Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.688
Filter
1.
Rev. latinoam. enferm. (Online) ; 31: e3908, ene.-dic. 2023. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BDENF | ID: biblio-1441988

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: analizar la efectividad del autocuidado digital en el manejo del dolor y la discapacidad funcional en personas con trastornos musculoesqueléticos espinales. Método: revisión sistemática de la literatura, desarrollada con la checklist PRISMA, de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados sobre personas con trastornos musculoesqueléticos de columna e intervenciones digitales a las que se accede por computadora, smartphones u otro dispositivo portátil. Bases de datos consultadas: National Library of Medicine, Excerpta Médica dataBASE, SciVerse Scopus, Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud, Science Citation Indexes, Cummulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature y Physiotherapy Evidence Database. Síntesis de resultados descriptiva y por metanálisis (modelo de efectos fijos) realizada con el software Review Manager. Calidad metodológica evaluada mediante la escala Physiotherapy Evidence Database. Resultados: se seleccionaron 25 ensayos (5142 participantes) que mostraron mejoras estadísticamente significativas (p<0,05) del 54% (12/22) en los niveles de dolor y del 47% (10/21) en la discapacidad funcional en el grupo intervención. Los metanálisis mostraron efectos moderados sobre la intensidad del dolor y efectos pequeños sobre la discapacidad funcional. Predominaron los estudios de calidad media. Conclusión: las intervenciones de atención digital demostraron resultados beneficiosos para la intensidad del dolor y la discapacidad funcional, principalmente para el dolor lumbar crónico. Se ha demostrado que la atención digital es promisoria para favorecer el automanejo de las afecciones musculoesqueléticas de columna. Registro PROSPERO CRD42021282102.


Objective: to analyze the effectiveness of digital self-care in the management of pain and functional disability among people with spine musculoskeletal disorders. Method: a systematic literature review, developed with the PRISMA checklist, of randomized clinical trials of people with spine musculoskeletal disorders and digital interventions accessed by means of computers, smartphones or other portable devices. Databases researched: National Library of Medicine, Excerpta Médica dataBASE, SciVerse Scopus, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, Science Citation Indexes, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Physiotherapy Evidence Database. The descriptive synthesis of the results and by means of meta-analyses (fixed-effects model) was performed with the Review Manager software. The methodological quality was evaluated with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. Results: a total of 25 trials were selected (5,142 participants), which showed statistically significant improvements (p <0.05) in 54% (12/22) in the pain levels and 47% (10/21) in functional disability in the Intervention Group. The meta-analyses showed moderate effects on pain intensity and small effects on functional disability. There was a predominance of medium quality studies. Conclusion: the digital care interventions showed a beneficial result in pain intensity and in functional disability, mainly for chronic low back pain. Digital care emerges as promising to support self-management of the spine musculoskeletal conditions. PROSPERO registry number CRD42021282102.


Objetivo: analisar a efetividade do autocuidado digital no manejo da dor e incapacidade funcional em pessoas com distúrbios musculoesqueléticos de coluna. Método: revisão sistemática da literatura, desenvolvida com o checklist PRISMA, de ensaios clínicos randomizados de pessoas com distúrbios musculoesqueléticos de coluna e intervenções digitais acessadas por computador, smartphones ou outro dispositivo portátil. Bases pesquisadas: National Library of Medicine, Excerpta Médica dataBASE, SciVerse Scopus, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, Science Citation Indexes, Cummulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature e Physiotherapy Evidence Database. Síntese dos resultados descritiva e por metanálises (modelo de efeitos fixos) com o software Review Manager. Qualidade metodológica avaliada pela escala Physiotherapy Evidence Database. Resultados: selecionaram-se 25 ensaios (5142 participantes) que revelaram melhoras estatisticamente significativas (p<0,05) em 54% (12/22) nos níveis de dor e 47% (10/21) na incapacidade funcional no grupo intervenção. As metanálises mostraram efeitos moderados na intensidade da dor e pequenos na incapacidade funcional. Houve predominância de estudos de média qualidade. Conclusão: intervenções de cuidados digitais mostraram resultado benéfico na intensidade da dor e na incapacidade funcional principalmente para dor lombar crônica. Evidenciam-se os cuidados digitais como promissores para apoiar o autogerenciamento das condições musculoesqueléticas de coluna. Registro PROSPERO CRD42021282102.


Subject(s)
Self Care , Pain Measurement , Musculoskeletal Diseases/therapy , Low Back Pain , Internet , Pain Management
2.
Rev. bras. ortop ; 58(3): 410-416, May-June 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1449832

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective The present study analyzes ankle mobility and lumbopelvic muscle mobility and resistance. In addition, it identifies factors associated with musculoskele-tal pain in young ballet dancers. Methods This is a quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional study evaluating 14 ballet dancers aged 12 to 16 years old. We used the following instruments: a) Nordic Musculoskeletal Symptom Questionnaire (NSQ) for musculoskeletal pain assessment; b) leg lateral reach test, lumbar lock, and rotation test (for trunk mobility analysis) and lunge test (for ankle mobility evaluation); c) front bridge, lumbar extensor, and lumbar flexor muscles tests to assess lumbopelvic complex resistance. Results The main complaints reported by ballet dancers were pain in the low back area and in the lower extremities, especially in the knee (57.1%). Those with low back pain had significantly lower lumbar mobility ( p = 0.05) and lower ankle mobility on both sides ( p ≤ 0.05). Dancers with knee pain presented significantly lower muscular trunk extensor muscle resistance ( p = 0.05). Conclusions Our study revealed significant associations between the lumbopelvic complex function and musculoskeletal symptoms, supporting the implementation of preventive strategies.


Resumo Objetivo Analisar a mobilidade e a resistência muscular lombopélvica e mobilidade de tornozelo, assim como identificar os fatores associados com dor musculoesquelética em bailarinas jovens. Métodos Trata-se de um estudo quantitativo, descritivo e transversal que avaliou 14 bailarinas de 12 a 16 anos. Os seguintes instrumentos foram aplicados: a) Questionário Nórdico de Sintomas Osteomusculares (QNSO) para avaliação da dor musculoesquelética; b) leg lateral reach test, lumbar lock e rotation test (avaliação da mobilidade de tronco) e lunge test (avaliação da mobilidade de tornozelo); c) ponte frontal, extensores lombares e flexores lombares para avaliação da resistência do complexo lombopélvico. Resultados A dor lombar e em membros inferiores, especialmente no joelho (57,1%), foram as principais queixas relatadas pelas bailarinas no presente estudo. As bailarinas avaliadas com dor lombar apresentavam significativamente menor mobilidade lombar (p = 0,05) e menor mobilidade de tornozelo em ambos os lados (p < 0,05). Entre as que apresentavam dores nos joelhos, a resistência muscular de extensores de tronco foi significativamente menor (p = 0,05). Conclusões O presente estudo encontrou associações importantes entre a função do complexo lombopélvico e sintomas musculoesqueléticos e apoia a construção de estratégias preventivas neste contexto.


