ABSTRACT
Objetivo: analisar efetividade e custos de modelos de cuidados transitórios em atenção domiciliar de pacientes com condições agudas e crônicas comparados a outras modalidades. Método: revisão integrativa de uma amostra de 18 artigos dentre os 278 pesquisados em sete bases de dados. Resultados: Destacaram-se, em 15 modelos de cuidados transitórios, os de: reabilitação; terapêuticas parenterais; acompanhamento de doenças crônicas; pós-operatórios e internação domiciliar. Foram efetivos para tratar condições agudas ou crônicas agudizadas; simplificar acesso a hospital; prevenir readmissões; reduzir tempo de internação; ampliar adesão em reabilitação ambulatorial, reduzir mortalidade e melhorar estado emocional/sobrecarga do cuidador. O principal componente de custo foi os valores de diárias. Em nove estudos, os modelos significaram quedas no custo geral com internação. Conclusão: Cuidados transitórios em Atenção Domiciliar possibilitam a continuidade do tratamento com efetividade e economia para provedores e sistemas de saúde
Objective: to analyze the effectiveness and costs of transitional care models in home care of patients with acute and chronic conditions compared with other modalities. Method:integrative review of a sample of 18 articles among the 278 searched in seven databases. Results: among 15 transitional care models, the following stood out: rehabilitation; parenteral therapies; chronic disease follow-up; postoperative care; and home hospitalization. They were effective in treating acute or chronic conditions; simplifying access to hospital; preventing readmissions; reducing length of stay; increasing adherence to outpatient rehabilitation, reducing mortality, and improving emotional status/caregiver burden. The main cost component was per diem rates. In nine studies, the models meant decreases in overall hospitalization costs. Conclusion: transitional care in home care enables effective and cost-efficient continuity of care for providers and health systems.
Objetivo: analizar la efectividad y los costes de los modelos de cuidados transitorios en la atención domiciliaria de pacientes con patologías agudas y crónicas en comparación con otras modalidades. Método: revisión integradora en una muestra de 18 artículos, entre 278 encontrados en siete bases de datos. Resultados: Entre los 15 modelos de cuidados transitorios destacaron los siguientes: rehabilitación; terapias parenterales; seguimiento de enfermedades crónicas; cuidados postoperatorios; y hospitalización a domicilio. Los modelos fueron eficaces para tratar enfermedades agudas o crónicas; simplificar el acceso al hospital; prevenir los reingresos; reducir la duración de la estancia; aumentar la adherencia a la rehabilitación ambulatoria; reducir la mortalidad; y mejorar el estado emocional/la carga para los cuidadores. El principal componente de coste fueron las tarifas diarias. En nueve estudios, los modelos resultaron en una disminución de los costes generales de hospitalización. Conclusión: Los cuidados de transición en la atención domiciliaria permiten una continuidad asistencial eficaz y rentable para los proveedores y los sistemas sanitarios
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Effectiveness , Health Care Costs , Transitional Care , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Home NursingABSTRACT
La seguridad y eficacia de los programas de suplementación con hierro a lactantes, está actualmente en discusión. El objetivo de esta revisión fue identificar estudios sobre riesgos y beneficios de la suplementación con hierro profiláctico en lactantes menores de un año, nacidos a término, con niveles de hemoglobina (Hb) y ferremia desconocidos. Se realizó una búsqueda en Pubmed y Cochrane, identificando 3 revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Estos estudios arrojaron resultados que indican mejoras en los niveles séricos de hierro y hemoglobina como resultado de la suplementación con hierro. Sin embargo, no se observó un beneficio significativo en el desarrollo cognitivo de los lactantes. Los efectos adversos más reportados son los gastrointestinales, efectos en el crecimiento (menor ganancia de talla y peso) y menor absorción de zinc. En resumen, la evidencia en cuanto a la profilaxis con hierro en lactantes es limitada, lo que nos lleva a recomendar un seguimiento cercano de los lactantes que reciben suplementos de hierro, con el objetivo de detectar posibles eventos adversos. Es fundamental evaluar cuidadosamente los riesgos y beneficios de esta intervención antes de su implementación (AU)
The safety and efficacy of iron supplementation programs for infants are currently under discussion. The objective of this review was to identify studies on the risks and benefits of prophylactic iron supplementation in infants under one year of age, born at term, with unknown hemoglobin (Hb) and serum iron levels. The search was conducted on Pubmed and Cochrane, identifying three systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The results indicate improvements in serum iron and hemoglobin levels as a result of iron supplementation. However, a significant benefit in infant cognitive development was not observed. The most reported adverse effects were gastrointestinal, effects on growth (reduced height and weight gain), and reduced zinc absorption. In summary, the evidence regarding iron prophylaxis in infants is limited, leading us to recommend close monitoring of infants receiving iron supplements to detect potential adverse events. It is crucial to carefully assess the risks and benefits of this intervention before implementation (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Ferrous Sulfate , Iron, Dietary/therapeutic use , Dietary Supplements/supply & distribution , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Hemoglobins , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/prevention & controlABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION@#Ultrasonography (US) is the current standard of care for imaging surveillance in patients at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been explored as an alternative, given the higher sensitivity of MRI, although this comes at a higher cost. We performed a cost-effective analysis comparing US and dual-sequence non-contrast-enhanced MRI (NCEMRI) for HCC surveillance in the local setting.@*METHODS@#Cost-effectiveness analysis of no surveillance, US surveillance and NCEMRI surveillance was performed using Markov modelling and microsimulation. At-risk patient cohort was simulated and followed up for 40 years to estimate the patients' disease status, direct medical costs and effectiveness. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were calculated.@*RESULTS@#Exactly 482,000 patients with an average age of 40 years were simulated and followed up for 40 years. The average total costs and QALYs for the three scenarios - no surveillance, US surveillance and NCEMRI surveillance - were SGD 1,193/7.460 QALYs, SGD 8,099/11.195 QALYs and SGD 9,720/11.366 QALYs, respectively.@*CONCLUSION@#Despite NCEMRI having a superior diagnostic accuracy, it is a less cost-effective strategy than US for HCC surveillance in the general at-risk population. Future local cost-effectiveness analyses should include stratifying surveillance methods with a variety of imaging techniques (US, NCEMRI, contrast-enhanced MRI) based on patients' risk profiles.
Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methodsABSTRACT
Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of typical pharmaceutical smoking cessation intervention strategies in China in the context of primary cancer prevention. Methods: Markov cohort simulation models were established to simulate the burden of 12 smoking caused cancer, including lung cancer, oral cancer, nasopharyngeal cancer, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, liver cancer, kidney cancer, bladder cancer, cervical cancer, and acute myeloid leukemia. Taking incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) as the main indicator, the model sets one year as the cycling period for 50 periods and simulates the cohort of 10 000 thirty-five-year-old current smokers with various smoking cessation strategies. To ensure the robustness of conclusion, univariate sensitivity analysis, probability sensitivity analysis, and age-group sensitivity analysis were conducted. Results: The results showed that varenicline intervention was the most cost-effective intervention. Compared to the next most effective option, incremental cost of each additional quality-adjusted life year is 11 140.28 yuan, which is below the threshold of willingness to pay (1 year GDP per capita). The value of ICER increased as the increasing age group of adopting intervention, but neither exceeded the threshold of willingness to pay. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the value of discount rate, the hazard ratio and cost of intervention strategy had a greater impact on the result of ICER. Conclusion: In China, the use of varenicline to quit smoking is highly cost effective in the context of cancer primary prevention, especially for younger smokers.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Smoking Cessation , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms , Varenicline , China , Kidney Neoplasms , Pharmaceutical PreparationsABSTRACT
Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of typical pharmaceutical smoking cessation intervention strategies in China in the context of primary cancer prevention. Methods: Markov cohort simulation models were established to simulate the burden of 12 smoking caused cancer, including lung cancer, oral cancer, nasopharyngeal cancer, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, liver cancer, kidney cancer, bladder cancer, cervical cancer, and acute myeloid leukemia. Taking incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) as the main indicator, the model sets one year as the cycling period for 50 periods and simulates the cohort of 10 000 thirty-five-year-old current smokers with various smoking cessation strategies. To ensure the robustness of conclusion, univariate sensitivity analysis, probability sensitivity analysis, and age-group sensitivity analysis were conducted. Results: The results showed that varenicline intervention was the most cost-effective intervention. Compared to the next most effective option, incremental cost of each additional quality-adjusted life year is 11 140.28 yuan, which is below the threshold of willingness to pay (1 year GDP per capita). The value of ICER increased as the increasing age group of adopting intervention, but neither exceeded the threshold of willingness to pay. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the value of discount rate, the hazard ratio and cost of intervention strategy had a greater impact on the result of ICER. Conclusion: In China, the use of varenicline to quit smoking is highly cost effective in the context of cancer primary prevention, especially for younger smokers.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Smoking Cessation , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms , Varenicline , China , Kidney Neoplasms , Pharmaceutical PreparationsABSTRACT
Aim: to evaluate the prognosis of root cariestreatment with non-invasive methods, as well as to compare non-invasive therapies as viable alternatives for clinicians, indicating their cost-effectiveness.Literaturereview: Data collected were number of active lesions at baseline(BL) and in the last clinical assessment after follow-up(FL), and the follow-up period in months(P). The outcome was the monthly progression rate of the lesions that was calculated by (FLBL)/P. A negative progression rate means the arrestment of the lesions. A cost-effectiveness rate was calculated. Results: From 596 titles retrieved in the search, 8 studies were included in a qualitative synthesis after assessed for eligibility. The monthly progression rate of lesions of home-based treatments (toothpastes, mouth rinses, supplemented milk intake) was an average of -0.79 (-3.68 to 2.3), while the office-based treatments (varnish, topic solutions) was 0.07 (-0.01 to 0.51), suggesting a better prognosis of the home-based treatments. The lowest monthly progression rate was -3.97 (toothpaste 5000ppm/F) while the highest was 2.31 (conventional toothpaste). The cost-effectiveness rate was better for treatments with toothpastes with 5000ppm/F (BRL21.78) when compared to mouthwashes (BRL579.47). Discussion: A better prognosis was found for toothpastes with a high fluoride concentration (5000ppm/F) compared to other therapies, as well as a better cost-effectiveness when compared to mouthwashes. Conclusion: Home-based therapiesrepresented the highest rates of good prognosis for treating root caries lesions within the available scientific evidence. Although 5000ppm/F toothpastes have a very high cost for the Brazilian market, this treatment presented the highest cost-effectiveness when compared to mouthrinses(PROSPERO:CRD42019136035).
