ABSTRACT
Background and Objective@#Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Likewise in the Philippines, the prevalence of CRC has shown to be increasing. Colonoscopy, a screening procedure for CRC, has parameters to gauge quality of detection. One of which is the Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR). Higher ADR has been linked to improved cancer detection. This study aimed to determine the ADR and Polyp Detection Rate (PDR) among Gastroenterology practitioners in a tertiary government university hospital in the Philippines, estimate ADR from PDR, and identify factors associated with ADR.@*Methods@#An analytical, cross-sectional study among patients who underwent colonoscopy for the years 2021 and the first half of 2022 at the Central Endoscopy Unit (CENDU) of the Philippine General Hospital. Demographic data of fellows and consultants were collected through an online form, while those from patients were obtained from electronic records. Colonoscopy details and histopathology results were accessed through the hospital’s Open Medical Record System (MRS). ADR, PDR, and estimated ADR were computed using established formulas. To evaluate the strength of the relationship between the estimated and actual ADR, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used. Chi-square analysis, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test were performed to identify the factors that might influence the ADR. A cut-off of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.@*Results@#The total computed ADR of consultants and fellows combined is 22%. The difference between the ADRs of Gastroenterology consultants and Fellows-in-Training is statistically significant at 31.6% and 18.7%, respectively (p= 0.017). The total Polyp Detection Rate is 57.6% while the weighted group average Adenoma to Polyp Detection Rate Quotient (APDRQ) is 0.4085 or 40.85%. The estimated ADR has a moderate degree of correlation with the actual ADR when an outlier was excluded (r=0.521 (95% CI, 0.072-0.795, p=0.0266). Significant factors related to ADR include endoscopists’ years of practice (p=0.020), number of colonoscopies done (p=0.031), and patient tobacco use (p=0.014).@*Conclusion@#The overall ADR among consultants and fellows is at par with the standard guidelines. A moderate degree of correlation exists between actual and estimated ADR when an outlier is excluded; however, more studies are needed to determine the APDRQ in the wider local setting. Longer years in practice, total number of colonoscopies performed, and patient tobacco use are associated with increased ADR.
Subject(s)
Adenoma , Colonic Polyps , Colorectal Neoplasms , ColonoscopyABSTRACT
Cold resection of colonic polyps is an important tool that reduces the incidence of colon cancer. Cold loop polypectomy is a safe and effective technique in colonic lesions smaller than 10 mm and cold mucosectomy with submucosal injection is a growing technique for the resection of non-pedunculated lesions between 10 and 19 mm. Post polypectomy bleeding is an infrequent complication in cold resection, but its recognition is key to reduce the impact of its consequences. The use of hemostatic clips is one of the methods preferred by endoscopists for the management of immediate post polypectomy bleeding, however its usefulness in the prevention of late bleeding is uncertain. In recent years, both meta-analysis and cost- effectiveness studies have concluded that the use of hemoclips does not reduce the incidence of late post-polypectomy bleeding, so their use should be reserved only for high-risk patients.
La resección fría de pólipos colónicos es una importante herramienta que reduce la incidencia de cáncer de colon. La polipectomía con asa fría es una técnica segura y efectiva en lesiones colónicas menores de 10 mm y la mucosectomía fría con inyección submucosa es una técnica en auge para la resección de lesiones no pediculadas entre 10 a 19 mm. El sangrado pospolipectomía es una complicación infrecuente en la resección fría, pero su reconocimiento es clave para disminuir el impacto de sus consecuencias. El uso de clips hemostáticos es uno de los método preferidos por los endoscopistas para el manejo del sangrado inmediato pospolipectomía, no obstante su utilidad en la prevención del sangrado tardío es incierto. En los últimos años, tanto metaanálisis como estudios de costo efectividad concluyen que el uso de hemoclips no reduce la incidencia de sangrado tardío pospolipectomía por lo que su uso debería reservarse sólo a pacientes de alto riesgo.
Subject(s)
Surgical Instruments , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonoscopy/methods , Colonoscopy/adverse effects , Hemostasis, Surgical/instrumentation , Hemostasis, Surgical/methodsABSTRACT
Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a key quality indicator in screening colonoscopy, closely linked to colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. Currently, the minimum recommended ADR is > 30% with an aspirational goal of > 35%; and the sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) minimum is > 7% with an aspirational goal of > 10%. Improving the detection of adenomas and serrated lesions involves rigorous bowel preparation, using the validated Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) with an adequate or superior score (≥ 6, with each segment ≥ 2: right-transverse-left) (minimum > 90% and > 95% aspirational goal). The most basic strategy is to implement split-dose bowel preparation regimens. A minimum withdrawal time of 6 minutes, ideally extended to 9 minutes, improves ADR and SSLDR, especially in the proximal colon. Incorporating techniques such as double examination of the right colon (retroflexion or second forward view), water-assisted colonoscopy, enhanced imaging endoscopy technologies (e.g., NBI, TXI, LCI, BLI), distal attachment devices, artificial intelligence systems (CADe), along with monitoring, feedback, continuing education, and teamwork, are key strategies to increase ADR and SSLDR, consequently, reduce the risk of post-colonoscopy or interval CRC.
