Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Rio de Janeiro; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro;PPG-MPCO;Hemorio; 19.jun.2024. 2 p. ilus.
No convencional en Portugués | LILACS, SES-RJ | ID: biblio-1556310

RESUMEN

Um material educativo sobre Saúde Bucal e Doença Falciforme em celebração ao dia 19 de Junho, Dia Mundial da Conscientização da Doença Falciforme.


Asunto(s)
Población Negra
2.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 38: e026, 2024. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1557364

RESUMEN

Abstract This study validated the content of an instrument designed to assess the knowledge, involvement (attitudes) and management (practice) of dentists relative to sickle-cell disease (KAPD-SCD). The instrument consisted of five domains composed of a total of thirteen items: I. Dentist's self-assessment relative to sickle-cell disease; II. Dentist's knowledge of the repercussions of sickle-cell disease on the stomatognathic system; III. Dentist's knowledge of the complications of sickle-cell disease in the stomatognathic system; IV. Dentist's knowledge concerning the dental management of sickle-cell disease patients; and V. Dentist's involvement in an approach to sickle-cell disease. Twelve experts assigned scores to each item of the instrument. The criteria were clarity, understanding and appropriateness, leaving open fields for comments. Descriptive and content analyses of the data were made. Each expert analyzed 39 assessment units. The percentages considered for agreement were high (>80%), medium (70%-80%), or low (<70%), and each item was maintained or revised according to the percentage observed. There was high consensus in 74% of the assessment units (the corresponding items were maintained), medium consensus in 24% of them (the corresponding items were revised), and disagreement in 2% of them, namely as regards the "appropriateness" of item 5 ("Are there oral complications in sickle-cell disease?"), which was revised. The final version of the instrument had 16 items for different applications such as in the clinical care program, teaching program, or research program, with different cut-off scores for each application. In conclusion, the level of agreement among experts showed evidence of the content validity of the instrument.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA