Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; Arq. bras. cardiol;100(6): 491-501, jun. 2013. ilus, tab
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS, SES-SP | ID: lil-679144
2.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; Arq. bras. cardiol;91(2): e17-e19, ago. 2008. ilus
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | LILACS | ID: lil-488903

RESUMEN

A persistência do canal arterial (PCA) é uma anomalia relativamente freqüente e de simples correção. A correção envolve a ligadura do ducto com ou sem a sua secção. A anomalia em adultos pode provocar hipertensão pulmonar persistente e disfunção ventricular. A correção em adultos é controversa e de maior risco. Um caso de correção endovascular com acesso intra-abdominal da PCA em adulto é descrito.


The patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is a common type of congenital heart defect and its correction is simple when performed early in life. Surgery is performed using stitches or clips. In adults, the anomaly can lead to pulmonary hypertension and ventricular dysfunction. Surgery in adults is controversial and high-risk. This report describes an alternative endovascular approach in an adult patient.


Asunto(s)
Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Conducto Arterioso Permeable/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Conducto Arterioso Permeable/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; Arq. bras. cardiol;79(4): 405-418, Oct. 2002. tab
Artículo en Portugués, Inglés | LILACS, SES-SP | ID: lil-323361

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To verify the results after the performance of primary coronary angioplasty in Brazil in the last 4 years. METHODS: During the first 24 hours of acute myocardial infarction onset, 9,434 (12.2 percent) patients underwent primary PTCA. We analyzed the success and occurrence of major in-hospital events, comparing them over the 4-year period. RESULTS: Primary PTCA use increased compared with that of all percutaneous interventions (1996=10.6 percent vs. 2000=13.1 percent; p<0.001). Coronary stent implantation increased (1996=20 percent vs. 2000=71.9 percent; p<0.001). Success was greater (1998=89.5 percent vs. 1999=92.5 percent; p<0.001). Reinfarction decreased (1998=3.9 percent vs. 99=2.4 percent vs. 2000=1.5 percent; p<0.001) as did emergency bypass surgery (1996=0.5 percent vs. 2000=0.2 percent; p=0.01). In-hospital deaths remained unchanged (1996=5.7 percent vs. 2000=5.1 percent, p=0.53). Balloon PTCA was one of the independent predictors of a higher rate of unsuccessful procedures (odds ratio 12.01 [CI=95 percent] 1.58-22.94), and stent implantation of lower mortality rates (odds ratio 4.62 [CI=95 percent] 3.19-6.08). CONCLUSION: The success rate has become progressively higher with a significant reduction in reinfarction and urgent bypass surgery, but in-hospital death remains nearly unchanged. Coronary stenting was a predictor of a lower death rate, and balloon PTCA was associated with greater procedural failure


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Infarto del Miocardio , Pronóstico , Recurrencia , Brasil , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Stents , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Infarto del Miocardio
4.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; Arq. bras. cardiol;76(6): 483-495, June 2001. tab
Artículo en Portugués, Inglés | LILACS, SES-SP | ID: lil-286366

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a comparative analysis of the in-hospital outcomes of patients who underwent primary percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTCA) or stent implantation because of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) related to an acute vein graft occlusion. METHODS: Since 1991 the Brazilian Society of Hemodynamic and Interventional Cardiology has maintained a large database (CENIC). From these, we selected all consecutive patients, who underwent primary PTCA or stenting in the first 24 hours of AMI, with the target vessel being an occluded vein graft. Immediate results and major coronary events occurring up until hospital discharge were analyzed. RESULTS: During this period, 5,932 patients underwent primary PTCA or stenting; 158 (3 percent) of the procedures were performed because of an acute vein graft occlusion. Stenting was performed in 74 (47 percent) patients. Patients treated with stents had a higher success rate and lower mean residual stenosis compared with those who underwent primary balloon PTCA. The incidence of reinfarction and death were similar for stenting and balloon PTCA. CONCLUSION: Primary percutaneous treatment of AMI related to acute vein graft occlusion is still an uncommon practice. Primary stenting improved luminal diameter and offered higher rates of success; however, this strategy did not reduce the in-hospital reinfarction and death rate, compared with that occurring with PTCA treatment


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Adulto , Vena Safena/trasplante , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Stents , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Brasil/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad
5.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; Arq. bras. cardiol;63(3): 179-184, set. 1994. ilus, graf
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS | ID: lil-155547

RESUMEN

PURPOSE--Comparative and prospective evaluation of three methods (transthoracic echo-Doppler (TTE), computerized tomography (CT) and aortography (AORT) utilized for aortic dissection diagnosis. METHODS--The 39 patients with confirmed aortic dissection (surgery or autopsy) underwent, within a few hours of each other, all three methods scrutinized. There were 19 cases of type A and 20 of type B dissection. RESULTS--In type A dissection the methods were equivalent (TTE = 73.7//, CT = 84.2//, AORT = 73.7//p = NS) but for type B, TTE was significantly inferior to the other two methods (TTE = 60//, TC 90//, AORT = 80//, p < 0.05 for TTE, for TC and AORT p = NS). In three occasions, even though all three methods were performed, the diagnosis was not obtained. CONCLUSION--The methods which were evaluated make the diagnosis in the majority of cases. In type A all methods are similar, however, in type B, TC and AORT are superior to TTE. Even performing all three methods in each patient, in three instances the diagnosis was not made


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aortografía , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Diagnóstico Diferencial
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA