A retrospective study on molar furcation assessment via clinical detection, intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: Accurate determination of bone loss at the molar furcation region by clinical detection and intraoral radiograph is challenging in many instances. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is expected to open a new horizon in periodontal assessment. The purpose of this study was to compare and correlate accuracy of molar furcation assessment via clinical detection, intraoral radiography and CBCT images. METHODS: Eighty-three patients with chronic periodontitis who had existing CBCT scans were included. Furcation involvement was assessed on maxillary and mandibular first molars. Periodontal charts (modified Glickman's classification), intraoral (periapical and/or bitewing) radiographs (recorded as presence or absence) and axial CBCT reconstructions were used to evaluate furcation involvement on buccal and palatal/lingual sites. The correlation of furcation assessment by the three methods was evaluated by Pearson analysis. RESULTS: There were significant correlations (p < 0.05) between clinical detection and intraoral radiography, clinical detection and CBCT, as well as intraoral radiography and CBCT at all the measured sites (r values range between 0.230 to 0.644). CBCT generally exhibited higher correlation with clinical detection relative to intraoral radiography, especially at distal palatal side of maxillary first molar (p < 0.05). In addition, CBCT provided more accurate assessment, with bone loss measurement up to 2 decimals in millimeters, whereas clinical detection had 3 classes and the intraoral radiographs usually only detected the presence of furcation involvement in Glickman Class 2 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: This study validates that CBCT is a valuable tool in molar furcation assessment in addition to clinical detection and intraoral radiography.

A novel decision-making process for tooth retention or extraction.

BACKGROUND: Implant-supported restorations have become the most popular therapeutic option for professionals and patients for the treatment of total and partial edentulism. When implants are placed in an ideal position, with adequate prosthetic loading and proper maintenance, they can have success rates >90% over 15 years of function. Implants may be considered a better therapeutic alternative than performing more extensive conservative procedures in an attempt to save or maintain a compromised tooth. Inadequate indication for tooth extraction has resulted in the sacrifice of many sound savable teeth. This article presents a chart that can assist clinicians in making the right decision when they are deciding which route to take. METHODS: Articles published in peer-reviewed English journals were selected using several scientific databases and subsequently reviewed. Book sources were also searched. Individual tooth- and patient-related features were thoroughly analyzed, particularly when determining if a tooth should be indicated for extraction. RESULTS: A color-based decision-making chart with six different levels, including several factors, was developed based upon available scientific literature. The rationale for including these factors is provided, and its interpretation is justified with literature support. CONCLUSION: The decision-making chart provided may serve as a reference guide for dentists when making the decision to save or extract a compromised tooth.

Interexaminer reliability of the assessment of clinical furcation parameters as related to different probes.

The aim of this study was to investigate the interexaminer reliability of the assessment of clinical furcation diagnosis. Horizontal attachment level (PAL-H) measurements were obtained by 3 examiners in 6 molars in each of 10 patients with advanced periodontitis. In each patient, 3 molars were examined using a 3 mm incrementally marked Nabers probe, and 3 molars were examined using a pressure-calibrated plastic probe (TPS). Assignment of the probe was random, and the schedule of examiners was changed for each patient. Clinical assessments were validated by intrasurgical measurements in 6 patients. Sixty molars with 152 furcations were investigated. Multifactorial analysis of variance revealed that PAL-H measurements were significantly influenced by examiner and furcation location, whereas type of probe and schedule of examination had no influence. The overall intraclass correlation coefficient was r = 0.695. The difference between clinical and intrasurgical PAL-H assessment was influenced by examiner and location but not by type of probe. Approximately 70% of the total variance of PAL-H measurements was due to the variance of true values, whereas 30% of the variance may be explained by interexaminer and intraexaminer variance. The pressure-calibrated TPS probe failed to increase the interexaminer reliability of PAL-H measurements when compared to a Nabers probe.

The Swedish National Dental Insurance's periodontal diagnosis. Used on an individual level.

The Swedish National Dental Insurance Board requires a periodontal diagnosis (FKF 2030 86.12GR) from general practitioners before treating patients, a process which is expensive. The Swedish National Dental Insurance-index (SNDI-index) is based on clinical data and radiographs and every tooth is assigned a rating between 0 and 4. From the time of introduction of the Swedish National Dental Insurance plan in 1974, data can have been collected for 1.7 million patients if the regulations were followed according to the Swedish National Dental Insurance Board in Stockholm, Sweden. It is of interest to examine whether all of these collected periodontal data reflect periodontal status. In this study includings 56 individuals, the Swedish National Dental Insurance-index, used on an individual level, correlated significantly with the individual changes in bone support (as percent of toothlength) of the tooth in 1979 (rs = -0.80, t = -9.7, p < 0.001, ci 95% = -0.88(-)-0.68) as well as in 1989 (rs = -0.79, t = -9.5, p < 0.001, ci 95% = -0.87(-)-0.67).

Reproducibility and validity of the assessment of clinical furcation parameters as related to different probes.

The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of the assessment of clinical furcation parameters (horizontal attachment levels [CAL-H], class of furcation invasion). Replicate measurements of CAL-H and furcation class were performed within 14 days in 420 molars of 105 patients with advanced periodontitis using a Nabers- (n=50), a TPS- (n=30) and a PCPUNC15-probe (n=25). Validity of clinical assessments was assessed by intrasurgical measurements. The standard deviation of single measurements (s) was calculated as a measure of the reproducibility of CAL-H measurements and weighted kappa-coefficients (Kw) to estimate the agreement of furcation class assessments. The s ranged from 0.55 to 1.13 mm (Nabers), 0.55 to 1.02 mm (TPS), and 0.58 to 1.11 mm (PCPUNC15). For all probes, a statistically significantly smaller measurement error was observed in buccal and lingual sites than in mesiolingual and distolingual furcations (P < 0.005). The Kw ranged from 0.59 to 0.89 (Nabers), 0.50 to 0.80 (TPS), and 0.53 to 0.72 (PCPUNC 15). Multiple linear regression analysis identified distolingual location, probing depth (PD) and CAL-H as factors influencing the variability of CAL-H measurements. Whereas there was no statistically significant difference between pre- and intrasurgical CAL-H measurements using the Nabers probe, the TPS and PCPUNC15 probe underestimated CAL-H for distolingual furcations (P < 0.025). Using the Nabers probe, no asymmetries between pre- and intrasurgically obtained class of furcation involvement were revealed, while the TPS and PCPUNC15 probe underestimated furcation degrees (P < 0.1). Multiple linear regression analysis identified distolingual location and height of furcation, as well as PD, vertical attachment level (CAL-V) and type of probe, as factors influencing the validity of CAL-H measurements. Clinical diagnosis of furcation lesions using the 3 mm incrementally marked Nabers probe provides reproducible and valid information about furcation invasion.