Objetivo: avaliar o prognóstico do tratamento da cárie radicular com métodosnão invasivos, bem como comparar as terapias não invasivas como alternativas viáveis para os clínicos, indicando seu custo-efetividade. Revisão deliteratura: os dados coletados foram o número de lesões ativas no início do estudo(BL) e na última avaliação clínica após o acompanhamento(FL), e o período de acompanhamento em meses(P). O desfecho foi a taxa de progressão mensal das lesões calculada por (FLBL)/P. Uma taxa de progressão negativa significou a inativação das lesões. Uma taxa de custo-efetividade foi calculada.Resultados: Dos 596 títulos recuperados na busca, 8 estudos foram incluídos em uma síntese qualitativa após avaliação de elegibilidade. A taxa de progressão mensal das lesões dos tratamentos caseiros (dentifrícios, enxaguatórios bucais, ingestão de leite complementado) foi em média -0,79 (-3,68 a 2,3), enquanto os tratamentos de consultório (verniz, soluções tópicas) foi de 0,07 (-0,01 a 0,51), sugerindo um melhor prognóstico dos tratamentos domiciliares. A menor taxa de progressão mensal foi de -3,97 (dentifrício 5000ppm/F), enquanto a maior foi de 2,31 (dentifrício convencional). A taxa de custo-efetividade foi melhor para tratamentos com dentifrícios com 5000ppm/F(R$21,78) quando comparados aos bochechos (R$579,47). Discussão: Foi encontrado melhor prognóstico para dentifrícios com alta concentração de flúor(5000ppm/F) em comparação com outras terapias, bem como melhor custo-efetividade quando comparados aos bochechos. Conclusão: As terapias domiciliares representaram as maiores taxas de bom prognóstico para o tratamento de lesões de cárie radicular dentro das evidências científicas disponíveis. Embora dentifrícios de 5000ppm/F tenham um custo muito alto para o mercado brasileiro, este tratamento apresentou o maior custo-efetividade quando comparado aos enxaguatórios bucais(PROSPERO:CRD42019136035).
Subject(s)
Humans , Prognosis , Dentifrices , Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisABSTRACT
Objetivo: analizar el costo-efectividad y calcular la relación costoefectividad incremental del tratamiento multicapa compresivo con respecto al inelástico (bota de Unna y estiramiento corto) según la literatura actual. Método: estudio cuantitativo de costo-efectividad a través de un modelo con ayuda del software TreeAge® para la elaboración del árbol de decisión. Los supuestos anunciados se obtuvieron mediante el uso de datos secundarios de la literatura para estimar el costo y la efectividad de los parámetros asumidos. Para ello, se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura con metaanálisis. Resultados: el árbol de decisión, después del Roll Back, mostró que la terapia multicapa prevaleció sobre las alternativas en el caso base, presentó un costo intermedio por aplicación, pero obtuvo la mayor efectividad. El gráfico del análisis de costo-efectividad también demostró que había un dominio extendido de la bota de Unna sobre el vendaje de estiramiento corto. El análisis de sensibilidad reveló que el vendaje multicapa sigue siendo la alternativa con mayor costoefectividad, dentro del umbral de disposición a pagar. Conclusión: la alternativa con mayor costo-efectividad fue el vendaje multicapa, considerado estándar de oro en la literatura. La segunda alternativa con mayor costo-efectividad fue la bota de Unna, la terapia más utilizada en Brasil.
Objective: to analyze the cost-effectiveness and calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of multilayer compressive treatment in relation to inelastic (Unna boot and short stretch) therapy according to the current literature. Method: quantitative study about cost-effectiveness through modeling with the aid of TreeAge® software for construction of the decision tree. The anticipated assumptions were obtained by using secondary literature data to estimate the cost and effectiveness of the assumed parameters. A systematic literature review with meta-analysis was performed for this end. Results: the decision tree after Roll Back showed that the multilayer therapy dominated the alternatives in the base case, representing an intermediate cost per application, although with the highest effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness analysis graph also showed extended dominance of the Unna boot in relation to the short stretch bandage. The sensitivity analysis showed that multilayer bandage remains a more cost-effective alternative, within the threshold of willingness to pay. Conclusion: the most cost-effective alternative was multilayer bandage, considered the gold standard in the literature. The second most cost-effective alternative was the Unna boot, the most used therapy in Brazil.
Objetivo: analisar a custo-efetividade e calcular a razão de custoefetividade incremental do tratamento compressivo multicamadas em relação ao inelástico (bota de Unna e curto estiramento) de acordo com a literatura atual. Método: estudo quantitativo sobre custo-efetividade por meio de modelagem com auxílio do software TreeAge® para a construção da árvore de decisão. Os pressupostos anunciados foram obtidos pelo uso de dados secundários de literatura para estimativa do custo e efetividade dos parâmetros assumidos. Para tal, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática de literatura com metanálise. Resultados: a árvore de decisão, após Roll Back mostrou que a terapia multicamadas dominou as alternativas no caso-base, representando custo intermediário por aplicação, porém, com a maior efetividade. O gráfico da análise de custo-efetividade também mostrou uma dominância estendida da bota de Unna em relação à bandagem de curto estiramento. A análise de sensibilidade mostrou que a bandagem multicamadas permanece como alternativa mais custo-efetiva, dentro do limiar de disposição para pagar. Conclusão: a alternativa com maior custo-efetividade foi a bandagem multicamadas, considerada padrão ouro na literatura. A segunda alternativa mais custo-efetiva foi a bota de Unna, terapia mais utilizada no Brasil.
Subject(s)
Humans , Varicose Ulcer/therapy , Wound Healing , Brazil , Compression Bandages , Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisABSTRACT
Objetivo: Desenvolver uma análise de custo-utilidade da implementação do teste farmacogenético como uma ferramenta adicional para orientar a escolha do melhor tratamento medicamentoso para indivíduos com depressão. Métodos: Para a realização desta análise, criou-se um modelo analítico de decisão baseado em um modelo de Markov. A avaliação foi realizada sob a perspectiva do Sistema de Saúde Suplementar brasileiro, com horizonte temporal de 10 anos, incluindo custos médicos diretos e custos da tecnologia utilizada, além de ter como comparador o tratamento empírico tradicional para a depressão. As probabilidades de transição foram obtidas por meio de análise da literatura disponível. Também foram realizadas análises de sensibilidade probabilística e univariada. Adicionalmente, foi realizada uma avaliação sob a perspectiva da sociedade, incluindo os custos de tratamento medicamentoso realizados pelos pacientes. Resultados: De acordo com a análise realizada, o emprego do teste farmacogenético como guia do tratamento para depressão mostrou-se favorável, proporcionando economia de -R$ 3.439,97 por paciente e aumento de 0,39 QALY ao longo do horizonte temporal. Assim, evidencia-se uma economia significativa a favor do teste farmacogenético, correspondendo a -R$ 8.776,78 por QALY salvo. Além disso, a robustez do modelo foi comprovada por meio das análises de sensibilidade. No cenário sob perspectiva da sociedade, o resultado foi ainda mais favorável, proporcionando economia de -R$ 9.381,49 por paciente e aumento de 0,39 QALY, correspondendo a -R$ 23.936,05 por QALY salvo. Conclusão: Os resultados encontrados neste estudo demonstraram que o uso de testes farmacogenéticos no tratamento da depressão é economicamente vantajoso, com aumento no valor de QALY e redução nos custos médicos diretos, em comparação ao tratamento empírico tradicional. Essa descoberta alinha-se à tendência atual de personalização no cuidado da saúde mental, sugerindo implicações práticas na reavaliação de protocolos, com potencial incorporação dos testes farmacogenéticos como padrão de cuidado.
Objective: To evaluate the cost-utility of pharmacogenetic testing incorporation as an additional tool in guiding the selection of optimal drug treatments for individuals with depression. Methods: A decision analytical model was created based on the Markov model for this analysis. The evaluation was conducted from the perspective of the Brazilian Supplementary Health System, with a time horizon of 10 years. The study included direct medical and technology costs and a comparison with traditional empirical treatment for depression was performed. Transition probabilities were derived from an analysis of available literature. Probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses were also carried out. Additionally, an evaluation was conducted from the perspective of Society, including the costs of drug treatment carried out by patients. Results: The application of pharmacogenetic testing as a guide for depression treatment demonstrated favorable outcomes, yielding savings of -R$ 3,439.97 per patient and an increase of 0.39 QALY over the specified time frame. Thus, significant savings were evident, corresponding to -R$ 8,776.78 per QALY saved. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the model's robustness. In the Society's perspective scenario, the outcome was even more favorable, resulting in savings of -R$ 9,381.49 per patient and a 0.39 increase in QALYs, equivalent to -R$ 23,936.05 per QALY saved. Conclusion: The study findings reveal that incorporating harmacogenetic tests in depression treatment offers economic benefits, evidenced by an increase in QALY value and a decrease in direct medical costs compared to conventional empirical treatment. This aligns with the ongoing trend towards personalized mental health care, implying practical considerations for protocol reassessment and the possible integration of pharmacogenetic tests as a standard of care.
Subject(s)
Markov Chains , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Pharmacogenomic Testing , Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisABSTRACT
Objetivo: Avaliar a relação de custo-efetividade e impacto orçamentário (AIO) do tratamento de deficiência de ferro (DF), com ou sem anemia, em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca (IC) com fração de ejeção reduzida NYHA II e III, com uso de carboximaltose férrica (CMF), comparada ao placebo (não intervenção), sob a perspectiva pagadora da saúde suplementar (SS). Métodos: No modelo econômico, foi utilizada a árvore de decisão, no horizonte temporal de 52 semanas, na perspectiva da SS, sendo mensurados os benefícios clínicos e os custos associados à intervenção. Também foram executadas análises de sensibilidade determinística e probabilística para avaliar possíveis incertezas futuras. A elaboração da AIO foi realizada considerando o horizonte temporal de cinco anos, a população a ser tratada, os diferentes cenários de market share e os custos diretos envolvidos no tratamento atual e no tratamento proposto. Resultados: A razão de custo-efetividade incremental (RCEI) foi de -R$ 20.517,07 para um ano de vida ajustado pela qualidade (QALYs). O impacto da incorporação da CMF na SS gerou uma economia em cinco anos de -R$ 43.945.225. Conclusões: A análise apresentada mostrou que o tratamento com CMF reduziu o custo de hospitalização, o número de consultas ambulatoriais e o custo de outros medicamentos relacionados à IC e proporcionou uma economia anual. Considerando um horizonte de tempo de 52 semanas, a terapia intravenosa com CMF resultou em uma estratégia de redução de custos, quando comparada ao tratamento proposto para a DF em pacientes com IC.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact (AIO) of iron carboxymaltose (CMF) for treatment of iron deficiency (ID), with or without anemia, in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction NYHA II and III compared to placebo (non-intervention), from the perspective of paying supplementary health (SS). Methods: In the economic model, the decision tree was used, with a time horizon of 52 weeks, from the SS perspective, measuring the clinical benefits and costs associated with the intervention. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyzes were also performed to assess possible future uncertainties. The elaboration of the AIO was carried out considering a time horizon of five years, population to be treated, different market share scenarios and direct costs involved in the current treatment and in the proposed treatment. Results: The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was -R$ 20,517.07 for 1 quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The budget impact of incorporation of the CMF in SSprovided savings in five years of -R$ 43,945,225. Conclusions: The presented analysis showed that treatment with CMF reduced the cost of hospitalization, the number of outpatient visits and the cost of other HF-related medications and provided annual savings. Considering a time horizon of 52 weeks, intravenous therapy with CMF resulted in a cost-saving strategy when compared to the proposed treatment for DF in patients with HF.
Subject(s)
Analysis of the Budgetary Impact of Therapeutic Advances , Iron Deficiencies , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Heart FailureABSTRACT
Objetivo: Analisar o impacto orçamentário da adoção de dispositivos contraceptivos reversíveis de longa duração em uma operadora de plano de saúde localizada no Sul do Brasil. Especificamente, analisamos a incorporação do implante subdérmico de etonogestrel (Implanon®) como alternativa ao sistema intrauterino de levonorgestrel (DIU Mirena® ou DIU Kyleena®), ao longo de um período de 15 anos. Métodos: Realizamos uma análise do impacto orçamentário incremental, considerando a inclusão gradual do implante subdérmico de etonogestrel. Foram considerados dados de uma operadora de planos de saúde com mais de 600.000 beneficiários. O horizonte temporal de 15 anos permitiu uma avaliação abrangente dos efeitos financeiros. Resultados: Identificamos 5.345 pacientes elegíveis para a utilização de contraceptivos reversíveis de longa duração. No cenário em que somente o sistema intrauterino de levonorgestrel era adotado, projetou-se um impacto orçamentário total de R$ 746.379.857,80 ao longo de 15 anos. No cenário alternativo, com a incorporação gradual do implante subdérmico, o impacto orçamentário total foi calculado em R$ 689.800.196,83. Isso resultou em um impacto orçamentário incremental negativo de -R$ 56.579.660,97 ao longo do período. Conclusão: A análise de impacto orçamentário realizada indica um potencial benefício financeiro ao adotar o implante subdérmico de etonogestrel como alternativa ao sistema intrauterino de levonorgestrel para contracepção. Esse achado sugere possíveis reduções de custos na área de saúde suplementar no Brasil, reforçando a importância de avaliar opções economicamente viáveis.
Objective: To analyze the budgetary impact of the adoption of long-acting reversible contraceptive devices in a health plan operator located in southern Brazil. Specifically, we analyzed the incorporation of the etonogestrel subdermal implant (Implanon®) as an alternative to the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (Mirena® IUD or Kyleena® IUD), over a period of 15 years. Methods: We performed an analysis of the incremental budgetary impact, considering the gradual inclusion of the etonogestrel subdermal implant. Data from a health plan operator with more than 600,000 beneficiaries were considered. The 15-year time horizon allowed for a comprehensive assessment of the financial effects. Results: We identified 5,345 patients eligible for the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives. In the scenario where only the levonorgestrel intrauterine system was adopted, a total budget impact of BRL 746,379,857.80 was projected over 15 years. In the alternative scenario, with the gradual incorporation of the subdermal implant, the total budgetary impact was calculated at BRL 689,800,196.83. This resulted in a negative incremental budgetary impact of -R$56,579,660.97 over the period. Conclusion: The budget impact analysis carried out indicates a potential financial benefit in adopting the etonogestrel subdermal implant as an alternative to the levonorgestrel intrauterine system for contraception. This finding suggests possible cost reductions in the supplementary healthcare area in Brazil, reinforcing the importance of evaluating economically viable options.
Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Contraception , Drug Implants , Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisABSTRACT
Objetivo: Comparar o implante transcateter de valva aórtica (TAVI) ao tratamento conservador em pacientes inoperáveis ou à cirurgia de troca valvar (SAVR) em pacientes com risco cirúrgico alto ou intermediário conforme a Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), por meio de uma revisão sistemática de avaliações econômicas completas. Avaliar a variabilidade de modelos econômicos, parâmetros, pressupostos e sua influência nos resultados finais. Métodos: Foi realizada uma busca da literatura nas bases Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SciELO e International HTA Base e busca manual. Foram incluídas análises econômicas completas baseadas em modelos econômicos publicadas entre 2011 e 2022, em português, inglês e espanhol. A qualidade dos estudos foi avaliada usando o instrumento QHES (Quality of Health Economic Studies). Resultados: Foram incluídos 36 estudos, majoritariamente análises de custo-utilidade (64%), da Europa (41%), utilizando dados de eficácia dos estudos PARTNER. O modelo de Markov (61%) foi predominante. O custo da prótese do TAVI foi um parâmetro de impacto na análise de sensibilidade nos três grupos. Os estudos alcançaram uma boa qualidade no instrumento QHES. Conclusão: O TAVI tendeu a ser custo-efetivo em relação aos comparadores. Os modelos não foram homogêneos nos parâmetros, horizontes temporais e taxa de desconto, podendo impactar a custo-efetividade do TAVI e dificultar a comparação dos resultados entre diferentes países e perspectivas.
ABSTRACT Objective: To compare transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to conservative treatment in inoperable patients or to valve replacement surgery (SAVR) in patients at high or intermediate surgical risk according to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), through a systematic review of comprehensive economic evaluations. Evaluate the variability of economic models, parameters, assumptions and their influence on final results. Methods: A literature search was performed in Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SciELO and International HTA Base and manual search. Complete economic analyzes based on economic models published between 2011 and 2022 in Portuguese, English and Spanish were included. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the QHES (Quality of Health Economic Studies) instrument. Results: Thirty-six studies were included, mostly cost-utility analyses (64%), from Europe (41%), and using efficacy data from the PARTNER studies. The Markov model (61%) was predominant. The cost of the TAVI prosthesis was the most important parameter in the sensitivity analysis in the three groups. The studies achieved a good quality in QHES instrument. Conclusion: TAVI tended to be cost-effective relative to comparators. The models were not homogeneous in parameters, time horizons and discount rate, which may have an impact on the cost-effectiveness of TAVI, making it difficult to compare the results between different countries and perspectives.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Systematic ReviewABSTRACT
Abstract Background and objectives: Contribution margin per hour (CMH) has been proposed in healthcare systems to increase the profitability of operating suites. The aim of our study is to propose a simple and reproducible model to calculate CMH and to increase cost-effectiveness. Methods: For the ten most commonly performed surgical procedures at our Institution, we prospectively collected their diagnosis-related group (DRG) reimbursement, variable costs and mean procedural time. We quantified the portion of total staffed operating room time to be reallocated with a minimal risk of overrun. Moreover, we calculated the total CMH with a random reallocation on a first come-first served basis. Finally, prioritizing procedures with higher CMH, we ran a simulation by calculating the total CMH. Results: Over a two-months period, we identified 14.5 hours of unutilized operating room to reallocate. In the case of a random ''first come -first serve'' basis, the total earnings were 87,117 United States dollars (USD). Conversely, with a reallocation which prioritized procedures with a high CMH, it was possible to earn 140,444 USD (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Surgical activity may be one of the most profitable activities for hospitals, but a cost-effective management requires a comprehension of its cost profile. Reallocation of unused operating room time according to CMH may represent a simple, reproducible and reliable tool for elective cases on a waiting list. In our experience, it helped improving the operating suite cost-effectiveness.
Subject(s)
Humans , Operating Rooms , Health Care Costs , Elective Surgical Procedures , Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisABSTRACT
Objetivos. Analizar el circuito de utilización de los medicamentos de alto costo (MAC) y los resultados clínicos obtenidos en un hospital de pediatría público de alta complejidad de Argentina y presentar una estrategia de selección replicable para otras instituciones de similares características de la región. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo, descriptivo, aleatorizado, conducido en el Hospital de Pediatría Juan P. Garrahan de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires en el período entre el 1 de setiembre de 2018 y el 31 de marzo de 2019. Se evaluaron dos unidades de estudio, la unidad paciente y la unidad MAC. Resultados: Los MAC consumen 7.921.200 dólares estadounidenses (USD) anuales y representan el 41% del costo de los medicamentos del hospital de alta complejidad. El 50% del costo de los MAC estuvo representado por la gammaglobulina (medicamento utilizado en diferentes enfermedades). Los pacientes proceden de toda la Argentina y otros países y un 44% tiene cobertura de salud. Los diagnósticos para los que se prescribieron MAC con mayor frecuencia fueron los relacionados con patología oncológica (leucemia linfoide aguda, leucemia mieloblástica aguda). El 54% de los pacientes presentó mejoría atribuible directamente a la administración de los MAC, 39% no presentó cambios y el 7% empeoró. Conclusiones: La efectividad en los resultados clínicos y el análisis de los circuitos de aprobación indican que, además de la aprobación por las entidades nacional e internacionales, la evaluación responsable por parte de las instituciones efectoras, mediante la discusión interdisciplinaria basada en la mejor evidencia, contribuye a optimizar la utilización de los MAC y la seguridad de los pacientes (AU)
Objectives. To analyze the utilization circuit of high-cost medications (HCM) and the clinical results obtained in a tertiarycare public pediatric hospital in Argentina and to present a selection strategy that may be disseminated to other institutions of similar characteristics in the region. Methods: A prospective, descriptive, randomized study was conducted at Hospital de Pediatría Juan P. Garrahan in Buenos Aires between September 1, 2018 and March 31, 2019. Two study units were evaluated, the patient and the HCM. Results: HCMs account for 7,921,200 US dollars (USD) per year and represent 41% of the cost of drugs in this tertiary-care hospital. Gamma globulin (a drug used for different diseases) accounted for 50% of the cost of HCMs. Patients came from Argentina and other countries and 44% had a health insurance. Cancer (acute lymphoid leukemia, acute myeloblastic leukemia) was the diagnosis for which HCMs were most frequently prescribed. Fifty-four percent of patients showed improvement directly attributable to the administration of HCMs, 39% showed no change, and 7% worsened. Conclusions: The effectiveness in clinical outcomes and the analysis of approval circuits show that, in addition to approval by national and international entities, responsible evaluation by the effector institutions through interdisciplinary discussion based on the best evidence contributes to optimizing the use of HCMs and patient safety (AU)
Subject(s)
Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee , Pharmaceutical Preparations/economics , Ethics Committees , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization , Hospitals, Pediatric , Hospitals, Public , Prospective Studies , Patient Safety , Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisABSTRACT
Background@#Cost-effectivenessstudiesareimportant for chronic diseases such as psoriasis, which may cause significant financial burden and negatively affect the patient's quality of life.@*Objectives@#This study evaluated which among the treatment options, namely topicals phototherapy (TP), topicals + systemic (TS), and topicals + biologics (TB), is the most cost-effective for the management of moderate to severe psoriasis at the Rizal Medical Center's Psoriasis Center@*Methods@#A total of 65 moderate to severe psoriasis patients seen at the Rizal Medical Center's Psoriasis Center in 2021 were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Chart review was conducted to account all direct costs of treatment. The effectiveness in relation to the overall cost was assessed using the psoriasis area severity index (PASI) and the dermatological life quality index (DLQI).@*Results@#Our study showed that TS is the most cost-effective treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis with the lowest cost per PASI75 and DLQI<5 improvement valued at Php335.36, followed by TP valued at Php 762.87, and lastly by TB at Php 19,058.03. Despite TB incurring the highest cost, all patients in this treatment group showed the highest mean difference of PASI and DLQI.@*Conclusions@#Our findings suggest that topical with systemic medication is the most cost-effective treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis
Subject(s)
Psoriasis , Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisABSTRACT
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and economic efficiency of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules combined with Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis(CRS). The randomized controlled trial(RCT) of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules combined with Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray in the treatment of CRS was searched against EMbase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, SinoMed, and Wanfang. The efficacy, nasal mucociliary transport time, and safety of the therapy above in the treatment of CRS were analyzed with single-group rate and Meta-analysis, and the economy and sensitivity were evaluated from the perspective of payer. A total of 9 RCTs were included, including 1 145 patients. Meta-analysis showed that compared with Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray alone, Biyuan Tongqiao Granules combined with Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray in the treatment of CRS patients increased the effective rate(RR=1.17, 95%CI[1.11, 1.24], P<0.000 01) and shortened the nasal mucociliary transport time(MD=-3.32, 95%CI[-5.86,-0.78], P=0.01), there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups. The incremental cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the treatment costs of the control group and the observation group were 44.15 yuan and 1 044.96 yuan, respectively. In the Biyuan Tongqiao Granules combined with Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray treatment group, 75.48 yuan was spent to improve the effective rate of CRS by 1%. The one-way sensitivity analysis indicated the days of treatment, the RR of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules combined with Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray, the price of unit preparation of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules, and the effective rate of Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray alone had great influence on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. In conclusion, Biyuan Tongqiao Granules combined with Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray improves the therapeutic effect on CRS. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that when the willingness to pay was greater than 7 920 yuan(less than 0.1 of GDP per capita 8 098 yuan), the combined therapy was economically superior to the control. Due to the limited number of articles published, it is necessary to carry out a real-world clinical trial of Biyuan Tongqiao Gra-nules and Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray in the treatment of CRS, so as to compare the cost-effectiveness of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules and Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray.
