Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 251
Filter
1.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 44(2): 126-130, 2024. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1564731

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the relapse rate after discontinuation of biological therapy in patients with Crohn's disease treated at the University Hospital. Methods: This is a series of 9 cases of CD patients who used long-term immunobiologicals. Non-randomized sample, followed for 1 year, prospectively. Results: Nine patients were studied, 8 females, with an average age of 43.8 years, and non-smokers. The average time of use of the immunobiological for suspension was 6.77 years, with 66.66% of them having been in use for more than 5 years. The mean initial CDAI was 25. After 6 months of follow-up, CRP was less than 10 mg/L in 88.8% of them. Only 3 patients measured the Calprotectin, low. (10, 15 and 30 mcg/g). The ESR averaged 15.77 mm/h. In 66.6% of those studied, the 6-month colonoscopy was normal - mayo 0. In the 1-year follow-up, 3 patients underwent CT, normal. At 1-year colonoscopy of 3 patients, there was endoscopic recurrence in 2. The mean CDAI after the first year was 38.11. The mean ESR was 17.11 mm/h. The worst outcomes occurred in 2 (20%) patients, both Montreal A3L3B2, with clinical and endoscopic recurrence. The same previous immunobiological was reintroduced, with excellent clinical response. Conclusion: Individualized analysis of the course of the disease proves to be the best way for adequate clinical monitoring during its use, optimization of the therapeutic regimen, and the possibility of interruption. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Crohn Disease/therapy , Recurrence , Biological Therapy
2.
Rev. chil. infectol ; 40(6): 618-625, dic. 2023. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1529991

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: La seroprevalencia del SARS-CoV-2 en las enfermedades inflamatorias inmunomediadas (IMID) sigue siendo fuente de controversia. OBJETIVO: Comparar la seroprevalencia de anticuerpos (Ac) anti SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con IMID en tratamientos con fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad biológicos (FAMEb) o sintéticos dirigidos (FAMEsd) frente a un grupo de personas sin IMID. MÉTODOS: Estudio de pacientes con IMID y tratamientos con FAMEb y FAMEsd y de individuos sin IMID. Mediante la técnica de inmunoensayo por quimioluminiscencia indirecta, se determinaron las serologías IgG frente al SARS-CoV-2 entre octubre/2020 y mayo/2021. RESULTADOS: Se estudiaron 1.100 sujetos, 550 pacientes con IMID y 550 personas sin IMID. Se observó una seroprevalencia de 16% (88/550) en los pacientes frente a 19,3% (106/550) en el grupo de personas sin IMID, sin significación estadística (OR 0,790 [IC 95% 0,558-1,118]). Comparando los tratamientos con FAMEb o FAMEsd, se observó una tendencia a una menor seroprevalencia con rituximab, en relación con los individuos sin IMID (OR 0,296 [IC 95% 0,0871,007]). Asimismo, se encontró menor seroprevalencia en los pacientes que además de su FAMEb recibían tratamiento con metotrexato, en comparación con el grupo de personas sin IMID (OR 0,432 [IC 95% 0,223-0,835]). CONCLUSIONES: Las IMID en tratamiento con FAMEb o FAMEsd no influyen en la seroprevalencia frente al SARS-CoV-2 de los pacientes. El tratamiento concomitante con metotrexato disminuye de forma significativa la seroprevalencia en estos pacientes.


BACKGROUND: The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in immunemediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) remains controversial. AIM: To compare the seroprevalence of antibodies (Ab) to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with IMID receiving treatment with biological diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) or targeted synthetic (tsDMARD) versus a group of people without IMID. METHODS: Study of patients with IMID and treatments with bDMARD and tsDMARD and individuals without IMID. IgG serology against SARS-CoV-2 was measured using the two-step sandwich immunoassay technique by indirect chemiluminescence between October 2020 and May 2021. RESULTS: A total of 1100 subjects were studied, 550 patients with IMID and 550 persons without IMID. A seroprevalence of 16% (88/550) was observed in patients versus 19.3% (106/550) in the group of people without IMID, without statistical significance (OR 0.790 [95% CI 0.558-1.118]). Comparing the treatments with bD- MARD or tsDMARD, there was a tendency to lower seroprevalence with rituximab, in relation to individuals without IMID (OR 0.296 [95% CI 0.087-1.007]). In addition, lower seroprevalence was found in patients who received methotrexate treatment in addition to their bDMARD, compared to the group of individuals without IMID (OR 0.432 [95% CI 0.223-0.835]). CONCLUSIONS: IMIDs in treatment with bDMARDs or tsDMARDs do not influence the seroprevalence against SARS-CoV-2 in patients. Concomitant treatment with methotrexate significantly decreased seroprevalence in these patients.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Immune System Diseases/immunology , Immune System Diseases/drug therapy , Immune System Diseases/epidemiology , Biological Therapy , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals , COVID-19/immunology
3.
Rev. argent. reumatolg. (En línea) ; 34(1): 3-15, ene. 2023. tab
Article in Spanish | BINACIS, LILACS | ID: biblio-1449435

ABSTRACT

Introducción: conocer la seguridad de las drogas actualmente disponibles para el tratamiento de las enfermedades reumáticas es muy importante al momento de tomar decisiones terapéuticas objetivas e individualizadas en la consulta médica diaria. Asimismo, datos de la vida real amplían el conocimiento revelado por los ensayos clínicos. Objetivos: describir los eventos adversos (EA) reportados, estimar su frecuencia e identificar los factores relacionados con su desarrollo. Materiales y métodos: se utilizaron datos BIOBADASAR, un registro voluntario y prospectivo de seguimiento de EA de tratamientos biológicos y sintéticos dirigidos en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas inmunomediadas. Los pacientes son seguidos hasta la muerte, pérdida de seguimiento o retiro del consentimiento informado. Para este análisis se extrajeron datos recopilados hasta el 31 de enero de 2023. Resultados: se incluyó un total de 6253 pacientes, los cuales aportaron 9533 ciclos de tratamiento, incluyendo 3647 (38,3%) ciclos sin drogas modificadoras de la enfermedad biológicas y sintéticas dirigidas (DME-b/sd) y 5886 (61,7%) con DME-b/sd. Dentro de estos últimos, los más utilizados fueron los inhibidores de TNF y abatacept. Se reportaron 5890 EA en un total de 2701 tratamientos (844 y 1857 sin y con DME-b/sd, respectivamente), con una incidencia de 53,9 eventos cada 1000 pacientes/año (IC 95% 51,9-55,9). La misma fue mayor en los ciclos con DME-b/sd (71,1 eventos cada 1000 pacientes/año, IC 95% 70,7-77,5 versus 33,7, IC 95% 31,5-36,1; p<0,001). Las infecciones, particularmente las de la vía aérea superior, fueron los EA más frecuentes en ambos grupos. El 10,9% fue serio y el 1,1% provocó la muerte del paciente. El 18,7% de los ciclos con DME-b/sd fue discontinuado a causa de un EA significativamente mayor a lo reportado en el otro grupo (11,5%; p<0,001). En el análisis ajustado, las DME-b/sd se asociaron a mayor riesgo de presentar al menos un EA (HR 1,82, IC 95% 1,64-1,96). De igual manera, la mayor edad, el mayor tiempo de evolución, el antecedente de enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica, el diagnóstico de lupus eritematoso sistémico y el uso de corticoides se asociaron a mayor riesgo de EA. Conclusiones: la incidencia de EA fue significativamente superior durante los ciclos de tratamientos que incluían DME-b/sd.


Introduction: knowing the efficacy and safety of the drugs currently available for the treatment of rheumatic diseases is very important when making objective and individualized therapeutic decisions in daily medical consultation. Likewise, real-life data extends the knowledge revealed by clinical trials. Objectives: to describe the reported adverse events (AEs), estimate their frequency and identify factors associated to them. Materials and methods: BIOBADASAR data were used, which is a voluntary, prospective follow-up registry of AEs of biological and synthetic treatments in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. Patients are followed until death, loss of followup, or withdrawal of informed consent. To carry out this analysis, the data collected up to January 31, 2023 was extracted. Results: a total of 6253 patients were included, who contributed with 9533 treatment periods, including 3647 (38.3%) periods without b/ts-DMARDs and 5886 (61.7%) with b/ts-DMARDs. Among the latter, the most used were TNF inhibitors and abatacept. A total of 5890 AEs were reported in a total of 2701 treatments (844 and 1857 without and with b/ts-DMARDs, respectively), with an incidence of 53.9 events per 1000 patients/ year (95% CI 51.9-55.9). It was higher during the periods with b/ts-DMARDs (71.1 events per 1000 patients/year, 95% CI 70.7-77.5 vs 33.7, 95% CI 31.5-36.1, p<0.001). Infections, particularly those of the upper respiratory tract, were the most frequent AEs in both groups. 10.9% were severe and 1.1% were associated with the death of the patient. 18.7% of the periods with b/ts-DMARDs were discontinued due to an AE, significantly higher than that reported in the other group (11.5%; p<0.001). In the adjusted analysis, b/ts-DMARDs were associated with a higher risk of presenting at least one AE (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.64-1.96). Similarly, older age, longer evolution time, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus, and use of corticosteroids were associated with a higher risk of AE. Conclusions: the incidence of AEs was significantly higher during those treatment periods that included DME-b/sd.


Subject(s)
Biological Therapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Synthetic Drugs
4.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 43(1): 43-48, Jan.-Mar. 2023.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1430691

ABSTRACT

Perianal fistula is a common complication of Crohn disease, and it is a great burden on the life and psychology of patients, but its treatment is still a difficult problem to face. In recent years, progress in the treatment of Crohn disease has progressed rapidly due to the advent of biological agents, but there has been a lack of research on perianal fistula in Crohn disease, and the direction of research has been scattered; therefore, the author reviews the traditional treatment of perianal fistula in Crohn disease in the context of the available literature and discusses emerging and potential therapeutic approaches. (AU)


Subject(s)
Crohn Disease/complications , Rectal Fistula/surgery , Rectal Fistula/etiology , Oxygen/therapeutic use , Biological Therapy , Rectal Fistula/drug therapy , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use
5.
Rev. Hosp. Ital. B. Aires (2004) ; 42(4): 231-239, dic. 2022. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, UNISALUD, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1424871

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: Un nuevo brote de coronavirus surgió en 2019 en Wuhan, China, causando conmoción en el sistema sanitario de todo el mundo; el Comité Internacional de Taxonomía de Virus lo denominó SARS-CoV-2, agente causante de la enfermedad COVID-19.El espectro de gravedad de la enfermedad es muy amplio: la mayoría de los pacientes no presentan gravedad, pero otros pueden desarrollar neumonías, y la insuficiencia respiratoria aguda es la causa más frecuente de mortalidad. Objetivo: analizar y desarrollar las distintas alternativas terapéuticas aportadas por la Biotecnología para tratar los síntomas de aquellos pacientes con COVID-19. Metodología: se realizó una revisión de la bibliografía disponible, a partir de enero de 2020 en PubMed, acerca de los tratamientos que se encuentran aún en ensayos clínicos y aquellos que cuentan con aprobación bajo uso de emergencia para la enfermedad COVID-19. También se realizaron búsquedas a través de Google y Google Académico para publicaciones de organismos de Salud en referencia a políticas de salud establecidas para la terapéutica durante dicha pandemia. Resultados: este trabajo aborda las nuevas alternativas terapéuticas para COVID-19 derivadas de la Biotecnología, que se encuentran tanto en uso como en etapas de ensayos clínicos comprendidos dentro del segmento de los biofármacos y las bioterapias. Se incluye un breve resumen del estatus regulatorio de entidades de salud, el mecanismo de acción de dichas terapias y características generales de cada uno. Se incluyen novedosas bioterapias que se empezaron a implementar para afrontar la pandemia. Conclusiones: la pandemia de coronavirus está poniendo a prueba el sistema sanitario internacional, para brindar soluciones tanto desde el diagnóstico y prevención como para el tratamiento de la población a fin de disminuir la mortalidad. Esto incluyó, obviamente también, al área de la Biotecnología aplicada a la salud, que ha aportado en los tres aspectos mencionados; el presente trabajo se centra en las respuestas de tipo terapéutico que ha brindado y que están comercializadas o en fases clínicas. (AU)


INTRODUCTION: A new coronavirus outbreak emerged in 2019 in Wuhan, China, causing a shock to the healthcare system around the world; the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses named it SARS-CoV- 2, the infectious agent of the COVID-19 disease. The spectrum of severity of the disease is very wide, most patients are not serious, but others can develop pneumonia, with acute respiratory failure being the most frequent cause of mortality. Objective: to analyze and develop the different therapeutic alternatives provided by Biotechnology dedicated to Health, to treat the symptoms of those COVID-19 patients who require it, and thus reduce mortality.Methodology: a review of the available literature from January 2020 in PubMed of the treatments that are still in clinical trials and those that have been approved under emergency use for the disease COVID-19 was performed. Searches were also carried out through Google and Google Scholar for publications of Health organizations in reference to health policies established for therapeutics during the mentioned pandemic. Results: this work addresses the new therapeutic alternatives derived from Biotechnology, which are both in use and in stages of clinical trials, to treat patients who developed COVID-19 included within the segment of biopharmaceuticals and biotherapies. A brief summary of the regulatory status of health entities, the mechanism of action of said therapies and general characteristics of each one is included. Innovative biotherapies that began to be implemented to face the pandemic are included. Conclusions: The coronavirus pandemic has driven the international health system to the test, to provide solutions both from the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of the population to reduce the mortality of patients. This obviously also included the area of Biotechnology applied to health, which has contributed in the three aspects mentioned. The present work focuses on the therapeutic responses that it has provided and that are commercialized or in clinical phases. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Animals , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Biological Therapy/methods , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , COVID-19/drug therapy , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Biological Therapy/classification , Biological Therapy/standards , Biotechnology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/drug effects , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2/drug effects , Immunomodulating Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Serotherapy , Horses , Immune Sera/biosynthesis , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use
6.
Rev. colomb. reumatol ; 29(4)oct.-dic. 2022.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1536196

ABSTRACT

Systemic sclerosis is an autoimmune disease whose etiology remains unknown. Some patients prove refractory and require other therapies. Recently, the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) for the treatment of disease refractory to conventional treatments has been considered. We present a case of refractory systemic sclerosis; Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cell was given in response. Decrease in perioral wrinkles, reduced telangiectasia and decrease in modified Rodnan skin score were observed two years later. A decrease in brain natriuretic peptide and improved pulmonary function were also found. And improvement of pulmonary fibrosis on high resolution tomography and capillaroscopy changes. In conclusion, MSC infusion seems to be effective and safe treatment of refractory scleroderma


La esclerosis sistémica es una enfermedad autoinmune de etiología desconocida y difícil manejo. Algunos casos que se tornan refractarios requieren terapias alternativas, como las células madre mesenquimales (MSC). Presentamos un caso de esclerosis sistémica refractaria que se llevó a terapia con MSC de gelatina de Wharton. Tras dos años, se observó ∗ Corresponding disminución en arrugas peribucales, aumento en apertura bucal, reducción de telangiectasias y en Rodnan modificado. También hubo disminución del péptido natriurético cerebral y mejora de pruebas de función pulmonar desde los seis meses de seguimiento, con mejoría en fibrosis pulmonar en tomografía de alta resolución y cambios en la capilaroscopia. En conclusión, el tratamiento con infusión de MSC parece efectivo y seguro en esclerosis sistémica refractaria.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Respiratory Tract Diseases , Scleroderma, Localized , Therapeutics , Biological Therapy , Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases , Cell Transplantation , Connective Tissue Diseases , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Hypertension, Pulmonary , Lung Diseases
7.
Biomédica (Bogotá) ; 42(2): 218-223, ene.-jun. 2022. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1403575

ABSTRACT

Introducción. Se han descrito múltiples efectos adversos con el uso de la terapia biológica para enfermedades autoinmunitarias, muchos de ellos secundarios al estado de inmunosupresión, como las infecciones bacterianas, fúngicas o virales. Caso clínico. Se presenta el caso de una mujer de 64 años con diagnóstico comprobado de criptococosis diseminada secundaria al uso de tofacitinib. Se descartaron otras causas de inmunosupresión, como infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (HIV). Tres años antes se le había diagnosticado artritis reumatoide y se encontraba en tratamiento farmacológico con un agente biológico que inhibe las enzimas JAK. Se han descrito muy pocos casos de criptococosis pulmonar y meníngea en este tipo de pacientes. Conclusión. Este reporte de caso es útil para que otros médicos tratantes tengan presente la posibilidad de este tipo de infección fúngica invasora asociada con la terapia biológica y el enfoque de gestión de riesgo.


Introduction: Multiple adverse effects have been described for the biological therapy in autoimmune diseases including many secondary to immunosuppression producing bacterial, fungal, or viral infections. Clinical case: We present the case of a 64-year-old female patient with proven disseminated cryptococcosis secondary to the use of tofacitinib. Other possible causes of immunosuppression such as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were ruled out. The patient had been in treatment for rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed three years before. This drug is a biological agent that inhibits JAK enzymes. Very few cases of pulmonary and meningeal cryptococcosis in this type of patient have been described in the literature. Conclusion: This case report should be useful for other clinicians to bear in mind the possibility of this type of invasive fungal infection associated with biological therapy and to take a risk-management approach.


Subject(s)
Cryptococcosis , Biological Therapy , Cryptococcus neoformans , Medication Errors
8.
Int. j. high dilution res ; 21(2): 18-18, May 6, 2022.
Article in English | LILACS, HomeoIndex | ID: biblio-1396735

ABSTRACT

Hyperadrenocorticism is a common endocrinopathy in dogs, associated to an excessive production or administration of cortisol.Aims:Report the evolution of homeopathic treatment in spontaneous hyperadrenocorticism analyzing with basal and post-acth stimulation cortisol values of a yorkshire male dog with 10 years old, diagnosed from the suppression test with low dose of dexamethasone and stimulation with ACTH, as well as complementary tests.Methodology: Homeopathic treatment was chosen, based on the principle of similitude usingIgnatia amarabecause the patient presents repertorized mental symptoms such as separation anxiety syndrome, docility, annoyances and jealousy and also because it is efficient and less harmful. It was associated to cortisol biotherapy to inhibit cortisol production and adrenal biotherapy to control the response of excess of the cortisol producted by the gland. The exposed information is consented by the tutor.Results:The dog was in convencional treatment with trilostane but didn't response to the therapy, showing 5,41 µg/dL of basal result and 11,8 µg/dL of post-acth result and the symptoms were worst on 12/12/2021, presenting lethargic, panting, more evident alopecia and severe muscle weakness which the patient unable to stand. Therefore, the protocol was recommended for 3 months, included 3 globules ofIgnatia amara30cH orally, every 12 hours, 3 globules of cortisol biotherapy 30 cH and also of adrenal biotherapy 6 cH every 24 hours. On 03/28/2022 the basal and post-acth stimulation results was 3,71 µg/dL e 5,79 µg/dL respectively and the patient was more active, the skin was better and even with difficulty it was movingand having more independence.Conclusion: Homeopathic treatment with high dilution was effective, keeping the indices with the recommended range of post acth between 2.0 and 5.0, confirming an adequate therapeutic monitoring and symptomatic improvement.


Subject(s)
Dogs , Biological Therapy , Hydrocortisone/analysis , Adrenocortical Hyperfunction/therapy , Homeopathy
9.
Medicina (Ribeirao Preto, Online) ; 55(2)abr. 2022. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1402303

ABSTRACT

Objective: this study evaluated the biological therapy effects on disease activity, functionality, quality of life, drug survival, and safety of patients with psoriatic arthritis naïve and experienced in biological therapy. Methods: a one-year prospective observational study was performed. The outcomes assessed were drug survival, disease activity, functionality, quality of life, and safety. Multiple linear regression was used to assess predictive factors for clinical re-sponse. Results: a total of 205 patients were included, 155 of whom were biologic naïve and 50 biologic experienced. Drug survival rate was greater for naïve patients than experienced patients at 6 months, but not at 12 months. Drug survival rates were 71.5% for naïve patients and 70.0% for experienced patients at 12 months. All clinical parameters improved for both biologic naïve and experienced patients. At 12 months, 63% of naïve patients and 52% of expe-rienced patients had an improvement in their quality of life. Besides, 48% of naïve patients and 42% of experienced patients had an improvement in functionality. The axial disease improved in 67% of naïve individuals and 56% of experienced patients. Good control of peripheral disease was achieved by 49% of naïve patients and 44% of experi-enced patients. Female sex, use of etanercept or infliximab, and lower functionality or quality of life at baseline were the main predictors of poor clinical response. Conclusion: Patients' health improved after starting biological therapy. In general, biologic experienced patients had more adverse reactions and lesser effectiveness (AU)


Objetivo: avaliar os efeitos da terapia biológica sobre a atividade da doença, funcionalidade, qualidade de vida, per-sistência no tratamento e segurança em pacientes com artrite psoriásica sem experiência e com experiência prévia em terapia biológica. Métodos: um estudo observacional prospectivo de um ano foi realizado. Os desfechos avaliados foram a persistência no tratamento, atividade da doença, funcionalidade, qualidade de vida e segurança. Um modelo de regressão linear múltipla foi utilizado para avaliar os fatores preditores de resposta clínica. Resultados: foram incluídos 205 pacientes, dos quais 155 não tinham e 50 tinham experiência prévia com medicamentos biológicos. As taxas de persistência no tratamento foram maiores para pacientes sem experiência prévia em comparação aos experientes em seis meses de acompanhamento, mas não em 12 meses. As taxas de persistência no tratamento foram 71,5% em pa-cientes sem experiência prévia e 70% em pacientes com experiência prévia em 12 meses. Todos os desfechos clínicos avaliados melhoraram em ambos os grupos de pacientes. Aos 12 meses, 63% dos pacientes sem experiência prévia e 52% dos pacientes com experiência prévia apresentaram melhora na qualidade de vida. Além disso, 48% dos pacientes sem experiência prévia e 42% dos pacientes com experiência prévia apresentaram melhora na funcionalidade. A do-ença axial melhorou em 67% dos pacientes sem experiência prévia e em 56% dos pacientes com experiência prévia. Um bom controle da doença articular periférica foi observado em 49% dos pacientes sem experiência prévia e em 44% dos pacientes com experiência prévia. Os principais fatores preditores de pior resposta clínica foram sexo feminino, uso de etanercepte ou infliximabe, bem como pior funcionalidade e qualidade de vida no início do estudo. Conclusão:a saúde dos pacientes melhorou após o início do tratamento com os medicamentos biológicos. Em geral, pacientes com experiência prévia com medicamentos biológicos apresentaram mais reações adversas e menor efetividade (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Quality of Life , Biological Therapy , Arthritis, Psoriatic/therapy , Evaluation of Results of Therapeutic Interventions , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
10.
Rev. Méd. Inst. Mex. Seguro Soc ; 60(2): 201-210, abr. 2022. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1367344

ABSTRACT

El manejo del asma grave descontrolada con biológicos es un área de extrema dificultad, dada la escasez de información respecto a los criterios de inicio de los mismos, las variables a evaluar para determinar la eficacia y seguridad de su manejo, los puntos de corte para determinar el momento oportuno para cambiar o agregar otro biológico y el proceso para disminuir o retirar los esteroides. Esta revisión incorpora la información más reciente y realiza una propuesta con base en ella.


The management of severe uncontrolled asthma with biologics is an area of extreme difficulty given the scarcity of information regarding their starting criteria, the variables to be evaluated to determine the efficacy and safety of their management, the cut-off points to determine the timing to change or add another biological and the process to decrease or withdraw steroids. This review incorporates the latest information and makes a proposal based on it


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Asthma/drug therapy , Biological Therapy , Asthma/immunology , Biomarkers/blood , Follow-Up Studies , Treatment Outcome , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
12.
Med. lab ; 26(1): 63-80, 2022. Grafs, Tabs
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1370955

ABSTRACT

Las reacciones a medicamentos han aumentado con el tiempo, estas implican ahora una carga importante de enfermedad, principalmente en los servicios de hospitalización. Los agentes quimioterapéuticos y biológicos son fármacos utilizados con frecuencia en enfermedades reumatológicas y neoplasias de diferente orden. Las reacciones de hipersensibilidad a quimioterapéuticos y monoclonales impactan en la calidad de vida, el pronóstico y la mortalidad de los pacientes con enfermedades autoinmunes y cáncer, es por eso que deben ser reconocidas y manejadas por un equipo de trabajo multidisciplinar. La desensibilización es una herramienta terapéutica que ofrece grandes beneficios a los pacientes con reacciones de hipersensibilidad, permitiéndoles la utilización de medicamentos de primera línea de manera segura y costoefectiva, con un impacto importante en la morbilidad y mortalidad de estos pacientes. El objetivo de este artículo fue revisar la información y evidencia más reciente sobre las reacciones de hipersensibilidad a quimioterapéuticos y biológicos, y los datos sobre las opciones de desensibilización con estos medicamentos y su desenlace


Drug reactions have increased over time, they now imply a significant burden of disease mainly in hospital services. Chemotherapeutic and biological agents are drugs frequently used in different rheumatological diseases and neoplasms. Hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic and monoclonal drugs impact the quality of life, prognosis and mortality of patients with autoimmune diseases and cancer, that is why they must be recognized and managed by a multidisciplinary team. Desensitization is a therapeutic tool that offers great benefits to patients with hypersensitivity reactions, allowing them to use first-line drugs in a safe and cost-effective manner, with a significant impact on patient morbidity and mortality. The objective of this article was to review the most recent information and evidence on hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutics and biologics, and data on desensitization options with these drugs and their outcome


Subject(s)
Humans , Drug Hypersensitivity , Biological Therapy , Desensitization, Immunologic , Hypersensitivity , Antineoplastic Agents
13.
Neumol. pediátr. (En línea) ; 17(3): 92-96, 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1418569

ABSTRACT

En los últimos años, ha habido un aumento sostenido del uso de terapias inmunomoduladoras como las terapias biológicas y en un período más reciente, de las terapias con moléculas pequeñas. Estos tratamientos constituyen un factor de riesgo más para enfermar de tuberculosis en adultos y aunque en menor grado, también en niños, especialmente con el uso de anti TNF-α, por lo que antes de iniciar una terapia biológica, hay que descartar la tuberculosis activa y la latente. En el tratamiento de una tuberculosis activa producida por un biológico se debe prolongar la etapa de continuación a 9 meses. Es importante el seguimiento clínico prolongado en años de quienes usan o han completado el uso de estas terapias. Hay que posponer la vacunación BCG en los hijos de madres que usaron terapias biológicas durante la gestación hasta la edad 6 a 12 meses de los niños. El foco de esta revisión está centrado en la tuberculosis por progresión de una forma latente a una activa o por un contacto estrecho con una persona con tuberculosis pulmonar en pacientes que reciben terapias biológicas anti TNF alfa de uso inmunoreumatológico.


In recent years, there has been a sustained increase in the use of immunomodulatory therapies such as biologic therapies and, more recently, small molecule therapies. Those therapies have become another risk factor for tuberculosis in adults and, although to lesser degree, also in children, especially some of them, such as anti-TNF α. Before starting biological therapy, active tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis must be ruled out. In the treatment of active tuberculosis caused by a biologic, the continuation stage should be extended to 9 months. Long-term clinical follow-up in years of those who use them or have completed their use, is important. BCG vaccine should be postponed in children of mother who used biologic therapies during pregnancy until the children ́s age 6 to 12 months. The focus of this review is centered on tuberculosis due to progression from a latent to an active form or due to close contact with a person with pulmonary tuberculosis in patients receiving anti-TNF alpha biological therapies for immunorheumatology use.


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Adult , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/chemically induced , Biological Therapy/adverse effects , Tuberculosis/complications , Tuberculin Test , Latent Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Interferon-gamma Release Tests , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immunomodulating Agents/adverse effects
14.
Rev. colomb. cancerol ; 25(4): 180-187, oct.-dic. 2021. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1388941

ABSTRACT

Resumen Objetivo: Aplicar la técnica de anticuerpos monoclonales para HER2/neu (human epidermal growth 2/neuro glioblastoma), en tumores de indígenas nativos de Perú con diagnóstico de cáncer de mama, así como correlacionar la sobreexpresión molecular con la sobrevida global. Pacientes y Métodos: Estudio experimental, prospectivo y analítico. Se evaluaron 23 muestras biológicas de tumores de pacientes indígenas andinos de Arequipa, con diagnóstico definitivo de adenocarcinoma de mama. La expresión del receptor HER2/neu se determinó mediante inmunohistoquímica con anticuerpos monoclonales. Resultados: El 43,4% (10 casos) fueron positivos para sobreexpresión del receptor. Los casos negativos fueron 56,6%. La supervivencia global de las pacientes a los 3 años fue 69,9% cuando los tumores tenían HER2/neu sobreexpresados y 84,6% para los negativos, mostrando diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p=0,017). Conclusiones: La técnica de inmunohistoquímica en tumores mamarios de indígenas andinos puede aplicarse siguiendo los protocolos mundiales. Así mismo, hubo correlación entre la sobreexpresión del receptor HER2/neu con menor sobrevida global. El principal beneficio de esta técnica es justificar el uso de terapia biológica con anticuerpos monoclonales, según el perfil molecular, en población nativa de Arequipa, en un hospital cercano a su residencia.


Abstract Objective: To apply the monoclonal antibody technique for HER2/neu, in tumors of indigenous natives of Peru with breast cancer, as well as to correlate molecular overexpression with global survival. Patients and methods: Experimental, prospective and analytical study. 23 biological samples of tumors from indigenous Andean patients from Arequipa, with a definitive diagnosis of breast adenocarcinoma, were evaluated. HER2/neu expression was determined by immunohistochemistry with monoclonal antibodies. Results: 43.4% (10 cases) were positive for receptor overexpression. The negative cases were 56.6%. The overall survival of the patients at 3 years was 69.9% when the tumors had overexpressed HER2/neu and 84.6% for the negative ones, showing a statistically significant difference (p = 0.017) Conclusions: The immunohistochemical technique in Andean indigenous mammary tumors can be applied following world protocols. Likewise, there was a correlation between the overexpression of the HER2 / neu receptor with lower overall survival. The main benefit of this technique is to justify the use of biological therapy with monoclonal antibodies, according to the molecular profile, in the native population of Arequipa, in a hospital near their residence.


Subject(s)
Female , Breast Neoplasms , Immunohistochemistry , Indigenous Peoples , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Biological Therapy , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Survivorship
15.
Rev. cuba. reumatol ; 23(3)dic. 2021.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1409171

ABSTRACT

resumen está disponible en el texto completo


Introduction: The development of recommendations for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the Cuban context may be one of the ways to achieve better control of this disease. Objective: To reach a consensus and update relevant aspects of conventional and biological RA modifier therapy in Cuba. Methods: 18 specialists from 8 Cuban provinces, experts in RA care, were summoned, according to the years of dedication to the specialty, the conferences on this topic and their publications. The first meeting took place in March 2016 in the provincial hospital of Villa Clara, Cuba, with the participation of all the experts. A review of the literature on conventional and biological therapy previously collected by the participants was developed, and two teams were formed: the first would address everything related to conventional therapy in RA (HRCT) and the other, biological therapy in RA (TBAR). Three questionnaires related to the use of corticosteroids, HRCT and TBAR, were prepared, answered by the participants via email. In a second meeting, held in October 2016 in Havana, the analysis of all the responses provided was carried out. Questions with a response of 90% or more votes were considered as recommendations. Results: The questionnaires were answered by 95% of the participants. 9 recommendations and 1 algorithm were established. The recommendations are as follows: methotrexate is the drug of choice in the treatment of RA after diagnosis; The administration of another conventional drug (DMARDc) (azathioprine, salazosulfapyridine, antimalarials and leflunomide) is recommended in patients with a diagnosis of active RA in whom methotrexate is contraindicated or there is a failure in response - consider the administration of low doses of prednisone or equivalent (<7.5 mg/d) associated with DMARDc in patients with active moderate to severe RA, for the shortest possible time; perform serological control including tests for hepatitis B and C viruses and screening for HIV in all patients diagnosed with RA before starting treatment with DMARDc and biologics; in patients in remission or, at least, with a DAS-28 below 3.2, consideration should be given to withdrawing one of the DMARDs or reducing, to the minimum possible expression, the dose of both disease modifiers; if methotrexate fails, tocilizumab in combination with methotrexate or as monotherapy will be indicated. Conclusions: Aspects related to conventional therapy with methotrexate, azathioprine, salazosulfapyridine, antimalarials and leflunomide were agreed. The value of early diagnosis and immediate initiation of DMARDc therapy and the use of glucocorticoids was analyzed. Treatment with tocilizumab, the only biological available in Cuba against RA, will be administered when there is a failure in the response to conventional therapy and combinations between these drugs. It is recommended to hold educational conferences through the mass media aimed at patientshttp(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Biological Therapy/methods , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/therapy
16.
Biomédica (Bogotá) ; 41(3): 472-480, jul.-set. 2021. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1345397

ABSTRACT

Resumen Introducción. La artritis reumatoide es una enfermedad autoinmunitaria, crónica y deformante asociada con discapacidad. Quienes la padecen reciben inmunosupresores y tienen un gran riesgo de desarrollar tuberculosis. La prueba de intradermorreacción a la tuberculina se utiliza como tamización en quienes van a recibir terapia biológica. Objetivo. Evaluar la frecuencia de positividad en la prueba de intradermorreacción a la tuberculina en una cohorte de pacientes con artritis reumatoide. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio descriptivo de corte transversal de una cohorte de pacientes con artritis reumatoide a quienes se les practicó la prueba de tuberculina antes de iniciar la terapia biológica o en el momento del cambio de tratamiento. Los pacientes presentaban enfermedad moderada o grave y eran candidatos para iniciar o cambiar de terapia biológica. Se definió el valor de ≥6 mm como punto de corte para la positividad de la prueba y se hizo un análisis descriptivo de cada una de las variables. Resultados. Se incluyeron 261 pacientes con artritis reumatoide, 92 % de ellos eran mujeres, la edad promedio fue de 55 años (desviación estándar, DE=13,92) y el tiempo desde el diagnóstico era de 12,3 años (DE=8,54). La frecuencia de positividad de la prueba fue de 15,71 % (n=41). Nueve de los 41 pacientes positivos habían recibido la prueba previamente (entre 1 y 6 años antes), todos con resultado negativo; 18 (43,9 %) de ellos venían recibiendo tratamiento con glucocorticoides y todos los 41 (100 %) recibían metotrexate. Conclusiones. La frecuencia de positividad de la prueba de tuberculina en pacientes colombianos con artritis reumatoide fue de aproximadamente 16 %. Se recomienda optimizar las estrategias para detectar esta condición y darle un tratamiento oportuno y, así, disminuir el riesgo de reactivación de la tuberculosis.


Abstract Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune, chronic, and deforming condition associated with disability. Patients are immunosuppressed and at high risk of developing tuberculosis. The tuberculin skin test is used to screen candidates for biological therapy. Objective: To evaluate the frequency of positivity of the tuberculin skin test in a cohort of Colombian patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Materials and methods: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study including patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving the tuberculin skin test prior to the start or at the time of the change of biological therapy. The patients' condition was moderate or severe and they were candidates for initiation or change of biological therapy. We defined the value of ≥6 mm as the cut-off point for a positive tuberculin skin test and performed a descriptive analysis for each of the variables considered. Results: In total, 261 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were included, 92 % of whom were women; the average age was 55 years (SD=13.92) and the time from diagnosis, 12.3 years (SD=8.54). The frequency of positive tuberculin skin tests was 15.71% (n=41). Of the 41 positive patients, nine had previously had the test (1 to 6 years before), all of them with negative results; 18 of these were receiving glucocorticoids (43.9%) and all of them (100%) were being treated with methotrexate. Conclusions: The frequency of positivity of the tuberculin skin test in these Colombian patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis was around 16%. We recommend optimizing strategies aimed at an optimal detection of this condition and the timely initiation of treatment to reduce the risk of tuberculosis reactivation.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Tuberculosis , Biological Therapy , Risk
17.
Rev. cuba. pediatr ; 93(3): e1382, 2021. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1347538

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El proceso de colonización del microbioma intestinal en los primeros 1000 días de vida tiene repercusión en la salud y enfermedades del niño dependientes de factores de riesgo. Objetivos: Revisar evidencias importantes sobre el significado de la relación entre la microbiota Intestinal y los primeros 1000 días de vida, y repercusión de los principales factores de riesgo. Métodos: Se revisaron publicaciones en idiomas español e inglés en PubMed, Google Scholar y SciELO: enero 2005-febrero 2020 usando los términos microbiota intestinal, microbiomas, primeros 1000 días de vida, factores de riesgo, enterocolitis necrosante, probióticos y prebióticos. Análisis e integración de la información: Hay demostrados argumentos que vinculan la microbiota intestinal y primeros 1000 días de vida del niño, según modo de parto, tiempo de gestación y lactancia. Se examina los beneficios del parto vaginal, lactancia materna y la aparición de enfermedades a mediano y largo plazo, relacionadas con factores de riesgo, como cesárea, prematuridad, lactancia artificial y exposición antibiótica prenatal y posnatal. Se describe resultados favorables con el uso de bioterapia con probióticos y prebióticos en la enterocolitis necrosante. Conclusiones: Se expone el valor de la microbiota intestinal en los primeros 1000 días de vida para la salud del niño, influenciada por condiciones de normalidad como el parto vaginal y la lactancia materna e implicaciones clínicas relacionadas con factores de riesgo mencionado. Es importante el tratamiento con probióticos multicepas y prebióticos para la recuperación de la microbiota en el niño en enfermedades como la enterocolitis necrosante y estados de sepsis grave(AU)


