Fundamentals of prosthetic urology / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)

The field of prosthetic urology demonstrates the striking impact that simple devices can have on quality of life. Penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter implantation are the cornerstone procedures on which this specialty focuses. Modern research largely concentrates on decreasing the rates of complication and infection, as the current devices offer superior rates of satisfaction when revision is not necessary. These techniques are also able to salvage sexual function and continence in more difficult patient populations including female-to-male transgender individuals, those with ischemic priapism, and those with erectile dysfunction and incontinence secondary to prostatectomy. This review summarizes modern techniques, outcomes, and complications in the field of prosthetic urology.

Conventional versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis / 부인종양

OBJECTIVE: Although nerve-sparing radical surgery (NSRS) is an emerging technique for reducing surgery-related dysfunctions, its efficacy is controversial in patients with cervical cancer. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes, and urinary, anorectal, and sexual dysfunctions between conventional radical surgery (CRS) and NSRS. METHODS: After searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, two randomized controlled trials, seven prospective and eleven retrospective cohort studies were included with 2,253 patients from January 2000 to February 2014. We performed crude analyses and then conducted subgroup analyses according to study design, quality of study, surgical approach, radicality, and adjustment for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Crude analyses showed decreases in blood loss, hospital stay, frequency of intraoperative complications, length of the resected vagina, duration of postoperative catheterization (DPC), urinary frequency, and abnormal sensation in NSRS, whereas there were no significant differences in other clinical parameters and dysfunctions between CRS and NSRS. In subgroup analyses, operative time was longer (standardized difference in means, 0.948; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.642 to 1.253), while intraoperative complications were less common (odds ratio, 0.147; 95% CI, 0.035 to 0.621) in NSRS. Furthermore, subgroup analyses showed that DPC was shorter, urinary incontinence or frequency, and constipation were less frequent in NSRS without adverse effects on survival and sexual functions. CONCLUSION: NSRS may not affect prognosis and sexual dysfunctions in patients with cervical cancer, whereas it may decrease intraoperative complications, and urinary and anorectal dysfunctions despite long operative time and short length of the resected vagina when compared with CRS.

Complications of Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Impact of Prebiopsy Enema

PURPOSE: Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy of the prostate is usually safe. However, some patients are hospitalized owing to complications from TRUS biopsy. We identified the risk factors for complications and effective preventive measures for treating complications after TRUS biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records and radiological images of 1,083 patients who underwent TRUS biopsy of the prostate over 10 years in Gyeongsang National University Hospital were examined retrospectively to investigate the correlation between complications after TRUS biopsy and preventive antibiotics, prebiopsy enema, number of biopsy cores, and pathological findings. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 69 patients (6.4%). The complication rates of the 1,008 patients who received antibiotics and the 75 patients who did not were 6.3% and 8.0%, respectively (p=0.469). Complication rates of the pre-biopsy enema group (n=658) and the group without prebiopsy enema (n=425) were 4.7% and 8.9%, respectively (p=0.007). Complication rates of the 6-core biopsy group (n=41) and the 12-core biopsy group (n=955) were 7.3% and 6.3%, respectively (p=0.891). Complication rates of the prostate cancer group (n=306) and the no prostate cancer group (n=713) were 6.2% and 6.6%, respectively (p=0.740). CONCLUSIONS: A prebiopsy enema was associated with a reduced risk of complications after TRUS biopsy. Preventive antibiotics, number of biopsy cores, and pathological findings did not significantly influence the complication rate.

Prevalência e fatores preditivos de retenção urinária diagnosticada por ultrassonografia no período pós-anestésico imediato / Prevalencia y factores predictivos de retención urinaria diagnosticada por ultrasonido en el período postanestésico inmediato / Prevalence and predictive factors of urinary retention assessed by ultrasound in the immediate post-anesthetic period

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Retenção urinária é uma condição frequente na sala de recuperação pós-anestésica (SRPA). Sobredistensão vesical e consequente lesão do detrusor da bexiga são situações passíveis de prevenção. A ultrassonografia permite medida confiável do volume urinário, determinando a prevalência da distensão vesical pós-operatória. Este estudo teve como objetivo determinar a prevalência de retenção urinária pós-operatória e identificar fatores independentes de previsão de sua ocorrência. MÉTODO: Prospectivamente, foram incluídos no estudo 257 pacientes admitidos na SRPA. As variáveis coletadas incluíram: idade, sexo, estado físico, local da cirurgia, tipo de anestesia, tempos cirúrgico e anestésico, uso ou não de opioides, volume de fluidos administrados, história prévia de sintomas urinários. Medidas do volume vesical foram feitas, por ultrassonografia, na admissão e na alta da SRPA. O critério para caracterizar retenção urinária foi: volume vesical igual ou maior que 600 mL, associado à incapacidade de micção espontânea 30 minutos após o diagnóstico. Análises univariadas e multivariadas foram utilizadas para identificar os fatores preditivos independentes. RESULTADOS: Ocorreu retenção urinária em 19 pacientes (7,39 por cento). Os fatores preditivos independentes identificados foram o volume urinário igual ou maior que 360 mL na admissão à SRPA (Qui-quadrado de Mantel-Haenszel (1 gl) = 18,76; p < 0,01), com razão de chances de 9,82 (intervalo de confiança 95 por cento = 3,26 29,55) e as cirurgias sobre os membros inferiores (Qui-quadrado de Mantel-Haenszel (1 gl) = 5,33; p = 0,02), com razão de chances de 4,33 (intervalo de confiança 95 por cento = 1,34 14,02). CONCLUSÕES: dada a prevalência da retenção urinária, sugere-se avaliação sistemática do volume urinário na SRPA, par ticular mente naqueles portadores de fatores preditivos.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Urinary retention is a common condition in the post-anesthetic care unit (PACU). Vesical overdistension and consequent damage of the detrusor muscle of the urinary bladder represent situations that can be prevented. The ultrasound allows the reliable measurement of the urinary volume, determining the prevalence of postoperative vesical distension. The objective of the present study was to determine the prevalence of postoperative urinary retention and identify independent predictive factors. METHODS: Two-hundred and fifty-seven patients admitted to the PACU were included prospectively in this study. Parameters collected included: age, gender, physical status, site of surgery, type of anesthesia, time of the surgery and anesthesia, use of opioids, volume of fluids administered, and history of urinary symptoms. Vesical volumes were measured by ultrasound after admission and upon discharge from the PACU. The criteria to characterize urinary retention were: vesical volume equal or higher than 600 mL associated with incapacity of spontaneous micturition for 30 minutes after the diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to indentify independent predictive factors. RESULTS: Urinary retention was observed in 19 patients (7.39 percent), independent predictive factors identified included urinary volume equal to or greater than 360 mL upon admission to the PACU (Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square test (1 dF) = 18.76; p < 0.01), with an odds ratio of 9.82 (95 percent confidence interval = 3.26-29.55) and surgeries of the lower limbs (Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square test (1 dF) = 5.33; p = 0.02), with odds ratio of 4.33 (95 percent confidence interval = 1.34-14.02). CONCLUSIONS: Due to the prevalence of urinary retention, we suggest that a systematic evaluation of the urinary volume at the PACU should be done, especially in those patients with predictive factors.

JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: La retención urinaria es una condición frecuente en la sala de recuperación postanestésica (SRPA). La sobredistensión vesical y la consecuente lesión del detrusor de la vejiga son situaciones que se pueden prevenir. El ultrasonido permite una medida confiable del volumen urinario, determinando la prevalencia de la distensión vesical postoperatoria. Este estudio tuvo el objetivo de determinar la prevalencia de retención urinaria postoperatoria e identificar los factores independientes de previsión para su aparecimiento. MÉTODO: Doscientos cincuenta y siete pacientes admitidos en la SRPA fueron prospectivamente incluidos en el estudio. Las variables recolectadas incluyeron: edad, sexo, estado físico, local de la cirugía, tipo de anestesia, tiempos quirúrgico y anestésico, uso o no de opioides, volumen de fluidos administrados, e historial previo de síntomas urinarios. Las medidas del volumen vesical fueron realizadas por ultrasonido, en la entrada y en el alta de la SRPA. El criterio para caracterizar la retención urinaria fue el volumen vesical igual o mayor que 600 mL, asociado a la incapacidad de micción espontánea 30 minutos después del diagnóstico. Los análisis univariados y multivariados fueron utilizados para identificar los factores predictivos independientes. RESULTADOS: Ocurrió una retención urinaria en 19 pacientes (7,39 por ciento). Los factores predictivos independientes identificados fueron el volumen urinario igual o mayor que 360 mL en la admisión a la SRPA (Cui-cuadrado de Mantel-Haenszel (1 gl.) = 18,76; p < 0,01), con razón de chances de 9,82 (intervalo de 95 por ciento de confianza = 3,26 29,55) y las cirugías sobre los miembros inferiores (Cui-cuadrado de Mantel-Haenszel (1 gl.) = 5,33; p = 0,02), con razón de chances de 4,33 (intervalo de un 95 por ciento de confianza = 1,34 14,02). CONCLUSIONES: dada la prevalencia de la retención urinaria, se sugiere una evaluación sistemática del volumen ...

Factores de riesgo de retención urinaria aguda en cirugía mayor ambulatoria bajo anestesia espinal / Risk factors for acute urinary retention after spinal surgery

Introducción: Estimar la prevalencia de retención urinaria aguda en el Programa de Cirugía mayor ambulatoria con anestesia espinal, e identificar los principales factores de riesgo para su desarrollo. Material y método: Estudio descriptivo de casos y controles. De 859 pacientes operados en programa de cirugía mayor ambulatoria entre abril 2003 y julio 2006, se seleccionaron 652 pacientes sometidos a cirugía con anestesia espinal. Los casos fueron 18 pacientes que desarrollaron retención urinaria aguda y 45 controles seleccionados al azar de los pacientes sin complicaciones en el postoperatorio. Se analizó estadística por pruebas estándares. Resultados: La prevalencia de retención urinaria aguda fue 2,76 por ciento. Se asociaron significativamente al desarrollo de retención urinaria aguda en postoperatorio las variables sexo masculino, p =0.026 OR =5.76 (IC 95 por ciento 1.17-28.24), edad sobre 50 años p =0.046 OR =3.14 (IC 95 por ciento 1.01-9.86) y cirugía hemiaria p =0.001 OR =7.59 (IC 95 por ciento 1.71-33.61). En todos los casos se manejó con cateterismo intermitente y la prolongación de estadía hospitalaria fue de un día en el 91 por ciento de los casos, y dos en el resto.

Background: The identified risk factors for acute urinary retention after spinal anesthesia are the dose and duration of anesthesia, old age and ano rectal surgical procedures. Aim: To assess the prevalence and risk factors of acute urinary retention in the program of ambulatory surgery with spinal anesthesia. Material and methods: Descriptive case control study. The medical records of 859 patients operated with spinal anesthesia between 2003 and 2006 were reviewed, and 18 patients aged 52 + 16 years, that had an acute urinary retention, were identified. Forty vive randomly chosen patients aged 46 + 14 years, without urinary retention were analyzed as controls. Results: The calculated prevalence of acute urinary retention was 2.8 percent. Male sex, an age over 50 years and hernia surgery were identified as risk factors for urinary retention with odds ratios of 5.8 (95 percent confidence interval (Cl) 17-28), 3.1 (95 percentCI 1.-9.9) and 7.6 (95 percentCI 1.7-33.6), respectively. All cases were managed with intermittent catheterization. Hospital stay was one day in 91 percent and two days in the rest. Conclusions: in this series, acute urinary retention occurred in 2.8 percent of patients after spinal surgery. Male sex, age over 50 years and hernia repair procedures were identified ads risk factors for the complication.