Subject(s)
Humans , Triamcinolone Acetonide/adverse effects , Nasal Sprays , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Chronic DiseaseABSTRACT
This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Chaiyin Granules compared with Oseltamivir Phosphate Capsules in the treatment of influenza(exogenous wind-heat syndrome). Based on a randomized, double-blind, positive drug parallel control clinical trial, this study evaluated the pharmacoeconomics of Chaiyin Granules with cost-effectiveness analysis method. A total of 116 patients with influenza from eight hospitals(grade Ⅱ level A above) in 6 cities were selected in this study, including 78 cases in the experimental group with Chaiyin Granules and Oseltamivir Phosphate Capsules placebo, and 38 cases in the control group with Oseltamivir Phosphate Capsules and Chaiyin Granules placebo. The total cost of this study included direct medical cost, direct non-medical cost, and indirect cost. The remission time of clinical symptoms, cure time/cure rate, antipyretic onset time/complete antipyretic time, viral nucleic acid negative rate, and traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) syndrome curative effect were selected as the effect indicators for cost-effectiveness analysis. Four-quadrant diagram was used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. The results showed that Chaiyin Granules were not inferior to Oseltamivir Phosphate Capsules in the remission time of clinical symptoms of influenza(3.1 d vs 2.9 d, P=0.360, non-inferiority margin was 0.5 d). Compared with Oseltamivir Phosphate Capsules, Chaiyin Granules would delay the remission time of clinic symptoms of influenza for 1 d, but could save 213.9 yuan. 1 d delay in cure time could save 149.3 yuan; 1% reduction in the cure rate could save 8.2 yuan; 1 d delay in antipyretic onset time could save 295.4 yuan; 1 d delay in complete antipyretic time could save 114.3 yuan; 1% reduction in the 5-day cure rate of TCM syndrome could save 19.2 yuan. Different from other indicators, there was no statistically significant difference between two groups in the effect of negative conversion rate of viral nucleic acid, but the cost was lower and the effect was superior, and the pharmacoeconomics was not different from that of Oseltamivir Phosphate Capsules in the field of influenza treatment.
Subject(s)
Humans , Antipyretics/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Nucleic Acids/therapeutic use , Oseltamivir/therapeutic use , Phosphates/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Double-Blind MethodABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the combined chemotherapy regimen containing Bedaquiline (BR) and the conventional treatment regimen (CR, not containing Bedaquiline) for the treatment of adults with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in China.@*METHODS@#A combination of a decision tree and a Markov model was developed to estimate the cost and effects of MDR patients in BR and CR within ten years. The model parameter data were synthesized from the literature, the national TB surveillance information system, and consultation with experts. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of BR vs. CR was determined.@*RESULTS@#BR ( vs. CR) had a higher sputum culture conversion rate and cure rate and prevented many premature deaths (decreased by 12.8%), thereby obtaining more quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (increased by 2.31 years). The per capita cost in BR was as high as 138,000 yuan, roughly double that of CR. The ICER for BR was 33,700 yuan/QALY, which was lower than China's 1× per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2020 (72,400 yuan).@*CONCLUSION@#BR is shown to be cost effective. When the unit price of Bedaquiline reaches or falls below 57.21 yuan per unit, BR is expected to be the dominant strategy in China over CR.
Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , China/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Discrete event simulation (DES) model is based on individual data, by which discrete events over time are simulated to reflect disease progression. The effects of individual characteristics on disease progression could be considered in the DES model. Moreover, unlike state-transition models, DES model without setting of fixed cycle can contribute to more accurate estimation of event time, especially in the evaluation of the long-term effectiveness of screening strategies for complex diseases in which time dimension needs to be considered. This article introduces the general principles, construction steps, analytic methods and other relevant issues of the DES model. Based on a research case of estimating the cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in women aged 65 years and above in the United Kingdom, key points in applications of the DES model in analysis on effectiveness of complex disease screening are discussed in detail, including model construction and analysis and interpretation of the results. DES model can predict occurring time of discrete events accurately by establishing the distribution function of their occurring time and is increasingly used to evaluate the screening strategies for complex diseases in which time dimension needs to be considered. In the construction of DES model, it is necessary to pay close attention to the clear presentation of model structure and simulation process and follow the relevant reporting specification to conduct cost-effectiveness analysis to ensure the transparency and repeatability of the research.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Disease ProgressionABSTRACT
O câncer de pulmão é reconhecidamente um dos mais agressivos dentre os tumores, com alta letalidade. A detecção precoce do câncer de pulmão com tomografia computadorizada de baixa dose tem sido avaliada em diversos países e implementada em alguns. Entretanto, a implementação do rastreamento com uso dessa tecnologia para detecção precoce de novos casos, permanece questionado no mundo, e no Brasil não está recomendado. Por esse motivo, foi elaborada uma avaliação de custo-efetividade do uso da tomografia computadorizada de baixa dose como estratégia de rastreamento para detecção precoce do câncer de pulmão em população de risco sob a perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde como órgão financiador. Inicialmente uma revisão sistemática foi elaborada e descrita uma síntese das diferentes abordagens disponíveis nas avaliações econômicas. Os 30 estudos selecionados e incluídos na revisão mostraram qualidade global, com bom padrão metodológico, que atendeu a mais de 80% dos critérios estabelecidos pelo formulário (Consensus Health Economic Criteria list). A análise da eficiência comparativa entre duas alternativas (anual e bianual) para o diagnóstico precoce de câncer de pulmão, considerando a estratégia de rastreamento com tomografia computadorizada de baixa dose e a conduta clínica sem rastreio, como cenário de referência, teve por base uma coorte hipotética de 100.000 indivíduos assintomáticos, e tabagistas de alto risco. O horizonte temporal considerou a expectativa de vida dos indivíduos, e a perspectiva foi o Sistema Único de Saúde como financiador da assistência à saúde. Apenas os custos médicos diretos dos itens relacionados ao processo de diagnóstico e tratamento foram estimados. O desfecho foi medido em anos de vida ganhos. O desconto de 5% foi aplicado aos custos e benefícios. E realizadas análises de sensibilidade determinística univariada e probabilística. A razão de custo-efetividade incremental da estratégia de rastreamento anual com a tomografia computadorizada de baixa dose para a detecção precoce de câncer de pulmão foi estimada em R$ 97.583,52 por cada ano de vida ganho e de R$ 56.642,20 por ano de vida ganho, com o rastreio a cada dois anos. A análise determinística mostrou que o impacto da redução da incidência de câncer de pulmão, em ambas as alternativas (anual e bianual), chega a gerar quase o triplo dos gastos estimados para a razão de custo-efetividade incremental. Para o anual esse aumento chega a R$ 176.834,47, fora do limiar de R$105.000,00, enquanto o rastreamento bianual, mesmo dobrando os gastos, ainda se manteria dentro do limiar de custo-efetividade atualmente definido para o país. Os demais parâmetros de relevância (sensibilidade do rastreamento para detecção de câncer e a proporção de diagnósticos em estadio I/II com o rastreamento) não impactaram nos resultados finais. A análise probabilística das alternativas de rastreamento mostrou para o rastreamento anual 52% das simulações dentro do limiar estabelecido e 94,2% referente ao bianual. O resultado do modelo econômico mostrou resultados favoráveis com a adoção da estratégia de rastreamento de câncer de pulmão com uso de tomografia computadorizada de baixa dose comparada a condução clínica, realizada a cada dois anos em população de alto risco, sob a perspectiva do SUS. (AU)
Lung cancer is one of the most aggressive tumors, with high lethality. Early detection of lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography has been evaluated in several countries and implemented in some. However, the implementation of screening using this technology for early detection of new cases remains questioned worldwide, but in Brazil, it has not been recommended. Thus, a cost-effectiveness assessment of a screening strategy with low-dose computed tomography for early lung cancer detection in a high-risk population under the Unified Health System perspective as a funding body. First, a systematic review was performed and synthesized the different approaches available in economic evaluations. Thirty studies selected and included in the review showed overall quality, with a well-designed methodological standard, which met more than 80% of the criteria established by the Consensus Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) list form. The analysis of the comparative efficiency between two alternatives (annual and biannual) for the early diagnosis of lung cancer, considering the screening strategy with low-dose computed tomography and the clinical management, without screening, as a reference scenario, was based on a cohort hypothetical 100,000 asymptomatic individuals, and high-risk smokers. The time horizon considered the individuals' life expectancy, and the perspective was the Brazilian Unified Health System as the funder of health care. Only the direct medical costs of items related to the diagnosis and treatment process were estimated. The outcome measure was life years gained. A discount of 5% has been applied to costs and benefits. A deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis has been performed. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the annual screening strategy for early lung cancer detection has been estimated at BRL 97,583.52 for each life-year gained and BRL 56,642.20 per year of life gained, with screening every two years. The deterministic analysis showed that the impact of reducing the incidence of lung cancer, in both alternatives (annual and biannual) generated almost three times the estimated expenses for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. For the annual survey, this increase reaches BRL 176,834.47, outside the BRL 105,000.00 threshold, while biannual screening, even doubling the expenses, would remain within the cost-effectiveness threshold currently defined for the country. The other relevant parameters (screening sensitivity for cancer detection and the proportion of stage I/II diagnoses with screening) have no impact on the final results. The probabilistic analysis showed that 52% of simulations within the established threshold correspond to the annual screening, and 94.2% to the biannual. The economic model designed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography compared to clinical care showed favorable results from the strategy performed every two years in a high-risk population, under the SUS perspective. (AU)