RESUMEN
Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of conventional dental prosthesis and implant repair in the treatment of dentition defect.Methods From March 2016 to December 2017,110 patients with dental defects in the First People＇s Hospital of Yongkang were selected and divided into control group and observation group according to different treatment methods,with 55 cases in each group.The control group received oral routine repair,and the observation group was treated with implant repair.The therapeutic effect of the two groups was analyzed.Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 96.36%,which was significantly higher than 81.82% of the control group (χ2＝3.168,P＜0.05).After treatment,the scores of fixation function,chewing function,language function,degree of comfort,degree of aesthetics in the observation group were (18.06 ±1.32)points,(17.97 ±1.12) points,(18.41 ±1.06) points,(18.24 ±1.03) points and (18.37 ±1.21) points,respectively,which in the control group were (12.51 ±2.43) points,(13.19 ±2.55) points,(13.76 ±2.46) points,(11.64 ±2.12) points,(13.16 ± 2.45)points,respectively,the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (t＝8.957,11.235,10.369,11.036,13.554,all P＜0.05).After treatment for 1 week,the denture plaque index,gingival index and gingival bleeding index in the observation group were (0.81 ±0.11) points,(0.92 ±0.14 ) points,(1.33 ± 0.17) points,respectively,which in the control group were (1.58 ±0.49) points,(1.65 ±0.58) points and (2.67 ±0.62) points,respectively,and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( t ＝14.512,10.647,11.354,all P＜0.05).Conclusion The effect of implant repair in the treatment of dentition defect better than conventional dental prosthesis,which can improve the repair effect of patients and maintain the healthy periodontal health,it is worthy of clinical application.