ABSTRACT
El Comité Editorial quiere brindar a sus lectores una actualización de las escalas de uso corriente. El empleo de tablas y escalas es una práctica muy extendida en la Ortopedia y Traumatología. La medición y la cuantificación de los aspectos clínicos, funcionales y radiográficos se convirtieron en una herramienta imprescindible para la toma de decisiones en diferentes aspectos de la actividad asistencial. Llevamos a cabo una revisión de las escalas más utilizadas, definiendo su uso e incluyendo bibliografía original y actualizada. Nivel de Evidencia: V
The Editorial Committee wants to provide its readers with an update on the commonly used scales. The use of tables and scales is a widespread practice in Orthopedics and Traumatology. The measurement and quantification of clinical, functional, and radiographic aspects has become an essential tool for decision-making in different aspects of healthcare activity. We carry out a review of the most used scales, defining their use and including original and updated literature. Level of Evidence: V
Subject(s)
Orthopedics , Injury Severity Score , Trauma Severity Indices , Surveys and Questionnaires , Decision MakingABSTRACT
Abstract Objective To demonstrate the degree of recommendation of mentors and mentees regarding a mentorship program, to assess the degree of satisfaction of the participants, and to describes the main characteristics of the meetings in pairs. Materials and Methods A primary, retrospective, analytical study based on answers to the annual evaluation questionnaires of the institutional mentorship program in pairs of the Orthopedics and Traumatology residency from December 2017 to February 2021. Results We compiled 52 responses from 26 mentorship preceptors and 26 mentored residents. The mentees and mentors had average ages of 27 (±1.5) years and 45 (±8.2) years respectively. A total of 96% of the participants recommend the program, and 89% of the mentees reported that the mentors contributed to their personal and professional decision-making process. Conclusion The mentorship program proved to be a highly recommended strategy in medical residency in Orthopedics. Data show that mentors contributed to the mentees' personal and professional decision-making process.
Resumo Objetivo Demonstrar o grau de recomendação de mentores e mentorados quanto à participação em um programa de mentoria, avaliar o grau de satisfação dos participantes, e descrever as principais características das reuniões em dupla. Materiais e Métodos Estudo primário, retrospectivo, analítico, com análise das respostas dos questionários de avaliação anual do programa de mentoria em dupla da residência de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da instituição de dezembro de 2017 a fevereiro de 2021. Resultados Foram obtidas 52 respostas de 26 preceptores mentores e 26 residentes mentorados. A média de idade dos mentorados foi de 27 anos (±1,5 ano), ao passo que a média de idade dos mentores foi de 45 anos (±8,2 anos). O grau de recomendação do programa pelos participantes foi de 96%, e 89% dos mentorados consideraram que os mentores contribuíram para a tomada de decisões pessoais e profissionais. Conclusão O programa de mentoria se mostrou uma estratégia com alto grau de recomendação na residência médica em Ortopedia. Os dados mostram que os mentores contribuíram para a tomada de decisões pessoais e profissionais dos mentorados.
Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Orthopedics/education , Traumatology/education , Mentors , Internship and ResidencyABSTRACT
Abstract Objective To evaluate the performance of orthopedic residents while conducting clinical examinations. Methods The Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) was applied by three teaching doctors at four different moments. The instrument was adapted by the authors for use in orthopedics, with the development of descriptors for each evaluated skill. Supervisors were trained to use the Mini-CEX by the principal investigator through teaching materials and discussions, with standardization of the instrument descriptors. Results The mean scores obtained in the 4 evaluations for each of the 21 residents reveal improvement in the performances of residents in all skills assessed from the 1st to the 4th meeting. Conclusions We have found that the performance of orthopedic residents presented a satisfactory evolution, with progressive improvement in all skills.
Resumo Objetivo Avaliar o desempenho de residentes de ortopedia na realização de exames clínicos. Métodos O Mini-CEX foi aplicado por três docentes em quatro momentos distintos. O instrumento foi adaptado pelos autores para uso em ortopedia, com desenvolvimento de descritores para cada habilidade avaliada. Os supervisores foram treinados pelo pesquisador principal para utilização do Mini-CEX por meio de materiais didáticos e discussões e os descritores do instrumento foram padronizados. Resultados As pontuações médias obtidas nas quatro avaliações de cada um dos 21 residentes revelaram melhora no desempenho de todas as habilidades entre o primeiro e o quarto encontro. Conclusões O desempenho dos residentes em ortopedia apresentou evolução satisfatória, com melhora progressiva de todas as habilidades.
Subject(s)
Humans , Orthopedics/education , Diagnosis , Employee Performance Appraisal , Learning , Medical Staff, Hospital/educationABSTRACT
Abstract Objective Orthopedics is not very common in many Brazilian medical schools, and there is no questionnaire to assess the teaching of musculoskeletal disorders during medical training. The Orthopedic Surgery Milestone Project is an assessment tool for orthopedic residents in programs or fellowships recognized by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery (ABOS). This study aims to translate the Orthopedic Surgery Milestone Project into Portuguese and to perform its transcultural adaptation. Methods The translation and transcultural adaptation consisted of the initial translation into Portuguese, back-translation into English, preparation of a pretest consensual text, and the subsequent elaboration of a final text. Results The final text was deemed adequate and equivalent to the original one for the evaluation of orthopedics residents throughout their program. Conclusions Given the lack of instruments for the assessment of orthopedic residents, the translation and transcultural adaptation of the Orthopedic Surgery Milestone Project were compatible; this can be an instrument for improved medical education.
Resumo Objetivo A ortopedia é uma especialidade pouco presente na formação de muitas escolas médicas brasileiras, sendo que não foi identificado nenhum questionário que avalie o ensino das desordens musculoesqueléticas durante a formação médica. O Orthopedic Surgery Milestone Project constitui um instrumento de avaliação de residentes de ortopedia nos programas de residência ou bolsas credenciados pela ACGME (The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education) e pelo ABOS (The American Board of Orthopedic Surgery). O objetivo é realizar a tradução para a língua portuguesa e adaptação transcultural do Orthopedic Surgery Milestone Project. Métodos A tradução e adaptação transcultural consistiram na tradução inicial para o português, retro tradução para o inglês, análise para a obtenção de uma versão consensual pré-teste e posterior versão final. Resultados A versão final foi considerada adequada e equivalente à original para a avaliação dos residentes de ortopedia ao longo do programa de residência médica. Conclusões Diante da falta de instrumentos para a avaliação dos residentes em Ortopedia, a tradução e a adaptação transcultural do Orthopedic Surgery Milestone Project foi compatível, podendo ser um instrumento para uma formação médica mais adequada.
Subject(s)
Orthopedics , Translating , Education, Medical , Cultural Competency , Medical Staff, HospitalABSTRACT
Objetivo: Avaliar o impacto das ações judiciais no setor de ortopedia da Santa Casa de Juiz de Fora/MG. Métodos: Foi realizada análise dos prontuários dos pacientes que passaram por cirurgia no setor de ortopedia da Santa Casa de Juiz de Fora no ano de 2016. E, logo após, os pacientes advindos de ação judicial foram identificados, dividindo-se, assim, a amostra em dois grupos. As variáveis analisadas foram: sexo e idade do paciente; tempo de internação, desfecho e custos, os quais foram desmembrados em diárias, honorários, procedimentos e materiais e medicamentos. Resultados: Os resultados demonstraram que os pacientes que realizaram cirurgias por via judicial são, em sua maioria, idosos, com leve predominância do sexo masculino. A maior das demandas é para a garantia de cirurgias do sistema osteomuscular de membros inferiores, representando 65,9% das cirurgias realizadas por ação judicial em 2016, que também são as cirurgias mais demandadas por via convencional. O custo direto das cirurgias por processos judiciais foi estimado em R$ 2.340.301,68. As diárias apresentaram o maior custo, sendo responsáveis por 90,7% de todo o custo estimado. Conclusão: A judicialização neste estudo expõe deficiências do Sistema Único de Saúde quanto à oferta de serviços, uma vez que todas as cirurgias demandadas por meio de ação judicial já são contempladas pelo sistema público de saúde. Assim, os aspectos judiciais da saúde, tais como a individualidade e os prazos para cumprimento, prevalecem sobre o coletivo e os que esperam nas filas.