Subject(s)
Humans , Low Back Pain , Dancing , Musculoskeletal Pain
3.
Rev. bras. ortop ; 58(2): 199-205, Mar.-Apr. 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1449789

ABSTRACT

Abstract Lumbar facet syndrome stands out as a significant cause for the increasing prevalence of back pain complaints. Alternatives such as radiofrequency (RF) ablation may be a therapeutic option to relieve the chronic pain associated with this condition. It is critical to analyze the effectiveness of lumbar facet syndrome treatment using the traditional RF ablation technique and the relief generated by it in chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study is a systematic review using the following inclusion criteria: title, observational studies, clinical trials, controlled clinical trials, clinical studies, and publications over the last 17 years (from 2005 to 2022). The exclusion criteria included papers addressing other themes and review articles. The databases used for data collection included the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), PubMed, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Lilacs, and Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (Virtual Health Library in Portuguese). The query used the following terms: facet, pain, lumbar, and radiofrequency. The application of these filters yielded 142 studies, and 12 were included in this review. Most studies indicated that the traditional RF ablation technique was beneficial in relieving CLBP refractory to conservative treatment.


Resumo Em um contexto de aumento da prevalência de queixas de dores na coluna, a síndrome facetária se destaca como um importante causador. Alternativas como a ablação por radiofrequência (RF) podem ser uma opção de terapia para alívio da dor crônica que essa patologia pode causar. É necessário analisar a eficácia do tratamento da síndrome facetária pela técnica de ablação por radiofrequência tradicional e o alívio gerado nas dores lombares crônicas (DLC). O presente estudo trata-se de uma revisão sistemática cujo os critérios de inclusão para análise foram: título; estudos observacionais; ensaios clínicos; ensaio clínico controlado; estudos clínicos e publicação nos últimos dezessete anos (2005-2022). Já os critérios de exclusão foram: artigos que abordavam outras temáticas e artigos de revisão. As bases utilizadas para coleta de dados incluíram Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System online (Medline), Pubmed, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Lilacs, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde. Os termos utilizados para a pesquisa foram: facet; pain; lumbar; radiofrequency. Aplicando-se os filtros foram encontrados 142 estudos, 12 foram incluídos. Os estudos em sua maioria apontaram ser benéfica a técnica de ablação por radiofrequência tradicional no alívio das dores lombares crônicas refratárias ao tratamento conservador.


Subject(s)
Humans , Low Back Pain/therapy , Zygapophyseal Joint , Radiofrequency Therapy , Lumbar Vertebrae
5.
Nursing (Ed. bras., Impr.) ; 26(296): 9280-9295, jan.2023. tab
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF | ID: biblio-1437514

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: comparar os efeitos da auriculoterapia e reflexoterapia podal para lombalgia aguda inespecífica em docentes e discentes universitários da área da saúde. Método: ensaio clínico, randomizado, controlado, duplo-cego, com 189 participantes distribuídos em três grupos: auriculoterapia experimental, reflexoterapia experimental e combinadas. Fora realizados 3 intervenções. Para a coleta foram utilizados: Questionário Sociodemográfico; Escala Visual e Analógica de intensidade na avaliação da dor; e Questionário para Lombalgia. Os dados foram analisados no programa IBM SPSS Statistics versão 18.0 Foram aplicados: teste de normalidade Kolmogorov-Smirnov; testes Qui-quadrado ou Exato de Fisher para comparação entre os grupos, e Análise de variância com post hoc ou Kruskal-Wallis, conforme apropriado. Resultados: evidenciou-se redução significativa da dor nos três protocolos (p=<0,001) para o Questionário de lombalgia, mas na comparaçãoda escala da dor, houve menor eficácia no grupo combinado (p=0,006). Conclusão: Ambas as terapias são eficazes e indicadas para controle da lombalgia aguda(AU)


Objective: to compare the effects of auriculotherapy and foot reflex therapy for nonspecific acute low back pain in university professors and students in the health area. Method: clinical trial, randomized, controlled, double-blind, with 189 participants divided into three groups: experimental auriculotherapy, experimental reflex therapy and combined therapy. Three interventions were performed. For data collection, the following were used: Sociodemographic Questionnaire; Visual and Analog Scale of intensity in pain assessment; and Low Back Pain Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics program, version 18.0. The following were applied: Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test; Chi-square or Fisher's Exact tests for comparison between groups, and Analysis of variance with post hoc or Kruskal-Wallis, as appropriate. Results: there was a significant reduction in pain in the three protocols (p=<0.001) for the Low Back Pain Questionnaire, but when comparing the pain scale, there was less efficacy in the combined group (p=0.006). Conclusion: Both therapies are effective and indicated for the control of acute low back pain(AU)


Objetivo: comparar los efectos de la auriculoterapia y la terapia refleja podal en el dolor lumbar agudo inespecífico en profesores y estudiantes universitarios del área de la salud. Método: ensayo clínico, aleatorizado, controlado, doble ciego, con 189 participantes divididos en tres grupos: auriculoterapia experimental, terapia refleja experimental y terapia combinada. Se realizaron tres intervenciones. Para la recolección de datos, se utilizaron: Cuestionario Sociodemográfico; Escala Visual y Analógica de intensidad en la valoración del dolor; y Cuestionario de dolor lumbar. Los datos fueron analizados mediante el programa IBM SPSS Statistics, versión 18.0, se aplicaron: prueba de normalidad de Kolmogorov-Smirnov; Pruebas Chi-cuadrado o Exacto de Fisher para comparación entre grupos, y Análisis de varianza con post hoc o Kruskal-Wallis, según corresponda. Resultados: hubo reducción significativa del dolor en los tres protocolos (p=<0,001) para el Low Back Pain Questionnaire, pero al comparar la escala de dolor, hubo menor eficacia en el grupo combinado (p=0,006). Conclusión: Ambas terapias son efectivas e indicadas para el control del dolor lumbar agudo(AU)


Subject(s)
Reflexotherapy , Student Health Services , Low Back Pain , Auriculotherapy
6.
Nursing (Ed. bras., Impr.) ; 26(296): 9280-9295, jan-2023. tab
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF | ID: biblio-1412714

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: comparar os efeitos da auriculoterapia e reflexoterapia podal para lombalgia aguda inespecífica em docentes e discentes universitários da área da saúde. Método: ensaio clínico, randomizado, controlado, duplo-cego, com 189 participantes distribuídos em três grupos: auriculoterapia experimental, reflexoterapia experimental e combinadas. Fora realizados 3 intervenções. Para a coleta foram utilizados: Questionário Sociodemográfico; Escala Visual e Analógica de intensidade na avaliação da dor; e Questionário para Lombalgia. Os dados foram analisados no programa IBM SPSS Statistics versão 18.0 Foram aplicados: teste de normalidade Kolmogorov-Smirnov; testes Qui-quadrado ou Exato de Fisher para comparação entre os grupos, e Análise de variância com post hoc ou Kruskal-Wallis, conforme apropriado. Resultados: evidenciou-se redução significativa da dor nos três protocolos (p=<0,001) para o Questionário de lombalgia, mas na comparaçãoda escala da dor, houve menor eficácia no grupo combinado (p=0,006). Conclusão: Ambas as terapias são eficazes e indicadas para controle da lombalgia aguda(AU)


