Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Blood Research ; : 307-310, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM | ID: wpr-21826

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stem cell units (SCUs) that are cryopreserved prior to both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (for donor lymphocyte infusion) remain unused or partially used several times, and become an increased burden to blood banks/SCU repositories. Because of the scarcity of data regarding the duration for which the storage is useful, there is no general consensus regarding disposal of SCUs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective audit of SCU utilization in 435 patients who planned to undergo either autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) (N=239) or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) (N=196) at a tertiary cancer care center between November 2007 to January 2015. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 1,728 SCUs stored for conducting auto-SCT and 729 SCUs stored for conducting donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) after allo-SCT. Stem cells were not infused in 12.5% of patients who had planned to undergo auto-SCT, and 80% of patients who underwent allo-SCT never received DLI. Forty-one percent of SCUs intended for use in auto-SCT remained unutilized, with a second auto-SCT being performed only in 4 patients. Ninety-four percent of SCUs intended for carrying out DLIs remained unused, with only minimal usage observed one year after undergoing allo-SCT. CONCLUSION: The duration of storage of unused SCUs needs to be debated upon, so that a consensus can be reached regarding the ethical disposal of SCU.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Consenso , Criopreservación , Países en Desarrollo , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Linfocitos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante de Células Madre , Células Madre , Donantes de Tejidos
2.
SJA-Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2011; 5 (2): 162-166
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-109222

RESUMEN

The objective was to compare the ability of norepinephrine and dopamine in reversing the hemodynamic and metabolic abnormalities of septic shock using Edwards Vigileo Monitor with Flotrac Sensor. Prospective randomized control study. Fifty consecutive patients presenting with hyperdynamic septic shock who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated to either group I or group II. The goal of therapy was to achieve and maintain for 6 hours, all of the following - systolic blood pressure [SBP] >90 mmHg, systemic vascular resistance index [SVRI] >1800 dynes.s/cm[5] m[2],cardiac index [CI] >4.0 lt/min/m[2], index of oxygen delivery >550 ml/min/m[2], index of oxygen uptake >150 ml/min/m[2]. The patients in group I were started on dopamine infusion at 10 microg/kg/min which was increased by 2.5 microg/kg/min, every 15 minutes till the goals were achieved. The patients in group II received norepinephrine infusion started at a dose of 0.5 microg/kg/min with a dose increment of 0.25 microg/kg/min, every 15 minutes till the goals were achieved. Post-treatment heart rate showed an increase in the mean value in group I patients and a decrease in group II patients. The post-treatment mean SBP and SVRI in group II was significantly higher than that in group I. Patients in group I showed a significantly higher increase in post-treatment CI and index of oxygen delivery compared to patients in group II. Nineteen out of 25 patients responded to the treatment in group II while only 10 out of 25 responded in group I. Norepinephrine was more useful in reversing the hemodynamic and metabolic abnormalities of hyperdynamic septic shock compared to dopamine

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA