RESUMEN
Background@#and Purpose: The rationale for performing a second brain biopsy after initial negativity is not well evaluated in the literature. This study was designed to 1) assess the efficacy of a second brain biopsy when the first biopsy was nondiagnostic, 2) identify possible factors associated with an increased diagnostic rate in the second biopsy, and 3) analyze additional morbidity induced by the second biopsy. @*Methods@#We performed a retrospective cohort study from 2009 to 2019, during which 1,919 patients underwent a brain biopsy, including 30 who were biopsied twice (1.6%). The specific histological diagnosis rate, diagnosis-associated factors, and complication rate were assessed for the 30 twice-biopsied patients. @*Results@#The second biopsy allowed a specific histological diagnosis in 86.7% of the patients who had initially undergone a nondiagnostic brain biopsy [odds ratio (OR)=7.5, 95% confidence interval (CI)=3.0–18.7, p<0.001]. The multivariate analysis showed that only prebiopsy corticosteroid administration (OR=2.6, 95% CI=1.1–6.0, p=0.01) was an important factor in predicting a nondiagnostic biopsy. None of the patients developed a symptomatic complication after the first biopsy, while two (6.0%) patients experienced a transient complication after the second biopsy (p=0.49). @*Conclusions@#Performing a second brain biopsy in patients who have an initial nondiagnostic biopsy is effective in most cases. We advocate that a second biopsy be systematically considered in the diagnosis algorithm of these patients after it has been verified that molecular testing cannot help to obtain a diagnosis. Corticosteroid administration can lead to nondiagnostic biopsies and should be avoided when possible during the prebiopsy period.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cysticercosis is the most frequent parasitic infection of the nervous system. Most lesions are intracranial, and spinal involvement is rare. We describe here in two cases of neurocysticercosis (NCC) in the brain and one in the spinal cord that illustrate three distinct mechanisms leading to symptomatic acute hydrocephalus. CASE REPORT: Hydrocephalus was related to intracranial NCC in two of them. In the first case the hydrocephalus was due to an extensive arachnoiditis to the craniocervical junction, while in the second it was caused by obstruction of Magendie's foramen in the fourth ventricle by the scolex of Taenia solium. For the third patient, hydrocephalus revealed cysticercosis of the cauda equina due to the scolex. CONCLUSIONS: NCC should be considered as a possible diagnosis for patients suffering from hydrocephalus when they originate from or have traveled in endemic areas, MRI of the spine is mandatory to search for intraspinal lesions.