Objective: to compare the effects of auriculotherapy and foot reflex therapy for nonspecific acute low back pain in university professors and students in the health area. Method: clinical trial, randomized, controlled, double-blind, with 189 participants divided into three groups: experimental auriculotherapy, experimental reflex therapy and combined therapy. Three interventions were performed. For data collection, the following were used: Sociodemographic Questionnaire; Visual and Analog Scale of intensity in pain assessment; and Low Back Pain Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics program, version 18.0. The following were applied: Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test; Chi-square or Fisher's Exact tests for comparison between groups, and Analysis of variance with post hoc or Kruskal-Wallis, as appropriate. Results: there was a significant reduction in pain in the three protocols (p=<0.001) for the Low Back Pain Questionnaire, but when comparing the pain scale, there was less efficacy in the combined group (p=0.006). Conclusion: Both therapies are effective and indicated for the control of acute low back pain.(AU)


Objetivo: comparar los efectos de la auriculoterapia y la terapia refleja podal en el dolor lumbar agudo inespecífico en profesores y estudiantes universitarios del área de la salud. Método: ensayo clínico, aleatorizado, controlado, doble ciego, con 189 participantes divididos en tres grupos: auriculoterapia experimental, terapia refleja experimental y terapia combinada. Se realizaron tres intervenciones. Para la recolección de datos, se utilizaron: Cuestionario Sociodemográfico; Escala Visual y Analógica de intensidad en la valoración del dolor; y Cuestionario de dolor lumbar. Los datos fueron analizados mediante el programa IBM SPSS Statistics, versión 18.0, se aplicaron: prueba de normalidad de Kolmogorov-Smirnov; Pruebas Chi-cuadrado o Exacto de Fisher para comparación entre grupos, y Análisis de varianza con post hoc o Kruskal-Wallis, según corresponda. Resultados: hubo reducción significativa del dolor en los tres protocolos (p=<0,001) para el Low Back Pain Questionnaire, pero al comparar la escala de dolor, hubo menor eficacia en el grupo combinado (p=0,006). Conclusión: Ambas terapias son efectivas e indicadas para el control del dolor lumbar agudo.(AU)


Subject(s)
Reflexotherapy , Student Health Services , Low Back Pain , Auriculotherapy
7.
Health Sciences Journal ; : 20-27, 2023.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-984394

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION@#Due to COVID-19 pandemic, many have shifted into working at home which led to physical inactivity. This may cause musculoskeletal discomfort, chronic disease, muscle atrophy and spinal imbalance due to improper and prolonged sitting posture. Since mobile devices are relatively available for most of the office workers, there were still a lack of evidence-based mobile applications that can counteract the inactivity through exercises, which led to the researchers to create an application called SitMate that consists of evidence-based exercises which aimed to prevent musculoskeletal discomfort among a business process outsourcing company Workforce Management Personnel (BPO-WMP).@*METHODS@#Eleven participants (18-40 years old) full-time, work-from-home BPO-WMP were randomized into Treatment Group(TG)(n=6) and Control Group (CG)(n=5). The TG received one month intervention with the use of SitMate Application containing relaxation exercises, range of motion exercises and stretching exercises, and notifications for postural correction while the CG continued their usual working schedule.@*RESULTS@#There were no significant differences between two groups on all body parts that were measured using the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire, and no significant differences in the intragroup pre-test and post-test scores on all body parts between TG and CG. For the intra-group post-test of the TG, there were noted improvements on the hip/buttock, right shoulder, upper back (median = 0) and right wrist (median = 1.5). There was also a noted increase in discomfort on the neck (median = 1.5) and lower back (median = 3). For the post-test of the CG, there were noted improvements on the right shoulder, right wrist (median = 0) and lower back (median = 1.5).@*CONCLUSION@#This study has shown that the SitMate application does not effectively reduce the prolonged sitting-related discomfort among the personnel after 1 month of intervention.


Subject(s)
Mobile Applications , Sedentary Behavior , Low Back Pain , Posture
8.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-971644

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND@#Low-back pain (LBP) in nurses is a major health concern that affects their quality of life and ability to work, with consequences for their economic status.@*OBJECTIVE@#This study evaluates the effect of low-level laser acupuncture combined with auricular acupressure (LAA) on pain intensity, pain interference and quality of life in nurses with LBP.@*DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS@#This randomized controlled trial recruited a convenience sample of hospital-based nurses from one teaching hospital in Taiwan, China. Participants were randomly assigned to the LAA group (n = 38) receiving low-level laser acupuncture and auricular acupressure for 4 weeks, and the control group (n = 38) receiving only sham laser acupuncture treatment without laser energy output.@*MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES@#Data were collected for the primary pain outcome using the Short Form of the Brief Pain Inventory, while the secondary outcome, quality of life, was evaluated using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Both primary and secondary outcomes were scored before the intervention, and after 2-week and 4-week intervention. The rate of LBP recurrence was evaluated at the 4th week and 8th week after the end of intervention.@*RESULTS@#After controlling for prior pain, the result of linear mixed model analysis showed trends in significant between-group differences in the level of current pain occurring in week 4 (P < 0.001), worst pain in week 2 (P < 0.001) and week 4 (P < 0.001), least pain in week 2 (P = 0.032) and week 4 (P < 0.001), pain interference in week 2 (P = 0.009) and week 4 (P < 0.001), and in the life dysfunction in week 2 (P < 0.001) and week 4 (P < 0.001). Recurrence rates of LBP at the 4th and 8th weeks after the end of intervention were 0% and 36.89% in the LAA group, and 69.44% and 36.11% in the control group.@*CONCLUSION@#This study shows that 4-week LAA intervention reduced pain intensity and pain interference, and improved quality of life for hospital-based nurses with LBP. These effects were maintained continuously for at least 4 weeks after the intervention. The nonpharmacological intervention, LAA, may be another efficacious, feasible, noninvasive, analgesic intervention for LBP.@*TRIAL REGISTRATION@#This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (registration number NCT04423445).


Subject(s)
Humans , Acupressure , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Low Back Pain/therapy , Acupuncture Therapy , Nurses
9.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-981439

ABSTRACT

This study aims to provide evidence for clinical practice by systematically reviewing the efficacy and safety of Gusongbao preparation in the treatment of primary osteoporosis(POP). The relevant papers were retrieved from four Chinese academic journal databases and four English academic journal databases(from inception to May 31, 2022). The randomized controlled trial(RCT) of Gusongbao preparation in the treatment of POP was included after screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of articles was evaluated using risk assessment tools, and the extracted data were subjected to Meta-analysis in RevMan 5.3. A total of 657 articles were retrieved, in which 15 articles were included in this study, which involved 16 RCTs. A total of 3 292 patients(1 071 in the observation group and 2 221 in the control group) were included in this study. In the treatment of POP, Gusongbao preparation+conventional treatment was superior to conventional treatment alone in terms of increasing lumbar spine(L2-L4) bone mineral density(MD=0.03, 95%CI[0.02, 0.04], P<0.000 01) and femoral neck bone mineral density, reducing low back pain(MD=-1.69, 95%CI[-2.46,-0.92], P<0.000 1) and improving clinical efficacy(RR=1.36, 95%CI[1.21, 1.53], P<0.000 01). Gusongbao preparation was comparable to similar Chinese patent medicines in terms of improving clinical efficacy(RR=0.95, 95%CI[0.86, 1.04], P=0.23). Gusongbao preparation was inferior to similar Chinese patent medicines in reducing traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scores(MD=1.08, 95%CI[0.44, 1.71], P=0.000 9) and improving Chinese medicine syndrome efficacy(RR=0.89, 95%CI[0.83, 0.95], P=0.000 4). The incidence of adverse reactions of Gusongbao preparation alone or combined with conventio-nal treatment was comparable to that of similar Chinese patent medicines(RR=0.98, 95%CI[0.57, 1.69], P=0.94) or conventio-nal treatment(RR=0.73, 95%CI[0.38, 1.42], P=0.35), and the adverse reactions were mainly gastrointestinal discomforts. According to the available data, Gusongbao preparation combined with conventional treatment is more effective than conventional treatment alone in increasing lumbar spine(L2-L4) bone mineral density and femoral neck bone mineral density, reducing low back pain, and improving clinical efficacy. The adverse reactions of Gusongbao preparation were mainly gastrointestinal discomforts, which were mild.


Subject(s)
Humans , Bone Density , Low Back Pain , Medicine, Chinese Traditional , Osteoporosis/drug therapy
10.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-970818

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE@#To assess the clinical effects of percutaneous endoscopic surgery through two different approaches for stable degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.@*METHODS@#Sixty-four patients with stable degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent percutaneous endoscopic procedures between January 2016 and December 2019 were divided into transforaminal approach group and interlaminar approach group according to surgical approaches, 32 patients in each group. There were 16 males and 16 females in transforaminal approach group, aged from 52 to 84 years old with an average of (66.03±9.60) years, L2 slippage in 4 cases, L3 slippage in 5, and L4 slippage in 23. There were 17 males and 15 females in interlaminar approach group, aged from 46 to 81 years old with an average of (61.38±9.88) years, L3 slippage in 3 cases, L4 slippage in 15, and L5 slippage in 14. Operative time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and postoperative bedtime were compared between two groups. Anteroposterior displacement values, interbody opening angles, and the percentage of slippage were measured on preoperative and postoperative 12-month dynamic radiographs. Visual analogue scale (VAS) of low back pain and lower extremity pain, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score before and after surgery were observed, and clinical effects were evaluated according to the modified MACNAB criteria.@*RESULTS@#All operations were successfully completed, and patients in both groups were followed up for more than 1 year, and without complications during follow-up period. ①There was no significant difference in operation time between two groups(P>0.05). Intraoperative fluoroscopy times were longer in transforaminal approach group than that in intervertebral approach group(P<0.05). Postoperative bedtime was shorter in transforaminal approach group than that in intervertebral approach group (P<0.05).② No lumbar instability was found on dynamic radiography at 12 months postoperatively in both groups. There were no significant differences in anteroposterior displacement values, interbody opening angles, and the percentage of slippage between two groups postoperative 12 months and preoperative 1 day(P>0.05). ③There was no significant difference between two groups in VAS of low back pain at 3 days and 1, 12 months after the operation compared with the preoperative(P>0.05), but the VAS of the lower extremity pain was significantly improved compared with the preoperative(P<0.05). Both of groups showed significant improvement in JOA score at 12 months compared with preoperatively(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS of low back pain, lower extremity pain and JOA scores between two groups during the same period after surgery(P>0.05). According to modified Macnab criteria, excellent, good, fair and poor outcomes were 21, 7, 3 and 1 in transforaminal approach group respectively, and which in intervertebral approach group were 20, 7, 5 and 0, there was no significant difference in clinical effect between the groups(P>0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#Intervertebral approach may reduce intraoperative fluoroscopy times and transforaminal approach can shorten postoperative bedtime, both approaches achieve satisfactory results in the treatment of stable degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with no progression of short-term slippage.


Subject(s)
Male , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Spondylolisthesis/surgery , Low Back Pain/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Spinal Fusion/methods , Retrospective Studies
11.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-969995

ABSTRACT

Based on the physiological and pathological characteristics of meridian sinew theory, the staging treatment of non-specific low back pain (NLBP) is explored to provide the reference of clinical practice. The twelve meridian sinews of the human body communicate with the bones and joints of the whole body, which governs the movement, body protection and defense, and meridian regulation. Physiologically, the meridian sinew maintains the functions of the lumbar region. In pathology, the meridian sinew may encounter stasis and pain, contraction and spasm or "transverse collateral" formation. According to the pathological staging of meridian sinew disorders, the progress of NLBP is divided into 3 phases and the corresponding treatments are provided. Mild stimulation and rapid analgesia is suggested to promote tissue repair at the early phase; muscle spasm is relieved to adjust muscular status at the middle phase; and the "cord-like" muscle foci is removed at the later phase of the disease.


Subject(s)
Humans , Low Back Pain , Meridians , Pain Management , Analgesia , Lumbosacral Region
12.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-981656

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE@#To analyze the early effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) laminectomy in the treatment of two-level lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).@*METHODS@#The clinical data of 98 patients with two-level LSS treated with UBE between September 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 53 males and 45 females with an average age of 59.9 years (range, 32-79 years). Among them, there were 56 cases of mixed spinal stenosis, 23 cases of central spinal canal stenosis, and 19 cases of nerve root canal stenosis. The duration of symptoms was 1.5- 10 years, with an average of 5.4 years. The operative segments were L 2, 3 and L 3, 4 in 2 cases, L 3, 4 and L 4, 5 in 29 cases, L 4, 5 and L 5, S 1 in 67 cases. All patients had different degrees of low back pain, among of which 76 cases were with unilateral lower extremity symptoms and 22 cases were with bilateral lower extremity symptoms. There were 29 cases of bilateral decompression in both segments, 63 cases of unilateral decompression in both segments, and 6 cases of unilateral decompression and bilateral decompression of each segment. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total incision length, hospitalization stay, ambulation time, and related complications were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to assess the low back and leg pain before operation and at 3 days, 3 months after operation, and at last follow-up. The Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate the functional recovery of lumbar spine before operation and at 3 months and last follow-up after operation. Modified MacNab criteria was used to evaluate clinical outcomes at last follow-up. Imaging examinations were performed before and after operation to measure the preservation rate of articular process, modified Pfirrmann scale, disc height (DH), lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), and cross-sectional area of the canal (CAC), and the CAC improvement rate was calculated.@*RESULTS@#All patients underwent surgery successfully. The operation time was (106.7±25.1) minutes, the intraoperative blood loss was (67.7±14.2) mL, and the total incision length was (3.2±0.4) cm. The hospitalization stay was 8 (7, 9) days, and the ambulation time was 3 (3, 4) days. All the wounds healed by first intention. Dural tear occurred in 1 case during operation, and mild headache occurred in 1 case after operation. All patients were followed up 13-28 months with an average of 19.3 months, and there was no recurrence or reoperation during the follow-up. At last follow-up, the preservation rate of articular process was 84.7%±7.3%. The modified Pfirrmann scale and DH were significantly different from those before operation ( P<0.05), while the LLA was not significantly different from that before operation ( P=0.050). The CAC significantly improved ( P<0.05), and the CAC improvement rate was 108.1%±17.8%. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODI at each time point after operation significantly improved when compared with those before operation, and the differences between each time points were significant ( P<0.05). According to the modified MacNab criteria, 63 cases were excellent, 25 cases were good, and 10 cases were fair, with an excellent and good rate of 89.8%.@*CONCLUSION@#UBE laminectomy is a safe and effective technique with little trauma and fast recovery for two-level LSS and the early effectiveness is satisfactory.


