ABSTRACT
AIMS: To assess the impact of belumosudil on the cost of care in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) patients who have failed at least two prior lines of systemic therapy using a budget impact model. METHODS: A budget impact model with a 5-year time horizon was constructed in Microsoft Excel. The base case model uses the US prevalence rate of 3 L/4L + cGVHD patients from literature and secondary sources, with the potential for user-defined inputs, including model perspectives. The model includes data for two perspectives: the national US population and a hypothetical US private payer health insurance plan with 10 million (Mil) members. Additional model inputs include market share of cGVHD treatments, their associated adverse event rates, and healthcare resource utilization. RESULTS: The potential annual budget impact for the US national and payer plans was evaluated for cGVHD patients. Based on belumosudil utilization increasing to 55% in 3 L and 4 L + by 2026, cost savings of â¼5.5% and 6.7% ($128.8 and $4.9 Mil USD) were observed from national and payer perspectives, respectively. Cost savings in 2026 were derived from fewer AEs ($108.4 and $3.9 Mil USD, for national and payer perspectives; e.g. neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) and reduced HCRU ($65.1 and $2.3 Mil USD, for national and payer perspectives; e.g. emergency room visits, ICU stays, etc.). LIMITATIONS: Results from the model were dependent on the available data inputs and assumptions. Real-world values may differ from the assumed performance of treatments, market growth, and treatment dosing and duration. CONCLUSION: The model results suggest that the introduction of belumosudil to treat cGVHD would be associated with substantial cost savings when evaluating a scenario with versus without belumosudil from a US payer perspective.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Acetamides , Budgets , Cost Savings , Delivery of Health Care , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Humans , United StatesABSTRACT
Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD/cGVHD) are serious conditions occurring after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Steroids are the most common first-line therapy; however, they are frequently associated with numerous morbid complications. To describe the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs of steroid-related complications in patients receiving systemic steroids for GVHD. This retrospective study used medical and pharmacy claims from the Optum Research database. Eligible patients were diagnosed with GVHD (aGVHD, cGVHD, or both) after HCT and were treated with systemic steroids between July 1, 2010, and August 31, 2019. The index date was the date of the first claim for systemic steroids after GVHD diagnosis. The baseline period was the 6 months before the index date, and the follow-up period was 2 years after the index date. Outcome variables included HCRU and costs associated with steroid complications, grouped into 4 categories: bone/muscle, gastrointestinal, infection, and metabolic/endocrine. A multivariate analysis was used to assess the cost ratio associated with the presence of each steroid complication; the linear model was adjusted for baseline patient characteristics and types of steroid conditions identified during follow-up. Another multivariate analysis assessed the hazard ratio for hospitalization associated with each steroid complication using a Cox proportional hazards regression model adjusted for the time-varying presence of each complication category. A total of 689 patients were studied (median age, 55 years; male, 60%); 22% had aGVHD only, 21% had cGVHD only, and 39% had both types of GVHD. After 2 years of follow-up, 97% had at least 1 steroid-associated complication. The most common complication category was infection (79.5%), followed by metabolic/endocrine (32.4%), gastrointestinal (29.2%), and bone/muscle conditions (19.7%). About two thirds (66%) of patients with any steroid complication had ≥1 hospitalization requiring a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 20 (8-43) hospital days. Patients with an infection experienced the highest hospitalization rate (72%) and thus the highest associated costs. The total mean (median [IQR]) healthcare cost potentially related to steroid complications was $164,787 ($50,834 [$8865-$182,693]), and the largest expense was hospitalization (mean [median {IQR}], $140,637 [$26,782 {$0-$141,398}]). Of the different steroid complications, infections were associated with the highest cost (mean [median {IQR}], $167,473 [$57,680 {$16,261-$178,698}]). In addition, a significantly higher total adjusted cost was associated with the presence of an infection, gastrointestinal complication, or bone/muscle complication in patients with GVHD versus the absence of each complication (all P < .001). Complications occurring after steroid treatment for GVHD may add substantially to the HCRU and costs associated with GVHD management. Infections in particular required inpatient care and were associated with the highest economic burden.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Retrospective Studies , SteroidsABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To explain the central role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis and follow-up of chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) in children and adolescents, centering on practical technical aspects and salient diagnostic features. RECENT FINDINGS: In the absence of conclusive clinical features and widely accepted laboratory tests, including validated disease biomarkers, MRI (whether targeted or covering the entire body) currently plays an indispensable role in the diagnosis and therapy response assessment of CNO. Whole-body MRI, which is the reference imaging standard for CNO, can be limited to a short tau inversion recovery (STIR) coronal image set covering the entire body and a STIR sagittal set covering the spine, an approximately 30-min examination with no need for intravenous contrast or diffusion-weighted imaging. The hallmark of CNO is periphyseal (metaphyseal and/or epi-/apophyseal) osteitis, identified as bright foci on STIR, with or without inflammation of the adjacent periosteum and surrounding soft tissue. Response to bisphosphonate treatment for CNO has some unique MRI findings that should not be mistaken for residual or relapsing disease. Diagnostic features and treatment response characteristics of MRI in pediatric CNO are discussed, also describing the techniques used, pitfalls encountered, and differential diagnostic possibilities considered during daily practice.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Osteomyelitis , Adolescent , Child , Chronic Disease , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Osteomyelitis/diagnostic imaging , Osteomyelitis/drug therapy , Whole Body Imaging/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study assessed pharmacoeconomic costs associated with extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) compared with other available second-line therapies for chronic graft-vs-host disease (cGvHD) in a tertiary Spanish institution. METHODS: Patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with steroid-refractory cGvHD were eligible. Data were collected retrospectively from index date until 1 year or relapse. Patients were distributed in two cohorts (ECP vs non-ECP), matched by age (≤ or > 40), hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HLA-identical sibling donor or other) and number of previous immunosuppressive lines (1, 2, or ≥ 3). Costs were assigned using the 2016 diagnosis-related group (DRG) system: DRG 579 (22 383) overnight stay due to major complication (ie, sepsis, pneumonia, parenteral nutrition, or respiratory failure), and DRG 875 (5154) if no major complication. The primary endpoint was healthcare resource utilization per patient. RESULTS: Forty patients (n = 20 per cohort) were included. Median age was 49, and 37.5% were female. Mean total cost per patient was 25 319 (95% CI: 17 049-33 590) across the two cohorts, with a slightly lower mean cost per ECP-treated patient (23 120) compared with the non-ECP cohort (27 519; P = .597). Twenty-seven inpatient hospitalizations occurred among ECP-treated patients, vs 33 in the non-ECP cohort. Day hospital and external consultations were more frequent in the ECP cohort. However, fewer inpatient admissions included DRG 579 compared with the non-ECP cohort (44% vs 58%). Inpatient length of stay was slightly shorter in the ECP cohort (30 vs 49 days; P = .298). CONCLUSIONS: ECP treatment may yield economic savings in Spain through resource savings and moving costs toward outpatient care.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Hospitals , Photopheresis/economics , Photopheresis/methods , Steroids/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Economics, Pharmaceutical , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/economics , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Hospitalization , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Spain/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), a potentially life-threatening complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), often occurs within 100 days of HSCT. While steroids are typically used as first-line treatment, there is no consensus on second-line steroid-refractory (SR) treatments. SR aGVHD is associated with significantly worse pediatric health outcomes, but less is known about its economic impact. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic burden of SR pediatric aGVHD in a commercially insured US patient population. METHODS: Retrospective analyses were conducted using medical and pharmacy claims data from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (study period January 1, 2006-May 31, 2019). Included patients had at least 1 claim for allogeneic HSCT (earliest HSCT claim set as index date), no claims for autologous HSCT, and no pre-index GVHD. Patients were aged less than 18 years with no minimum pre- or post-index continuous enrollment. The GVHD cohort included patients with at least 1 claim for aGVHD over 100 days from index with at least 1 claim for any steroid and at least 1 claim for second-line therapy, both on or after the date of the first aGVHD claim. Patients post-HSCT with no GVHD claims over follow-up formed the comparison cohort. Health care resource utilization and costs over 12 months from the index date were calculated and compared between cohorts using parametric testing. RESULTS: 38 patients with SR aGVHD and 184 controls were included. Mean age and sex were similar for aGVHD (8.6 years, 50% female) and control (8.2 years, 45% female). During the 12-month post-index follow-up, SR aGVHD patients had higher rates of complications vs controls (* for P < 0.05): anemia (79% vs 68%), drug-induced anemia* (53% vs 34%), neutropenia (63% vs 53%), thrombocytopenia (58% vs 42%), gastrointestinal complications* (95% vs 65%), and infections* (95% vs 79%). Mean inpatient length of stay was longer by 31.6 days (P < 0.01) with a total average of 96.0 days for those with SR aGVHD vs 64.3 days for the controls. More SR aGVHD patients required inpatient total parenteral nutrition (71% vs 58%), readmission within 12 months of discharge from index hospitalization* (89% vs 60%), ER visits (34% vs 24%), and outpatient visits (100% vs 86%). Total 12-month mean medical costs were higher in aGVHD patients: $1,212,944 vs $673,491 (P < 0.001), mostly because of complication-related costs: $868,966 vs $396,757 (P < 0.001). Among patients with SR aGVHD, mean total costs were higher by about $1.8 million ($2,609,445 vs $812,385; P = 0.014) for those who died compared with those who were alive within 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: SR aGVHD in pediatric patients following HSCT is associated with incremental 12-month medical costs of greater than $500,000, driven largely by complications. DISCLOSURES: This research was sponsored by Mesoblast, Inc. Grabner is an employee of HealthCore, Inc., which acted as consultants to Mesoblast, Inc., during the conduct of this research. Strati is an employee of Mesoblast, Inc. Sandman and Forsythe are employees of Purple Squirrel Economics, which acted as consultants to Mesoblast, Inc., during the conduct of this research. This work was presented at the AMCP Annual Meeting online in April 2020 and was an encore presentation at AMCP Nexus 2020 Virtual in October 2020.
Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Steroids/administration & dosage , Steroids/economics , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Insurance Claim Review , Male , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Aim: To compare secondary systemic treatment (SST) continuation and associated resource use and costs in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) patients in the USA. Materials & methods: This was a retrospective study using Truven Health MarketScan database (2009-2016). cGvHD patients were classified as continuers or discontinuers if treated with SST for ≥180 days without or with a treatment gap (≥45 days), respectively. Results: Among 464 cGvHD patients with SST, mTOR inhibitors, extracorporeal photopheresis and imatinib were most frequently used. A total of 172 patients were SST continuers and 292 were discontinuers. Extracorporeal photopheresis treated patients were the highest continuers, followed by imatinib and mTOR inhibitors. SST continuers had lower monthly hospitalization costs versus discontinuers. Conclusion: This real-world analysis demonstrates high SST continuation rates in cGvHD patients are associated with lower resource utilization and cost.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Chronic Disease , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/economics , Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology , Health Care Costs , Health Resources/economics , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Insurance Claim Review , MTOR Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/economics , Photopheresis , Retrospective Studies , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: El presente dictamen expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad del esquema ibrutinib + corticoides, comparado con los esquemas basados en corticoides + inmunosupresores, para el tratamiento de pacientes adultos con enfermedad de injerto contra huésped crónica (cGVHD) post-trasplante alogénico de progenitores hematopoyéticos (TACPH) refractaria a corticoides. La enfermedad de injerto contra huésped (GVHD, por sus siglas en inglés) es un desorden inflamatorio multisistémico, potencialmente mortal, que puede ocurrir tras el trasplante de un órgano o tejido. La GVHD ocurre porque las células T del donante fallan en reconocer los antígenos de histocompatibilidad principales del receptor y, por lo tanto, empiezan a atacarlo; produciendo una reacción inflamatoria exagerada. Durante el trasplante alogénico de células progenitoras hematopoyéticas (TACPH) se transfiere una mayor cantidad de células T maduras e inmunocompetentes. Por este motivo, el GVHD es más frecuente en pacientes post-TACPH que en pacientes con trasplante de órganos sólidos o de médula ósea. TECNOLOGÍA SANITARIA DE INTERÉS: Ibrutinib: Ibrutinib es un inhibidor irreversible de la tirosina quinasa de Bruton y la quinasa inducible por interleucina 2, las cuales activan las vías de señalización de los receptores de células B y células T, respectivamente (Ramachandran, Kolli, y