La tasa de detección de adenomas (ADR) es un indicador de calidad fundamental en la colonoscopia de tamizaje, estrechamente relacionado con la prevención del cáncer colorrectal (CCR). Actualmente la ADR mínima reco- mendada es > 30% y aspiracional > 35%; y la tasa de detección de lesiones serradas sésiles (SSLDR) mínima > 7% y aspiracional > 10%. Mejorar la detección de adenomas y pólipos serrados implica una preparación intestinal rigurosa, utilizando la escala validada de Boston con puntuación adecuada o superior (≥ 6, con cada segmento ≥ 2: derecho-transverso-izquierdo) (mínimo > 90% y > 95% meta aspiracional). Siendo la estrategia más básica implementar regímenes de preparación intestinal en dosis divididas. Un tiempo de retirada mínimo de 6 minutos, idealmente extendido a 9 minutos, mejora la ADR y SSLDR, especialmente en el colon proximal. La incorporación de técnicas como la doble inspección del colon derecho (retroflexión o segunda visión frontal), la colonoscopia asistida por agua, tecnologías de endoscopia con imagen mejorada (ej: NBI, TXI, LCI, BLI), dispositivos de fija- ción distal, sistemas de inteligencia artificial (CADe), junto con la monitorización, retroalimentación, educación continua y trabajo en equipo, son estrategias clave para aumentar la ADR y SSLDR, en consecuencia, reducir el riesgo de CCR posterior de colonoscopia o intervalo.
Subject(s)
Humans , Adenoma/diagnosis , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Early Diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colonoscopy , Early Detection of CancerABSTRACT
Serrated polyposis syndrome is considered the most prevalent colonic polyposis syndrome in the world. Its importance has been increasingly discussed due to the significant increase in the risk of developing colorectal cancer in its affected individuals, similarly to other well-known polyposis syndromes, such as familial adenomatous polyposis. Serrated lesions of the colon play a major role in this syndrome represented by hyperplastic polyps, serrated sessile lesions and traditional serrated adenomas. Among these lesions, the sessile serrated lesion stands out, considered the main precursor lesion of the serrated pathway of colon carcinogenesis. Diagnosis of serrated polyposis syndrome is given through colonoscopy examination. Diagnostic criteria are: 1) 5 or more serrated lesions proximal to the rectum, all >4mm in size, with at least two >9mm in size; or 2) 20 serrated lesions of any size located anywhere in the large intestine, with >4 lesions proximal to the rectum. The ideal treatment is removal of all relevant serrated lesions by colonoscopy. In case of failure of endoscopic therapy, surgery is indicated. This manuscript is based on two case reports and a literature review and aims to broaden the discussion about the subject. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Colonic Polyps/therapy , Colonic Polyps/epidemiology , ColonoscopyABSTRACT
Background: Due to few sufficient data regarding the comparison between endoscopic and surgical resection of malignant colorectal polyps regarding outcomes and survival benefits, there are no clear guidelines of management strategies of malignant colorectal polyps. The aims of the present study were to compare endoscopic resection alone and surgical resection in patients with malignant polyps in the colon (T1N0M0) readings advantages, disadvantages, recurrence risks, survival benefits, and long-term prognosis to detect how management strategy affects outcome. Patients and methods: we included 350 patients. All included patients were divided into 2 groups; the first group included 100 patients who underwent only endoscopic polypectomy and the second group included 250 patients who underwent endoscopic polypectomy followed by definitive surgical resection after histopathological diagnosis. We followed all patients for about 5 years, ranging from 18 to 55 months. The primarily evaluated parameters are surgical consequences and patients' morbidity. The secondary evaluated parameters are recurrence risks, recurrence free survival, and overall survival rates. Results: The age of patients who underwent polypectomy is usually younger than the surgical group, males have more liability to polypectomy in comparison with females. Patients with tumors in the left colon have more liability to polypectomy in comparison with the right colon (p< 0.0001). Tumor factors associated with more liability to surgical resection are presence of lymphovascular invasion, high grade, and poor tumor differentiation (p< 0.0001). The management strategy was the most significant predictor of overall and recurrence free survival rates in patients with malignant colon polyps (p< 0.001). Conclusions: We found that survival benefits and lower incidence of recurrence are detected in the surgical resection group more than in the polypectomy group. (AU)
Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/mortality , Laparoscopy , Endoscopy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm StagingABSTRACT
In order to address the issues of spatial induction bias and lack of effective representation of global contextual information in colon polyp image segmentation, which lead to the loss of edge details and mis-segmentation of lesion areas, a colon polyp segmentation method that combines Transformer and cross-level phase-awareness is proposed. The method started from the perspective of global feature transformation, and used a hierarchical Transformer encoder to extract semantic information and spatial details of lesion areas layer by layer. Secondly, a phase-aware fusion module (PAFM) was designed to capture cross-level interaction information and effectively aggregate multi-scale contextual information. Thirdly, a position oriented functional module (POF) was designed to effectively integrate global and local feature information, fill in semantic gaps, and suppress background noise. Fourthly, a residual axis reverse attention module (RA-IA) was used to improve the network's ability to recognize edge pixels. The proposed method was experimentally tested on public datasets CVC-ClinicDB, Kvasir, CVC-ColonDB, and EITS, with Dice similarity coefficients of 94.04%, 92.04%, 80.78%, and 76.80%, respectively, and mean intersection over union of 89.31%, 86.81%, 73.55%, and 69.10%, respectively. The simulation experimental results show that the proposed method can effectively segment colon polyp images, providing a new window for the diagnosis of colon polyps.
Subject(s)
Humans , Colonic Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Computer Simulation , Electric Power Supplies , Semantics , Image Processing, Computer-AssistedABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of polyps and their treatments. Materials and Method: This is a retrospective study conducted in our department over 20 years and 3 months between January 2000 and March 2021. All patients with colorectal polyps who underwent endoscopic resection were included. We evaluated the resection techniques and the management of complications. Results: The total number of patients was 273, with a mean age of 57.26 ± 14.058 (18-90) and a M/W sex ratio of 2. The prevalence was 3.35% and the mean number of polyps was 1.33 ± 0.69. The most frequent symptoms were rectal bleeding (23.5%) and constipation (12.1%). The median size was 6 mm (4-12 mm). The left colonic location was the most frequent site (43%). All polyps were classified according to the Paris classification, with a predominance of sessile polyps in 45.75%, followed by pedunculated polyps, representing 42.4%. Endoscopic resection was performed either by biopsy forceps, polypectomy, or mucosectomy in 30.2%, 27.4%, and 25.4% of cases, respectively. Our study noted immediate bleeding in 1.5% of cases, and no perforations or late complications. All complications were treated endoscopically, and no patient required blood transfusion or surgical intervention. Conclusion: Endoscopic resection of rectocolic polyps is the ideal treatment for these lesions. In our department, the prevalence was 3.35%, the most used resection techniques were forceps resection and polypectomy, and the complication rate was 1.5%. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colonic Polyps/therapy , Colonic Polyps/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Colonoscopy/adverse effectsABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN. El cáncer de colon es una neoplasia del tubo digestivo considerada una de las más frecuentes en ambos sexos y que predomina en adultos mayores. OBJETIVO. Describir las características clínicas y epidemiológicas de los pacientes con cáncer de colon. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS. Estudio observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo. Población de 1 601 y muestra de 210 datos de Historias Clínicas Electrónicas de pacientes diagnosticados con cáncer de colon, atendidos por la Unidad de Oncología del Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín de la ciudad de Quito en el periodo enero de 2016 a diciembre de 2019. Criterios de inclusión: diagnóstico confirmado de Cáncer de Colon, edad igual o mayor a 18 años, y disponer de todos los datos clínicos requeridos en el estudio. Se utilizó el método de muestreo probabilístico con lo que se estimó una proporción para el estudio con un intervalo de confianza del 95%, un margen de error del 5% y una frecuencia esperada del 3%, de donde se obtuvo una muestra ajustada al 10% de pérdidas. El procesamiento de datos se realizó en los programas Microsoft Excel versión 16 y el Statistical Package for Social Sciences versión 24. RESULTADOS. La mayor presentación fue en adultos mayores de 50 años, con una relación 1:1 en cuanto a sexo, y en la procedencia, se ubicó mayoritariamente en la población de la región Sierra; las personas con una actividad económica de tipo profesional fueron las más afectadas; en lo que se refiere a los antecedentes se encontró mayor relación en los personales y dentro de estos los pólipos; no hubo relación con los antecedentes quirúrgicos ni familiares. El síntoma de debut más prevalente fue el dolor abdominal; la mayoría fueron sometidos a colonoscopia; predominó la lateralidad derecha y el tipo histológico principalmente identificado fue el adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIÓN. No se observó relación estadísticamente significante entre estadíos, evolución y tratamientos instaurados, lo que pudo estar influenciado por el muestreo al azar; y que el 53,30% de los pacientes aún se encuentra en controles.
INTRODUCTION. Colon cancer is a neoplasm of the digestive tract considered one of the most frequent in both sexes and predominantly in older adults. OBJECTIVE. To describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with colon cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Observational, descriptive, retrospective study. Population of 1 601 and sample of 210 data from Electronic Medical Records of patients diagnosed with colon cancer, attended by the Oncology Unit of the Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín of the city of Quito in the period January 2016 to December 2019. Inclusion criteria: confirmed diagnosis of Colon Cancer, age equal to or older than 18 years, and having all the clinical data required in the study. The probability sampling method was used with which a proportion was estimated for the study with a confidence interval of 95%, a margin of error of 5% and an expected frequency of 3%, from which a 10% loss adjusted sample was obtained. Data processing was performed in Microsoft Excel version 16 and Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 24. The greatest presentation was in adults over 50 years of age, with a 1:1 ratio in terms of sex, and in terms of origin, it was mainly located in the population of the Sierra region; people with a professional economic activity were the most affected; in terms of history, a greater relationship was found in personal history and within these, polyps; there was no relationship with surgical or family history. The most prevalent debut symptom was abdominal pain; the majority underwent colonoscopy; right laterality predominated and the histological type mainly identified was adestatistically significant relationship was observed between stages, evolution and treatment, which could be influenced by random sampling; and that 53,30% of the patients are still in controls.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Sigmoid Neoplasms , Colonic Polyps , Colon , Colonic Diseases , Colonic Neoplasms , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli , Cholecystectomy , Adenocarcinoma , Abdominal Pain , Colonoscopy , Colectomy , Ecuador , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage , Intestinal Neoplasms , Medical OncologyABSTRACT
Antecedentes: Los pólipos colorrectales son la causa más frecuente de hemorragia de tubo digestivo bajo no anemizante. Se presen- ta en el 3-4% de la población menor de 21 años. Objetivo: Describir las características clíni- cas, endoscópicas e histológicas de los pacien- tes pediátricos con pólipos colorrectales atendi- dos en el periodo enero del 2021- agosto 2022. Pacientes y metodología: Estudio descriptivo, ana- lítico, retrospectivo, de corte transversal, realizado en 93 pacientes que cumplían los criterios de inclu- sión. Se empleó muestreo no probabilístico a conve- niencia, utilizando un instrumento tipo formulario. Resultados: Predominó el sexo masculino, raza mes- tiza, edad entre 5-10 años y la procedencia urbana. El principal motivo de consulta fue el sangrado diges- tivo bajo, que junto al prolapso del pólipo fueron los dos síntomas gastrointestinales referidos. Endoscópica- mente lo más frecuente fue encontrar de 1-4 pólipos, de localización rectal, aspecto sésil. La polipectomía demostró ser un procedimiento seguro. El pólipo infla- matorio constituyó el reporte histológico más frecuente. * Médico Residente de tercer año de Pediatría, Escuela Universitaria de las Ciencias de la Salud, UNAH-VS ** Asesor Clínico Subespecialidad en Gastroenterología Pediátrica *** Asesor metodológico-Neumólogo pediatra, Máster en Investigación médica Correspondencia enviar a: Dr. Daniel Almazán, E-mail: dr.daniel.almazan@gmail.com Fecha de entrega: 20/09/2022 Fecha de aprobado 27/09/2022 Conclusiones: Los pólipos colorrectales deben ser el primer diagnóstico sospechado en pacientes pe- diátricos con sangrado digestivo bajo no asociado a diarrea ni estreñimiento. La referencia temprana al gastroenterólogo pediatra ayuda a la pronta me- joría de la calidad de vida del paciente; y encontra- mos que actualmente se realiza tardíamente. No se encontró relación estadísticamente significativa en- tre la edad, sexo, aspecto y diagnóstico del pólipo...(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Child, Preschool , Child , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Rectal Prolapse , Digestive System DiseasesABSTRACT
Antecedentes: La sepsis neonatal representa un desa- fío para los Servicios de Neonatología en el mundo, a pesar de los avances en estudios diagnósticos y te- rapia antimicrobiana, más del 46% de las muertes en menores de 5 años corresponden al periodo neo- natal, y dentro de ese porcentaje 15% es por sepsis. Objetivo: Caracterizar los factores de riesgo aso- ciados a sepsis neonatal en los recién nacidos ingre- sados en UCIN (Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos), en área de Cuidados Mínimos del Instituto Hondu- reño de Seguridad Social, de enero a junio del 2022. Pacientes y Metodología: Estudio cuantitativo con un alcance descriptivo, se estudiaron a 100 neonatos con el diagnóstico de sepsis neonatal ingresados en UCIN en área de cuidados mínimos, muestreo no probabilísti- co a conveniencia, con revisión de expedientes clínicos y aplicación de consentimiento informado a padre y/o tutor. Resultados: El 57% tenían entre 1 24 horas de vida al ingreso, 65.0% de género masculino, un 93.0% de raza mestiza y un 7% de raza negra. El 83.0% de las madres eran primigestas, con antecedente de infección urinaria en un 70.0% durante el tercer trimestre de ges- tación y el 15.5% con antecedente de infecciones vagi- nales. Un 7.8% con ruptura prematura de membranas, 3.9% corioamnionitis, 6.49% fiebre intraparto y 10.0% con infecciones respiratorias maternas. La fiebre fue el signo de sepsis predominante en todos los pacientes.Conclusiones: Madre entre 26-35 años, ser primípara, tener menos de tres controles prenatales durante su ges- tación se consideran factores de riesgo para sepsis neo- natal con una relación estadísticamente significativa ...(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Colonic Polyps , Neonatal Sepsis/diagnosis , Demography , Rectal ProlapseABSTRACT
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer in the United States and it is found in 17% of patients thought to have complicated diverticular disease. However, primary adenocarcinoma rarely occur in the colostomy site and the risk of developing malignancy is similar to that of any other colonic segment. Polyps found in CRC screenings can be divided into the following types: hyperplastic polyps, polyps with no malignant potential, adenomatous polyps, polyps with malignant potential, and malignancies. Local complications of the colostomy can appear in the immediate, early, or late postoperative period, with an incidence ranging from 15 to 30%; neoplasia is even less common. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Colostomy/adverse effects , Adenocarcinoma , Colonic Neoplasms , Prolapse , Colonic Polyps , Colon/pathology , Diverticular DiseasesABSTRACT
Colonoscopy with endoscopic resection of detected colonic adenomas interrupts the adenoma-carcinoma sequence and reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer and cancer-related mortality. In the past decade, there have been significant developments in instruments and techniques for endoscopic polypectomy. Guidelines have been formulated by various professional bodies in Europe, Japan and the United States, but some of the recommendations differ between the various bodies. An expert professional workgroup under the auspices of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, was set up to provide guidance on the endoscopic management of colonic polyps in Singapore. A total of 23 recommendations addressed the following issues: accurate description and diagnostic evaluation of detected polyps; techniques to reduce the risk of post-polypectomy bleeding and delayed perforation; the role of specific endoscopic resection techniques; the histopathological criteria for defining endoscopic cure; and the role of surveillance colonoscopy following curative resection.
Subject(s)
Humans , Adenoma/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonoscopy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Singapore , United StatesABSTRACT
Colonoscopy is the reference standard procedure for the prevention and diagnosis of colorectal cancer, which is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Singapore. Artificial intelligence systems are automated, objective and reproducible. Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy has recently been introduced into clinical practice as a clinical decision support tool. This review article provides a summary of the current published data and discusses ongoing research and current clinical applications of artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy.
Subject(s)
Humans , Artificial Intelligence , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Colonoscopy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES@#To study the clinical features of children with colorectal polyps and the efficacy of endoscopic treatment.@*METHODS@#A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical data of 1 351 children with colorectal polyps who were admitted and received colonoscopy and treatment in the past 8 years, including clinical features and the pattern and outcomes of endoscopic treatment.@*RESULTS@#Among the 1 351 children, 893 (66.10%) were boys and 981 (72.61%) had an age of 2-<7 years, and hematochezia (1 307, 96.74%) was the most common clinical manifestation. Of all the children, 89.27% (1 206/1 351) had solitary polyps, and 95.77% (1 290/1 347) had juvenile polyps. The polyps were removed by electric cauterization with hot biopsy forceps (6 cases) or high-frequency electrotomy and electrocoagulation after snare ligation (1 345 cases). A total of 1 758 polyps were resected, among which 1 593 (90.61%) were pedunculated and 1 349 (76.73%) had a diameter of <2 cm. Postoperative complications included bleeding in 51 children (3.77%), vomiting in 87 children (6.44%), abdominal pain in 14 children (1.04%), and fever in 39 children (2.89%), while no perforation was observed. The children aged <3 years had the highest incidence rates of postoperative bleeding and fever (P<0.0125), and the children with a polyp diameter of ≥2 cm had significantly higher incidence rates of postoperative bleeding, vomiting, and fever (P<0.05).@*CONCLUSIONS@#Solitary polyps, pedunculated polyps, and juvenile polyps are common types of pediatric colorectal polyps. Electric cauterization with hot biopsy forceps or high-frequency electrotomy and electrocoagulation after snare ligation can effectively remove colorectal polyps in children, with good efficacy and few complications. Younger age and larger polyp diameter are associated with a higher risk of postoperative bleeding.
Subject(s)
Child , Female , Humans , Male , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonoscopy , Intestinal Polyps/surgery , Retrospective Studies , VomitingABSTRACT
Introducción: El cáncer colorrectal en nuestro país ocupa la tercera causa de muerte por tumores malignos y constituye un problema de salud a nivel mundial, que en la actualidad es prevenible al realizar pruebas para la detección de lesiones premalignas. Objetivo: Evaluar el valor presuntivo de lesiones premalignas colónicas en pacientes con sangre oculta en las heces. Métodos: Se realizó estudio observacional, descriptivo, transversal, en pacientes con sangre oculta en las heces, atendidos en el Servicio de Gastroenterología del Hospital Docente Clínico Quirúrgico Diez de Octubre, a los cuales se les realizó colonoscopia, en el período comprendido de enero de 2016 a enero de 2017. Para evaluar las variables se utilizó el porcentaje como medida matemática y los resultados fueron expuestos en tablas. Resultados: Al finalizar el estudio se observó un predomino del sexo femenino. La pesquisa, el cambio del hábito intestinal y las diarreas crónicas fueron las indicaciones más frecuentes de sangre oculta en heces. Los pólipos y las lesiones de aspecto malignas fueron los diagnósticos colonoscópicos más frecuentes. Las lesiones de aspecto malignas se localizaron en mayor proporción en colon izquierdo. El diagnóstico histológico más frecuente fueron los adenomas y adenocarcinomas. Conclusiones: El test de sangre oculta en heces es un método predictivo en la pesquisa de lesiones premalignas y malignas de colon en pacientes atendidos en el primer nivel de atención(AU)
Introduction: In Cuba, colorectal cancer accounts for the third cause of death by malignant tumors, while it is a worldwide health problem, currently preventable by performing tests for the detection of premalignant lesions. Objective: To evaluate the presumptive value of colonic premalignant lesions in patients with fecal occult blood. Methods: An observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out in patients with fecal occult blood, who received attention in the gastroenterology service of Diez de Octubre Surgical Clinical Teaching Hospital and underwent colonoscopy, in the period from January 2016 to January 2017. To evaluate the variables, the percentage was used as a mathematical measure and the results were shown in tables. Results: At the end of the study, a predominance of the female sex was observed. Screening, change of bowel habit and chronic diarrhea were the most frequent indications of fecal occult blood. Polyps and malignant lesions were the most frequent colonoscopic diagnoses. Malignant-appearing lesions were mostly located in the left colon. The most frequent histological diagnosis was made up of adenomas and adenocarcinomas. Conclusions: The fecal occult blood test is a predictive method for the detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the colon in patients who receive attention at the first level of care(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Colonoscopy , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Age and Sex Distribution , Early Detection of Cancer , Occult Blood , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cuba , OctogenariansSubject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Colonic Polyps/epidemiology , Mass Screening/adverse effects , Mass Screening/methods , Colonoscopy/adverse effects , Colonoscopy/methods , Europe , Early Detection of Cancer/adverse effects , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Pragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicABSTRACT
El Streptococcus gallolyticus del colon. La fisiopatología que explica este fenómeno implica el aumento local de niveles de lactato puede presentarse como el germen causal de la endocarditis infecciosa en pacientes con lesiones premalignas y malignas, colágeno, fibrinógeno y fibronectina secundario a la hiperactividad metabólica tumoral que genera un ambiente adecuado para el crecimiento y adhesión bacteriana a la pared intestinal y posterior translocación al torrente sanguíneo. Simultáneamente, se establece la presencia de infecciones secundarias por la formación de biofilms, tanto a nivel colorrectal como en válvulas cardíacas. El objetivo del manuscrito es un mapeo en la literatura médica disponible sobre la correlación entre la endocarditis por Streptococcus gallolyticus y las lesiones premalignas y malignas de colon. Simultáneamente, exponer la experiencia clínica de un hombre de 82 años con diagnóstico de endocarditis por Streptococcus gallolyticus y el hallazgo incidental de pólipos adenomatosos del colon(AU)
Streptococcus gallolyticus can present as the causative germ of infective endocarditis in patients with premalignant and malignant lesions of the colon. The pathophysiology that explains this phenomenon involves the local increase in lactate that can be presented as the causal germ of infective endocarditis in patients with premalignant and malignant lesions, collagen, fibrinogen, and fibronectin levels secondary to tumor metabolic hyperactivity, which generates a suitable environment for bacterial growth and adhesion to the intestinal wall and subsequent translocation to the bloodstream. Simultaneously, the presence of secondary infections is established due to the formation of biofilms, both at the colorectal level and in the heart valves. The objective of the manuscript is a mapping in the available medical literature on the correlation between Streptococcus gallolyticus endocarditis and premalignant and malignant colonic lesions. Simultaneously, to present the clinical experience of an 82-year-old man diagnosed with Streptococcus gallolyticus endocarditis and the incidental finding of adenomatous polyps of the colon(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged, 80 and over , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Endocarditis/physiopathology , Streptococcus gallolyticus/virology , Bacterial Adhesion , Ceftriaxone/therapeutic use , Abdominal Pain , Colonic Polyps , Drug TherapyABSTRACT