Introduction: The process of colonizing the gut microbiome in the first 1000 days of life has an impact on the health and diseases dependent on risk factors of the child. Objectives: Review important evidence on the meaning of the relation between the gut microbiota and the first 1000 days of life and the impact of the main risk factors. Methods: Spanish and English language publications were reviewed on PubMed, Google Scholar and SciELO, from January 2005 to February 2020 using the terms: gut microbiota, microbiomes, first 1000 days of life, risk factors, necrotizing enterocolitis, probiotics and prebiotics. Analysis and information integration: Arguments linking the gut microbiota and the child's first 1000 days of life are demonstrated, depending on the child's mode of delivery, gestation time and lactation. It is conducted an assessment of benefits of vaginal delivery, breastfeeding and the onset of medium- and long-term diseases related to risk factors, such as C-section, prematurity, artificial lactation, and prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure. Favorable results with the use of biotherapy with probiotics and prebiotics in necrotizing enterocolitis are described. Conclusions: It is presented the value of the gut microbiota in the first 1000 days of life for the health of the child, influenced by normal conditions such as vaginal delivery and breastfeeding, and clinical implications related to the mentioned risk factors. Treatment with multi-strain probiotics and prebiotics for microbiota recovery in the child is important in diseases such as necrotizing enterocolitis and states of severe sepsis(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Biological Therapy/methods , Child Health , Risk Factors , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Publications , Review Literature as Topic , Probiotics/adverse effects , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing
20.
Arq. gastroenterol ; 57(4): 491-497, Oct.-Dec. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1142345

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Biological therapy and new drugs have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Ideally, the choice of medication should be a shared decision with the patient, aiming at greater satisfaction, compliance, and consequently, favorable clinical outcome. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate patient's preferences in the choice of their therapy and the factors that influence this choice. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled 101 outpatients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and no previous exposure to biological therapy. Patients' preferences were assessed through questions that addressed the preferred mode of administration (oral, subcutaneous, or intravenous) and the factors that determined the choice of medication (efficacy, medical indication, fear of medication, convenience, mode of application, and personal doctors' indication). RESULTS: The mean age was 43.6±13.5 years, 75.3% were female, and 81.2% were cases of ulcerative colitis. Regarding the mode of administration, the majority of patients preferred oral (87.1%), followed by intravenous (6.93%) and subcutaneous (5.94%) medications. The reasons were "I prefer to take it at home" (42.57%), "I have more freedom" (36.63%), "I don't like self-application" (29.70%), and "I believe it works better" (19.80%). Younger patients and patients in clinical disease activity preferred intravenous mode compared to the oral route (P<0.05). Doctor's opinion (98%) was an important factor associated with the medication choice. CONCLUSION: Oral route was the preferred mode of administration and most patients took their physician's opinion into account in their choice of medication.


RESUMO CONTEXTO: A terapia biológica e os novos medicamentos revolucionaram o tratamento da doença inflamatória intestinal. A escolha do medicamento deve ser compartilhada com o paciente, visando maior satisfação, adesão e, consequentemente, desfecho clínico favorável. OBJETIVO: Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar as preferências do paciente na escolha de sua terapia e os fatores que influenciaram essa escolha. MÉTODOS: Este estudo transversal incluiu 101 pacientes ambulatoriais com doença de Crohn ou retocolite ulcerativa. Os critérios de inclusão foram idade ≥18 anos e nenhuma exposição prévia à terapia biológica. A preferência dos pacientes foi avaliada por meio de perguntas que abordaram o modo de administração preferido (oral, subcutâneo ou intravenoso) e os fatores que determinaram a escolha do medicamento (eficácia, indicação médica, medo da injeção, conveniência, modo de aplicação e opinião pessoal do médico). RESULTADOS: A idade média foi de 43,6±13,5 anos, 75,3% eram mulheres e 81,2% eram portadores de retocolite ulcerativa. Em relação ao modo de administração, a maioria dos pacientes preferiu os medicamentos orais (87,1%), seguidos dos endovenosos (6,93%) e subcutâneos (5,94%). Os motivos foram "prefiro aplicar em casa" (42,57%), "tenho mais liberdade com essa medicação" (36,63%), "não gosto de autoaplicação" (29,70%) e "acredito que funcione melhor" (19,80%). Pacientes jovens e pacientes em atividade clínica preferiram a via intravenosa em comparação com a via oral (P<0,05). A opinião do médico (98%) foi um fator importante associado à escolha do medicamento. CONCLUSÃO: A via oral foi preferida e a maioria dos pacientes levou em consideração a opinião do seu médico na escolha do medicamento.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Gastrointestinal Agents/administration & dosage , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Patient Satisfaction , Patient Preference , Injections, Subcutaneous/statistics & numerical data , Biological Therapy , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL