatment is liver transplantation; however, many patients die before this can be done. Terlipressin improves renal function in HRS, but recent studies have shown similar effects with the cheaper and more readily available norepinephrine. This review included randomized trials comparing noradrenaline to terlipressin for patients with type 1 HRS, as defined by the International Ascites Club. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and effectiveness of noradrenaline in the management of HRS in terms of 1) reducing mortality, 2) reversal and 3) occurrence of adverse events METHODOLOGY: For this meta-analysis paper, the researchers utilized an electronic search of databases and manual scanning of reference lists were performed. Standardized eligibility assessment was performed independently by three reviewers. Review Manager 5.0.23 was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as well as I2 values for inter-trial heterogeneity. Standardized eligibility assessment was performed independently by three reviewers. RESULTS: Thirty-six articles were found after electronic and manual searching. Three were assessed for validity and included in the final analysis. The total number of patients across all trials was 95. Noradrenaline was found not to differ from terlipressin in terms of 15-day survival rate (OR 01.17; 95% CI: 0.51-2.66), reversal of HRS (OR1.07; 95% CI: 0.47-2.44), and a post-hoc analysis on disease-free survival (OR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.34-1.79). Results of sensitivity analysis were consistent with the previous findings (15-day survival: OR=1.21 95% CI = 0.52-2.83; HRS reversal: OR= 1.33, 95% CI = 0.56-3.13; disease-free survival: 1.35, CI =0.56-3.25). Only transient adverse effects were noted with either drugs. CONCLUSION: There is inconclusive evidence that noradrenaline and terlipressin are significantly different in the reversal of HRS and reduction of mortality. Larger trials on noradrenaline or a non-inferiority trial may be needed to establish the equivalence of noradrenaline with terlipressin.