Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery ; : 7-2022.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM | ID: wpr-969131

RESUMEN

Background@#Excessive bleeding is a major intraoperative risk associated with orthognathic surgery. This study aimed to investigate the factors involved in massive bleeding during orthognathic surgeries so that safe surgeries can be performed. Patients (n=213) diagnosed with jaw deformities and treated with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery (Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy) in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Suidobashi Hospital, Tokyo Dental College between January 2014 and December 2016 were included. Using the patients’ medical and operative records, the number of cases according to sex, age at the time of surgery, body mass index (BMI), circulating blood volume, diagnosis of maxillary deformity, direction of maxillary movement, operative duration, incidence of bad split, injury of nasal mucosa, and blood type were analyzed. @*Results@#The results revealed that BMI, circulating blood volume, nasal mucosal injury, and operative time were associated with the risk of intraoperative massive bleeding in orthognathic surgeries. Chi-square tests and binomial logistic regression analyses showed significant differences in BMI, circulating blood volume, direction of maxillary movement, operative duration, and injury to the nasal mucosa. Operative duration emerged as the most important risk factor. Furthermore, a >4-mm upward migration of the posterior nasal spine predicted the risk of massive bleeding in orthognathic surgery. @*Conclusions@#The upward movement of the maxilla should be recognized during the preoperative planning stage as a risk factor for intraoperative bleeding, and avoiding damage to the nasal mucosa should be considered a requirement for surgeons to prevent massive bleeding during surgery.

2.
Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Medicine. 2014; 2 (2): 158-161
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-183573

RESUMEN

Introduction: The treatment of complicated parapneumonic effusion [PPE] and thoracic empyema [TE] is controversial; and the choice of treatment after confirming the failure of simple drainage remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of intrapleural urokinase [UK] administration and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery [VATS] as initial treatment options for PPE and TE


Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed and compared the data of 20 patients with PPE and TE diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2012 at our hospital, dividing them on the basis of the initial treatment into a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery [VATS] group [n=9] and UK group [n=11]


Results: Age was the only statistically different parameter between both groups [P=0.025]; with the mean age of the VATS and UK groups being 64 and 76 years, respectively. There was no significant difference in the duration of drainage or success rate between the UK or VATS groups. Although no statistically significant differences [P=0.20] were observed, duration of hospital stay was longer in the UK group [21 and 28 day for VATS and UK, respectively]


Conclusion: VATS for PPE and TE may shorten the duration of hospital stay. However, UK administration may be used for selective patients because it is considered to yield outcomes similar to VATS

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA