Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Tipo de estudio
Intervalo de año
1.
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine ; (6): 567-593, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM | ID: wpr-904035

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND@#Since the cornea is responsible for transmitting and focusing light into the eye, injury or pathology affecting any layer of the cornea can cause a detrimental effect on visual acuity. Aging is also a reason for corneal degeneration. Depending on the level of the injury, conservative therapies and donor tissue transplantation are the most common treatments for corneal diseases. Not only is there a lack of donor tissue and risk of infection/rejection, but the inherent ability of corneal cells and layers to regenerate has led to research in regenerative approaches and treatments. @*METHODS@#In this review, we first discussed the anatomy of the cornea and the required properties for reconstructing layers of the cornea. Regenerative approaches are divided into two main categories; using direct cell/growth factor delivery or using scaffold-based cell delivery. It is expected delivered cells migrate and integrate into the host tissue and restore its structure and function to restore vision. Growth factor delivery also has shown promising results for corneal surface regeneration. Scaffold-based approaches are categorized based on the type of scaffold, since it has a significant impact on the efficiency of regeneration, into the hydrogel and non-hydrogel based scaffolds. Various types of cells, biomaterials, and techniques are well covered. @*RESULTS@#The most important characteristics to be considered for biomaterials in corneal regeneration are suitable mechanical properties, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and transparency. Moreover, a curved shape structure and spatial arrangement of the fibrils have been shown to mimic the corneal extracellular matrix for cells and enhance cell differentiation. @*CONCLUSION@#Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches showed to have promising outcomes for corneal regeneration. However, besides proper mechanical and optical properties, other factors such as appropriate sterilization method, storage, shelf life and etc. should be taken into account in order to develop an engineered cornea for clinical trials.

2.
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine ; (6): 567-593, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM | ID: wpr-896331

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND@#Since the cornea is responsible for transmitting and focusing light into the eye, injury or pathology affecting any layer of the cornea can cause a detrimental effect on visual acuity. Aging is also a reason for corneal degeneration. Depending on the level of the injury, conservative therapies and donor tissue transplantation are the most common treatments for corneal diseases. Not only is there a lack of donor tissue and risk of infection/rejection, but the inherent ability of corneal cells and layers to regenerate has led to research in regenerative approaches and treatments. @*METHODS@#In this review, we first discussed the anatomy of the cornea and the required properties for reconstructing layers of the cornea. Regenerative approaches are divided into two main categories; using direct cell/growth factor delivery or using scaffold-based cell delivery. It is expected delivered cells migrate and integrate into the host tissue and restore its structure and function to restore vision. Growth factor delivery also has shown promising results for corneal surface regeneration. Scaffold-based approaches are categorized based on the type of scaffold, since it has a significant impact on the efficiency of regeneration, into the hydrogel and non-hydrogel based scaffolds. Various types of cells, biomaterials, and techniques are well covered. @*RESULTS@#The most important characteristics to be considered for biomaterials in corneal regeneration are suitable mechanical properties, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and transparency. Moreover, a curved shape structure and spatial arrangement of the fibrils have been shown to mimic the corneal extracellular matrix for cells and enhance cell differentiation. @*CONCLUSION@#Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches showed to have promising outcomes for corneal regeneration. However, besides proper mechanical and optical properties, other factors such as appropriate sterilization method, storage, shelf life and etc. should be taken into account in order to develop an engineered cornea for clinical trials.

3.
Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research. 2012; 7 (1): 76-83
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-163684
4.
Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research. 2010; 5 (2): 82-86
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-129490

RESUMEN

To report the indications and techniques of corneal transplantation at a tertiary referral center in Tehran over a 3-year-period. Records of patients who had undergone any kind of corneal transplantation at Labbafinejad Medical Center, Tehran, Iran form March 2004 to March 2007 were reviewed to determine the indications and types of corneal transplantation. During this period, 776 eyes of 756 patients [including 504 male subjects] with mean age of 41.3 +/- 21.3 years underwent corneal transplantation. The most common indication was keratoconus [n=317, 40.8%], followed by bullous keratopathy [n=90, 11.6%], non-herpetic corneal scars [n=62, 8.0%], infectious by corneal ulcers [n=90, 11.6%], non-herpetic corneal scars [n=317, 40.8%] followed by bullous keratopathy [n= 61, 7.9%], previously failed grafts [n=61, 7.9%], endothelial and stromal corneal dystrophies [n=28, 3.6%], and trachoma keratopathy [n=26, 3.3%]. Other indications including Terrien's marginal degeneration, post-LASIK keratectasia, trauma, chemical burns, and peripheral ulcerative keratitis constituted the rest of cases. Techniques of corneal transplantation included penetrating keratoplasty [n=607, 78.2%], deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty [n=108, 13.9%], conventional lamellar keratoplasty [n=44, 5.7%], automated lamellar therapeutic keratoplasty [n= 8, 1.0%], and Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty [n=6, 0.8%] in descending order. The remaining cases were endothelial keratoplasty and sclerokeratoplasty. In this study, keratoconus was the most common indication for penetrating keratoplasty which was the most prevalent technique of corneal transplantation. However, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty is emerging as a growing alternative for corneal pathologies not involving the endothelium


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Queratoplastia Penetrante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de la Córnea/cirugía
5.
Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research. 2010; 5 (2): 130-135
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-129498
6.
Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research. 2009; 4 (3): 177-181
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-101023
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA