A Comparative Analysis of Endoscopic Versus Conventional Open Thyroidectomy in the Treatment of Papillary Thyroid Cancer According to Preoperative Risk Stratification / 대한내분비외과학회지

PURPOSE: It is well known that papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) has a good prognosis and high incidence in young women. The objective of the study was to review our criteria to select surgical modality and surgical results and to confirm the feasibility of endoscopic thyroidectomy according to the preoperative risk stratification in the treatment of papillary thyroid cancer. METHODS: Between May 2009 and April 2012, 197 patients underwent either a conventional open or an endoscopic thyroidectomy with the preoperative consideration of risk group using clinical parameters of AMES system (patient age, size of tumor, extrathyroid extension, and presence of distant metastasis). A retrospective analysis of the pathologic data according to AMES system after surgery was also conducted. The endoscopic thyroidectomy was performed using the BABA (bilateral axillo-breast approach) method. RESULTS: Based on the method of operation, the low-risk group patients (n=197) were divided into two groups: endoscopic group (n=78) and open group (n=119). Procedure time, postoperative complication rates, and length of hospital stay were tracked, albeit these were not significantly different between the two groups. From the pathologic findings, it was reported that there were no significant differences in tumor size, extrathyroid extension, and metastasis and also in the Off T4 – thyroglobulin level between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic thyroidectomy is a feasible method for the treatment of selected cases of thyroid cancer such as low-risk group according to the appropriate preoperative risk stratification.

Outcomes of Early Liver Transplantation in a Hospital That Is Starting to Perform Liver Transplantation / 대한이식학회지

BACKGROUND: In Korea, the number of liver transplantation (LT) center is still changing. Many more centers are performing liver transplantations than that during the past decades. But several centers have stopped liver transplantation, while some centers have newly started performing liver transplantation. We present our initial experience in a newly built center as an example for any center that is considering performing LT. METHODS: A total of 33 consecutive adult LTs that were performed from June 2006 to October 2009 were analyzed by comparing the first 11 living donor liver transplants (LDLTs) performed with the help of an outside experienced team (group 2) with the second 11 LDLTs (group 3) and the 11 deceased donor liver transplantations (DDLTs) cases (group 1) that were independently performed in our center. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality for the donors and there were two operative mortalities for the recipients. During a mean follow-up of 27.1 months (range: 2 days~61 months), there were two cases of late mortality for the recipients. There were no re-operations and no major complications for the donors. The warm ischemic time was significantly longer in group 1 than that in groups 2 and 3. Otherwise, there was no significant difference in the operative outcomes among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Thorough preparation and the valuable assistance of an experienced liver transplantation team at the beginning can facilitate a more rapid learning curve and bring about good outcomes even in a small, newly established institution.