Strowd 2019). Al inhibir estas vías, la activación, diferenciación y proliferación de células B y células T no se producirá; y en consecuencia se podrá manejar la respuesta anti-inflamatoria, la vía pro-fibrótica y la producción de anticuerpos anti-receptor (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 2012; Jaglowski y Blazar 2018). METODOLOGÍA: Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda sistemática de la literatura con respecto a la eficacia y seguridad del esquema ibrutinib + corticoides en el tratamiento de pacientes adultos con cGVHD post-TACPH refractaria a corticoides. Se realizó tanto una búsqueda sistemática como una búsqueda manual en las páginas web de grupos dedicados a la investigación y educación en salud que elaboran guías de práctica clínica (GPC) y evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS). RESULTADOS: La presente evaluación de tecnología sanitaria muestra la evidencia encontrada luego de una búsqueda sistemática, con respecto a la eficacia y seguridad del esquema ibrutinib + corticoides, en términos de: sobrevida global, tasa de respuesta total, calidad de vida, reducción/descontinuación de corticoides e incidencia de eventos adversos, en comparación con tratamientos basados en corticoides e inmunosupresores en pacientes adultos con cGVHD post-TACPH refractaria a corticoides. Al respecto, se identificó una guía de práctica clínica (GPC) sobre el manejo de cGVHD y un ensayo clínico (EC) fase Ib/II, sin grupo de comparación, que evalúa la eficacia y seguridad de ibrutinib en el tratamiento de pacientes con cGVHD y falla al tratamiento con corticoides. La GPC publicada por la Sociedad Francófona de Trasplante de Médula Ósea y Terapia Celular (SFGM-TC, por sus siglas en francés) señala que en pacientes con cGVHD no existe un tratamiento de segunda línea de referencia, pero presenta una lista de 20 alternativas de tratamiento, entre medicamentos y otros procedimientos. Aunque el grado de recomendación de estas alternativas es bajo (grado C), muchas de estas alternativas también han sido recomendadas por otras dos GPC publicadas antes de la aprobación de ibrutinib para el tratamiento de cGVHD. La GPC de la SFGM-TC no presenta una descripción detallada de la metodología utilizada para selección de la evidencia y la formulación de las recomendaciones; sin embargo, la consistencia con las recomendaciones de otras GPC internacionales les confiere cierto grado de confianza. CONCLUSIONES: El equipo técnico del IETSI valoró los siguientes aspectos: i) La cGVHD es una condición relativamente frecuente que puede ser mortal si no es tratada ii) La evidencia disponible es escasa e insuficiente para disipar la incertidumbre sobre la eficacia de ibrutinib en el tratamiento de pacientes con cGVHD refractaria a corticoides, iii) Aproximadamente, la mitad de pacientes del único EC disponible a la fecha descontinuó el tratamiento por eventos adversos, muerte o progresión de la enfermedad, iv) La ausencia de estudios que comparen el esquema ibrutinib + corticoides con otros esquemas de tratamiento impiden formular conclusiones sobre la superioridad de ibrutinib en eficacia y seguridad y v) Actualmente, existen otras alternativas disponibles en ESSALUD que también son recomendadas por las GPC internacionales. El Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación - IETSI no aprueba el uso de ibrutinib para el tratamiento de pacientes adultos con cGVHD, post-TACPH refractaria a corticoides.
Subject(s)
Humans , Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Health Evaluation , Cost-Benefit AnalysisABSTRACT
We present a case study for developing clinical trial scenarios in a complex progressive disease with multiple events of interest. The idea is to first capture the course of the disease in a multistate Markov model, and then to simulate clinical trials from this model, including a variety of hypothesized drug effects. This case study focuses on the prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The patient trajectory after HSCT is characterized by a complex interplay of various events of interest, and there is no established best method of measuring and/or analyzing treatment benefits. We characterized patient trajectories by means of multistate models that we fitted to a subset of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database. Events of interest included acute GvHD of grade III or IV, severe chronic GvHD, relapse of the underlying disease, and death. The transition probability matrix was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, and patient characteristics were identified that were associated with different transition rates. In a second step, clinical trial scenarios were simulated from the model assuming various drug effects on the background transition rates, and the operating characteristics of different endpoints and analysis strategies were compared in these scenarios. This helped devise a drug development strategy in GvHD prevention after allogeneic HSCT. More generally, multistate models provide a rich framework for exploring complex progressive diseases, and the availability of a corresponding simulation machinery provides great flexibility for clinical trial planning.
