Mapa de evidências sobre sequelas e reablitação da covid-19 pós-aguda: uma versão atualizada em julho de 2022 / Evidence map on post-acute COVID-19 sequelae and rehabilitation: Update as of July 2022 / Mapa de evidencia sobre las secuelas y la rehabilitación tras la COVID-19 aguda: versión actualizada en julio del 2022

RESUMO Objetivo. Atualizar o mapa de evidências sobre os efeitos de intervenções para reabilitação de covid-19 pós-aguda. Métodos. O escopo da busca foi definido conforme a população (pacientes que tiveram covid-19 sintomática e sequelas da doença pós-aguda), o contexto (intervenções para recuperação das sequelas) e o tipo de estudo (revisão sistemática, revisão sistemática rápida, revisão de escopo ou revisão de revisões). Após a busca na PubMed e na Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, dois autores independentes selecionaram estudos de revisão. A atualização do mapa feita em 27 de julho de 2022 seguiu os mesmos procedimentos descritos anteriormente. Resultados. O mapa inicial de evidências continha 22 estudos (quatro revisões sistemáticas, quatro revisões rápidas, quatro revisões de estudos de caso, uma revisão de escopo e nove protocolos de revisão sistemática). Nesta atualização, outros 10 estudos foram incluídos. Foram identificados quatro grupos de intervenções (multimodal, terapêutica, terapias complementares e farmacológica) e sete grupos de desfechos (condições patológicas, doenças/transtornos respiratórios, dor, indicadores fisiológicos e metabólicos, saúde mental/qualidade de vida, funções sensoriais, mortalidade), totalizando 166 associações entre intervenções e desfechos. As terapias complementares tiveram mais associações com os desfechos (n = 94). Entre os desfechos, destacaram-se os indicadores fisiológicos e metabólicos, as condições patológicas e a saúde mental/qualidade de vida (44, 41 e 35 associações, respectivamente). Conclusões. Na atualização do mapa, analisaram-se 69 associações, com destaque para exercício (isolado, multicomponente ou intervenção multimodal, apresentando 23 efeitos positivos e quatro potencialmente positivos) e intervenções farmacológicas e terapias complementares para funções sensoriais (15 associações). O alto número de protocolos indica que a literatura permanece incipiente.

ABSTRACT Objective. To update the evidence map on the effects of interventions for post-acute COVID-19 rehabilitation. Method. The search scope was defined according to the population (patients with symptomatic COVID-19 and post-acute COVID sequelae), the context (interventions for rehabilitation), and the type of study (systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews or overviews of reviews). Following a search in PubMed and the Virtual Health Library, two independent authors selected the articles for review. The map was updated on July 27, 2022, using the same procedures employed in the initial review. Results. The initial evidence map included 22 studies (four systematic reviews, four rapid reviews, four reviews of case reports, one scoping review, and nine systematic review protocols). In the present update, an additional 10 studies were included. The analysis revealed four groups of interventions (multimodal, therapeutic, complementary, and pharmacological) and seven groups of outcomes (pathological conditions, diseases/respiratory disorders, pain, physiological and metabolic markers, mental health/quality of life, sensory function, and mortality), totaling 166 associations between interventions and outcomes. The highest number of associations was observed for complementary therapies (n = 94). Among the outcomes, the highest number of associations was observed for physiological and metabolic markers, pathological conditions, and mental health/quality of life (44, 41, and 35 associations respectively). Conclusions. The map update involved the analysis of 69 associations, most notably exercise (isolated, multicomponent, or multimodal intervention), with 23 positive and four potentially positive effects) and pharmacologic and complementary therapies for sensorial functions (15 associations). The high number of systematic review protocols indicates that the literature is still incipient.