Subject(s)
Male , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Laminectomy , Spinal Stenosis/surgery , Constriction, Pathologic/surgery , Low Back Pain , Retrospective Studies , Blood Loss, Surgical , Endoscopy , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Spinal Fusion/methods , Decompression, Surgical , Surgical Wound/surgery , Treatment Outcome
13.
Coluna/Columna ; 22(3): e272849, 2023. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1514051

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Objective: To correlate the four quality of life questionnaires: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF-36, Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire (SSS), and EQ-5D in patients who have not received surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis. Methods: Prospective cross-sectional study. Forty patients diagnosed with lumbar stenosis at a university hospital answered four quality-of-life questionnaires in a preoperative consultation. The scores of each questionnaire were tabulated and then compared. In statistical analysis, the Spearman correlation was performed. Results: 17 female and 23 male patients with a mean age of 56.5 years. ODI had an average dysfunction of 44.9%; the PCS score averaged 29.9, and the MCS score of 41.3. The general symptoms of SSS presented a mean of 3.2, and the EQ-5D presented an average of 0.491. The EQ-5D presented the best correlation with the other questionnaires. The score that presented a worse correlation with the other questionnaires was the neuroischemic symptomatology of SSS. Conclusion: quality-of-life questionnaires can be correlated; thus, the evaluation of preoperative patients can be simplified. Level of Evidence III; Diagnostic Studies.


RESUMO: Objetivo: Correlacionar os quatro questionários de qualidade de vida: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF-36, Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire (SSS) e EQ-5D em pacientes que não foram submetidos a tratamento cirúrgico de estenose lombar. Métodos: Estudo transversal prospectivo. Quarenta pacientes com diagnóstico de estenose lombar acompanhados em hospital universitário responderam a quatro questionários de qualidade de vida em consulta pré-operatória. As pontuações de cada questionário foram tabuladas e depois comparadas. Na análise estatística, foi realizada a correlação de Spearman. Resultados: 17 pacientes do sexo feminino e 23 do sexo masculino com idade média de 56,5 anos. ODI teve uma disfunção média de 44,9%, a pontuação do PCS foi em média de 29,9 e a pontuação do MCS de 41,3. Os sintomas gerais de SSS apresentaram média de 3,2 e o EQ-5D apresentou média de 0,491. O EQ-5D apresentou a melhor correlação com os demais questionários. A pontuação que apresentou pior correlação com os demais questionários foi a sintomatologia neuroisquêmica do SSS. Conclusão: os questionários de qualidade de vida podem ser correlacionados e, assim, simplificar a avaliação dos pacientes no pré-operatório. Nível de Evidência III; Estudo diagnóstico.


RESUMEN: Objetivo: Correlacionar los cuatro cuestionarios de calidad de vida: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF-36, Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire (SSS) y EQ-5D en pacientes que no han sido sometidos a tratamiento quirúrgico de estenosis lumbar. Métodos: Estudio transversal prospectivo. Cuarenta pacientes con diagnóstico de estenosis lumbar acompañados en un hospital universitario respondieron cuatro cuestionarios de calidad de vida en una consulta preoperatoria. Las puntuaciones de cada cuestionario fueron tabuladas y luego comparadas. En el análisis estadístico se realizó la correlación de Spearman. Resultados: 17 pacientes del sexo femenino y 23 del sexo masculino con una edad media de 56,5 años. ODI tuvo una disfunción promedio de 44,9%, el puntaje PCS promedió 29,9 y el puntaje MCS de 41,3. Los síntomas generales de SSS presentaron una media de 3,2 y el EQ-5D presentó una media de 0,491. El EQ-5D presentó la mejor correlación con los demás cuestionarios. La puntuación que presentó una peor correlación con los demás cuestionarios fue la sintomatología neuroisquémica del SSS. Conclusión: los cuestionarios de calidad de vida se pueden correlacionar y, por lo tanto, se puede simplificar la evaluación de los pacientes preoperatorios. Nivel de Evidencia III; Estudios de diagnósticos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Orthopedics , Low Back Pain
14.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1437493

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La enfermedad degenerativa de la columna lumbar es frecuente, pero aún existen dudas en relación con los criterios de inestabilidad. Objetivos: Analizar la relación del signo del fluido facetario lumbar como criterio de inestabilidad vertebral segmentaria. materiales y métodos: Pacientes con enfermedad lumbar crónica, que presentan hidrartrosis facetaria en la resonancia magnética y las radiografías de columna lumbar dinámicas. Se analizan la prevalencia del sexo, la edad, la sintomatología principal y el dolor a la extensión unilateral o bilateral. Resultados: Se evaluó a 139 pacientes (62% mujeres), con un promedio de edad de 50.8 años; el principal motivo de consulta fue lumbalgia (76%). El 65% refería dolor en extensión; el 35%, dolor unilateral y el 30%, dolor bilateral. El 14% tenía espondilolistesis de bajo grado en L4-L5 y el 7%, en L5-S1. La hidrartrosis era unilateral en el 20% y bilateral en el 80%; el nivel de hidrartrosis más frecuente era en L4-L5 (58%). El 6% tenía solo inestabilidad traslacionaly el 2%, mixta. Un 8% presentaba Modic I y un 5%, Modic II. Conclusiones: La presencia de fluido facetario no es un criterio de inestabilidad vertebral segmentaria, al margen del nivel y el segmento localizado, o la presentación facetaria lumbar unilateral o bilateral. Nivel de Evidencia: IV