Subject(s)
Biometry , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Discovery , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Models, Statistical , Disease-Free Survival , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Humans , Markov Chains , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) frequently affects the oral mucosa and is generally responsive to topical immunomodulatory therapies. Clinicians may benefit from guidance in choosing the most appropriate therapy with respect to practicality and cost. To assess the economic considerations related to topical immunomodulatory treatments for management of oral mucosal cGVHD and their practical implications. Topical treatments used for management of oral cGVHD were obtained from the National Institutes of Health Consensus document for ancillary and supportive care. Cost data for a standard 1-month prescription was obtained from national databases for commercially available formulations and from compounding pharmacies for formulations requiring compounding. There are numerous topical preparations used for the management of oral cGVHD, many of which require compounding. The average wholesale price of the commercially available agents ranges from $5 to $277/month, and the cost of the compounded preparations ranges from $43 to $499/month. Costs can be influenced by drug-, patient-, and pharmacy-related factors. The costs associated with topical treatment of oral cGVHD are substantial, particularly because the disease is chronic and expenses accumulate over time. Rational prescribing according to a proposed algorithm, including de-escalation of therapy when indicated, can help to minimize associated costs. This has practical implications for patients, physicians, pharmacies, and insurance providers.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Mouth Diseases/drug therapy , Administration, Topical , Algorithms , Chronic Disease , Graft vs Host Disease/economics , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/economics , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Mouth Diseases/economics , Mouth MucosaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Oral Graft-versus-Host Disease (oGvHD) is a common complication of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Choosing the right topical application to be used intra orally can be a challenge. Consequently, the aim of this work is to review the effectiveness and safety of topical agents currently used in the management of the inflammatory mucosal lesions encountered in oGVHD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out electronic searches of publications up to May 2015 of the databases Pubmed, National Library of Medicine's Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical trials to identify potentially relevant studies (keywords: "oral", "graft", "versus", "host", "disease" and "treatment"). The main inclusion criterion was the reported use of a topical agent which was not intentionally swallowed when used for the treatment of oGVHD. A 3-point grading system, described by the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, was used to rate the methodological quality of the papers. RESULTS: From the 902 entries identified in the search, 7 studies qualifying for inclusion were analysed. Overall, there is limited evidence with regards to the effectiveness of topical steroids for oGVHD. However, the studies showed some effect of Budesonide alone and when combined with dexamethasone. Topical tacrolimus also appears to have some effect and clobetasol propionate mouthwash had a significantly better clinical response than dexamethasone mouthwash in treating oGVHD. CONCLUSIONS: As the number of clinical trials conducted is limited, there is little evidence to support the use of topical therapies to treat the inflammatory mucosal lesions found in oGVHD. High quality randomised control trials are needed in order to measure the effectiveness of any topical application for the treatment of the inflammatory mucosal lesions found in oGVHD.
Subject(s)
Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Mouth Diseases/drug therapy , Administration, Topical , HumansABSTRACT
Community respiratory viruses (CRV) are important agents of morbidity and mortality within the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) population. Few proven methods to prevent CRV infections exist. No studies have specifically investigated their impact on older patients. We reviewed patients 50 years and older undergoing HCT between 2009-2013 to determine the incidence of CRV infection using multiplex PCR and risk factors for infection including geriatric assessment (GA). Thirty-two first episode CRV infections occurred in 118 patients for a 1-year cumulative incidence of 27.2% (CI: 19.4-35.6%). Hospitalization and mortality were restricted to those who developed lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) (n = 22, 69%). CRV infection contributed to 8 deaths (36% of LRTIs) and 7 of these patients were taking steroids for GvHD at the time of infection. Health impairments by GA did not translate into increased risk for CRV infection. Steroid use at time of LRTI was associated with high mortality.
Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Geriatric Assessment , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Paramyxoviridae/isolation & purification , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Age Factors , Aged , Community-Acquired Infections/virology , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Risk Factors , Transplant Recipients , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effectsSubject(s)
Colonic Diseases/pathology , Graft vs Host Disease/pathology , Sigmoidoscopy/methods , Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Adult , Colonic Diseases/drug therapy , Colonic Diseases/etiology , Color , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Humans , Male , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effectsABSTRACT
In 2005, the National Institutes of Health sponsored a Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in chronic graft-versus-host (cGVHD) to achieve consensus about key elements of cGVHD research, including definitions for diagnosis, severity scoring, and response measures. To test these proposed definitions, a multicenter prospective cohort study of people with cGVHD is ongoing. This study will evaluate the performance of proposed prognostic factors, measures of disease activity, and surrogate endpoints for therapeutic response. Data are collected at 6-month intervals in a heterogeneous population of patients reflecting modern transplant techniques and posttransplantation clinical management (target enrollment 672 with cGVHD from 10 transplantation centers). This report describes the rationale, design, and methods of the cGVHD cohort study, and invites other investigators to collaborate with the Consortium to analyze data or specimens.
Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Graft vs Host Disease/diagnosis , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Chronic Disease , Cohort Studies , Data Collection , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/pathology , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole for the prevention of invasive fungal infections (IFI) in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) patients in the Netherlands. A decision analytic model was developed based on a double-blind randomized trial that compared posaconazole with fluconazole antifungal prophylaxis in recipients of allogeneic HSCT with GVHD who were receiving immunosuppressive therapy (Ullmann et al., N Engl J Med 356:335-347, 2007). Clinical events were modeled with chance nodes reflecting probabilities of IFIs, IFI-related death, and death from other causes. Data on life expectancy, quality-of-life, medical resource consumption, and costs were obtained from the literature. The total cost with posaconazole amounted to
Subject(s)
Fluconazole/administration & dosage , Fluconazole/economics , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/economics , Models, Economic , Triazoles/administration & dosage , Triazoles/economics , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Netherlands , Quality-Adjusted Life YearsABSTRACT
Because morbidity early after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) results in large part from the development of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), we previously proposed that a longitudinal assessment of morbidity involving the skin, liver, and gastrointestinal (GI) tract might provide a more complete, objective approach for comparing 2 arms of open-label randomized clinical trials for acute GVHD prevention. In this study, we determined both morbidity across time and GVHD across time in a retrospective analysis of a database from an open-label randomized clinical trial comparing tacrolimus/methotrexate and cyclosporine/methotrexate after myeloablative conditioning and marrow transplantation from HLA-matched unrelated donors. The results confirm differences in overall morbidity across time in patients with peak grade II-IV GVHD compared with those with grade 0-I GVHD, but no significant differences in morbidity associated with grade II GVHD compared with grade 0-I GVHD. We observed less skin morbidity and a trend toward less liver morbidity across time in the tacrolimus group (P = .04 and .09, respectively), but not for GI morbidity or overall morbidity, despite significantly decreased skin and liver stages and overall grades of GVHD across time in this group. Thus, our objective assessment of differences in morbidity (regardless of cause) as a measure of acute GVHD in a randomized clinical trial of acute GVHD prevention has only limited utility. The difficulty of demonstrating clinical benefits from objective parameters, such as survival and morbidity, and the subjectivity of grading acute GVHD emphasize the need for blinded assessments in clinical trials of GVHD prevention.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Acute Disease , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Cyclosporine/administration & dosage , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrointestinal Diseases/epidemiology , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hematologic Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Liver Diseases/epidemiology , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Organ Specificity , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Skin Diseases/epidemiology , Tacrolimus/administration & dosage , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Transplantation Conditioning , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effectsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Previous studies have evaluated practice variation in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) among transplant centers and countries. There are no studies investigating individual physician practice variation in HCT. METHODS: An international Internet-based survey of transplant physicians collected data on medical decisions made by adult and pediatric HCT physicians. Multivariable analyses identified practitioner and transplant center characteristics predictive of medical decision making. RESULTS: Analysis of 526 assessable respondents showed a wide variation in management approaches to specific clinical scenarios. Pediatric and adult transplant physicians differed significantly in their management strategies for chronic myeloid leukemia, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, and choice of graft source for patients with aplastic anemia. Among adult transplant physicians, there was little agreement on the patient factors favoring reduced intensity conditioning or myeloablative conditioning. CONCLUSION: These results emphasize the heterogeneity of worldwide transplant practices. Local preferences or biases likely result in similar patients being offered different transplant and treatment procedures. The degree of practice variation also highlights the need for clinical trials to clarify areas of controversy. Where clinical trials are not feasible, data from observational studies may be the best available evidence to guide practice.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Aplastic/surgery , Graft vs Host Disease/surgery , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/surgery , Leukemia/surgery , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/surgery , Patient Selection , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Blast Crisis/surgery , Decision Making , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Health Care Surveys , Health Services Accessibility , Healthcare Disparities , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Internet , Leukemia/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/surgery , Quality of Health Care , Residence Characteristics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Transplantation Conditioning , Transplantation, HomologousABSTRACT
Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is the major cause of transplant-related mortality and morbidity. As it is closely related to the major therapeutic principle, graft-versus-leukaemia (GvL) effect, risk assessment has to balance both risks depending on the pre-transplant status. This is clearly demonstrated when comparing the two major strategies for prevention of GvHD. While the majority of approaches aiming at T-cell depletion show efficacy in reducing acute and chronic GvHD and transplant-related mortality, T-cell depletion also affects graft-versus-leukaemia effects and thus results in a higher relapse rate. Thus, standard prophylaxis relying on calcineurin inhibitors frequently results in at least equivalent or even superior long-term disease-free survival, and the risk of relapse has to be considered when selecting regimens for prevention of GvHD. In addition to this general dilemma, drug-specific side-effects and risks have to be considered when selecting regimens for GvHD prevention and treatment.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Acute Disease , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Calcineurin Inhibitors , Chronic Disease/drug therapy , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Graft vs Leukemia Effect/drug effects , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Mycophenolic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic use , Risk Assessment , T-Lymphocytes/physiology , Tacrolimus/therapeutic useSubject(s)
Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Liver Diseases/drug therapy , Liver Diseases/etiology , Polydeoxyribonucleotides/administration & dosage , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Vascular Diseases/drug therapy , Vascular Diseases/etiology , Adult , Aged , Diagnosis, Differential , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/diagnosis , Graft vs Host Disease/mortality , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Incidence , Liver Diseases/diagnosis , Liver Diseases/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors , Transplantation, Autologous , Transplantation, Homologous , Vascular Diseases/diagnosis , Vascular Diseases/mortalityABSTRACT
The effects of immunosuppressive regimens on the outcomes of patients with hematological malignancies undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation remain uncertain. We conducted an individual patient data meta-analysis using data from nine randomized trials comparing allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSCT) transplants to bone marrow (BMT) transplants, focusing on the administration of three vs four doses of methotrexate (MTX) as part of a regimen for graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis which included cyclosporine. Six trials containing 573 patients prescribed four doses of MTX while three trials containing 534 patients prescribed three doses of MTX. Four doses of MTX conferred a statistically significant survival advantage, resulting in death odds ratio (OR) 0.67 (CI 0.52-0.88) (P=0.0036) for recipients of PBSC compared to BM; with three doses, there was no statistically significant difference. In the four-dose studies relapse rates were 36.6% among recipients of BM compared to 19.2% among recipients of PBSC (P=0.0015). The rates of relapse in the three dose studies were 26% for both PBSC and BM. We hypothesize that the fourth dose of MTX provides extra immunosuppression among BM recipients resulting in a reduced anti-leukemic effect. This hypothesis can only be proved or disproved by a prospective, randomized trial.
Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Bone Marrow Transplantation/adverse effects , Bone Marrow Transplantation/methods , Bone Marrow Transplantation/mortality , Disease Management , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Humans , Odds Ratio , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recurrence , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Transplantation, HomologousABSTRACT
Female genital tract graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is an under-recognized complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation impacting on quality of life. We describe a prospective surveillance programme for female genital GVHD to better characterize incidence, risk factors and clinical features and the impact of a structured intervention policy. A retrospective audit was conducted on the medical records of all female transplant recipients surviving at least 6 months at a single centre over a 5-year period. Patients commenced topical vaginal oestrogen early post transplant with hormone replacement as appropriate for age, prior menopausal status and co-morbidities. A genital tract management programme included regular gynaecological review and self-maintenance of vaginal capacity by dilator or intercourse. The incidence of genital GVHD was 35% (95% confidence interval (CI) (25, 50%)) at 1 year and 49% (95% CI (36, 63%)) at 2 years. Topical therapy was effective in most cases; no patient required surgical intervention to divide vaginal adhesions. The main risk factor was stem cell source with peripheral blood progenitor cells posing a higher risk than marrow (hazard ratio=3.07 (1.22, 7.73), P=0.017). Extensive GVHD in other organs was a common association. We conclude that female genital GVHD is common, and early detection and commencement of topical immunosuppression with dilator use appears to be highly effective at preventing progression.