RESUMEN Objetivo. Actualizar el mapa de evidencia de los efectos de las intervenciones de rehabilitación tras la COVID-19 aguda. Métodos. El alcance de la búsqueda se definió en función de la población (pacientes que habían tenido COVID-19 sintomática y secuelas tras un cuadro agudo de la enfermedad), el contexto (intervenciones de recuperación de las secuelas) y el tipo de estudio (revisión sistemática, revisión sistemática rápida, revisión del alcance o revisión de revisiones). Después de realizar búsquedas en PubMed y en la Biblioteca Virtual de Salud, dos autores independientes seleccionaron los estudios de revisión. En la actualización del mapa realizada el 27 de julio del 2022 se siguieron los mismos procedimientos descritos anteriormente. Resultados. El mapa de evidencia inicial contenía 22 estudios (cuatro revisiones sistemáticas, cuatro revisiones rápidas, cuatro revisiones de estudios de casos, una revisión del alcance y nueve protocolos de revisión sistemática). En esta actualización se incluyeron otros 10 estudios. Se encontraron cuatro grupos de intervenciones (multimodales y terapéuticas, y tratamientos complementarios y farmacológicos) y siete grupos de resultados (afecciones patológicas, enfermedades y trastornos respiratorios, dolor, indicadores fisiológicos y metabólicos, salud mental/calidad de vida, funciones sensoriales y mortalidad), con un total de 166 asociaciones entre las intervenciones y los resultados. Los tratamientos complementarios presentaron más asociaciones con los resultados (n = 94). Entre los resultados, se destacaron los indicadores fisiológicos y metabólicos, las afecciones patológicas y la salud mental/calidad de vida (44, 41 y 35 asociaciones, respectivamente). Conclusiones. En la actualización del mapa, se analizaron 69 asociaciones entre las cuales se destacan el ejercicio (aislado o compuesto o una intervención multimodal, con 23 efectos positivos y cuatro potencialmente positivos) y las intervenciones farmacológicas y los tratamientos complementarios para las funciones sensoriales (15 asociaciones). El elevado número de protocolos indica que la bibliografía sigue siendo incipiente.

Tratamientos alternativos y/o complementarios en pacientes con trastorno del espectro autista / Alternative and/or complementary treatments in patients with autism spectrum disorder

El Trastorno del Espectro Autista (TEA) es una condición que afecta el neurodesarrollo caracterizada por presentar alteraciones en la comunicación, conducta y en las interacciones sociales, y que afecta el funcionamiento del individuo a lo largo de su vida. Los tratamientos recomendados por la evidencia científica incluyen un enfoque interdisciplinario que combina intervenciones educativas, terapias psicológicas/conductuales, terapia del habla y el lenguaje, terapia ocupacional/física y tratamientos médicos. Para muchas familias, barreras económicas y geográficas limitan el acceso a los tratamientos específicos. Este y otros motivos llevan a incorporar tratamientos alternativos y/o complementarios. El Centro Nacional de Medicina Complementaria y Alternativa (NIH-EEUU) define los Tratamientos Alternativos Complementarios (TAC) como "un grupo de diversos sistemas médicos y de cuidados de la salud; prácticas y productos que generalmente no son considerados parte de la medicina convencional". La prevalencia del uso de TAC en personas con TEA está entre las más altas respecto a otras patologías y a otros trastornos del desarrollo, con porcentajes entre 52% y 95%. Su uso debe ser preguntado en las consultas de seguimiento, y debe discutirse sobre riesgos, beneficios y costos. La cantidad y el tipo de intervención que reciben niños, niñas, adolescentes (NNyA) y adultos con TEA varían enormemente en todo el mundo e incluso dentro de un mismo país y región. El pronóstico del TEA es mejorado cuando el diagnóstico es oportuno y temprano y el abordaje educativo terapéutico es iniciado y orientado a aspectos funcionales y centrados en la familia. (AU)

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by alterations in communication, behavior, and social interactions that affect the individual's functioning throughout life. Evidence-based treatments include an interdisciplinary approach that combines educational interventions, psychological/behavioral therapies, speech and language therapy, occupational/physical therapy, and medical treatments. For many families, economic and geographic barriers limit access to specific treatments. This and other reasons have led to the incorporation of alternative and/or complementary treatments. The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH - USA) defines complementary alternative medicine (CAM) as "a group of diverse medical and health care systems, practices and products that are not generally considered part of conventional medicine". The prevalence of the use of CAM in people with ASD is among the highest compared to other diseases and developmental disorders, with percentages ranging from 52% to 95%. Their use should be considered in follow-up visits, and risks, benefits, and costs should be discussed. The amount and type of intervention received by children, adolescents, and adults with ASD varies greatly around the world and even within the same country and region. The prognosis of ASD is improved with timely diagnosis and early, family-centered and functionally oriented educational and therapeutic approaches

Impact of a "journal club" on the confidence of dental students to critically appraise a clinical trial / Impacto de un "club de revistas" en la confianza de estudiantes de odontología para valorar críticamente un ensayo clínico

Introduction: Journal clubs are a strategy that allows students to be exposed to critical appraisal of articles from the early stages of their training. Its long term impact on the formation of competencies is debated. Objetive: To evaluate if the sessions of a Journal Club increase the confidence that Dentistry students have in their abilities to critically appraise a clinical trial. Material and Methods: A prospective cohort study that involved 21 students from the Faculty of Dentistry of the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (Lima, Peru) who participated in six Journal Club monthly sessions. The sessions involved the analysis and discussion of clinical trials. Confidence to critically appraise an article before and after was assessed using a self-administered scale. Final and baseline scores were analyzed using a Wilcoxon test. Results: Nineteen students finished all the sessions. Scores before the sessions were on average 2.09±1.17, while after the sixth session an average of 3.53±0.26 was obtained (p<0.05). Both males and females had improved scores after the sessions; however, there were no differences between them (p=0.08). The third- and fourth-year students presented significant changes in their scores (p<0.05). Conclusion: The constant participation in the sessions of a Journal Club improved the confidence that students have when critically evaluating a clinical trial article.

Introducción: Los clubes de revistas son una estrategia que permiten exponer a los estudiantes a la valoración crítica de artículos desde etapas tempranas de su formación. Su impacto a largo plazo en la formación de competencias es discutido. Objetivo: Evaluar si las sesiones de un Club de Revistas permiten aumentar la confianza que tienen los estudiantes de Odontología en las habilidades para valorar críticamente un ensayo clínico. Material y Métodos: Estudio de cohorte prospectivo que involucró 21 estudiantes de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (Lima. Perú) que participaron de seis sesiones mensuales de un Club de Revistas. Las sesiones implicaron el análisis y discusión de ensayos clínicos. Se evaluó la confianza para valorar críticamente un artículo antes y después a través de una escala autoadministrada. Las puntuaciones finales y basales se analizaron a través de una prueba de Wilcoxon. Resultados: 19 estudiantes finalizaron la totalidad de las sesiones. Las puntuaciones antes de las sesiones eviden-ciaron una media de 2,09 ± 1,17, mientras que después de la sexta sesión se obtuvo una media de 3,53 ± 0,26 (p<0,05). Tanto varones como mujeres evidenciaron mejorar su puntuación media luego de las sesiones; sin embargo, no evidenciaron diferencias entre ellos (p=0,08). Los estudiantes de tercer y cuarto año presentaron cambios significativos de sus puntuaciones (p<0,05). Conclusión: La participación constante a las sesiones de un Club de Revistas permitió mejorar la confianza que tienen los estudiantes al momento de valorar críticamente un artículo del tipo ensayo clínico.

What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions? / O que revisões sistemáticas Cochrane dizem sobre terapêutica para zumbido?

INTRODUCTION: Tinnitus is a sound perception not related to stimulation. It can significantly impair the quality of life and its treatment is considered one significant challenge of Medicine. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate systematic reviews developed by Cochrane regarding therapeutic interventions for subjective tinnitus. METHODS: It is an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. We searched systematic reviews on Cochrane Library. The MeSH term "tinnitus" was used for searches. Inclusion criteria involved therapeutic interventions for patients with subjective tinnitus. RESULTS: The search strategy recovered 577 citations with 14 Cochrane systematic reviews. 13 were included because they were focusing on primary tinnitus interventions. One review had no scope of analysis for tinnitus and it was excluded. 7,998 tinnitus patients were evaluated. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of evidence of the effectiveness of any intervention for tinnitus treatment, considering the studies performed so far and compiled in Cochrane systematic reviews.

INTRODUÇÃO: O zumbido é a sensação do som sem que haja estimulação ambiental. Pode prejudicar significativamente a qualidade de vida e seu tratamento é considerado um grande desafio da Medicina. OBJETIVO: Avaliar as revisões sistemáticas desenvolvidas pela Cochrane, no que concerne às intervenções terapêuticas para o zumbido subjetivo. MÉTODOS: Trata-se de overview de revisões sistemáticas Cochrane. Procedeu-se à busca por revisões sistemáticas na Cochrane Library. Foi utilizado o termo DeCS "zumbido". Os critérios de inclusão envolveram intervenções terapêuticas para pacientes com zumbido subjetivo. RESULTADOS: A estratégia de busca recuperou 577 citações e, destas, 14 revisões sistemáticas Cochrane, sendo que 13 enfocavam intervenções primárias para zumbido, sendo estas incluídas neste estudo. Uma revisão não tinha escopo de análise para zumbido e foi excluída. Foram avaliados 7.998 portadores de zumbido. CONCLUSÃO: Há carência de evidência de efetividade de qualquer intervenção, medicamentosa ou não, para tratamento do zumbido, considerando os estudos realizados até o momento e compilados em revisões sistemáticas Cochrane.

