Manejo dos eventos adversos do dupilumabe na dermatite atópica e no prurigo nodular / Management of the adverse effects of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis and prurigo nodularis

A dermatite atópica (DA) e o prurigo nodular (PN) são doenças inflamatórias da pele que cursam com lesões variadas, como eczemas, pápulas e nódulos, acompanhados de intenso prurido e, nos casos graves, de importante prejuízo da qualidade de vida para os pacientes e seus familiares. O dupilumabe está aprovado no Brasil para o manejo das duas condições: DA moderada/grave e PN que não responde aos tratamentos tópicos. A eficácia e segurança do dupilumabe foram amplamente estabelecidas para ambas as condições em ensaios clínicos e estudos de vida real. Este artigo tem como objetivo revisar os principais eventos adversos (EAD) associados ao uso do dupilumabe em DA e PN, e auxiliar no seu manejo. Desde o início do uso da medicação, há alguns anos, os principais EAD reportados foram: a reação no local da injeção, a doença da superfície ocular (conjuntivite não infecciosa, blefarite, olhos secos), a eosinofilia e o eritema de face/pescoço. Outras manifestações também foram observadas em pacientes com DA em uso de dupilumabe, mas sem associação comprovada: psoríase, artralgia e alopecia areata. Apesar de muito infrequentemente levarem à suspensão do dupilumabe, é fundamental que os médicos prescritores deste medicamento para estas condições, dermatologistas e imunoalergistas, saibam detectar e manejar seus possíveis eventos adversos.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) and prurigo nodularis (PN) are inflammatory skin diseases characterized by various lesions such as eczema, papules, and nodules, with marked pruritus and, in severe cases, significant impairment of quality of life for patients and their families. Dupilumab is approved in Brazil for the management of both moderate/severe AD and PN that does not respond to topical treatments. The efficacy and safety of dupilumab have been extensively established for both conditions in clinical trials and real-world studies.This article aims to review the main adverse events (AEs) associated with the use of dupilumab in AD and PN and assist in their management. Since the introduction of dupilumab a few years ago, the main reported AEs have been injection site reactions, ocular surface disease (non-infectious conjunctivitis, blepharitis, dry eyes), eosinophilia, and facial/neck erythema. Other manifestations have also been observed in patients with AD on dupilumab, but without proven association: psoriasis, arthralgia, and alopecia areata. Although AEs very infrequently lead to discontinuation of dupilumab, it is crucial that physicians prescribing it for these conditions, dermatologists, and immunologists know how to detect and manage its possible adverse effects.

Efficacy and safety of CM310 in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

BACKGROUND@#Atopic dermatitis (AD) affects approximately 10% of adults worldwide. CM310 is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-4 receptor alpha that blocks interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signaling. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CM310 in Chinese adults with moderate-to-severe AD.@*METHODS@#This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial was conducted in 21 medical institutions in China from February to November 2021. Totally 120 eligible patients were enrolled and randomized (1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous injections of 300 mg CM310, 150 mg CM310, or placebo every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, followed by an 8-week follow-up period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving ≥75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) score from baseline at week 16. Safety and pharmacodynamics were also studied.@*RESULTS@#At week 16, the proportion of EASI-75 responders from baseline was significantly higher in the CM310 groups (70% [28/40] for high-dose and 65% [26/40] for low-dose) than that in the placebo group (20%[8/40]). The differences in EASI-75 response rate were 50% (high vs . placebo, 95% CI 31%-69%) and 45% (low vs . placebo, 95% CI 26%-64%), with both P values <0.0001. CM310 at both doses also significantly improved the EASI score, Investigator's Global Assessment score, daily peak pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, AD-affected body surface area, and Dermatology Life Quality Index compared with placebo. CM310 treatment reduced levels of thymus and activation-regulated chemokine, total immunoglobulin E, lactate dehydrogenase, and blood eosinophils. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar among all three groups, with the most common TEAEs reported being upper respiratory tract infection, atopic dermatitis, hyperlipidemia, and hyperuricemia. No severe adverse events were deemed to be attributed to CM310.@*CONCLUSION@#CM310 at 150 mg and 300 mg every 2 weeks demonstrated significant efficacy and was well-tolerated in adults with moderate-to-severe AD.

Eficacia del nimotuzumab según índices inflamatorios en pacientes con cáncer de pulmón no microcítico avanzado / Efficacy of nimotuzumab according to inflammatory indices in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Introducción: La respuesta a las terapias en el cáncer de pulmón avanzado pudiera estar relacionada con determinados factores pronósticos como los índices inflamatorios. Objetivo: Evaluar la eficacia del anticuerpo monoclonal humanizado nimotuzumab en pacientes portadores de cáncer de pulmón no microcítico avanzado según índices inflamatorios. Método: Se realizó un estudio de evaluación longitudinal retrospectivo, en un universo de 498 pacientes mayores de 18 años, con diagnóstico citohistológico de cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas, en estadios avanzados, después de la primera línea de terapia oncológica, incluidos en ensayos clínicos multicéntricos promovidos por el Centro de Inmunología Molecular desde 2002 a 2018. Se aplicó la estadística descriptiva, se utilizó el software x-tile 3.6.1 para el test de Kaplan Meier; se consideraron diferencias significativas cuando p< 0,05. Resultados: En los pacientes analizados el nimotuzumab mostró beneficio terapéutico en el grupo de pacientes no progresores a la primera línea de tratamiento con quimioterapia o quimiorradioterapia, cuando tenían menor índice de neutrófilos/linfocitos (p= 0,017 y p= 0,027) y menor índice de plaquetas/linfocitos (p= 0,030 y p= 0,009). Conclusión: La selección de un paciente con menor índice inflamatorio beneficia la eficacia del tratamiento con el AcM humanizado nimotuzumab en el cáncer de pulmón avanzado no microcítico, la que se convierte en una herramienta predictiva de la respuesta al tratamiento(AU)

Introduction: The response to therapies in advanced lung cancer could be related to certain prognostic factors such as inflammatory indices. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the humanized monoclonal antibody nimotuzumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer according to inflammatory indices. Method: A retrospective longitudinal evaluation study was carried out in a universe of 498 patients older than 18 years, with a cytohistological diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer, in advanced stages, after the first line of oncological therapy, including in multicenter clinical trials promoted by the Center for Molecular Immunology from 2002 to 2018. Descriptive statistics were applied, the x-tile 3.6.1 software was used for the Kaplan Meier test, significant differences were considered when p< 0,05. Results: In the patients analyzed, nimotuzumab showed therapeutic benefit in the group of patients who did not progress to the first line of treatment with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, when they had a lower neutrophil-lymphocyte index (p= 0,017 and p= 0,027) and a lower platelet-lymphocyte index (p= 0,030 and p= 0,009). Conclusion: Selecting a patient with a lower inflammatory index benefits the efficacy of treatment with the humanized mAb nimotuzumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, which becomes a predictive tool for response to treatment(AU)

Cetoacidosis diabética como debut de diabetes mellitus inmunomediada en paciente en tratamiento con inhibidores de checkpoint / Diabetic ketoacidosis as debut of immune-mediated diabetes mellitus in a patient in treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Los inhibidores de checkpoint (ICP) son anticuerpos usados en inmunoterapia contra el cáncer. Uno de sus blancos de acción es el receptor de muerte celular programada-1 (PD-1), el cual es importante para mantener la tolerancia inmunitaria. Sin embargo, este mecanismo se asocia a riesgo de eventos adversos relacionados a la inmunidad que pueden afectar a múltiples órganos incluyendo el sistema endocrino. Se describe el caso inhabitual de un paciente que a los 18 meses de terapia con ICP debutó con cetoacidosis diabética (CAD).

Immune checkpoint inhibitors consist in antibodies used in immunotherapy against cancer. One of their targets is the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) receptor, which is important in maintaining self-tolerance. However, this mechanism is associated with a risk for immune-related adverse events potentially affecting multiple organs, including the endocrine system. We describe the unusual case of a patient who, after 18 months of treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, debuted with diabetic ketoacidosis

Dupilumabe e upadacitinibe comparados a medicamentos imunossupressores para o tratamento de dermatite atópica moderada a grave refratária a terapia tópica: revisão rápida de evidências / Dupilumab and upadacitinib compared to immunosuppressive drugs for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis refractory to topical therapy: rapid review of evidence

Tecnologia: Dupilumabe e upadacitinibe. Comparadores: Azatioprina, metotrexato, ciclosporina, micofenolato de mofetila. Indicação: Tratamento de dermatite atópica severa em pacientes adultos. Pergunta: Dupilumabe e upadacitinibe são mais eficazes e tão seguros quanto ciclosporina ou outros agentes imunossupressores para obter os desfechos de saúde no tratamento sistêmico de dermatite atópica moderada a grave refratária à terapia atópica? Métodos: Levantamento bibliográfico foi realizado na base de dados PUBMED e Cochrane Library, seguindo estratégias de buscas predefinidas. Foi feita avaliação da qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas com a ferramenta AMSTAR2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Version 2). Resultados: Foram selecionados três estudos que atenderam aos critérios de inclusão. Conclusão: Dupilumabe, upadacitinibe, ciclosporina e azatioprina são mais eficazes que placebo nos desfechos de eficácia (reduzir sinais clínicos em escalas, reduzir sintomas em escalas) para tratamento da dermatite atópica moderada a grave refratária à terapia tópica, mas esses medicamentos não diferem entre si. Dupilumabe, upadacitinibe, ciclosporina e azatioprina são bem tolerados e seguros

Technology: Dupilumab, upadacitinibe. Comparators: Azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil. Indication: Treatment of severe atopic dermatitis in adult patients. Question: Are dupilumab and upadacitinib more effective and as safe as cyclosporine or other immunosuppressive agents for achieving health outcomes in the systemic treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis refractory to atopic therapy? Methods: A bibliographic survey was done in the PUBMED e Cochrane Library databases, following predefined search strategies. The methodological quality of systematic reviews was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 tool (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Version 2). Results: Three studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. Conclusion: Dupilumab, upadacitinib, cyclosporine, and azathioprine are more effective than placebo on efficacy endpoints (reduce clinical signs on scales, reduce symptoms on scales) for treating moderate to severe atopic dermatitis refractory to topical therapy, but these drugs do not differ from each other. Dupilumab, upadacitinib, cyclosporine, and azathioprine are well tolerated and safe

Adverse drug events, comorbidities, and older age are statistically more prevalent in COVID-19 hospitalized patients treated with remdesivir than tocilizumab in a private hospital from southern Brazil

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic spread rapidly with more than 670 million cases and 6.8 million deaths. Since the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, the purpose of treating the disease has become a priority. To date, there is no consensus on the best pharmacological therapy. The objective of the present study was to compare two pharmacological therapies, evaluating the adverse drug events, one on the label (remdesivir) and another off-label (tocilizumab) used to treat patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in a private hospital in southern Brazil. Methods: The study analyzed data from hospital records of 124 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (n = 80 treated with tocilizumab and n = 34 with remdesivir), confirmed by RT-PCR, between 2020 and 2021. Poisson regression models with prevalence ratio (PR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were applied to confirm the association between dependent variables and with treatment used. Results: Patients treated with remdesivir were older than those treated with tocilizumab (median 70.0 vs 61.0; p = 0.02). Adverse drug effects were more frequent in patients treated with remdesivir (35.3%) than tocilizumab (3.8%) (p<0.01). Comorbidities ≥ 3 were 58.8% in the remdesivir group and 25.0% in the tocilizumab (p= 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, patients treated with remdesivir had a higher prevalence of advanced age (PR: 1.58; 95%CI: 1.11­3.05), adverse reaction (PR: 13.21; 95%CI: 3.74­54.96), mechanical ventilation (PR: 5.60; 95%CI: 1.51­11.20), comorbidities ≥ 3 (PR: .11; 95%CI: 1.76­10.56), hypertension (PR: 2.47; 95%CI: 1.08­5.98), cardiac disease (PR: 3.15; 95%CI: 1.35­7.75), dyslipidemia (PR: 3.83; 95%CI: 1.15­13.55), cancer (PR: 3.81; 95%CI: 1.33­13.21) and kidney disease (PR: 4.21; 95%CI: 1.02­19.66). Conclusion: Remdesivir-treated patients had more adverse events, were older, and had more comorbidities than tocilizumab-treated patients.

