Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae ; (6): 198-200, 2004.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-231959

RESUMEN

Vascular dementia (VaD) subtypes include multi-infarct dementia, subcortical ischemic vascular dementia, strategic-infarct dementia, etc. Poststroke dementia may be related to preexisting cognitive level, and the frequency increased with aging, lower educational level and accompanied vascular risk factors. Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) forms a spectrum that includes VaD, mixed Alzheimer's disease (AD) with a vascular component, and VCI without dementia. The concept of VCI will improve the early diagnoses and secondary prevention and treatment of VaD, and promote the further research on vascular component in neurodegenrative disorders.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Cognición , Trastornos del Conocimiento , Clasificación , Diagnóstico , Demencia por Múltiples Infartos , Clasificación , Diagnóstico , Demencia Vascular , Clasificación , Diagnóstico
2.
Chinese Journal of Neurology ; (12)1999.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-676419

RESUMEN

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of memantine in the treatment of patients with Alzheimer' s disease (AD).Methods This was a 16-week,multi-center,randomized,double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (Study 10116).A total of 258 AD patients (MMSE score 5—18) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either memantine 10—20 mg/day (MEM,n=128) or placebo (PBO,n= 130) group for 16 weeks.Efficacy was primarily assessed in terms of changes of severe impairment battery (SIB) score in patients from baseline up to SIB assessment in the 16th week (16-week completers set, CS16).While ehanges of MMSE,ADCS-ADL_(19),and NPI (neuropsychiatric inventory) were evaluated as secondary efficacy parameters on both CSI6 and full-analysis set (FAS).Safety was assessed by physical examination,lab assays,ECG,and adverse events.Results 236 subjeets (CS16:MEM n=117,PBO n=119) were eligible for the efficacy assessment.No statistically significant difference between the treatments was observed on the primary and seeondary efficacy analysis,although both treatment groups had a slight increase from baseline in SIB total score.Post hoe evaluation of the data identified two bias factors that had a significant impact on the results of the pre-protoeol specified primary and secondary analyses.In a re-analysis of the data (CS16_(modified),MEM n=94,PBO n=95) excluding patient data affeeted by these factors,memantine-treated patients showed a statistically significant improvement related to placebo in the 16th week on the SIB (MEM 2.2 vs PBO 0.3,P=0.04),MMSE (MEM 1.0 vs PBO 0.1,P=0.03),and ADL (MEM 0.1 vs PBO-1.6,P=0.02) scales,indicating that memantine improved the cognitive function of AD patients and stabilized the activity of daily life.Memantine was well tolerated with an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo.Conclusion This study provides further support for pre-existing data,showing that memantine is efficacious,safe,and well-tolerated in patients with moderate to severe AD.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA