RESUMEN
Abstract Background: Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis (TRAS) is a recognized vascular complication after kidney transplantation. The overall risk predictors of TRAS are poorly understood. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with suspected TRAS (Doppler ultrasound PSV > 200 cm/s) who underwent angiographic study in a single center between 2007 and 2014. All patients with stenosis > 50% were considered with TRAS. Stenosis restricted in the body of the artery was also analyzed in a subgroup. Results: 274 patients were submitted to a renal angiography and 166 confirmed TRAS. TRAS group featured an older population (46.3 ± 11.0 vs. 40.9 ±14.2 years; p = 0.001), more frequent hypertensive nephropathy (30.1% vs. 15.7%; p = 0.01), higher incidence of Delayed Graft Function (DGF) (52.0% vs. 25.6%; p < 0.001) and longer Cold Ischemia Time (CIT) (21.5 ± 10.6 vs. 15.7 ± 12.9h; p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, DGF (OR = 3.31; 95% CI 1.78-6.30; p < 0.0001) was independent risk factors for TRAS. DM and CIT showed a tendency towards TRAS. The compound discriminatory capacity of the multivariable model (AUC = 0.775; 95% CI 0.718-0.831) is significantly higher than systolic blood pressure and creatinine alone (AUC = 0.62; 95% CI 0.558-0.661). In body artery stenosis subgroup, DGF (OR = 1.86; 95% CI 1.04-3.36; p = 0.03) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM) (OR = 2.44; 95% CI 1.31-4.60; p = 0.005) were independent risk factors for TRAS. Conclusion: In our transplant population, DGF increased more than 3-fold the risk of TRAS. In the subgroup analysis, both DGF and DM increases the risk of body artery stenosis. The addition of other factors to hypertension and renal dysfunction may increase diagnostic accuracy.
RESUMEN
Nas últimas duas décadas, comprovou-se que a terapia com estatinas é o instrumento isolado mais potente para atenuar o risco cardiovascular, e seu uso frequente foi enfatizado como um dos elementos mais importantes para reduzir a mortalidade cardiovascular nos países desenvolvidos. Uma incidência igualmente frequente de sintomas musculares em usuários de estatinas levanta a possibilidade de um nexo de causalidade, que leva a uma entidade patológica conhecida como sintomas musculares associados a estatinas (SMAS). Estudos e ensaios clínicos mecanicistas destinados a estudar os SMAS levaram a uma definição clara da sua história natural e incidência exata. Essa informação é essencial para evitar riscos desnecessários de formas graves de SMAS. Ao mesmo tempo, essa compreensão concreta dos SMAS evita o diagnóstico exagerado e a suspensão desnecessária de uma das mais poderosas estratégias de prevenção atuais. Nesse contexto, este artigo de revisão reuniu todas as informações disponíveis sobre o assunto, que são apresentadas em detalhe neste documento como a base da identificação e tratamento dos SMAS
In the last 2 decades, statin therapy has proved to be the most potent isolated instrument for attenuating cardiovascular risk, and its frequent use has been highlighted as one of the most important elements for reducing cardiovascular mortality in developed countries. An equally frequent incidence of muscle symptoms in statin users raises the possibility of a causal link, leading to a disease entity known as statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS). Mechanistic studies and clinical trials designed to the study of SAMS have led to a clear definition of its natural history and accurate incidence. This information is vital for avoiding unnecessary risk of severe forms of SAMS. At the same time, this concrete understanding of SAMS prevents over-diagnosis and unnecessary suspension of one of the most powerful prevention strategies available today. In this context, this review has gathered all the available information on the issue, which is presented in detail, in this document, as the basis for the identification and management of SAMS