Objective: Evaluate the impact of legal actions in the orthopedic sector of Santa Casa de Juiz de Fora/MG. Methods: An analysis was carried out of the medical records of patients who underwent surgery in the orthopedic sector of Santa Casa de Juiz de Fora in the year 2016. Soon afterwards, patients from a judicial action were identified, thus dividing the sample into two groups. The analyzed variables were: sex and age of the patient; time of hospitalization, outcome and costs, which were broken down into: daily, fees, procedures and materials and medicines. Results: The results showed that patients who underwent surgeries by judicial means are mostly elderly, with a slight predominance of males. The largest of the demands is to guarantee osteomuscular lower limb surgeries, accounting for 65.9% of surgeries performed by lawsuit in 2016, which are also the most commonly performed surgeries. The direct cost of surgeries for legal proceedings was estimated at R$ 2,340,301.68. The daily costs were those that presented the highest cost, accounting for 90.7% of the estimated cost. Conclusion: The judicialization in this study exposes deficiencies of the Unified Health System regarding the offer of services, once all the surgeries demanded by lawsuit are already contemplated by the public health system. Thus, the judicial aspects of health, such as: individuality and deadlines for compliance prevail over the collective and those waiting in the queues.
Subject(s)
Orthopedics , Health Law , Health's JudicializationABSTRACT
RESUMEN Introducción: Actualmente la salud es concebida como un derecho fundamental y para garantizarlo se debe propender por una adecuada formación de los profesionales de la salud. El internado rotatorio es la última etapa y la más importante del pregrado en Medicina. Objetivo: Explorar los factores desde la perspectiva de estudiantes y docentes, que influyen en el desarrollo de competencias en la rotación de Ortopedia y Traumatología durante el internado médico. Métodos: Estudio cualitativo con enfoque en teoría fundamentada. Para la recolección de datos se realizó un cuestionario semiestructurado a una muestra aleatoria de 14 participantes, 7 estudiantes y 7 docentes, que cumplían los criterios de inclusión. El análisis se basó en la codificación y categorización de los datos que posteriormente fueron sometidos a un proceso de triangulación para lograr la teorización final. Resultados: Los factores que favorecen el desarrollo de competencias están relacionados con la motivación intrínseca del estudiante, la flexibilidad y disponibilidad de recursos académicos, las características del programa de la rotación y el ambiente de práctica. Se identificaron como factores limitantes aquellos asociados a una formación deficiente en ciencias básicas médicas, la priorización del componente asistencial sobre el académico, la disponibilidad limitada de espacios y recursos de aprendizaje y los métodos de enseñanza tradicionales. Conclusiones: Es de vital importancia la identificación de los factores que favorecen y limitan el desarrollo de las competencias de los estudiantes de medicina en su última etapa de formación en ortopedia.
ABSTRACT Introduction: Few areas of orthopedic surgery have had such important technical changes in recent decades as in corrective spinal surgery. Fundamental changes have come with the new spinal instrumentation systems, which have been substantially modified and improved to facilitate three-dimensional correction of the deformity and provide secure spinal fixation, correction and stability. Objective: To evaluate the results achieved with the spinal instrumentation systems used in the correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis due to ankylosing spondylitis. Methods: A descriptive, retrospective and longitudinal study was carried out on 16 patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis due to ankylosing spondylitis operated on with the pedicle subtraction osteotomy technique and instrumented with Luque-type pedicle and sublaminar systems, in the Orthopedics service at Hermanos Ameijeiras Surgical Clinical Hospital, from March 2001 to March 2021. Results: All the patients were male, white skin color and average age of 39 years. More than 80% correction was achieved in the sagittal profile and an average of 34.3° per osteotomy, without major neurological complications. Good functional results were obtained, with high degree of patient satisfaction and improvement in their quality of life. Conclusions: The use of both spinal instrumentation systems is effective in maintaining the correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis due to ankylosing spondylitis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Professional Competence , Teaching/education , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/trends , Internship and Residency , Orthopedics/education , Traumatology/education , Evaluation Studies as TopicABSTRACT