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The gold standard test for colorectal cancer screening the colonoscopy. Although this is the test of choice, colonoscopy misses a significant number of lesions, mainly in the proximal colon. With the purpose of reducing the number of lesions missed, new techniques have been studied, amongst them, retroflexed view in the right side of the colon and the second direct forward view. OBJECTIVE: Assessing the safety of the retroview in the proximal colon (cecum and ascending colon), its impact on the detection of lesions in the proximal colon and its advantage over the double right forward view using adenoma detection rate and adenoma miss rate. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-three patients who came to Hospital Mater Dei to undergo colonoscopy from March to July 2017, prospectively. Out of these, 372 were included in the study based on the following exclusion criteria: being under 18 years of age, inadequate bowel preparations (Boston scale <7), history of colectomy, inflammatory bowel disease or polypoid diseases. First, an endoscopist inserted the colonoscope into the cecum and examine the cecum and the ascending colon with a forward view twice. In the third insertion into the cecum, retroflexed view was performed, cecal mucosa was examined until the hepatic flexure in search of polyps missed on forward view. All lesions found were resected and sent for histological analysis. RESULTS: In 334 (89.8%) patients, retroflexed view was performed successfully, 65.8% of failures were attributed to the loops of the device which prevented the maneuver. The direct view identified 175 polyps in the proximal colon in 102 people. Retroflexed view detected 26 polyps missed by the direct view in 24 (6.5%) people, with a missing rate of 12.9% in the test with only the forward view. Out of the 26 polyps found in retroview, 21 (80.76%) were adenomas, one of them with a high-grade dysplasia. Eleven patients had polyps seen only in retroflexed view. Retroview has increased the polyp detection rate from 27.41% to 31.72% and the adenoma detection rate from 21.77% to 25%. The adenoma miss rate by the double direct view was 12.8%. Without the retroview, one polyp in every 13.91 colonoscopies would be missed (number needed to treat - NNT=13.91). There was no adverse event. CONCLUSION: The retroflexed view technique in the proximal colon was shown to be safe, fast and feasible in most cases. It increased the adenoma detection rate and was shown to be advantageous in this study wit benefit beyond the double direct view.
RESUMO CONTEXTO: O exame padrão ouro para rastreamento de câncer colorretal é a colonoscopia. Apesar de ser o exame de escolha, a colonoscopia perde um número não desprezível de lesões, principalmente no cólon proximal. Com a intenção de reduzir a perda de lesões, novas técnicas são estudadas, dentre elas, a retroflexão em cólon direito e a segunda visão frontal direta. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a segurança da retrovisão no cólon proximal (ceco e cólon ascendente), o seu impacto na detecção de lesões em cólon proximal e sua superioridade sobre a dupla visão frontal direta usando taxa de detecção de adenoma e taxa de adenoma perdido. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 393 pacientes de forma prospectiva que procuraram o Hospital Mater Dei para realizar colonoscopia entre março e julho de 2017. Desses, 372 foram incluídos baseados nos critérios de exclusão: menores de 18 anos, preparos intestinais inadequados (escala de Boston <7), com antecedente de colectomia, doença inflamatória intestinal ou síndromes polipoides. Primeiramente um endoscopista realizou a inserção do colonoscópio até o ceco e examinou o ceco e o cólon ascendente em visão frontal por duas vezes. Na terceira reinserção até o ceco era realizada a retroflexão e inspeção da mucosa do ceco até a flexura hepática em busca de pólipos perdidos à visão frontal. Todas lesões encontradas foram ressecadas e enviadas para análise histológica. RESULTADOS: Em 334 (89,8%) pacientes a retroflexão foi realizada com sucesso, 65,8% dos insucessos foram atribuídos a alças no aparelho que impediram a manobra. A visão direta identificou 175 pólipos no cólon proximal em 102 pessoas. A retroflexão detectou 26 pólipos perdidos pela visão direta em 24 (6,5%) pessoas, com uma taxa de perda de 12,9% no exame apenas em visão frontal. Dos 26 pólipos encontrados em retrovisão, 21 (80,76%) eram adenomas, um deles com displasia de alto grau. Onze pacientes tinham pólipos vistos apenas em retroflexão. A realização da retrovisão aumentou a taxa de detecção de pólipo de 27,41% para 31,72% e a taxa de detecção e adenomas de 21,77% para 25%. A taxa de adenoma perdido pela dupla visão direta foi de 12,8%. Se a retrovisão não fosse realizada, um pólipo a cada 13,91 colonoscopias seria perdido (NNT=13,91). Não houve nenhum evento adverso. CONCLUSÃO: A técnica de retroflexão em cólon proximal mostrou-se segura, rápida e factível na maioria dos casos. Ela aumentou a taxa de detecção de adenomas e mostrou-se soberana neste estudo com benfeitorias além da dupla visão direta.