Introduction: Degenerative lumbar spine disease is prevalent, however, the criteria for instability are still debated. Objectives:To analyze the presence of the lumbar facet fluid sign as a criterion for segmental instability of the spine. materials and meth-ods: Patients with chronic lumbar disease, who present facet hydrarthrosis on MRI and dynamic lumbar spine radiographs. The prevalence of sex, age, main symptomatology, and pain on unilateral or bilateral extension was investigated. Results: A total of 139 patients (62% women) were evaluated, with an average age of 50.8 years; the main reason for consultation was low back pain (76%). Sixty-five percent reported pain in extension, with 35% reporting unilateral pain and 30% reporting bilateral pain. Fourteen percent had low-grade spondylolisthesis at L4-L5 and 7% at L5-S1. Hydrarthrosis was unilateral in 20% and bilateral in 80%; the most frequent level of hydrarthrosis was L4-L5 (58%). Six percent had only translational instability and 2% had mixed instability. 8% and 5%, respectively, had Modic I and Modic II changes. Conclusions: The presence of facet fluid is not a criterion for segmental instability of the spine, regardless of the level and localized segment, or the unilateral or bilateral lumbar facet presentation. Level of Evidence: IV


Subject(s)
Spine , Low Back Pain , Joint Instability , Lumbar Vertebrae
15.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1437496

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Los bloqueos facetarios intrarticulares y radiculares selectivos son útiles como método diagnóstico y terapéutico para el manejo del dolor lumbar crónico. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir y analizar los resultados de dichos bloqueos. materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo con datos de pacientes sometidos a bloqueos facetarios intrarticulares y radiculares selectivos guiados por tomografía computarizada, entre enero de 2014 y febrero de 2015. Se analizaron los datos demográficos, el puntaje en la escala analógica visual antes del bloqueo y después, y se analizó la asociación de estos factores con los resultados. Resultados: El estudio incluyó a 68 pacientes con bloqueo facetario intrarticular y 89 con bloqueo radicular selectivo. En ambos grupos, el dolor mejoró significativamente (p <0,05). Hubo una asociación entre la mejoría del dolor con los bloqueos facetarios intrarticulares y el sexo y la edad, y entre la mejoría lograda por los bloqueos radiculares selectivos y el tipo de dolor inicial. Conclusiones: Los bloqueos facetarios intrarticulares y los bloqueos radiculares selectivos son un método diagnóstico útil en el manejo del dolor lumbar crónico y su acción terapéutica es significativa, aunque hacen falta estudios para conocer su efecto analgésico a mediano y largo plazo, y así poder mejorar la calidad de vida de los pacientes. Nivel de Evidencia: IV


Introduction: Intra-articular facet blocks and selective nerve root blocks are useful as a diagnostic and therapeutic method for the management of chronic low back pain. The objective of this study was to describe and analyze the results of these blocks. materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with data from patients undergoing CT-guided intra-articular facet block and selective nerve root block between January 2014 and February 2015. The demographic information, the visual analog scale's score before and after the block, and their relationships to the outcomes were analyzed. Results: The study included 68 patients with intra-articular facet block and 89 with selective nerve root block. In both groups, pain improved significantly (p < 0.05). There was an association between the improvement in pain with intra-articular facet blocks and gender and age, and between the improvement achieved by selective nerve root blocks and the type of initial pain. Conclusions: Intra-articular facet blocks and selective nerve root blocks are a useful diagnostic method in the management of chronic low back pain and their therapeutic action is significant, although studies are needed to know their analgesic effect in the medium and long term, in order to improve the quality of life of patients. .Level of Evidence: IV


Subject(s)
Spinal Diseases , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Low Back Pain
16.
Coluna/Columna ; 22(2): e269638, 2023. tab, il. color
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1439957

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: The spinous process separation technique is a less invasive surgical technique for treating lumbar canal stenosis. The objective is to evaluate this technique's results in treating lumbar canal stenosis. Method: Thirty patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis underwent surgical treatment using the spinous process separation technique and were evaluated in the 3-year postoperative period using the Denis Pain and Work Scale and by the SF-36 questionnaire and radiographic evaluation of the operated segment. Results: In the evaluation of the Denis pain scale, 21 (70%) patients had no pain (P1), and nine (30%) patients reported minimal low back pain, not needing medication (P2). Denis' work schedule showed that nine (30%) patients had restrictions on returning to their previous work activity (W2), and 21 (70%) patients were classified as W1. The SF-36 questionnaire showed results of 81.25 for physical aspects (PA), 81.9 for functional capacity (FC), 81.3 for emotional aspects (EA), 64.3 for vitality (V), 65.9 for mental health (MH), 81.98 for social aspects (SA), 75.6 for pain (P) and 68.1 for general health status (GHS). In addition, there were no radiographic signs of instability of the operated vertebral segment in the radiographic evaluation. Conclusion: The decompression of the lumbar spinal canal using the spinous process separation technique showed good results in the evaluated patients three years after the operation. Level of Evidence II, Retrospective Comparative Study.


Resumo: Objetivo: A técnica de separação do processo espinhoso é uma técnica cirúrgica menos invasiva para o tratamento da estenose do canal lombar. O objetivo é avaliar os resultados dessa técnica no tratamento da estenose do canal lombar. Método: Trinta pacientes portadores de estenose do canal vertebral lombar foram submetidos ao tratamento cirúrgico por meio da técnica da separação do processo espinhoso, tendo sido avaliados no período de três anos de pós-operatório, por meio da escala de dor e de trabalho de Denis, pelo questionário SF-36 e avaliação radiográfica do segmento operado. Resultados: Na avaliação da escala de dor de Denis, 21 (70%) pacientes não apresentavam dor (P1) e nove (30%) pacientes relataram dor mínima lombar, não necessitando medicação (P2). A escala de trabalho de Denis evidenciou que nove (30%) pacientes apresentavam restrições ao retorno à atividade prévia de trabalho (W2) e 21 (70%) pacientes foram classificados como W1. O questionário SF-36 apresentou resultados 81,25 para aspectos físicos (AF), 81,9 para capacidade funcional (CF), 81,3 para aspectos emocionais (AE), 64,3 para vitalidade(V), 65,9 para saúde mental (SM), 81,98 para aspectos sociais (AS), 75,6 para dor (D) e 68,1 para estado geral de saúde (EGS). Não foram observados sinais radiográficos de instabilidade do segmento vertebral operado na avaliação radiográfica. Conclusão: A descompressão do canal vertebral lombar por meio da técnica de separação do processo espinhoso apresentou bons resultados na avaliação num período de três anos de pós-operatório dos pacientes avaliados. Nível de Evidência II, Estudo Retrospectivo Comparativo.


Resumen: Objetivo: La técnica de separación de la apófisis espinosa es una técnica quirúrgica menos invasiva para el tratamiento de la estenosis del canal lumbar. El objetivo es evaluar los resultados de esta técnica en el tratamiento de la estenosis del canal lumbar. Método: Treinta pacientes con estenosis del conducto raquídeo lumbar fueron intervenidos quirúrgicamente mediante la técnica de separación de la apófisis espinosa, y fueron evaluados en el postoperatorio de tres años mediante la Escala de Dolor y Trabajo de Denis, mediante el cuestionario SF-36 y evaluación radiográfica del segmento operado. Resultados: En la evaluación de la escala de dolor de Denis, 21 (70%) pacientes no presentaron dolor (P1) y nueve (30%) pacientes refirieron dolor lumbar mínimo, sin necesidad de medicación (P2). La escala de trabajo de Denis mostró que nueve (30%) pacientes tenían restricciones para regresar a su actividad laboral anterior (W2) y 21 (70%) pacientes fueron clasificados como W1. El cuestionario SF-36 arrojó resultados 81,25 para aspectos físicos (AF), 81,9 para capacidad funcional (CF), 81,3 para aspectos emocionales (AE), 64,3 para vitalidad (V), 65,9 para salud mental (SM), 81,98 para aspectos sociales (AS), 75,6 para dolor (D) y 68,1 para estado general de salud (EGS). No hubo signos radiográficos de inestabilidad del segmento vertebral intervenido en la evaluación radiográfica. Conclusión: La descompresión del canal espinal lumbar mediante la técnica de separación de apófisis espinosa mostró buenos resultados en la evaluación de un período de 3 años después de la operación de los pacientes evaluados.


Subject(s)
Humans , Spinal Stenosis , Manipulation, Spinal , Spine , Low Back Pain
17.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1449924

ABSTRACT

El número de intervenciones terapéuticas apoyadas en el uso de los recursos digitales aumenta cada día como vía para facilitar el acceso a cualquier tipo de atención sanitaria. Se realizó una revisión sistemática con el objetivo de analizar la efectividad (estado funcional, la intensidad del dolor y la adherencia al tratamiento) de la intervención de fisioterapia, apoyada en recursos digitales, frente a la fisioterapia convencional en pacientes adultos con dolor de espalda. Este estudio consultó las bases de datos científicas: PubMed, Biblioteca Virtual en Salud, Cochrane, Base de datos de Fisioterapia basada en la evidencia, Science Direct, Scopus, Episteminikos y Google Académico. La selección inicial de los estudios, la evaluación exhaustiva de los artículos completos y la extracción de las características necesarias para la investigación fueron realizadas por los seis investigadores y revisadas por dos revisores independientes. Se incluyeron 12 artículos (10 ensayos clínicos y dos estudios de cohorte). Los resultados de la revisión sistemática soportan el uso de los recursos digitales disponibles para el manejo de dolor de espalda baja, con una importante relación con la reducción de los niveles de dolor y la mejora en la funcionalidad. Es necesario realizar más estudios de alta calidad para evidenciar estos resultados, pues están por determinarse los criterios de la intervención(AU)


The number of therapeutic interventions supported by the use of digital resources is increasing every day as a way to facilitate access to any type of health care. A systematic review was carried out with the aim of analyzing the effectiveness (functional status, pain intensity and adherence to treatment) of the physiotherapy intervention, supported by digital resources, compared to conventional physiotherapy in adult patients with back pain. This study consulted the scientific databases such as PubMed, Virtual Health Library, Cochrane, Evidence-Based Physiotherapy Database, Science Direct, Scopus, Episteminikos, and Google Scholar. The initial selection of the studies, the exhaustive evaluation of the full articles and the extraction of the characteristics necessary for the investigation were carried out by the six research fellows and reviewed by two independent reviewers. Twelve articles were included (10 clinical trials and two cohort studies). The results of the systematic review support the use of available digital resources for the management of low back pain, with an important relationship with the reduction of pain levels and the improvement in functionality. It is necessary to carry out more high-quality studies to demonstrate these results, since the criteria for the intervention are yet to be determined(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Telemedicine/methods , Low Back Pain/therapy , Physical Therapy Modalities
18.
Rev. bras. ortop ; 57(6): 941-946, Nov.-Dec. 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1423631

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective To assess the role of facet tropism (FT) in intervertebral disc prolapse. Methods A total 98 patients with lower back pain were included in the study. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed and analyzed. The angles of the right and left facets were measured on the axial section. Patients without disc prolapse at the L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels act as controls for those with disc prolapse at the same levels. A statistical analysis was also performed. Results The incidence of FT at the L3-L4 level was of 85.2% in patients with disc herniation (n= 27), and of 56.3% in the control group, which was statistically significant (p= 0.008). Similarly, at the L4-L5 level, incidence of FT among cases and controls was of 71.4% (n= 35) and 52.4% respectively (p= 0.066). At the L5-S1 the incidence was of 66% and 51% among cases and controls respectively (p= 0.13). Conclusion We found a positive association between FT and disc herniation at the L3-L4 level, but no association at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels.


Resumo Objetivo Avaliar o papel do tropismo facetário (TF) no prolapso discal intervertebral. Métodos Um total de 98 pacientes com dor lombar foram incluídos no estudo. Exames de ressonância magnética foram realizados e analisados, e os ângulos das facetas direita e esquerda foram medidos na seção axial. Os pacientes sem prolapso discal nos níveis L3-L4, L4-L5 e L5-S1 atuam como controles para aqueles com prolapso nos mesmos níveis. Fez-se também uma análise estatística. Resultados A incidência de TF no nível L3-L4 foi de 85,2% em pacientes com hérnia discal (n= 27), e de 56,3% no grupo controle, o que foi estatisticamente significativo (p= 0,008). Da mesma forma, a incidência de TF no nível L4-L5 entre casos e controles foi de 71,4% (n= 35) e 52,4%, respectivamente (p= 0,066). No nível L5-S1, a incidência foi de 66% e 51% nos caso e nos controles, respectivamente (p= 0,13). Conclusão Encontramos associação positiva entre TF e hérnia de disco no nível L3-L4, mas nenhuma associação nos níveis L4-L5 e L5-S1.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Spondylolisthesis , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Low Back Pain/diagnostic imaging , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology
19.
Rev. bras. ortop ; 57(6): 947-952, Nov.-Dec. 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1423647

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objectives To verify if there is a difference in postural hypervigilance in sitting in individuals with and without low back pain. Additionally, to observe whether there is a difference in the perception of correct sitting posture between individuals with low back pain and without low back pain. Methods The present study has a cross-sectional observational design, as a sample size of 92 individuals, later divided equally into two groups (with low back pain and without low back pain). Two instruments were used: the hypervigilance scale to analyze the frequency that volunteers correct their sitting posture during the day, and posture scans to investigate the perception of volunteers about the correct sitting posture. The data were submitted to the Shapiro-Wilk Normality test. To compare the values of Hypervigilance Scale, the Mann-Whitney, Chi-Square, and Fisher Exact tests were used to assess correct sitting posture. Results There was no significant difference between postural hypervigilance in sitting between individuals with low back pain and without low back pain. There was no significant difference between the choice of correct sitting posture between the group of individuals with and without low back pain. Conclusion There is no difference between the choice of correct sitting posture and the amount of postural hypervigilance in individuals with or without low back pain.


Resumo Objetivos Verificar se há diferença na hipervigilância postural sentada em indivíduos com e sem dor lombar. Além disso, observar se há diferença na percepção da postura correta sentada entre indivíduos com dor lombar e sem dor lombar. Métodos O presente estudo possui delineamento observacional transversal, como tamanho amostral de 92 indivíduos, posteriormente divididos igualmente em dois grupos (com dor lombar e sem dor lombar). Foram utilizados dois instrumentos: a escala de hipervigilância para analisar a frequência que voluntários corrigem a postura sentada no dia; e o quadro de posturas para investigar a percepção dos voluntários sobre a postura correta sentada. Os dados foram submetidos ao teste de Normalidade de Shapiro-Wilk. Para comparar os valores da Escala de Hipervigilância foi utilizado o teste de Mann-Whitney e o teste Qui-quadrado e exato de Fisher para avaliação da postura correta sentada. Resultados Não houve diferença significativa entre a hipervigilância postural sentada entre indivíduos com dor lombar e sem dor lombar. Não houve diferença significativa entre a escolha da postura correta sentada entre o grupo de indivíduos com e sem dor lombar. Conclusão Não há diferença entre a escolha da postura correta sentada e quantidade de hipervigilância postural em indivíduos com ou sem dor lombar.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Posture , Low Back Pain/physiopathology , Sitting Position , Lordosis/diagnosis
20.
Notas enferm. (Córdoba) ; 22(39): 15-22, junio 2022.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BDENF, BINACIS, UNISALUD | ID: biblio-1380254

ABSTRACT

El dolor lumbar es una enfermedad laboral frecuente en enfermería, asociado a exigencias del cargo y múltiples causas. La intensidad varía según postura y actividad física, acompañándose de limitación dolorosa del movimiento, ser localizado, referido o irradiado. Objetivo: Determinar las características demográficas y laborales del personal de enfermería que presenta dolor lumbar de un hospital público de Corrientes, capital en el año 2021. Metodología: Diseño cuantitativo, transversal, observacional. Población 170 trabajadores de enfermería del hospital. Se incluyeron aquellos con dolor lumbar y que no cursaban enfermedades crónicas o invalidantes. Los datos se recogieron mediante cuestionario de elaboración propia, validado mediante prueba piloto. Variables: edad, género, formación en enfermería, frecuencia, intensidad y duración del dolor, principal tipo de dolor, tratamiento farmacológico y no farmacológico, principal situación generadora, tipo de trabajo realizado, turno y antigüedad laboral. Resultados: Se analizaron las respuestas de 115 trabajadores con dolor lumbar; amplitud etaria 22 a 62 años, promedio 36 años; 67% mujeres. El dolor lumbar fue diario en 22%, frecuente en 35%, ocasional en 43%. Según intensidad, 13% manifestó dolor leve, 47% moderado y 40% severo. El dolor era diario en 10% de jóvenes, en 20% de adultos jóvenes, en 45% de adultos intermedios y en 59% de adultos tardíos. En duración, el 73% lo padecía en forma aguda y el 27% crónica. En localización del dolor, el 75% indicó padecer dolor localizado y 25% irradiado. Principales situaciones generadoras de lumbalgia, 51% al movilizar pacientes, 23% al permanecer de pie, 18% al trasladar objetos pesados. En la percepción del personal sobre tipo de trabajo habitual, el 41% indicó pesado y 12% muy pesado. El 86%de los encuestados utilizó AINES. Conclusión: La intensidad del dolor lumbar es menor en el personal más joven respecto a los mayores. Los más jóvenes refieren dolor localizado, los de mayor edad dolor irradiado. El principal desencadenante del dolor lumbar es la movilización de pacientes[AU]


Low back pain is a common occupational disease in nursing, associated with the demands of the position and multiple causes. Te intensity varies according to posture and physical activity, accompanied by painful limitation of movement, being localized, referred or irradiated. Objective: To determine the demographic and labor characteristics of the nursing staff that presents low back pain in a public hospital in Corrientes, capital in the year 2021. Methodology: Quantitative, cross-sectional, observational design. Population 170 hospital nursing workers. Tose with low back pain and who did not have chronic or disabling diseases were included. Te data was collected through a self-prepared questionnaire, validated through a pilot test. Variables: age, gender, nursing training, frequency, intensity and duration of pain, main type of pain, pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment, main generating situation, type of work performed, shif and work seniority. Results: Te responses of 115 workers with low back pain were analyzed; age range 22 to 62 years, average 36 years; 67% women. Low back pain was daily in 22%, frequent in 35%, occasional in 43%. According to intensity, 13% reported mild pain, 47% moderate and 40% severe. Pain was daily in 10% of youth, 20% of young adults, 45% of middle adults, and 59% of late adults. In duration, 73% suffered from it acutely and 27% chronically. In pain location, 75% indicated localized pain and 25% irradiated. Main situations that generate low back pain, 51% when moving patients, 23% when standing, 18% when moving heavy objects. In the perception of the personnel on the type of habitual work, 41% indicated heavy and 12% very heavy. 86% of those surveyed used NSAIDs. Conclusion: Te intensity of low back pain is lower in the younger staff compared to the older ones. Te youngest refer localized pain, the oldest radiated pain. Te main trigger of low back pain is the mobilization of patients[AU]


A lombalgia é uma doença ocupacional comum na enfermagem, associada às demandas do cargo e a múltiplas causas. A intensidade varia de acordo com a postura e atividade física, acompanhada de limitação dolorosa do movimento, sendo localizada, referida ou irradiada. Objetivo: Determinar as características demográfcas e laborais da equipe de enfermagem que apresenta lombalgia em um hospital público de Corrientes, capital no ano de 2021. Metodologia: Desenho quantitativo, transversal, observacional. População 170 trabalhadores de enfermagem hospitalar. Foram incluídos aqueles com lombalgia e que não possuíam doenças crônicas ou incapacitantes. Os dados foram coletados por meio de um questionário autoelaborado, validado por meio de um teste piloto. Variáveis: idade, sexo, formação do enfermeiro, frequência, intensidade e duração da dor, principal tipo de dor, tratamento farmacológico e não farmacológico, principal situação geradora, tipo de trabalho realizado, turno e antiguidade no trabalho. Resultados: Foram analisadas as respostas de 115 trabalhadores com lombalgia; faixa etária de 22 a 62 anos, média de 36 anos; 67% mulheres. A dor lombar foi diária em 22%, frequente em 35%, ocasional em 43%. De acordo com a intensidade, 13% relataram dor leve, 47% moderada e 40% intensa. A dor foi diária em 10% dos jovens, 20% dos adultos jovens, 45% dos adultos intermediários e 59% dos adultos tardios. Em duração, 73% sofriam agudamente e 27% cronicamente. Na localização da dor, 75% indicaram dor localizada e 25% irradiada. Principais situações que geram lombalgia, 51% ao movimentar pacientes, 23% ao fcar em pé, 18% ao movimentar objetos pesados. Na percepção do pessoal sobre o tipo de trabalho habitual, 41% indicaram pesado e 12% muito pesado. 86% dos entrevistados usaram AINEs. Conclusão: A intensidade da dor lombar é menor na equipe mais jovem em comparação com a mais velha. Os mais jovens referem dor localizada, os mais velhos referem dor irradiada. O principal desencadeador da lombalgia é a mobilização dos pacientes[AU]


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Occupational Risks , Demography , Low Back Pain , Hospitals, Public , Nursing Staff , Occupational Diseases , Posture , Pain Measurement
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL