ABSTRACT
El gluten y otras proteínas relacionadas del trigo, centeno y cebada, tienen propiedades antigénicas que pueden desencadenar reacciones adversas en individuos susceptibles. La enfermedad celíaca fue la primera patología en que se estableció relación causal con estas proteínas alimentarias. Recientemente se han descrito la alergia al trigo y la sensibilidad no celíaca al gluten. Si bien sus formas de presentación clínica y su relación con la ingesta pueden ser similares, sus mecanismos patogénicos, forma de diagnóstico y tratamiento difieren. Dado que su prevalencia en conjunto es relativamente alta, resulta necesario que los médicos de atención primaria y pediatras se familiaricen con estas patologías, sepan cómo diferenciarlas y enfrentarlas. El objetivo de esta revisión es comparar los principales aspectos de epidemiología, fisiopatología, diagnóstico y tratamiento de estas 3 condiciones.
Gluten and other related proteins of the wheat, rye and barley, have antigenic properties that may trigger adverse reactions in susceptible individuals. Celiac disease was the first pathology with clear causal association related to the intake of these proteins. Recently, wheat allergy and non celiac gluten sensitivity have been described. Although, clinical presentation and its relation with protein ingestion may be similar and elicit confusion, their pathogenic mechanism, diagnosis and treatment are quite different. Since the prevalence of these diseases is relatively high as a whole, it is essential that these become familiar to primary care doctors and general pediatricians, thus they will know how to differentiate and face them. The aim of this review is to compare the main aspects of epidemiology, pathofisiology, diagnosis and treatment of these 3 conditions.
Subject(s)
Humans , Celiac Disease/diagnosis , Celiac Disease/diet therapy , Celiac Disease/physiopathology , Celiac Disease/epidemiology , Wheat Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Glutens/adverse effects , Prognosis , Chile/epidemiology , Global Health , Wheat Hypersensitivity/diet therapy , Wheat Hypersensitivity/physiopathology , Wheat Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Diet, Gluten-FreeABSTRACT
Specific IgE to gliadin was proposed as a marker for wheat dependent exercise induced anaphylaxis, while Tri a 14 was found to induce IgE response in baker's asthma. We evaluated whether these components could be used for discriminating phenotypes of wheat allergy. Twenty-nine patients who were wheat-induced anaphylaxis and/or urticaria (n=21, group I) and baker's asthma (n=8, group II) were enrolled. The prevalence of serum specific IgE to Tri a 14 was higher in group II (25%) than in group I (4.8%), while the serum specific IgE to gliadin was significantly higher in group I (70%) than in group II (12.5%). The cutoff value for predicting the baker's asthma using the ratio of serum specific IgE to Tri a 14 to gliadin was 742.8 optical densityx1,000/(kU/L) with high sensitivity and specificity. These findings suggest that Tri a 14/gliadin may be a potential marker for predicting baker's asthma.