Narrative evidence-based medicine:a strategy for evaluation of clinical efficacy of Chinese medicine / 中国中药杂志

Rich experience of clinical diagnosis and treatment has been accumulated in the developmental history of Chinese medicine, and the efficacy has been increasingly accepted by the public. However, the evaluation of clinical efficacy is currently based more on scientific evidence instead of merely the changes of patient symptoms. In Chinese medicine, the changes of major disease indicators, patient symptoms, and pathogenesis are the major criteria for the evaluation of clinical efficacy. The lack of well-accepted and uniform criteria and the uncertainty of subjective evaluation limit the development of clinical Chinese medicine. Evidence-based medicine combines clinical skills with the current best evidence. Narrative medicine, utilizing people's narratives in clinical practice, emphasizes patient feelings, willingness, and value orientation. The introduction of both evidence-based medicine and narrative medicine into the evaluation of clinical efficacy refers to the construction of the clinical efficacy evaluation system in a paradigm of participatory diagnosis and treatment. It can fully reflect the characteristics of Chinese medicine, respect the values of patients, and achieve universal clinical evidence. Therefore, it helps to improve the diagnosis and treatment, the relationship between doctors and patients, patients' life quality and decision-making awareness, and finally the new evaluation model of clinical efficacy of Chinese medicine.

Extração de recomendações farmacológicas para subsidiar o processo de adaptação de guias de prática clínica utilizados no tratamento da fibrilação atrial não valvar - uma revisão sistemática de guias de prática clínica / Extraction of pharmacological recommendations to support the process of adaptation of clinical practice guides used in the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines

A fibrilação atrial (FA) não valvar é a arritmia cardíaca mais comum em adultos, principalmente na população idosa. Para o tratamento da FA, recomenda-se a utilização de guias de prática clínica (GPCs), que são documentos que apresentam as melhores e mais atualizadas evidências para o tratamento dos pacientes acometidos por essa arritmia. Todavia, o processo de desenvolvimento dos GPCs requer recursos humanos, financeiros e tempo. Assim, a adaptação dos referidos documentos é uma opção para reduzir a duplicação de esforços e possibilitar sua adequação para uso local. O objetivo deste trabalho foi elaborar uma matriz de recomendações farmacológicas para subsidiar o processo de adaptação de GPCs utilizados no tratamento da fibrilação atrial não valvar. Para tanto, aplicou-se o método ADAPTE: revisão sistematizada de GPCs, avaliação e seleção dos GPCs de qualidade e elaboração da matriz. Foram considerados elegíveis 26 GPCs com recomendações farmacológicas para assistência primária da fibrilação atrial não valvar em adultos, publicados em inglês, espanhol ou português no período de abril de 2014 a abril de 2019 e indexados às bases de referência: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library e em 12 bases de dados específicas. A qualidade dos GPCs, foi avaliada pela aplicação do instrumento Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluarion II (AGREE II), sendo considerados de alta qualidade aqueles que apresentaram nota igual ou superior a 60 % no domínio Rigor de desenvolvimento. Todas as etapas foram realizadas por, pelo menos, 2 avaliadores e em caso de discrepância, um terceiro avaliador participou do processo. Dos 26 GPCs avaliados apenas 7 (26,9%) foram considerados de alta qualidade. A maioria dos GPCs utiliza o escore CHA2DS2-VASc, que indica a profilaxia tromboembólica em pacientes com FA não valvar a partir da pontuação 1 (fator de risco não sexual) e sugere a anticoagulação com anticoagulantes de ação direta. Houve pouca ênfase à complexidade da profilaxia de eventos tromboembólicos em idosos. Esta matriz visa contribuir para que sejam realizadas discussões e adaptações de GPCs destinado ao tratamento da FA não valvar com ênfase nas demandas e necessidades locais

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in adults, especially in the elderly population. For the treatment of AF, the use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is recommended, which are documents that present the best and most up-to-date evidence for the treatment of patients who are affected by this arrhythmia. However, the CPGs development process requires human, financial and time resources. However, the adaptation of documents is an option to reduce the duplication of efforts and make it possible to adapt them for any local use. The objective of this work was to elaborate a matrix of pharmacological treatment to support the process of adaptation of CPGs used in the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Therefore, the ADAPTE method was applied: systematic review of CPGs, evaluation and selection of quality CPGs and matrix definition. Twenty-six CPGs were considered eligible with pharmacological recommendations for primary care of non-valvular atrial fibrillation valid in adults, published in English, Spanish or Portuguese from April 2014 to April 2019 and indexed to the following reference databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and in 12 specific databases. The quality of the CPGs was assessed by applying the Assessment of Guidelines for Research and Assessment II (AGREE II) instrument, being considered of high those who had a grade equal to or greater than 60% in the domain Rigour of development. All steps were performed by a least 2 evaluators and in case of discrepancy, a third evaluator participated in the process. Of the 26 CPGs evaluated, only 7 (26.9%) were considered to be of high quality. Most CPGs use the CHA2DS2-VASc score, which indicates thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular AF from score 1 (non-sexual risk factor), and suggest anticoagulation with direct-acting anticoagulants. There was little emphasis on the complexity of prophylaxis for thromboembolic events in the elderly. This matrix aims to contribute to discussion and adaptations of CPGs for the treatment of non-valvar AF with the emphasis on local demands and needs

Eficácia e segurança de tripla terapia broncodilatadora comparada à dupla terapia em DPOC grave: revisão rápida de evidências / Effectiveness and safety of triple bronchodilator therapy compared to dual therapy in severe COPD: rapid response review of evidence

Tecnologia: Tripla terapia broncodilatadora (vilanterol/ umeclidínio/ fluticasona, formoterol/ glicopirrônio/ beclometasona) e dupla terapia. Indicação: Tratamento de doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (DPOC), formas grave e muito grave. Pergunta: Há diferenças de efeito nos principais desfechos de eficácia e segurança entre a tripla terapia broncodilatadora e as duplas terapias no tratamento de pacientes com DPOC, formas grave e muito grave? Métodos: Revisão rápida de evidências (overview) de revisões sistemáticas, com levantamento bibliográfico realizado na base de dados PUBMED, utilizando estratégia estruturada de busca. A qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas foi avaliada com AMSTAR-2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews). Resultados: Foram selecionadas e incluídas 2 revisões sistemáticas. Conclusão: A tripla terapia broncodilatadora era mais eficaz que a dupla terapia para reduzir a taxa anual de exacerbações moderadas a severas, mas não tinha superioridade para obter ganhos clínicos em outros desfechos (volume expiratório forçado no primeiro segundo, qualidade de vida, índice de dispneia, mortalidade geral, mortalidade respiratória), exceto que a tripla terapia era superior à dupla terapia com agonistas beta-2/ antagonistas antimuscarínicos e similar à dupla terapia com agonistas beta-2/ corticoesteróides inalatórios para reduzir mortalidade. A tripla terapia tinha perfil de segurança similar à dupla terapia, com mesmo risco para eventos adversos e eventos adversos graves. A tripla terapia tinha maior risco para pneumonias que a dupla terapia com agonistas beta-2/ antagonistas antimuscarínicos

Technology: Triple bronchodilator therapy (vilanterol/ umeclidinium/ fluticasone, formoterol/ glycopyrronium/ beclomethasone) and dual therapy. Indication: Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), severe and very severe forms. Question: Are there differences in effects of efficacy and safety outcomes between triple bronchodilator therapy and dual therapies in treating patients with severe and very severe forms of COPD? Methods: Rapid review of evidence (overview) from systematic reviews, with a bibliographic search in the PUBMED database, using a structured strategy. The methodological quality of systematic reviews was assessed with AMSTAR-2 (Methodological Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews). Results: Two systematic reviews were selected and included. Conclusion: Triple bronchodilator therapy was more effective than dual therapy in reducing the annual rate of moderate to severe exacerbations, but had no superiority for clinical gains in other outcomes (forced expiratory volume in first second, quality of life, dyspnea index, general mortality, respiratory mortality), except that, for reducing mortality, triple therapy was superior to dual therapy with beta-2 agonists/ antimuscarinic antimuscarinics and similar to dual therapy with beta 2 agonists/ inhaled corticosteroids. The triple therapy had a similar safety profile to dual therapy, with the same risk for adverse events and serious adverse events. The triple therapy had a higher risk for pneumonia than a dual therapy with beta-2 agonists/ antimuscarinic antagonists

Overview of systematic reviews of acupuncture clinical research published in international journals / 中国针灸

The systematic reviews (SRs) of acupuncture published before December 31 of 2020 in PubMed, Cochrane and EMbase databases were searched, and the publication overview of international acupuncture SRs were analyzed. As a result, a total of 717 SRs were included, and the overall number of published SRs showed a fluctuating upward trend. A total of 15 categories of diseases were involved, of which 113 SRs suggested that acupuncture was effective, and 12 SRs did not support acupuncture, and the remaining SRs showed uncertain conclusions. It is suggested that the standard of evidence-based medicine should be adopted to standardize the design of acupuncture trial and improve the level of clinical research; SRs should include high-quality literature that met the standards according to the principles and methods of PRISMA, so as to provide reliable clinical evidence for acupuncture.

Evidencia científica de la rehabilitación cardiaca en Costa Rica / Scientific Evidence of Rehabilitation Cardiac in Costa Rica

Resumen A pesar de la amplia evidencia científica de los beneficios de la Rehabilitación Cardiaca (RC) a nivel mundial, la investigación en Costa Rica en esta área continúa siendo escasa. Objetivo: Presentar la evidencia científica de las investigaciones realizadas por programas de RC en Costa Rica. Metodología: se realizó una búsqueda de artículos en las bases de datos "PUBMED""ScienceDirect""SportDiscus" y "Google Académico", utilizando las palabras claves: "Rehabilitación cardiaca en Costa Rica", "Cardiac Rehabilitation AND Costa Rica". Los estudios incluidos fueron publicaciones en revistas indexadas entre los años 2000 a octubre de 2021. Resultados: Se encontraron 14 publicaciones en revistas indexadas, ocho publicaciones en revistas costarricenses y seis internacionales. Los principales resultados de las investigaciones fueron que el VO2máx aumentó entre 19 % a 30 %. La capacidad funcional mejoró entre 31 % a 34 %, la presión arterial sistólica disminuyó entre 4 mmHg y 7,8 mmHg y la presión arterial diastólica se redujo entre 1,2 y 2 mmHg. También, se reportó mejorías en IMC, colesterol total, HDL-C y disminuciones en triglicéridos. Los niveles de estrés percibido disminuyeron el 50 % y los estados de ánimo tuvieron reducciones en la fatiga 58 %, la tensión en 60 % y el vigor aumentó 31 % después de una o varias semanas de RC. Asimismo, la calidad de vida de los pacientes mejoró. Conclusión: Los programas de RC en Costa Rica lograron aumentar el VO2máx, la capacidad funcional, disminuir la presión arterial y mejorar los factores de riesgo coronario de los pacientes con ECV. Además, la RC contribuye psicológicamente, puesto que disminuye el estrés, mejora los estados de ánimo y la calidad de vida de los pacientes cardiacos.

Abstract Despite the extensive scientific evidence regarding the health benefits of Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) worldwide, research in Costa Rica in this area is still lacking. Objective: To present the scientific evidence of CR research made in Costa Rica. Methods: This systematic review searched articles in electronic databases: "PUBMED" "ScienceDirect" "SportDiscus" y "Google Scholar", using keywords: "Rehabilitación cardiaca en Costa Rica", "Cardiac Rehabilitation AND Costa Rica", The studies included were from years 2000 to October 2021 and publications on indexed journals. Results: A total of 14 publications were found in indexed journals, 8 in Costa Rican journals and 6 on international journals. The main results from these publications were that VO2max increased between 19% to 30%. functional capacity improved 31% to 34%, systolic blood pressure decreased 4 mmHg to 7.8 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure reduced 1.2 to 2 mmHg. Improvements in BMI, total cholesterol, HDL-C and reductions in triglycerides were also found. Perceived stress decreased by 50% and mood states of fatigue reduced 58%, tension 60% and vigor increased 31% after one or several weeks. Conclusión: CR programs in Costa Rica reported improvements in VO2max, functional capacity, reductions in blood pressure, and improvements in coronary risk factors from patients with cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, CR contributes to improving psychological outcomes by reducing stress, improvement of mood states and quality of life in cardiac patients.

Recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia para alcanzar un parto respetado / Evidence-based recommendations for achieving humanized birth

INTRODUCCIÓN: El cambio de modelo en la atención en salud ha traído varias transformaciones, entre ellas el empoderamiento de las mujeres por recuperar sus derechos y control sobre el parto, concepto conocido como "parto respetado" En Chile, a diferencia de otros países, no se ha incorporado dentro de la legislación. La Organización Mundial de la Salud ha elaborado guías con recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia para lograr un parto respetado. OBJETIVO: Generar una recomendación y propuesta de parto respetado para el sistema de salud chileno. MÉTODO: Búsqueda bibliográfica dirigida de los principales puntos descritos en la literatura y la evidencia que los respalda. RESULTADOS: Se recomienda definir fase activa del parto sobre 5 cm de dilatación, preferir auscultación intermitente, manejar el dolor según las preferencias de la mujer, favorecer el movimiento, el apego inmediato y el retraso en el pinzamiento del cordón, y restringir episiotomías, amniotomías, cesáreas y tactos vaginales. CONCLUSIONES: Las recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia contribuirán a conseguir un parto respetado, dado que muchas de las intervenciones consideradas violencia obstétrica, o que no colaboran con un parto respetado, no están basadas en la evidencia, y por tanto representan intervenciones innecesarias para el proceso del parto.

INTRODUCTION: The change in healthcare paradigm has brought many transformations, between them womens empowerment in taking back their rights and control over birth. This is known as respected birth. Chile, in contrast to other countries, has not incorporated these regulations into law. World Healthcare Organization made guidelines with evidence-based recommendations for achieving respected birth. OBJECTIVE: Generate recommendations and proposal for respected birth at the Chilean public health system. METHODOLOGY: directed bibliographic review of main topics addressed in literature and evidence that supports them. RESULTS: Active labor should be defined over 5 cm of dilation, use intermittent auscultation, manage pain according women desires, favor movement, immediate skin-to-skin contact, delayed umbilical cord clamping, and restrict episiotomies, amniotomies, caesarians and vaginal examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Following evidence-based recommendations will contribute to achieve respected birth, given that many of interventions considered as obstetric violence or that are not contributing to a respected birth are not evidence-based, and therefore represent unnecessary interventions for the parturition process.

Oral Iron Supplementation in Pregnancy: Current Recommendations and Evidence-Based Medicine Suplementação oral de ferro na gravidez: recomendações atuais e medicina baseada na evidência

Abstract Objective To review the evidence about universal iron supplementation in pregnancy to prevent maternal anemia. Methods Bibliographic research of randomized and controlled clinical trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and clinical guidelines, published between August 2009 and August 2019, using the MeSH terms: iron; therapeutic use; pregnancy; anemia, prevention and control. Results We included six clinical guidelines, three meta-analyses and one randomized controlled clinical trial. Discussion Most articles point to the improvement of hematological parameters and reduction of maternal anemia risk, with supplementary iron. However, they do not correlate this improvement in pregnant women without previous anemia with the eventual improvement of clinical parameters. Conclusion Universal iron supplementation in pregnancy is controversial, so we attribute a SORT C recommendation strength.

Resumo Objetivo Rever a evidência sobre a necessidade de suplementação universal de ferro na gravidez para prevenção de anemia materna. Métodos Pesquisa bibliográfica de ensaios clínicos aleatorizados e controlados, metanálises, revisões sistemáticas e normas de orientação clínica, publicados entre agosto de 2009 e agosto de 2019, utilizando os termos MeSH: iron, terapêuticas use; pregnancy; anemia, preventivos and control. Resultados Incluímos seis normas de orientação clínica, três metanálises e um ensaio clínico randomizado e controlado. Discussão A maioria dos artigos aponta para a melhoria dos parâmetros hematológicos e redução do risco de anemia materna por meio da suplementação com ferro. Conclusões A suplementação universal com ferro na gravidez é controversa, pelo que atribuímos uma força de recomendação SORT C.