ABSTRACT
O cigarro eletrônico (CE) surgiu como uma alternativa ao uso do cigarro convencional (CC) atuando como um meio de combate ao tabagismo. Apesar de ser considerado menos prejudicial à saúde do que o cigarro convencional, por muitos autores, seu uso não é isento de riscos. O presente estudo visa discutir e elucidar os impactos do uso de cigarros eletrônicos na saúde oral de pacientes adultos jovens. Esta revisão de literatura foi elaborada através da seleção de artigos científicos nos idiomas português e inglês, que abordam os temas de cigarro eletrônico e saúde oral. Utilizaram-se os bancos de dados Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), PubMed e Google acadêmico, a busca foi baseada nos seguintes descritores de saúde: cigarro eletrônico, vaping e saúde bucal, e os respectivos em inglês, com limite temporal de 2019 a 2023. Diversas pesquisas relatam os efeitos dos cigarros eletrônicos na saúde bucal, como a xerostomia, halitose, cárie dental, perda e avulsão de elementos dentários, doença periodontal e diversas patologias orais. Além disso, os componentes químicos presentes nos líquidos dos cigarros eletrônicos também podem afetar a saúde bucal, podendo levar a danos no esmalte dentário e riscos desconhecidos as células e tecidos da cavidade oral. Logo, é necessário abordar o impacto que os cigarros eletrônicos causam e seus riscos à saúde bucal, além dos riscos já conhecidos para saúde geral dos usuários. Os profissionais de saúde devem estar atentos a essa questão e incluir informações sobre o uso de cigarros eletrônicos em suas avaliações e orientações aos pacientes.
The electronic cigarette (EC) emerged as an alternative to conventional cigarette (CC) use, acting as a means to combat smoking. Despite being considered less harmful to health than conventional cigarettes by many authors, its use is not without risks. The present study aims to discuss and elucidate the impacts of electronic cigarette use on the oral health of young adult patients. This literature review was conducted through the selection of scientific articles in Portuguese and English languages, addressing the topics of electronic cigarettes and oral health. The databases used included the Virtual Health Library (BVS), PubMed, and Google Scholar. The search was based on the following health descriptors: electronic cigarette, vaping, and oral health, and their English equivalents, with a time limit from 2019 to 2023. Several studies report the effects of electronic cigarettes on oral health, such as xerostomia, halitosis, dental caries, tooth loss and avulsion, periodontal disease, and various oral pathologies. Furthermore, the chemical components present in electronic cigarette liquids can also impact oral health, potentially leading to dental enamel damage and unknown risks to oral cavity cells and tissues. Therefore, it is necessary to address the impact and risks of electronic cigarettes on oral health, in addition to the known risks to users' overall health. Health professionals should be attentive to this issue and include information about electronic cigarette use in their assessments and patient guidance.
Subject(s)
Oral Health , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Vaping , Mouth DiseasesABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the effects of vaping and cigarette smoking and indicate their impact on periodontal health. Material and Methods: A total of 90 subjects divided into three groups. Group I: 30 Traditional cigarettes smoker who have smoked up to 10 cigarettes, Group II: 30 electronic cigarettes subjects who have been using vape at least one year and never smoke, and Group III: 30 subjects who have no smoking history. Using a mirror and a periodontal probe, periodontal parameters (plaque index, gingival index, probing depth and clinical attachment loss) were used to evaluate periodontal health. Results: The findings showed that the periodontal parameters had a highly significant differences at P ≤ 0.01 between traditional and electronic smoking groups. While clinical attachment loss demonstrated non-significant difference P ≥ 0.05 in comparison between electronic cigarettes and the group who never smoke. Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that traditional cigarettes and electronic cigarettes both had unfavorable impact on periodontal health status, never the less quit smoking showed positive impacts on periodontal parameters (AU)
Objetivo: O objetivo foi comparar os efeitos do uso do cigarro eletrônico e do cigarro convencional, indicando seus impactos na saúde bucal. Material e Método: 90 indivíduos foram divididos igualmente em três grupos: Grupo I, usuários de cigarro convencional que fumaram até 10 cigarros por dia; Grupo II: usuários de cigarro eletrônico que utilizam este por pelo menos há 1 ano e não fumavam antes disso; Grupo III: usuários sem qualquer história de hábitos tabagistas. Utilizando um espelho bucal e uma sonda periodontal, parâmetros periodontais (índice de placa, índice gengival, profundidade de sondagem e perda de inserção clínica) foram coletados para avaliar a saúde periodontal. Resultados: As evidências mostraram que os parâmetros periodontais apresentaram diferença significativa (P ≤ 0.01) entre os grupos I e II. Conclusão: Os resultados deste estudo sugerem que tanto o uso de cigarro convencional como o de cigarro eletrônico possuem impactos desfavoráveis na saúde periodontal, e que a cessação do uso destes mostraram impactos positivos nos parâmetros periodontais(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Periodontitis , Tobacco Use Disorder , Periodontium , Tobacco Products , VapingABSTRACT
Objective: To explore the influencing factors of electronic cigarette use among adolescent students in China. Methods: We searched CNKI, Database of Chinese sci-tech periodicals (VIP), Wan-fang database, PubMed, Web of Science and ScienceDirect for potentially relevant articles published from the inception to March 20th, 2023. The Metagen package in R was used for Meta-analysis. Results: A total of 19 publications with a sample size of 5 336 017 were identified. The results showed that electronic cigarette use among Chinese adolescent students was associated with gender (OR=2.41, 95%CI: 2.03-2.86), close friends smoking (OR=3.02, 95%CI: 2.08-4.39), current smoking (OR=11.26, 95%CI: 4.35-29.18), friends using electronic cigarettes (OR=5.19, 95%CI: 2.01-13.38), thinking smoking makes young people look more attractive (OR=2.00, 95%CI: 1.35-2.97), type of school (OR=2.10, 95%CI: 1.59-2.78), thinking smoking makes people feel more comfortable in social situations (OR=3.58, 95%CI: 2.99-4.28), other tobacco use (OR=5.53, 95%CI: 3.33-9.20), and ever experimented with cigarette use (OR=9.32, 95%CI: 4.38-19.80). Conclusion: The influencing factors for electronic cigarette use among adolescent students in China include gender, close friends smoking, current smoking, friends using electronic cigarettes, thinking smoking makes young people look more attractive, type of school, thinking smoking makes people feel more comfortable in social situations, other tobacco use, and ever experimented with cigarette use.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , East Asian People , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Students , VapingABSTRACT
To evaluate e-cigarette vaping-induced respiratory toxicity and the interventional effects of air cleaners. A randomized controlled trial study of toxic vaping by the respiratory tract were conducted at the Key Laboratory of Environmental Medical Engineering, Ministry of Education, the School of Public Health, Southeast University from January to December 2022. 8-week-old male C57BL/6JGpt mice selected with a random number table method were used to establish a vaping-exposure model at different periods (0 d, 3 d, 7 d or 14 d), or exposed to clean air as a control group. Mice were exposed to regular heated vaping (200 ℃) and high-temperature heated vaping (280 ℃). Total lung RNA was extracted from control and e-cigarette exposed mice for transcriptome sequencing analysis. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) generation and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) were detected by flow cytometry. Total superoxide dismutase (SOD) and superoxide (O2-) were evaluated using a microplate reader. Real-Time Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was used to detect gene expression. Air filter and ionizer were used to intervene the toxicity of vaping. Data were expressed as (x¯±s), differences between multiple groups were compared using one-way or two-way ANOVA. The results showed that, RNA sequencing assays suggested that the differential genes between the control and vaping exposure groups were significantly enriched in the oxidative stress (Fold Enrichment=3.18) and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) (Fold Enrichment=5.74) pathways. Both types of heated vaping exposure caused significantly increased the score of alveolitis (F=10.8, P<0.001), increased endogenous ROS generation (F=16.8, P<0.001), decreased MMP (F=13.6, P<0.01), and gene expression of mitochondrial complex I dysfunction. The toxic effects of high-temperature heated vaping were stronger compared to regular heated vaping (F=2.9, P<0.05). The filter demonstrated better protective effects against vaping than the ionizer by reducing pulmonary alveolitis (F=7.4, P<0.01). Air cleaners could partially alleviate oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. In conclusion, this study demonstrate that vaping brings potential health risks. Air cleaners could partially reverse mitochondrial dysfunction, but cannot completely prevent the toxic effects, effective interventions remain to be investigated.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Animals , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Reactive Oxygen Species , Vaping , Mitochondrial DiseasesABSTRACT
Objective: To explore the influencing factors of electronic cigarette use among adolescent students in China. Methods: We searched CNKI, Database of Chinese sci-tech periodicals (VIP), Wan-fang database, PubMed, Web of Science and ScienceDirect for potentially relevant articles published from the inception to March 20th, 2023. The Metagen package in R was used for Meta-analysis. Results: A total of 19 publications with a sample size of 5 336 017 were identified. The results showed that electronic cigarette use among Chinese adolescent students was associated with gender (OR=2.41, 95%CI: 2.03-2.86), close friends smoking (OR=3.02, 95%CI: 2.08-4.39), current smoking (OR=11.26, 95%CI: 4.35-29.18), friends using electronic cigarettes (OR=5.19, 95%CI: 2.01-13.38), thinking smoking makes young people look more attractive (OR=2.00, 95%CI: 1.35-2.97), type of school (OR=2.10, 95%CI: 1.59-2.78), thinking smoking makes people feel more comfortable in social situations (OR=3.58, 95%CI: 2.99-4.28), other tobacco use (OR=5.53, 95%CI: 3.33-9.20), and ever experimented with cigarette use (OR=9.32, 95%CI: 4.38-19.80). Conclusion: The influencing factors for electronic cigarette use among adolescent students in China include gender, close friends smoking, current smoking, friends using electronic cigarettes, thinking smoking makes young people look more attractive, type of school, thinking smoking makes people feel more comfortable in social situations, other tobacco use, and ever experimented with cigarette use.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , East Asian People , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Students , VapingABSTRACT
To evaluate e-cigarette vaping-induced respiratory toxicity and the interventional effects of air cleaners. A randomized controlled trial study of toxic vaping by the respiratory tract were conducted at the Key Laboratory of Environmental Medical Engineering, Ministry of Education, the School of Public Health, Southeast University from January to December 2022. 8-week-old male C57BL/6JGpt mice selected with a random number table method were used to establish a vaping-exposure model at different periods (0 d, 3 d, 7 d or 14 d), or exposed to clean air as a control group. Mice were exposed to regular heated vaping (200 ℃) and high-temperature heated vaping (280 ℃). Total lung RNA was extracted from control and e-cigarette exposed mice for transcriptome sequencing analysis. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) generation and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) were detected by flow cytometry. Total superoxide dismutase (SOD) and superoxide (O2-) were evaluated using a microplate reader. Real-Time Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was used to detect gene expression. Air filter and ionizer were used to intervene the toxicity of vaping. Data were expressed as (x¯±s), differences between multiple groups were compared using one-way or two-way ANOVA. The results showed that, RNA sequencing assays suggested that the differential genes between the control and vaping exposure groups were significantly enriched in the oxidative stress (Fold Enrichment=3.18) and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) (Fold Enrichment=5.74) pathways. Both types of heated vaping exposure caused significantly increased the score of alveolitis (F=10.8, P<0.001), increased endogenous ROS generation (F=16.8, P<0.001), decreased MMP (F=13.6, P<0.01), and gene expression of mitochondrial complex I dysfunction. The toxic effects of high-temperature heated vaping were stronger compared to regular heated vaping (F=2.9, P<0.05). The filter demonstrated better protective effects against vaping than the ionizer by reducing pulmonary alveolitis (F=7.4, P<0.01). Air cleaners could partially alleviate oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. In conclusion, this study demonstrate that vaping brings potential health risks. Air cleaners could partially reverse mitochondrial dysfunction, but cannot completely prevent the toxic effects, effective interventions remain to be investigated.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Animals , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Reactive Oxygen Species , Vaping , Mitochondrial DiseasesABSTRACT
Objetivos: El propósito de esta investigación fue determinar el nivel de conocimiento, creencias, percepción y practicas asociadas al consumo de cigarrillos electrónicos en los estudiantes universitarios (UASD), recinto Santiago, República Dominicana. Cada estudiante firmó un consentimiento informado certificando que éste respondió cada pregunta realizada por el entrevistador de manera voluntaria. El método de recolección de los datos fue mediante entrevistas, las cuales fueron grabadas por los entrevistadores. La muestra fue de 53 entrevistas, 48 individuales y 5 grupos focales, la misma se tomó hasta alcanzar el punto de saturación de cada pregunta, es decir cuando todas las respuestas se tornaron repetitivas. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio cualitativo de tipo fenomenológico y de fuentes primarias en el período mayo-agosto del año 2019 en la universidad privada Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra (PUCMM) y la universidad pública Universidad Autónoma de Santo Domingo. (UASD), campus Santiago, República Dominicana. El método de recolección de datos se realizó a través de entrevistas, las cuales fueron grabadas por los entrevistadores. Cada estudiante entrevistado firmó un consentimiento informado certificando que respondió voluntariamente a cada pregunta formulada por el entrevistador. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 53 entrevistas, 48 personas y cinco grupos focales. Las entrevistas se realizaron hasta llegar al punto de saturación de cada pregunta, que es cuando todas las respuestas se volvieron repetitivas. Resultados: El conocimiento que tiene los estudiantes universitarios sobre cigarrillo electrónico (CE), es pobre, desde su funcionamiento, partes, sustancias e incluso las posibles complicaciones que puede traer a la salud, tanto en la Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra (PUCMM) como en la Universidad Autónoma de Santo Domingo (UASD), pero es más notable en la universidad pública. Por otro lado, muchos perciben el CE, como una alternativa del uso de tabaco, que posee diversidad de sabores, olor agradable, atractivo, práctico y capaz de ofrecer relajación. En cuanto a la actitud hacia el dispositivo, en PUCMM exhibe un mayor nivel de rechazo con respecto al uso. Es importante mencionar, que mayoría de los entrevistados son o alguna vez fueron usuarios de este, no obstante, no lo recomiendan en gran medida, ya que asumen que puede causar daño y ser adictivo, aunque en menor medida al cigarrillo convencional. La población más susceptible a su uso, son los jóvenes y el sexo masculino, aunque las féminas se han ido sumando de manera significativa. De igual modo, se logró apreciar las grandes influencias que mueven a los jóvenes a su consumo, incluyendo, las redes sociales, familia, amigos, en general el entorno en que se rodean. Conclusión: Concluimos que los estudiantes universitarios carecen de conocimiento con respecto al cigarrillo electrónico, tanto en el funcionamiento, sustancias y complicaciones para la salud. Muchos observan al cigarrillo electrónico como un dispositivo para fumar con un olor agradable, por lo cual puede ser muy atractivo para los usuarios. Se logró apreciar el importante papel que juegan las influencias sociales para el uso del dispositivo, promovido por las redes sociales y relaciones cercanas. Otro problema en la sociedad actual es el uso de CE en menores de edad. Según los resultados existe una gran necesidad de intervención y educación, principalmente en los jóvenes.
Objective: The purpose of this research was to determine the level of knowledge, beliefs, perception, and practices associated with consuming electronic cigarettes among university students. Materials and methods: A qualitative study of phenome-nological type and from primary sources was carried out in the period of May-August of the year 2019 at the private university Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Mae-stra (PUCMM) and the public university Universidad Autónoma de Santo Domingo (UASD), Santiago campus, Dominican Republic. The data collection method was done through interviews, which the interviewers recorded. Each student interviewed signed an informed consent cer-tifying that they answered voluntarily each question asked by the interviewer. The sample consisted of 53 interviews, 48 individuals, and five focus groups. Interviews were done until reaching the saturation point of each question, which is when all the answers became repetitive. Results: University students' knowledge regarding elec-tronic cigarettes (EC) is poor. Knowledge regarding its mechanism, parts, substances, and possible complications to one's health, is scarce both in PUCMM and the UASD, but this is more notable at the public university. Addition-ally, many perceive EC as an alternative to tobacco use, the former, as per our study population, having a variety of fla-vors, a pleasant smell, being attractive, practical, and capa-ble of offering relaxation. Regarding the attitude towards the device, PUCMM exhibits a higher level of rejection regarding its use. It is essential to mention that most inter-viewees were once users of EC. However, they do not rec-ommend it to a great extent since they assume that it can cause harm and be addictive, although to a lesser extent than conventional cigarettes. The population most suscep-tible to its use are young people, including minors and the male gender, although females have been significantly increasing its use. Similarly, it was possible to appreciate the influences that greatly evoke the younger population's consumption, including social networks, family, friends, and the surrounding environment. Conclusion: We concluded that university students have insufficient knowledge regarding electronic cigarettes, both in their mechanism, substances, and health compli-cations. Most see electronic cigarettes as smoking devices with a pleasant smell, which can be very attractive to users. It was possible to observe the critical role played by social influences on the use of the device, promoted by social networks and close relationships. Another problem in cur-rent society is the use of CE in minors. According to the results, there is a great need for intervention and educa-tion, mainly among the younger generation.
Subject(s)
Humans , Adolescent , Adult , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Vaping , Students , Dominican Republic , Tobacco ProductsABSTRACT
O cigarro eletrônico surgiu como uma tentativa para minimizar a dependência ao uso de tabaco, entretanto, engloba controvérsias e dúvidas acerca das reais implicações para o organismo humano. Diante disso, o presente estudo tem como objetivo realizar uma revisão da literatura a fim de relacionar o uso de cigarro eletrônico com suas consequências para os humanos. Os estudos analisados relatam experimentos in vitro e in vivo em camundongos, demonstrando menor concentração de poluentes e nocividades no cigarro eletrônico comparado ao convencional, porém, seu potencial efeito maléfico está relacionado à composição do e-líquido, à maneira do uso e à variedade de aromas presentes nos produtos. Além disso, foram verificadas lesões celulares, hiperreatividade das vias aéreas, liberação de citocinas IL-8, IL-10 e TNF, redução da ação antimicrobiana de queratinócitos e potencial apoptose nas células alveolares. Foi observado também um aumento em até cinco vezes da concentração de carboxihemoglobina em comparação ao cigarro comum e um aumento na auto renovação de células de adenocarcinoma pulmonar de células não pequenas, devido à expressão de SOX2. Observa-se também que em casos de DPOC, o cigarro eletrônico não apresenta agravamentos na fisiologia respiratória, contrapondo outras ocorrências como asma, pneumonia, câncer de pulmão e doenças infecciosas que podem ser ocasionadas ou exacerbadas pelo seu uso. Contudo, pelo curto prazo de observação de seus efeitos, não é possível determinar com precisão a segurança dos cigarros eletrônicos, dessa forma, faz-se necessário que mais pesquisas longitudinais sejam desenvolvidas, auxiliando, assim, na construção de evidências sobre a segurança dos cigarros eletrônicos e na regulamentação futura do produto.
Electronic cigarettes emerged as an attempt to minimize tobacco dependence. However, its use is surrounded by controversies and doubts about the real implications for the human organism. Therefore, this study aims at performing a review of the most recent literature to corelate the use of e-cigarettes with their consequences for the human body. The analyzed studies relate in vitro and in vivo experiments on mice, demonstrating lower concentration of pollutants and harmfulness in the electronic cigarette than in conventional cigarettes. However, its potential harmful effect is related to the composition of the e-liquid, in its use and in the variety of aromas in the products. In addition, cellular lesions, airway hyperreactivity, release of IL-8, IL-10 and TNF cytokines could be observed, as well as reduced keratinocyte antimicrobial action and potential apoptosis in alveolar cells. An increase of up to five-fold the concentration of carboxyhemoglobin in comparison to ordinary cigarettes and an increase in self-renewal of non-small pulmonary adenocarcinoma cells due to the expression of SOX2 have also been related. It could also be observed that in COPD cases, e-cigarettes do not present worsening in respiratory physiology, which contrasts with other occurrences such as asthma, pneumonia, lung cancer, and infectious diseases that can be caused or exacerbated by its use. However, due to the short term of observation of the effects, the safety of e-cigarettes could not be accurately determined, thus, the need for further longitudinal research is necessary, which could be used to help build evidence about the safety of e-cigarettes and also to create future regulation of the product.
Subject(s)
Animals , Mice , Rats , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/instrumentation , Lung Diseases , Pneumonia/complications , Asthma/complications , Tobacco Use Disorder/complications , Smoking , Disease , Lung Injury , Tobacco Use , Vaping , Smokers , E-Cigarette Vapor/adverse effects , Lung NeoplasmsABSTRACT
Objective: To describe the prevalence of e-cigarette use among adolescent in Zhejiang province, and to analyze its distribution of different genders and school types to provide evidence for controlling the use of e-cigarette among adolescent. Methods: A total of 7 663 students from 60 middle schools through stratified multi-stage cluster sampling methods from Zhejiang province were surveyed by using questionnaire. Indicators as tried to use e-cigarette rate, current e-cigarette using rate, and other indicators were collected. All data were weighted by age proportions of adolescent in Zhejiang. Results: The prevalence of tried to use and current using e-cigarettes among middle school students were 6.99% and 1.45%, respectively; and there were 4.19% juniors who were susceptibility to future e-cigarette use. The rate of tied to use e-cigarette, current using e-cigarette and susceptibility to future e-cigarette use were higher in boys than in girls. The rate of current using e-cigarette was 2.07% for rural and 0.48% for urban. Technical secondary school students had the highest rate of tried to use e-cigarette and susceptibility to future e-cigarette use (13.53%, 6.91%). Junior school students (2.96%) had the lowest level of susceptibility to future tobacco use. The rate of tried e-cigarette use and current e-cigarette use and susceptibility to future e-cigarette use were higher in the group of "One of students' parents was smoker" (8.63%, 2.19%, 5.23%). The highest rate of current smoking was found in the group of "Weekly allowance more than 50 Yuan" (10.02%, 2.54%, 6.29%). Compared to technical secondary school students, senior school student (OR=0.57) and junior school students (OR=0.45) were less likely to try to use e-cigarette. Students whose weekly allowance were less than 20 Yuan were less likely to try to use e-cigarette (OR=0.49). Students who were boys (OR=5.44) and one of their parents was smoker (OR=1.59) were more likely to try to use e-cigarette. Conclusions: There were middle school students with tried e-cigarette use and current e-cigarette use, especially in technical secondary schools. The prevalence of e-cigarette using among middle school students increased with age. It is important to further spread of e-cigarette knowledge widely and deeply, and reduce the susceptible population of adolescents using e-cigarettes.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Female , Humans , Male , China/epidemiology , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Prevalence , Schools , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tobacco Products , VapingABSTRACT
@#<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the prevalence of dysphonia, defined as any perceived voice pathology, in conventional cigarette smokers and e-cigarette users and to quantify and compare the Filipino Voice Handicap Index (VHI) scores of the two groups based on the mean scores for each of the three domains of this tool, as well as the mean total score for each group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study</p><p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary National University Hospital</p><p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Participants: </strong>52 adults between the ages 18-65 with no previously known laryngeal illness or condition were divided into 26 conventional smokers and 26 e-cigarette users and completed the self-administered Filipino Voice Handicap Index.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of impairment in the sample using a total VHI score cut-off of 18 was 17.31% (9 out of 52, CI 8.23-30.32%) and the prevalence of dysphonic symptoms in the sample was 86.54% (45 out of 52, CI 74.21-94.41%). There were no significant differences between smokers and e-cigarette users for impairment using this cut-off (z: -1.36, p: .07) and dysphonic symptoms (z: 0.4063, p: .68). The prevalence of moderate impairment was 3.85% (1 out of 26, CI: 0.10-19.64%) among those using e-cigarettes; and 1.92% (1 out of 52, CI: 0.04-10.26%) among the entire sample population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There appears to be no statistically significant difference between the Filipino VHI scores of conventional smokers and e-cigarette users. Further inquiry into the subject would benefit from a larger sample size, comparison with a control group, inclusion of other factors relevant to the development of dysphonia, and correlation with objective means for voice analysis.</p>
Subject(s)
Dysphonia , Smoking , Vaping , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Tobacco ProductsABSTRACT
La lesión pulmonar asociada al uso de cigarrillos electrónicos o vapeo (EVALI) es una enfermedad respiratoria aguda o subaguda que puede ser grave y potencialmente mortal. Vapear es el proceso de inhalar un aerosol creado al calentar una sustancia como la nicotina o el tetrahidrocannabinol (THC) con un dispositivo electrónico que funciona con baterías, como un cigarrillo electrónico. En el mundo se han descrito más de 2.000 casos, 2/3 hombres, entre los 13 y 75 años. A continuación, presentamos un caso de una paciente de 15 años, con antecedente de consumo de cigarrillo y cannabis vapeado, quien es llevada por sus padres a una institución de alta complejidad por un cuadro respiratorio agudo grave, descartando inicialmente infección por SARS-CoV-2, en quien finalmente se confirma una EVALI manifestada histológicamente como neumonía eosinofílica aguda.
Vaping or electronic cigarettes (E-cigarette vaping) can induce acute or subacute lung pulmonary which can be serious and potentially life-threatening. Vaping is the process by which a substance such as nicotine or tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), is heated creating aerosols that are inhaled using different devices such as E-cigarette that work on batteries. In the world, there are more than 2000 cases described of which two-thirds are males between the ages of 13 and 75 years of age. Here we present the case of a 15-year-old female patient, with prior use of cigarettes and vaping of cannabis, that is brought to the emergency room by her parents with acute respiratory complains during de COVID 19 pandemic and was finally diagnosed as acute eosinophilic pneumonia as a histological manifestation of EVALI.
Subject(s)
Humans , Vaping , Pulmonary Eosinophilia , Respiratory Tract Diseases , Lung Injury , Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsABSTRACT
Diversos estudios advierten de la relación a corto plazo entre el uso de los cigarrillos electrónicos y enfermedades pulmonares, cardiovasculares, además de su potencial adictivo. No existen estudios al respecto en estudiantes universitarios chilenos. MÉTODOS: Este estudio descriptivo transversal, mide la prevalencia de consumo, percepción de riesgo, motivaciones y actitudes del uso de cigarrillos electrónicos en estudiantes de Medicina, mediante un cuestionario online. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 354 sujetos, 32,9% han utilizado cigarrillos electrónicos alguna vez en la vida, 6,8% en el último año y 1,1% en el último mes. La edad media de inicio fue 18,0 ± 2,2 años. Respecto a las percepciones positivas hacia los cigarrillos electrónicos: 37,1% cree que ayudan a la gente a dejar de fumar; 39,7% que son menos peligrosos que los cigarrillos y 19,0% que son menos adictivos. El consumo de cigarrillos electrónicos alguna vez en la vida se asoció al consumo de tabaco y percepciones positivas hacia cigarrillos electrónicos (efectivo para dejar de fumar y menos adictivos que los cigarrillos). Las principales motivaciones al consumo fueron "simplemente porque sí", "porque me gusta el sabor", "me lo recomendó un amigo/familiar" y "porque me relaja". CONCLUSIÓN: Se sugiere prohibir la promoción de los cigarrillos electrónicos como una opción menos dañina y adictiva que el cigarrillo, tampoco como alternativa para dejar de fumar, puesto que la evidencia científica no es suficiente para respaldar tales afirmaciones. Este estudio puede contribuir a la prevención de consumo de cigarrillos electrónicos en poblaciones jóvenes.
INTRODUCTION: Several studies warn of the short-term relationship between the use of electronic cigarettes and lung and cardiovascular diseases, in addition to their addictive potential. There are no studies in this regard in Chilean university students. METHODS: This cross-sectional descriptive study measures the prevalence of consumption, risk perception, motivations and attitudes of e-cigarette use in medical students, using an online questionnaire. RESULTS: We analyzed 354 subjects, 32.9% have used electronic cigarettes once in their lives, 6.8% in the last year and 1.1% in the last month. The mean age of onset was 18.0 ± 2.2 years. Regarding positive perceptions towards e-cigarettes: 37.1% believe they help people quit smoking; 39.7% that they are less dangerous than cigarettes and 19.0% that they are less addictive. E-cigarette use was once in a lifetime associated with tobacco use and positive perceptions toward e-cigarettes (effective for quitting smoking and less addictive than cigarettes). The main motivations for consumption were "simply because I do", "because I like the taste", "it was recommended to me by a friend/family member" and "because it relaxes me". CONCLUSION: It is suggested to ban the promotion of e-cigarettes as a less harmful and addictive option than cigarettes, nor as an alternative to quitting smoking, since scientific evidence is not sufficient to support such claims. This study may contribute to the prevention of e-cigarette use in young populations.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Perception , Students, Medical/psychology , Smoking/epidemiology , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Risk , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Smoking Cessation , Vaping/epidemiology , MotivationABSTRACT
@#<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Objective.</strong> The study aims to determine the knowledge, attitudes and practices of Filipino adolescents aged 13-18 years old regarding cigarette smoking.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Methods.</strong> This is a descriptive cross-sectional study that utilized a questionnaire adapted from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Results.</strong> The prevalence among study participants who tried smoking (11.8%) and current users (3.6%) is lower than the global statistics and the country's reported prevalence, but started at a younger age (5.3% started smoking at 12-13 years old). Electronic cigarette (12.9%) is more commonly tried and used than conventional cigarettes (11.8%). Ninety five percent (95%) of the participants view smoking as harmful. Some (13.5%) do not know the effects of smoking, 1.1% consider it harmless, and 8.2% have no objections to starting to smoke someday. Most adolescents (49.1%) do not know the price of cigarettes, but 22% prefer to pay less than the actual price.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Conclusion.</strong> Adolescents are knowledgeable and have a negative attitude towards smoking. Regardless if they are non-smokers, tried smoking, or are currently smoking, they still need to be educated more regarding the effects and consequences of smoking.</p>
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Smoking , Tobacco Use , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , VapingABSTRACT
Resumo: O objetivo deste estudo foi estimar a prevalência de uso de dispositivos eletrônicos para fumar (DEF) e explorar o fluxo lógico esperado do potencial impacto dos DEF na iniciação de cigarro convencional. Foram utilizados dados da Vigilância de Fatores de Risco e Proteção para Doenças Crônicas por Inquérito Telefônico (Vigitel) de 2019, que entrevistou 52.443 indivíduos de 18 anos ou mais das 26 capitais brasileiras e do Distrito Federal. Foram calculados as prevalências pontuais e os intervalos de confiança (IC95%) de uso atual e na vida de DEF em cada capital brasileira, e avaliado o perfil dos usuários destes dispositivos. Estimou-se a prevalência de uso na vida em 6,7% (IC95%: 6,13-7,27) e uso atual em 2,32% (IC95%: 1,97-2,68). São 2,4 milhões de indivíduos que já usaram DEF e 835 mil que usam atualmente. Cerca de 80% das pessoas que já usaram DEF têm entre 18 e 34 anos. A prevalência de uso diário e uso dual entre jovens de 18 a 24 anos foi quase 10 vezes a prevalência nas faixas etárias superiores. Mais da metade dos indivíduos que usaram DEF na vida nunca fumaram. A proporção de mulheres e de indivíduos com escolaridade mais elevada foi maior no grupo de jovens que faz uso exclusivo de DEF do que entre os que usam cigarros convencionais exclusivamente. Também, usuários de dispositivos apresentaram maior consumo abusivo de álcool. Nossos achados vão em sentido oposto ao argumento da indústria do tabaco de que o público-alvo dos DEF são fumantes adultos. E, dado que grupos, a princípio, menos propícios ao uso de cigarros convencionais estão tendo sua iniciação com o DEF, os resultados alertam sobre o possível impacto negativo da disseminação dos dispositivos sobre a exitosa experiência do Brasil no combate ao tabagismo.
Abstract: The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and to explore the potential impact of ENDS use on smoking initiation with conventional cigarettes. We used data from the Risk and Protective Factors Surveillance System for Chronic Non-Comunicable Diseases Through Telephone Interview (Vigitel), 2019 edition, which interviewed 52,443 individuals 18 years or older in Brazil's 26 state capitals and the Federal District. Point prevalence rates and confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated for current and ever use of ENDS in each state capital, and the profile of ENDS users were described. Prevalence of lifetime use was estimated at 6.7% (95%CI: 6.13-7.27) and current use at 2.32% (95%CI: 1.97-2.68). A total of 2.4 million individuals had used ENDS any time in life, and 835,000 were currently using them. Approximately 80% of persons who had used ENDS were 18 to 34 years-old. Prevalence rates for daily use and dual use in individuals aged 18 to 24 years were nearly 10 times than prevalence in the older age groups. More than half of individuals who had ever used ENDS were never smokers. The proportion of women and individuals with high educational level were higher in the group of young people who only used ENDS than among those who only smoked conventional cigarettes. ENDS users also presented a higher proportion of binge drinking. Our findings are opposite to the tobacco industry's argument that the target public for ENDS is adult smokers. Considering that groups purportedly less prone to using conventional cigarettes are experiencing initiation with ENDS, our findings call attention to the possible negative impact of the dissemination of ENDS on Brazil's successful experience in the fight against tobacco.
Resumen: El objetivo de este estudio fue estimar la prevalencia del uso de dispositivos electrónicos para fumar (DEF) e investigar el flujo lógico esperado del potencial impacto de los DEF en la iniciación de para fumar cigarrillos convencionales. Se utilizaron datos de la Vigilancia de Factores de Riesgo y Protección para Enfermedades Crónicas No Transmisibles por Entrevista Telefónica (Vigitel) de 2019, que entrevistó a 52.443 individuos de 18 años o más de las 26 capitales brasileñas y el Distrito Federal. Se calcularon prevalencias puntuales e intervalos de confianza (IC95%) de consumo actual y en la vida de DEF en cada capital brasileña, y se evaluó el perfil de los usuarios de DEF. Se estimó una prevalencia de consumo en la vida de 6,7% (IC95%: 6,13-7,27) y consumo actual 2,32% (IC95%: 1,97-2,68). Son 2,4 millones de individuos que ya usaron DEF y 835 mil que lo usan actualmente. Cerca de un 80% de las personas que ya usó DEF tiene entre 18 y 34 años. La prevalencia de uso diario y uso dual entre jóvenes de 18 a 24 años fue casi 10 veces la prevalencia en las franjas etarias superiores. Más de la mitad de los individuos que usaron DEF en la vida nunca fumaron. La proporción de mujeres y de individuos de escolaridad más elevada es mayor en el grupo de jóvenes que usa exclusivamente DEF, que entre los que consumen cigarrillos convencionales exclusivamente. También, los usuarios de DEF presentaron un mayor consumo abusivo de alcohol. Nuestros resultados van en el sentido opuesto al argumento de la industria del tabaco de que el público-objetivo de los DEF son fumadores adultos. Y, dado que grupos, en un principio menos propicios al consumo de cigarrillos convencionales, están iniciándose con el DEF, los resultados alertan sobre el posible impacto negativo de la diseminación de los DEF sobre la exitosa experiencia de Brasil en el combate al tabaquismo.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Young Adult , Prevalence , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Vaping , Nicotiana , Tobacco Use Disorder , Brazil/epidemiology , Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemSubject(s)
Humans , Lung Injury , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Vaping , COVID-19 , Diagnosis, Differential , SARS-CoV-2Subject(s)
Nicotiana , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Control , Brazil , Vaping , Smoking Water PipesABSTRACT
Introducción: El consumo de Cigarrillos electrónicos (CE) ha aumentado considerablemente en los últimos años. Estos productos son ahora los más comúnmente utilizados por la juventud en diversos países del mundo y nuestro país no está exento de su utilización. En este contexto se ha realizado el presente estudio; cuyo objetivo fue conocer la frecuencia de uso de cigarrillo electrónico y otras características del consumo de CE en universitarios. Materiales y Métodos: Estudio observacional, descriptivo. Se procesaron datos de 1500 estudiantes de diferentes Unidades Académicas de la UNA que respondieron a la encuesta electrónica. Se determinaron variables demográficas como sexo y edad, particularidades sobre los CE relacionadas a la preferencia por determinado dispositivo, motivaciones para el consumo, simultaneidad de consumo de cigarrillo común, así como la percepción de riesgo con respecto al mismo y las molestias ocasionadas por vapear. La encuesta fue anónima y realizada entre los meses de junio y julio del año 2019 mediante la plataforma libre Google Form. Para el procesamiento de datos se utilizó la planilla Excel. Los estudiantes recibieron vía aplicación de mensajería instantánea un link para responder el cuestionario, el mismo fue distribuido por grupos de docentes y delegados de los cursos de cada unidad académica. Resultados: Respondieron a la encuesta un total de 1500 alumnos, 502 hombres (33,5%) y 998 mujeres (66,5%). El promedio de edad fue de 24 años (DE: ± 3.2), con edades comprendidas entre los 17 y 62 años. Al preguntar sobre el hábito de fumar o vapear los estudiantes respondieron: No fuma ninguno 1222 (81 %), consume cigarrillos electrónicos: 74(5 %), 146 (10%) consumen cigarrillo común y un total de 58(4%) consumen ambos productos. Considerando el total de consumidores de CE y aquellos que utilizan ambos (CE y Cigarrillo común), tenemos una frecuencia de 132 consumidores de CE (9%). Percepción de riesgo con respecto a cigarrillos comunes: Ningún riesgo 32 (24%), pequeño riesgo: 54 (41%), riesgo moderado: 34 (26%), alto riesgo: 9 (7%) e igual riesgo: 3 (2%). Entre las molestias más frecuentes: tos 27 (20%), irritación de garganta 20 (15%), dolor de cabeza 6 (5 %) y malestar general 4 (3%). Conclusión: El uso de CE se aproxima al consumo de cigarrillo común y los universitarios no son conscientes sobre los daños potenciales que confiere el uso de estos dispositivos. Para prevenir y reducir el uso de cigarrillos electrónicos por los jóvenes y los adultos jóvenes debemos poner en práctica estrategias de prevención efectivas.