Introducción: El 11 de marzo de 2020, la OMS declaró la pandemia global por COVID-19 que afectó la práctica ortopédica en el mundo. Para analizar la influencia de la COVID-19 sobre la situación laboral de los socios de la Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología, hemos realizado tres encuestas desde el inicio (marzo 2020) hasta la etapa posvacunación (julio 2021).Los objetivos fueron determinar diferencias en la reducción relativa del trabajo (consultorios, cirugías) durante las tres fases de la pandemia: prepico, pico y etapa de vacunación, y diferenciar entre la población estudiada, cuidados de protección, actividad, testeos, infección, aislamientos, vacunación. Materiales y métodos: Encuesta prospectiva, en tres etapas, a los socios en general, autorizada por la Comisión Directiva, desde el inicio del aislamiento social obligatorio (Ro de 2,8), en el pico y posvacunación. Resultados: Se observó un bajo grado de adherencia que fue disminuyendo progresivamente entre las fases. El 6,99% había sido testeado en la primera encuesta; el 25,29%, en la segunda, y el 88,2%, luego de 6 meses. La reducción de las actividades habituales y la incorporación de la telemedicina, como una nueva forma de intercambio médico-paciente, fue la novedad en la segunda parte de la encuesta. Conclusiones: Los sistemas de protección han dado un porcentaje aceptable de confiabilidad con un alto índice de vacunación dentro de los especialistas. A pesar del riesgo y los miedos al contagio, la telemedicina no ha logrado ser una alternativa aceptaba tanto por los profesionales como por los pacientes. Palabras clave:COVID-19; encuesta; protección personal; telemedicina. Nivel de Evidencia: IV
Introduction: On March 11, 2020, the WHO declared a global pandemic due to COVID-19 that affected orthopedic practice world-wide. To analyze the influence of COVID-19 on the employment situation of the members of the Argentine Association of Orthopedics and Traumatology (AAOT), we have conducted 3 surveys from the beginning of March 2020 to the post-vaccination stage in July 2021. The objectives were to determine differences between the relative reduction of work (outpatient clinics, surgeries) during the three phases of the pandemic: pre-peak, peak, and vaccination stage and to differentiate between the studied population, protective care, activity, tests, infection, isolation, and vaccination. materials and methods: Prospective survey, in three stages, to members in general, authorized by the Board of Directors, from the beginning of compulsory social isolation (R0 2.8), through the peak and post-vaccination stages. Results: We observed a low degree of participation that progressively decreased between phases. In the first survey, 6.99% had been tested; in the second, 25.29%; and after 6 months, 88.2%. The reduction of habitual activities and the incorporation of telemedicine as a new way of doctor-patient exchange was the novelty in the second part of the survey. Conclusion: Protection systems have given an acceptable percentage of reliability with a high vaccination rate among specialists. Despite the risk and fears of contagion, telemedicine has not managed to be an alternative accepted by both professionals and patients. Level of evidence: IV
Subject(s)
Orthopedics , Physicians , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pandemics , COVID-19ABSTRACT
El acceso a la tecnología de planificación e impresión 3D está destinado a tener un impacto disruptivo en la práctica quirúrgica de la Ortopedia y Traumatología. Sus ventajas incluyen una mejor comprensión de las lesiones por tratar, mayor precisión técnica, acortamiento de los tiempos quirúrgicos, disminución de la pérdida sanguínea y menor exposición a los rayos. El objetivo de esta publicación es ofrecer una guía práctica paso a paso tomando como ejemplo el tratamiento de una fractura desplazada del tercio medio de la clavícula. Nivel de Evidencia: V
Access to 3D planning and printing technology is destined to have a disruptive impact on the surgical practice of Orthopedics. Its advantages include a better understanding of the injuries, greater technical precision, shortened surgical times, decreased blood loss, and less exposure to X-rays. The aim of this publication is to provide a practical step-by-step guide using the treatment of a displaced middle-third clavicle fracture as an example. Level of Evidence: V
Subject(s)
Orthopedics , Clavicle/injuries , Preoperative Period , Printing, Three-DimensionalABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To explore the effect of Chinese massage on the rehabilitation of scoliosis patients undergoing 3D printing orthopedics.@*METHODS@#A retrospective selection of 262 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis(AIS) who underwent 3D printing technology orthopedics admitted to the Department of Orthopedics in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2019 were selected for clinical research. According to the rehabilitation treatment methods adopted by the patients after the operation, the patients were divided into control group and observation group, there were 131 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with traditional Chinese acupuncture and massage after operation, and the control group was treated with conventional rehabilitation. The torso rotation angle and the maximum Cobb angle before and after intervention were measured and compared between two groups, Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) was used for functional evaluation, and the visual analogue scale(VAS) was used to evaluate the changes in pain before and after rehabilitation intervention.@*RESULTS@#After the intervention, the trunk rotation angle and maximum Cobb angle of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group, the VAS score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group, ODI in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#After scoliosis patients undergo preoperative 3D printing correction, the scientific and reasonable implementation of TCM acupuncture and massage can effectively improve the patient's vertebral rotation angle, maximum Cobb angle, and improve the patient's spinal function.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Massage , Medicine, Chinese Traditional , Orthopedic Procedures , Orthopedics , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Retrospective Studies , Scoliosis/surgery , Spinal Fusion , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
El Comité Editorial quiere brindar a los lectores de la RAAOT una actualización de las escalas de uso corriente. El empleo de tablas y escalas es una práctica muy extendida en la ortopedia y traumatología. La medición y la cuantificación de los aspectos clínicos, funcionales y radiográficos se convirtieron en una herramienta imprescindible para la toma de decisiones en diferentes aspectos de la actividad asistencial. Llevamos a cabo una revisión de las escalas más utilizadas, definimos su uso e incluimos bibliografía original y actualizada. Nivel de Evidencia: V
The Editorial Committee wants to provide its readers with an update on the commonly used scales. The use of tables and scales is a widespread practice in Orthopedics and Traumatology. The measurement and quantification of clinical, functional, and radiographic aspects have become an essential tool for decision-making in different aspects of healthcare activity. We carry out a review of the most used scales, defining their use and including original and updated literature. Level of Evidence: V
Subject(s)
Orthopedics , Injury Severity Score , Trauma Severity IndicesABSTRACT
El Comité Editorial quiere brindar a sus lectores una actualización de las escalas de uso corriente. El empleo de tablas y escalas es una práctica muy extendida en la Ortopedia y Traumatología. La medición y la cuantificación de los aspectos clínicos, funcionales y radiográficos se convirtieron en una herramienta imprescindible para la toma de decisiones en diferentes aspectos de la actividad asistencial. Llevamos a cabo una revisión de las escalas más utilizadas, definiendo su uso e incluyendo bibliografía original y actualizada. Nivel de Evidencia: V
The Editorial Committee wants to provide its readers with an update on the commonly used scales. The use of tables and scales is a widespread practice in Orthopedics and Traumatology. The measurement and quantification of clinical, functional, and radiographic aspects has become an essential tool for decision-making in different aspects of healthcare activity. We carry out a review of the most used scales, defining their use and including original and updated literature. Level of Evidence: V
Subject(s)
Orthopedics , Shoulder , Injury Severity Score , Trauma Severity Indices , Surveys and Questionnaires , ElbowABSTRACT
El Comité Editorial quiere brindar a sus lectores una actualización de las escalas de uso corriente. El empleo de tablas y escalas es una práctica muy extendida en la Ortopedia y Traumatología. La medición y la cuantificación de los aspectos clínicos, funcionales y radiográficos se convirtieron en una herramienta imprescindible para la toma de decisiones en diferentes aspectos de la actividad asistencial. Llevamos a cabo una revisión de las escalas más utilizadas, definiendo su uso e incluyendo bibliografía original y actualizada. Nivel de Evidencia: V
The Editorial Committee wants to provide its readers with an update on the commonly used scales. The use of tables and scales is a widespread practice in Orthopedics and Traumatology. The measurement and quantification of clinical, functional, and radiographic aspects have become essential tools for decision-making in different aspects of healthcare activity. We carried out a review of the most used scales, defining their use and including original and updated literature. Level of Evidence: V
Subject(s)
Orthopedics , Injury Severity Score , Trauma Severity Indices , Surveys and Questionnaires , Disability Evaluation , Hand InjuriesABSTRACT
El Comité Editorial quiere brindar a sus lectores una actualización de las escalas de uso corriente. El empleo de tablas y escalas es una práctica muy extendida en la Ortopedia y Traumatología. La medición y la cuantificación de los aspectos clínicos, funcionales y radiográficos se convirtieron en una herramienta imprescindible para la toma de decisiones en diferentes aspectos de la actividad asistencial. Llevamos a cabo una revisión de las escalas más utilizadas, definiendo su uso e incluyendo bibliografía original y actualizada. Nivel de Evidencia: V
The Editorial Committee wants to provide its readers with an update on the commonly used scales. The use of tables and scales is a widespread practice in Orthopedics and Traumatology. The measurement and quantification of clinical, functional, and radiographic aspects have become an essential tool for decision-making in different aspects of healthcare activity. We carry out a review of the most used scales, defining their use and including original and updated literature. Level of Evidence: V