RESUMEN
The preservation of deciduous teeth is crucial in pediatric dentistry to maintain normal speech, development, and self-esteem, while also preventing secondary issues like space loss and tooth impaction. Different materials and approaches have been explored over time, ranging from mummification to maintaining pulp vitality and promoting healing. In today's conservative dentistry, techniques like indirect pulp treatment and partial pulpotomy (PP) have gained popularity. Adults diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis due to deep caries often receive root canal therapy (RCT). However, coronal pulpotomy treatment (CPT) has emerged as an affordable alternative for those unable to afford RCT. CPT removes the coronal pulp, allowing the remaining pulp to remain vital. PP and complete pulpotomy are explored as treatments for teeth with signs of irreversible pulpitis. Success depends on eliminating infected tissue, using aseptic techniques, and achieving a tight restorative seal. Materials like MTA have shown favorable outcomes. Direct pulp therapy and PP can effectively preserve vital pulp in primary and young permanent teeth. The choice of pulpotomy material, such as MTA, plays a significant role in success rates.
RESUMEN
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a lung condition marked by restricted lung airflow. It is a globally prevalent condition affecting almost 300 million individuals. COPD is linked to a significant burden of morbidity and mortality thus necessitating early diagnosis and management. Rising COPD treatment options complicate care and necessitate a review of clinical data to guide treatment choices. Corticosteroids and bronchodilators are the mainstay of treatment for COPD due to their safety and efficacy. Compared to inhaled corticosteroids or long-acting ?-agonist therapy alone, inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting ?-agonist lower the risk of exacerbations and enhance lung function and health status in patients with COPD. Patients who experience frequent exacerbations despite taking long-acting bronchodilators and those who have evidence of eosinophilic bronchial inflammation, as shown by high blood eosinophil levels and/or a history of asthma or asthma-COPD overlap, may both benefit greatly from inhaled corticosteroids therapy. Although not widespread, inhaled corticosteroid use is linked to an elevated risk of pneumonia and may vary depending on the particular corticosteroid utilized. Recent research on combination therapy of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting ?-agonist has shown significant advantages and supports its widespread use in COPD patients who experience frequent exacerbations however some clinical studies and trials have also demonstrated quite conflicting outcomes to this therefore necessitating the need for further clinical trials to exhibit conclusive results. The purpose of this research is to review the available information about the effectiveness and safety of bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids in the management of COPD.
RESUMEN
Obesity and its associated comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease, are one of today's most pressing health issues and increasing incidence of obesity has marked it a global health challenge. For obese individuals with a high risk of morbidity and mortality who have not lost enough weight with lifestyle and medicinal care and who are experiencing the repercussions of obesity, bariatric surgery should be taken into consideration. Significant weight loss, the remission of coexisting diseases, and an improvement in quality of life are all possible outcomes of bariatric surgery. Laparoscopic procedures account for 96% of all bariatric procedures performed globally, with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) being the most popular and prevalent. The current gold standard for bariatric surgery is LSG, since it is associated with significant complications such as gastroesophageal reflux disease hence a less invasive replacement for LSG was developed, which is endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG). In the past few years, ESG, a relatively new technique of endoscopic bariatric therapy, has become more well-known. Several multi-center studies have established the safety, viability, repeatability, and potential for reversibility of ESG. Although it is inferior to LSG in terms of percentage of total body weight loss (TBWL), but within a year of follow-up, it carries a reduced risk of unfavourable outcomes than other surgical procedures. The purpose of this research is to review the available information about advantages and disadvantages of ESG versus LSG.