ECRL--a wrist extensor with multiple uses in deformity correction.

Extensor carpi radialis longus muscle has been used in various types of procedures for corrective hand surgery and is a favored muscle for correction of finger clawing due to ulnar nerve palsy in leprosy because its removal leaves an insignificant motor deficit and gives a linear scar at the donor site. It is usually not paralyzed in leprosy. The muscle, being phasic, is easy to re-educate. The excursion of the muscle is similar to lumbrical muscles which it substitutes. Since the muscle is dorsally located, the transfer does not lose tension due to adaptive wrist flexing habit. Its tendon is usually thick enough, can be split into two and used as graft to elongate the muscle-tendon unit or for ligament reconstruction in cases of trapezio-metacarpal joint arthritis.

Extensor indicis proprius transfer for the abducted small finger

PURPOSE: Persistent abduction of the small finger has usually been treated by transfer of the extensor digiti minimi muscle. However, anatomic variations of the extensor system may limit the potential for a successful extensor digiti minimi transfer. Therefore, we evaluated the outcomes of an alternative reconstruction method for the abducted small finger using an extensor indicis proprius (EIP) transfer. METHODS: We performed 8 EIP transfers in 8 patients with persistent, flexible abduction posturing of the small finger. The primary etiology of the deformity was incomplete motor reinnervation after surgeries for ulnar neuropathy in 6 patients, rupture of the third palmar interosseous musculotendinous unit in 1 patient, and intrinsic muscle fibrosis in 1 patient. The EIP was elongated by splitting the tendinous portion and was transferred to the distal and radial part of the extensor hood. Surgical outcomes were assessed by comparing preoperative and postoperative active adduction and abduction motion of the 2 ulnar digits. RESULTS: At the mean follow-up of 23 months, the average adduction angle improved from 19 degrees to 1 degrees postoperatively. In terms of active finger motion, 6 patients showed excellent results, 1 good, and 1 fair, without loss of flexion and extension. No patient had an extension lag or complained of functional deficits of the donor index finger. There was not adverse change to digital function or range of motion for the middle and ring fingers that are crossed by the EIP. CONCLUSIONS: Extensor indicis proprius transfer can be a reliable option for correction of abduction deformity of the small finger, maintaining active abduction and full flexion and extension. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.