Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine ; : 371-374, 2017.
Artículo en Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-136427

RESUMEN

Stellate ganglion block (SGB) is an effective method that is used by pain clinicians to treat patients who have pain in the head, neck and arm area. SGB acts mainly by increasing regional blood flow via peripheral vasodilation and decreasing pain sensation by reducing the afferent sensory signals of the sympathetic nervous system in the region. This patient had received more than 450 sessions of left SGB continually for the past 6 years to relieve her left-sided facial pain caused by facial trauma. Out of our curiosity, we tried to obtain some objective dermatological measurements like skin elasticity, water content, and hair follicle density on her scalp and we found that the values were different between the left side of her face and the right side of her face. Here, we report the results and we want pain clinicians to know that repeated SGBs may improve skin elasticity, water content in the skin, and increase the number of hair follicles on the scalp.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Brazo , Elasticidad , Conducta Exploratoria , Dolor Facial , Folículo Piloso , Cabeza , Métodos , Cuello , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Cuero Cabelludo , Sensación , Piel , Ganglio Estrellado , Sistema Nervioso Simpático , Vasodilatación , Agua
2.
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine ; : 371-374, 2017.
Artículo en Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-136426

RESUMEN

Stellate ganglion block (SGB) is an effective method that is used by pain clinicians to treat patients who have pain in the head, neck and arm area. SGB acts mainly by increasing regional blood flow via peripheral vasodilation and decreasing pain sensation by reducing the afferent sensory signals of the sympathetic nervous system in the region. This patient had received more than 450 sessions of left SGB continually for the past 6 years to relieve her left-sided facial pain caused by facial trauma. Out of our curiosity, we tried to obtain some objective dermatological measurements like skin elasticity, water content, and hair follicle density on her scalp and we found that the values were different between the left side of her face and the right side of her face. Here, we report the results and we want pain clinicians to know that repeated SGBs may improve skin elasticity, water content in the skin, and increase the number of hair follicles on the scalp.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Brazo , Elasticidad , Conducta Exploratoria , Dolor Facial , Folículo Piloso , Cabeza , Métodos , Cuello , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Cuero Cabelludo , Sensación , Piel , Ganglio Estrellado , Sistema Nervioso Simpático , Vasodilatación , Agua
3.
The Korean Journal of Hepatology ; : 147-157, 2010.
Artículo en Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-14485

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The prevalence and clinical characteristics of entecavir (ETV) resistance is not well known. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of genotypic resistance in nonresponders and virologic breakthrough (VBT) patients. METHODS: The medical records of 76 chronic hepatitis B patients treated for a least 6 months from October 2006 to October 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. We divided patients into two groups: nucleoside analogue (NA)-naive patients (n=38) and LAM experienced patients (n=38). NA-naive and LAM experienced patients received ETV at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/day, respectively. The virologic response and VBT were investigated in both groups. We used the multiplex restriction fragment mass polymorphism (RFMP) method to test genotypic resistance at the rtI169, rtT184, rtS202, rtM204, and rtM250 sites. RESULTS: Age, gender, serum ALT, and HBV DNA level before treatment did not differ between the groups. Neither VBT nor nonresponse was observed in the NA-naive group, whereas VBT and nonresponse were observed in three patients each in the lamivudine (LAM)-experienced group; all six patients had YMDD mutation at study enrollment, all three patients with VBT had genotypic resistance to ETV, but the three nonresponse patients did not have genotypic resistance to ETV. CONCLUSIONS: We suspect that VBT is mostly associated with genotypic resistance to ETV. However, nonresponse might be associated with the continuance or reselection of the YMDD mutant in LAM-experienced patients.


Asunto(s)
Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Viral/genética , Genotipo , Guanina/análogos & derivados , Hepatitis B/genética , Hepatitis B Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Lamivudine/uso terapéutico , Mutación , Polimorfismo de Longitud del Fragmento de Restricción , ADN Polimerasa Dirigida por ARN/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA