AMPA, not NMDA, activates RhoA GTPases and subsequetly phosphorylates moesin

Glutamate induced rapid phosphorylation of moesin, one of ERM family proteins involved in the ligation of membrane to actin cytoskeleton, in rat hippocampal cells (JBC, 277:16576-16584, 2002). However, the identity of glutamate receptor has not been explored. Here we show that a-amino- 3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor is responsible for glutamate-induced RhoA activation and phosphorylation of moesin. Glutamate induced phosphorylation at Thr-558 of moesin was still detectible upon chelation of Ca(2+), suggesting involvement of AMPA receptor instead of N-methyl D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor in this phosphorylation of moesin. AMPA but not NMDA- induced moesin phosphorylation was independent of Ca(2+). Both AMPA and NMDA but not Kainate induced moesin phosphorylation at similar levels. However, the kinetics of phosphorylation varied greatly between AMPA and NMDA where AMPA treatment rapidly increased phosphomoesin, which reached a maximum at 10 min after treatment and returned to a basal level at 30 min. In contrast, NMDA-induced phosphorylation of moesin reached a maximum at 30 min after treatment and was remained at higher levels at 60 min. A possible involvement of RhoA and its downstream effector, Rho kinase in the AMPA receptor-triggered phosphorylation of moesin was also explored. The kinetics for the glutamate- induced membrane translocation of RhoA was similar to that of moesin phosphorylation induced by AMPA. Moreover, Y-27632, a specific Rho kinase inhibitor, completely blocked AMPA-induced moesin phosphorylation but had no effect on NMDA-induced moesin phosphorylation. These results suggest that glutamate-induced phosphorylation of moesin may be mediated through the AMPA receptor/RhoA/Rho kinase pathway.

Spinal Gabapentin and Antinociception: Mechanisms of Action

Spinal gabapentin has been known to show the antinociceptive effect. Although several assumptions have been suggested, mechanisms of action of gabapentin have not been clearly established. The present study was undertaken to examine the action mechanisms of gabapentin at the spinal level. Male SD rats were prepared for intrathecal catheterization. The effect of gabapentin was assessed in the formalin test. After pretreatment with many classes of drugs, changes of effect of gabapentin were examined. General behaviors were also observed. Intrathecal gabapentin produced a suppression of the phase 2 flinching, but not phase 1 in the formalin test. The antinociceptive action of intrathecal gabapentin was reversed by intrathecal NMDA, AMPA, D-serine, CGS 15943, atropine, and naloxone. No antagonism was seen following administration of bicuculline, saclofen, prazosin, yohimbine, mecamylamine, L-leucine, dihydroergocristine, or thapsigargin. Taken together, intrathecal gabapentin attenuated only the facilitated state. At the spinal level, NMDA receptor, AMPA receptor, nonstrychnine site of NMDA receptor, adenosine receptor, muscarinic receptor, and opioid receptor may be involved in the antinociception of gabapentin, but GABA receptor, L-amino acid transporter, adrenergic receptor, nicotinic receptor, serotonin receptor, or calcium may not be involved.