Response characteristics of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer / 中华肿瘤杂志

Objective: To investigate the response characteristics of patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC) treated with tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy in the first line. Methods: Patients with nsq-NSCLC who achieved complete or partial remission after treatment with tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone in the RATIONALE 304 study, as assessed by an independent review board, were selected to analyze the response characteristics and safety profile of the responders. Time to response (TTR) was defined as the time from randomization to the achievement of first objective response. Depth of response (DpR) was defined as the maximum percentage of tumor shrinkage compared with the sum of the baseline target lesion length diameters. Results: As of January 23, 2020, 128 patients treated with tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy achieved objective tumor response (responders), representing 57.4%(128/223) of the intention-to-treat population, with a TTR of 5.1 to 33.3 weeks and a median TTR of 7.9 weeks. Of the responders (128), 50.8%(65) achieved first remission at the first efficacy assessment (week 6), 31.3%(40) at the second efficacy assessment (week 12), and 18.0%(23) at the third and subsequent tumor assessments. The percentages of responders who achieved a depth of tumor response of 30% to <50%, 50% to <70% and 70% to 100% were 45.3%(58/128), 28.1%(36/128) and 26.6%(34/128), respectively, with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.0 months (95% CI: 7.7 to 9.9 months), 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.7 months to not reached) and not reached (95% CI: 11.8 months to not estimable), respectively. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy were generally well tolerated in responders with similar safety profile to the overall safety population. Conclusion: Among responders to tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy for nsq-NSCLC, 82.0%(105/128) achieves response within the first two tumor assessments (12 weeks) and 18.0%(23/128) achieves response at later (18 to 33 weeks) assessments, and there is a trend toward prolonged PFS in responders with deeper tumor response.

A phase I study of subcutaneous envafolimab (KN035) monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors / 中华肿瘤杂志

Objective: To evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of envafolimab monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This open-label, multicenter phase I trial included dose escalation and dose expansion phases. In the dose escalation phase, patients received subcutaneous 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0 or 10.0 mg/kg envafolimab once weekly (QW) following a modified "3+ 3" design. The dose expansion phase was performed in the 2.5 mg/kg and 5.0 mg/kg (QW) dose cohorts. Results: At November 25, 2019, a total of 287 patients received envafolimab treatment. During the dose escalation phase, no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) was observed. In all dose cohorts, drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for all grades occurred in 75.3% of patients, and grade 3 or 4 occurred in 20.6% of patients. The incidence of immune-related adverse reactions (irAE) was 24.0% for all grades, the most common irAEs (≥2%) included hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, immune-associated hepatitis and rash. The incidence of injection site reactions was low (3.8%), all of which were grades 1-2. Among the 216 efficacy evaluable patients, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 11.6% and 43.1%, respectively. Median duration of response was 49.1 weeks (95% CI: 24.0, 49.3). Pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure to envafolimab is proportional to dose and median time to maximum plasma concentration is 72-120 hours based on the PK results from the dose escalation phase of the study. Conclusion: Subcutaneous envafolimab has a favorable safety and promising preliminary anti-tumor activity in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors.

A phase I study of subcutaneous envafolimab (KN035) monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors / 中华肿瘤杂志