Introduction: The consumption of Electronic Cigarettes (EC) has increased considerably in recent years. These products are now the most commonly used by youth in various countries of the world and our country is not exempt from their use. In this context, the present study has been carried out; whose objective was to know the frequency of use of electronic cigarettes and other characteristics of CE consumption in university students. Materials and methods: Observational, descriptive study. Data from 1500 students from different UNA Academic Units that responded to the electronic survey were processed. Demographic variables such as sex and age, peculiarities on EC related to the preference for a certain device, motivations for consumption, simultaneity of consumption of common cigarettes, as well as the perception of risk with respect to it and the discomfort caused by vaping were determined. The survey was anonymous and carried out between the months of June and July of the year 2019 through the free platform Google Forms. The Excel spreadsheet was used for data processing. The students received a link via instant messaging application to answer the questionnaire, it was distributed by groups of teachers and delegates of the courses of each academic unit. Results: A total of 1500 students answered the survey, 502 men (33.5%) and 998 women (66.5%). The average age was 24 years (SD: ±16), with ages between 17 and 62 years. When asked about the habit of smoking or vaping, the students answered: 1222 (81%) do not smoke, use electronic cigarettes: 74 (5%), 146 (10%) use a regular cigarette and a total of 58 (4%) use both products. Considering the total of EC consumers and those who use both (EC and Common Cigarette), we have a frequency of 132 EC consumers (9%). Perception of risk with respect to common cigarettes: No risk 32 (24%), small risk: 54 (41%), moderate risk: 34 (26%), high risk: 9 (7%) and equal risk: 3 (2 %). Among the most frequent complaints: cough 27 (20%), throat irritation 20 (15%), headache 6 (5%) and general discomfort 4 (3%). Conclusion: The use of EC is close to the consumption of common cigarettes and the university students are not aware of the potential damage that the use of these devices confers. To prevent and reduce the use of electronic cigarettes by youth and young adults, we must implement effective prevention strategies.
Subject(s)
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Surveys and Questionnaires , VapingABSTRACT
Ha habido mucha discusión sobre los efectos dañinos para la salud producidos por los cigarrillos electrónicos o vapeadores y su utilidad como ayuda para dejar de fumar. Cada vez aparecen más publicaciones con efectos deletéreos sobre la salud. Esta discusión se ha acentuado en los últimos años, por el importante aumento del uso de los vapeadores en todo el mundo, especialmente entre los adolescentes y adultos jóvenes. En septiembre de 2019 el Centro de Control y Prevención de Enfermedades (CDC) de los EE. UU. alertó sobre un importante número de casos de enfermedad pulmonar asociada al uso de cigarrillo electrónico (EVALI: e-cigarette or vaping associated lung injury). Epidemiológicamente se consideró un brote que al 17 de enero, 2020 ha presentado 2.668 pacientes hospitalizados, con 57 fallecidos. Durante la semana del 15 de septiembre 2019 ocurrió el 'peak' de hospitalizaciones por EVALI. La mayoría eran varones jóvenes. El 82% usó productos con Tetrahidrocanabinoides (THC) y el 14% productos con nicotina. En el lavado bronquio-alveolar de 51 casos de EVALI se encontró la presencia de acetato de Vitamina E, producto utilizado como espesante para la elaboración de productos de 'vapeo' que contienen THC, lo que lo hace un posible factor causal, pero no se puede descartar el papel de otros compuestos tóxicos. Las principales sociedades científicas del mundo y la OMS han advertido de los riesgos a largo plazo del uso de los cigarrillos electrónicos y recomiendan su control y regulación.
There has been a lot of discussion about the harmful health effects caused by electronic cigarettes or vapers and their usefulness as a smoking cessation aid. More and more publications appear with deleterious effects on health. This discussion has been straightened in recent years, due to the significant increase in the use of vapers worldwide, especially among adolescents and young adults. In September 2019, the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention warned of a significant number of cases of lung disease associated with the use of electronic cigarettes (EVALI: e-cigarette or vaping associated lung injury). Epidemiologically it was considered an outbreak that as of January 17, 2020 presented 2668 hospitalized patients, with 57 deaths. During the week of September 15, 2019 the peak of hospitalizations for EVALI occurred. The majority were young men. 82% of them used products with Tetrahydrocanabinoids (THC) and 14% products with nicotine. In the bronchoalveolar lavage of 51 cases of EVALI, the presence of Vitamin E acetate was found, a product used as a thickener for the elaboration of vaping products containing THC, which makes it a possible causal factor, but it cannot be ruled out the contribution of other toxic compounds. The world's leading scientific societies and World Health Organization have warned of the long-term risks of using electronic cigarettes and recommend their control and regulation.