Subject(s)
Humans , Adolescent , Colonic Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Colonoscopy , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Since 2012, a new technique for resection of large polyps has been described, the underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR). Some advantages that emerge from it is the needless of injection in submucosal layer and a greater chance of complete capture of the polyp. OBJECTIVE: There are few studies of UEMR in Brazil. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique in one Brazilian center. METHODS: This case series was conducted from February to December of 2020. Colorectal polyps greater than 9 mm without features of deep submucosal invasion were resected using UEMR. RESULTS: Twenty-four large polyps were resected with the UEMR approach from 24 patients. The mean size of the polys was 19 mm, ranging from 12 to 35 mm. All lesions were successful resected and 66% (16/24) were resected en bloc. In histologic analyses, most of them were adenomas (70.8%) and only one had deep submucosal invasion. There were no cases of acute complications, such perforation or acute bleeding. CONCLUSION: The UEMR is a safe and feasible procedure. With the emerging data on the procedure, it seems to be a wonderful tool in preventing colorectal cancer and its applicability and scope should be encourage to surpass reference centers.
RESUMO CONTEXTO: Desde 2012, uma nova técnica para ressecção de pólipos grandes tem sido descrita, a ressecção da mucosa endoscópica sob imersão d'água (REMS). Algumas vantagens que surgem desta técnica são evitar a injeção na camada submucosa e a maior chance de captura completa do pólipo. Objetivo - Há poucos estudos com REMS no Brasil. Nosso objetivo é avaliar a segurança e a eficácia da técnica em um centro brasileiro. MÉTODOS: Esta série de casos foi conduzida de fevereiro a dezembro de 2020. Pólipos colorretais maiores que 9 mm sem sinais endoscópicos de invasão de submucosa foram ressecados utilizando RMES. RESULTADOS: Vinte e quatro pólipos foram ressecados com RMES em 24 pacientes diferentes. O tamanho médio dos pólipos era de 19 mm, variando de 12 a 35 mm. Todas as lesões foram ressecadas e 66% (16/24) foram ressecadas em monobloco. Na análise histológica, a maioria era adenoma (70.8%) e apenas uma havia invasão profunda da submucosa. CONCLUSÃO: O uso de REMS é um procedimento seguro e factível. Com o aumento de dados relativos ao procedimento, esta parece ser uma excelente ferramenta na prevenção do câncer colorretal e sua aplicabilidade deve ser encorajada para fora dos centros de referência.
Subject(s)
Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Brazil , Colonoscopy , Ambulatory Care , Intestinal Mucosa , Intestinal Mucosa/surgeryABSTRACT
Objectives: To evaluate the serrated lesion detection rate in colonoscopy at a specialized clinic and its role as quality criteria for endoscopic examination. Methods: This is an observational cross-sectional study with all patients that underwent colonoscopy between October 2018 and May 2019, performed by an experimented physician. A questionnaire was answered before the examination by the patient, and another questionnaire after the colonoscopy was answered by themedical team. All polyps identified were removed and sent to the same pathologist for analysis. Results: A total of 1,000 colonoscopies were evaluated. The average age of the patients was 58.9 years old, and most of them were female (60.6%). In 62.5% of the procedures, polyps were removed, obtaining a total of 1,730 polyps, of which 529 were serrated lesions, being 272 sessile serrated lesions (SSL). This data resulted in a serrated lesion detection rate (SDR) of 29.2%, and of 14% when considering only the SSL detection rate (SSLDR). The right colon had higher rates, with 22.3% SDR and 15.3% SSLDR. Screening colonoscopies also presented a higher serrated detection rate, of 20%, followed by diagnostics and follow-up exams. Smoking was the only risk factor associated with higher serrated detection rate. Conclusions: The serrated lesion detection rate is higher than the ones already previously suggested and the have the higher rates were stablished in the right colon and on screening exams. (AU)