RESUMEN
Objective:To investigate the feasibility of applying Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE) combined with Virtual Intelligent Sonographer Assistance (VIS-Assistance ?) in the prenatal screening of right aortic arch (RAA) with left-sided ductus arteriosus (LDA). Methods:A total of 32 fetuses with RAA and LDA during middle and late pregnancy in Zhejiang University Medical College Affiliated Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from Jauary 2018 to Jauary 2020 were included in this retrospective study, and the datas about fetal cardiac three-dimensional volume were analyzed. The time-space correlation imaging (STIC) volume data were collected by using FINE by Senior doctor A. The two diagnostic elements of the transverse aortic arch on the right side of the trachea and the "U" -shaped vascular ring, as well as the three-vessel tracheal diagnostic section were obtained by low-aged doctor B and middle-aged doctor C by using VIS-Assistance ? technology. And then the detection rates of diagnostic sections and diagnostic elements for fetuses with RAA and LDA were calculated. The postpartum outcomes of fetuses with RAA and LDA were followed up. Results:Thirty-two fetuses were included in the study after excluding 2 cases due to the poor quality images, and the datas about fetal cardiac three-dimensional volume of the 32 fetuses were analyzed. The detection rate of one diagnostic element (the aortic arch on the right side of the trachea) were 84.4% vs 87.5% before VIS-Assistance ?, and 93.8% vs 93.8% after VIS-Assistance ? for each doctor B and doctor C , respectively. Another diagnostic element ( "U" -shaped vascular ring) were 78.1% vs 87.3% before VIS-Assistance ?, and 90.6% vs 90.6% after VIS-Assistance ? for doctor B and doctor C, respectively. But no significant difference was found before and after VIS-Assistance ? between the two each doctors(all P>0.05). The detection rate of three-vascular tracheal diagnosis view were 65.6% vs 71.9% before VIS-Assistance ? and 84.4% vs 87.5% after VIS-Assistance ? for doctor B and doctor C, respectively. There was significant difference before and after VIS-Assistance ? of doctor C( P<0.05). The scores of image quality after VIS-Assistance ? were significantly higher than that before VIS-Assistance ? for doctor B and doctor C, respectively [3(2.5, 3) vs 3.25(3.0, 3.5), and 3(2.5, 3.5) vs 3.5(3.0, 3.5)]. The agreement between two doctors performing VIS-Assistance ? was investigated using Bland-Altman analysis and the result showed that within 95% of the differences fall in the agreement interval. No obvious clinical symptoms of compression were found in 32 neonates after follow-up. Conclusions:The application of FINE combined with VIS-Assistance ? technology can easily and reliably obtain the key diagnostic view of RAA with LDA (three-vessel and tracheal view), and clearly display all diagnostic elements, having high repeatability and stability. VIS-Assistance ? technology can improve the detection rate and image quality even if the doctor was lack of experience. So it can be used as an effective supplementary means for prenatal screening of RAA and LDA.