Objective: To evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of envafolimab monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This open-label, multicenter phase I trial included dose escalation and dose expansion phases. In the dose escalation phase, patients received subcutaneous 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0 or 10.0 mg/kg envafolimab once weekly (QW) following a modified "3+ 3" design. The dose expansion phase was performed in the 2.5 mg/kg and 5.0 mg/kg (QW) dose cohorts. Results: At November 25, 2019, a total of 287 patients received envafolimab treatment. During the dose escalation phase, no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) was observed. In all dose cohorts, drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for all grades occurred in 75.3% of patients, and grade 3 or 4 occurred in 20.6% of patients. The incidence of immune-related adverse reactions (irAE) was 24.0% for all grades, the most common irAEs (≥2%) included hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, immune-associated hepatitis and rash. The incidence of injection site reactions was low (3.8%), all of which were grades 1-2. Among the 216 efficacy evaluable patients, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 11.6% and 43.1%, respectively. Median duration of response was 49.1 weeks (95% CI: 24.0, 49.3). Pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure to envafolimab is proportional to dose and median time to maximum plasma concentration is 72-120 hours based on the PK results from the dose escalation phase of the study. Conclusion: Subcutaneous envafolimab has a favorable safety and promising preliminary anti-tumor activity in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors.

Immune Thrombocytopenia Induced by Sintilimab in Lung Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review / 中国肺癌杂志

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show unique advantages in the treatment of lung cancer, making the treatment of lung cancer enter the era of immunotherapy, but ICIs will also have adverse reactions, and the incidence of immune-induced hematological toxicity is not very high. Immunotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare adverse event.We report one case of thrombocytopenia induced by ICIs and review the literature on thrombocytopenia associated with ICIs and discuss the clinical features, possible mechanisms, and optimal treatment. 
.

Dupilumab for Treatment of Food-Dependent, Exercise-Induced Anaphylaxis: Report of One Case / 中国医学科学杂志(英文版)

Food-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) is a potentially life-threatening disorder that often occurs with exercise, and patients typically have eaten a specific food within hours before disease onset. This disease is exceedingly rare, with a prevalence of 0.02%. No well-recognized prevention or treatment strategy has been available for FDEIA except avoiding triggers strictly. Here we report an 11-year-old boy with a history of recurrent anaphylaxis of unknown etiology more than 10 times within two years. As the anaphylactic symptoms had not been controlled after traditional treatments, the patient was given subcutaneous injection of dupilumab seven times within 33 weeks. During dupilumab treatments, the patient was exposed to culprit mushrooms plus exercises at least twice a month but without notable anaphylaxis. Thus, Dupilumab may improve the allergic reactions in FDEIA patients.

Eculizumab, a successful treatment for atypical postpartum hemolytic-uremic syndrome: a case report / Eculizumab, un tratamiento exitoso en el síndrome hemolítico-urémico atípico puerperal: un caso clínico

Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare entity characterized by the association of acute kidney failure, thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia due to the dysregulation of the alternative pathway of the complement system. It is included within the thrombotic microangiopathies. The following aHUS was developed in the immediate puerperium in the context of severe preeclampsia. The patient was a primiparous woman of 30+1 weeks who required hospitalization for anticonvulsant and hypotensive treatment, and who underwent an emergency cesarean section due to a pathological cardiotocographic pattern. 36 hours after delivery, the patient presented with sudden dyspnea and cognitive deterioration, progressing in a few hours to renal and multiorgan failure. Blood test showed severe anemia, thrombopenia and hypertransaminemia. In view of the fast evolution and severity, it was decided to treat with Eculizumab, although the scientific evidence was very poor. Aside from the supportive treatment performed in the Intensive Care Unit, the patient was successfully treated with Eculizumab, with favorable evolution over the following months and restoration of kidney function, although need for chronic hypotensive treatment remained.

El síndrome hemolítico-urémico atípico (SHUa) es una entidad rara caracterizada por la asociación de insuficiencia renal aguda, trombocitopenia y anemia hemolítica microangiopática debido a la desregulación de la vía alternativa del sistema del complemento. Se incluye dentro de las microangiopatías trombóticas. Se presenta un SHUa que se desarrolló en el puerperio inmediato en el contexto de una preeclampsia grave. La paciente era una primípara de 30+1 semanas que requirió hospitalización para tratamiento anticonvulsivo e hipotensor, y a la que se le practicó una cesárea de urgencia por un patrón cardiotocográfico patológico. A las 36 horas del parto, la paciente presentó una disnea súbita y un deterioro cognitivo progresivo, que evolucionó en pocas horas a un fallo renal agudo y multiorgánico. La analítica mostró anemia severa, trombopenia e hipertransaminemia. Ante la rápida evolución y gravedad, se decidió tratar con Eculizumab, aunque la evidencia científica era escasa. Aparte del tratamiento de soporte realizado en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, la paciente fue tratada con éxito con Eculizumab, con evolución favorable en los meses siguientes y restablecimiento de la función renal, aunque se mantuvo la necesidad de tratamiento hipotensor crónico.

Uso de anticuerpos monoclonales en adultos con COVID-19 en un hospital público de Honduras / Use of monoclonal antibodies in adults with COVID-19 in a public hospital of Honduras

Antecedentes: La pandemia de COVID-19 ha provocado una crisis de salud pública mundial, creando incertidumbre sobre su tratamiento. El Tocilizumab (TCZ), un anticuerpo monoclonal humanizado que actúa como antagonista del receptor de Interleucina 6 (IL-6), ha sido utilizado en enfermedades inmunológicas y en pacientes críticos por COVID-19. Objetivo: Describir el uso de TCZ en pacientes adultos hospitalizados por COVID-19 en Hospital María Especialidades Pediátricas (HMEP), agosto 2020-marzo 2021. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo. Fuente de datos: expedientes clínicos. Criterios de inclusión: Adulto mayor de 18 años, manejo hospitalario por COVID-19, con TCZ y expediente clínico completo. Criterios de exclusión: Haber recibido TCZ en otro hospital. Se utilizó estadística descriptiva y se realizó análisis de sobrevida de Kaplan & Meier para comparar las probabilidades de sobrevida según edad, con un nivel se significancia p<0.05. Resultados: Se analizaron 104 expedientes clínicos. La mediana de edad de los pacientes fue 57 años (RI=44-67), la edad fue mayor en los pacientes fallecidos; 60% (62/104) del sexo masculino. Los pacientes mostraron mejoría en parámetros clínicos y laboratoriales, como descensos en frecuencia respiratoria y frecuencia cardíaca, aumento de linfocitos y descenso de Proteína C Reactiva (PCR). El análisis de sobrevida de Kaplan & Meier mostró que la probabilidad de vivir en estos pacientes disminuye conforme aumenta la edad. Discusión: Los resultados de este estudio coinciden con los encontrados a nivel internacional, avalando el uso de TCZ en pacientes críticos por COVID-19...(AU)

Diretrizes brasileiras de angioedema hereditário 2022 ­ Parte 2: terapêutica / 2022 Brazilian guidelines for hereditary angioedema ­ Part 2: therapy

O tratamento do angioedema hereditário tem início com a educação dos pacientes e familiares sobre a doença, pois é fundamental o conhecimento da imprevisibilidade das crises, assim como os seus fatores desencadeantes. O tratamento medicamentoso se divide em terapia das crises e profilaxia das manifestações clínicas. As crises devem ser tratadas o mais precocemente possível com o uso do antagonista do receptor de bradicinina, o icatibanto ou o concentrado de C1-inibidor. É necessário estabeler um plano de ação em caso de crises para todos os pacientes. A profilaxia de longo prazo dos sintomas deve ser realizada preferencialmente com medicamentos de primeira linha, como concentrado do C1-inibidor ou o anticorpo monoclonal anti-calicreína, lanadelumabe. Como segunda linha de tratamento temos os andrógenos atenuados. Na profilaxia de curto prazo, antes de procedimentos que podem desencadear crises, o uso do concentrado de C1-inibidor é preconizado. Existem algumas restrições para uso desses tratamentos em crianças e gestantes que devem ser consideradas. Novos medicamentos baseados nos avanços do conhecimento da fisiopatologia do angioedema hereditário estão em desenvolvimento, devendo melhorar a qualidade de vida dos pacientes. O uso de ferramentas padronizadas para monitorização da qualidade de vida, do controle e da atividade da doença são fundamentais no acompanhamento destes pacientes. A criação de associações de pacientes e familiares de pacientes com angioedema hereditário tem desempenhado um papel muito importante no cuidado destes pacientes no nosso país.

The treatment of hereditary angioedema begins with the education of patients and their families about the disease, as it is essential to know the unpredictability of attacks as well as their triggering factors. Drug treatment is divided into attack therapy and prophylaxis of clinical manifestations. Attacks should be treated as early as possible with the bradykinin receptor antagonist icatibant or C1-inhibitor concentrate. An action plan needs to be established for all patients with attacks. Long-term prophylaxis of symptoms should preferably be performed with first-line drugs such as C1-inhibitor concentrate or the anti-kallikrein monoclonal antibody lanadelumab. Attenuated androgens are the second line of treatment. In short-term prophylaxis, before procedures that can trigger attacks, the use of C1-inhibitor concentrate is recommended. There are some restrictions for the use of these treatments in children and pregnant women that should be considered. New drugs based on advances in knowledge of the pathophysiology of hereditary angioedema are under development and are expected to improve patient quality of life. The use of standardized tools for monitoring quality of life and controlling disease activity is essential in the follow-up of these patients. The creation of associations of patients and families of patients with hereditary angioedema has played a very important role in the care of these patients in Brazil.

Dupilumabe no tratamento de rinossinusite crônica com pólipo nasal em adolescente / Dupilumab in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in adolescents

O uso do anticorpo monoclonal dupilumabe em adultos tem possibilitado o controle da inflamação crônica, reduzindo significativamente o tamanho e a recorrência de novos pólipos, melhorando os sintomas nasais e, consequentemente, a qualidade de vida desses indivíduos. Relatamos o caso de uma adolescente que evidencia a eficácia de dupilumabe no tratamento da rinossinusite crônica com pólipo nasal.

The use of the monoclonal antibody dupilumab in adults has allowed the control of chronic inflammation, significantly reducing the size and recurrence of new polyps, improving nasal symptoms, and, consequently, quality of life. We report a successful case of dupilumab use in an adolescent for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Guía práctica de seguimiento y manejo del paciente con asma grave tratado con biológicos / Practical guide for the follow-up and management of patients with severe asthma treated with biologics

El manejo del asma grave descontrolada con biológicos es un área de extrema dificultad, dada la escasez de información respecto a los criterios de inicio de los mismos, las variables a evaluar para determinar la eficacia y seguridad de su manejo, los puntos de corte para determinar el momento oportuno para cambiar o agregar otro biológico y el proceso para disminuir o retirar los esteroides. Esta revisión incorpora la información más reciente y realiza una propuesta con base en ella.

The management of severe uncontrolled asthma with biologics is an area of extreme difficulty given the scarcity of information regarding their starting criteria, the variables to be evaluated to determine the efficacy and safety of their management, the cut-off points to determine the timing to change or add another biological and the process to decrease or withdraw steroids. This review incorporates the latest information and makes a proposal based on it

Tocilizumab en pacientes COVID-19: evaluación del perfil de seguridad en una indicación off label / Surveillance of adverse effects of Tocilizumab for COVID-19

BAKCGROUND: Tocilizumab (TCZ) is a new therapeutic alternative for severe cases of COVID-19 pneumonia. AIM: To evaluate the cumulative incidence (CI) of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADR) from TCZ in adult patients with COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An active pharmacological surveillance protocol was carried out in patients older than 18 years old, who received at least one dose of TCZ between May and August 2020 at a clinical hospital. Non-infectious ADRs were categorized according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and the development of infection was classified as present or absent. Causality and preventability of ADRs were determined with the Naranjo Algorithm and the modified Schumock & Thornton criteria, respectively. RESULTS: The CI of ADRs caused by TCZ was 69.6% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 63.5-76.6). A rise in alanine and aspartate aminotransferases and the development of infections were the most frequent adverse events. Seventy-four percent were considered mild in severity. Sixty two percent of suspected non-infectious ADRs were classified as probable and all the infectious events as Possible. Of the ADRs observed, 33% were preventable. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of ADRs after the use of TCZ is frequent, of mild severity, and in one third of the cases, preventable. We suggest monitoring blood count, liver function tests and ruling out infection prior to TCZ administration.