Postoperative urinary retention: evaluation of patients using opioids analgesic

The study aimed to determine the occurrence of urinary retention in patients using opioid analgesic and to describe the method used for vesical relief. A prospective and consecutive series of 1,316 patients undergoing surgery from September 1999 to April 2003 and using opioids post surgery were studied. From the 1,136 patients, 594 did not use urinary catheters pre-surgery. From these 594 patients, 128 (22 percent) suffered post operative urinary retention. Urinary retention was significantly related to the use of continuous epidural analgesia (p=0.009). About 69 percent of patients experiencing urinary retention post surgery returned to spontaneous micturition following a single catheterization. The incidence found of urinary retention was similar to the literature, more frequent in men who received continuous epidural analgesia. The findings suggest orientation and careful nursing team observation of post operative micturition, emphasizing the intermittent aseptically catheterization for urinary retention in order to prevent potential complications of the urinary tract.

Los objetivos de este estudio fueron determinar la incidencia de retención urinaria post-operatoria en pacientes que se encontraban en uso de analgésicos opioides, así como describir el método utilizado en el vaciado vesical. Se trata de una serie prospectiva y consecutiva de 1.316 pacientes quirúrgicos, estudiados de septiembre de 1999 a abril de 2003. De ellos, 594 pacientes no usaron cateterismo de demora en el pre-operatorio. Así mismo, 128 pacientes de este grupo presentó retención urinaria, con una incidencia del 22 por ciento (128/594). Hubo una asociación estadísticamente significativa entre la ocurrencia de retención urinaria y el uso de analgesia epidural continua (p=0,009). El 69 por ciento de los pacientes presentó una micción espontánea luego de haber realizado apenas un cateterismo. La incidencia de retención urinaria encontrada es semejante a la descrita en la literatura, siendo más frecuente en hombres, así como en aquellos pacientes sometidos a analgesia epidural continua. Se sugiere una orientación y vigilancia adecuadas por el equipo de enfermería, haciendo énfasis en el cateterismo vesical intermitente aséptico, durante el transcurso de la retención urinaria, para prevenir complicaciones del tracto urinario.

Os objetivos deste estudo foram determinar a incidência de retenção urinária pós-operatória em pacientes que estavam em uso de analgesia com opióides e descrever o método utilizado para esvaziamento vesical. Trata-se de uma série prospectiva e consecutiva de 1.316 pacientes cirúrgicos de 9/1999 a 4/2003. Dos 1.316 pacientes, 594 não usaram cateterismo de demora no pré-operatório. Desses, 128 pacientes apresentaram retenção urinária, com incidência de 22 por cento (128/594). Houve associação estatisticamente significativa entre a ocorrência de retenção urinária e uso da analgesia peridural contínua (p=0,009). Cerca de 69 por cento dos pacientes apresentaram micção espontânea após a realização de apenas um cateterismo. A incidência de retenção urinária encontrada é semelhante à literatura, sendo mais freqüente em homens e naqueles submetidos à analgesia peridural contínua. Sugere-se orientação e vigilância adequada pela equipe de enfermagem, com ênfase no cateterismo vesical intermitente asséptico, na ocorrência de retenção urinária para prevenção de complicações do trato urinário.

Post operative urinary retention in general surgical ward

Two hundred and fifty consecutive patients who had under gone surgery under spinal and general anaesthesia were studied prospectively to determine the incidence of post-operative urinary retention. The sex and age of the patient did not affect the incidence of retention of urine. The use of long acting spinal anaesthetics and over enthusiastic treatment of post-operative pain with strong narcotic analgesics may be the important factors in post operative urinary retention

Urodynamic study of children with voiding problems.

Twenty high risk children aged 5-12 years with various voiding problems were studied prospectively by urodynamics to evaluate the function of their urinary bladder and its continence mechanism. None of them had neuropathic bladder or any obstruction distal to bladder neck. Fourteen out of twenty (70%) had abnormal findings on urodynamics evaluation; 8 (40%) had non-neurogenic neurogenic bladder (NNNB); 3 (15%) had small capacity hypertonic bladder (SCHB); 2 (10%) had atonic bladder (AB) and 1 (5%) had hyperreflexic bladder (HB). We conclude that urodynamic abnormalities are as frequent in high risk Indian children as they are in developed countries. The high risk children should be subjected to urodynamic studies more frequently than being done hitherto and be directed to proper therapeutic modality.