RESUMEN
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the blood supply of primary lung cancer (PLC) using CT angiography for bronchial artery (BA) and pulmonary artery (PA).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Thin-section enhanced multi-layer spiral CT (MSCT) were carried out in 147 primary lung cancer patients and 46 healthy subjects as control. Three-dimensional images of bronchial artery and pulmonary artery were obtained using volume render (VR) and multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) or maximum intensity projection (MIP) at the workstation, and their morphological findings and relationship with the mass were assessed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>136 primary lung cancer patients and 32 healthy controls were evaluated for at least one bronchial artery displayed clearly in VR. The detective rate of the bronchial artery was 92.5% and 69.6%, respectively. The bronchial artery caliber and the total section area of lesion side in lung cancer patients were significantly larger than that on the contralateral side and that of the control (P < 0.05). Bronchial artery on the lesion side in lung cancer was dilated and tortuous, directly penetrating into the mass with reticularly anastomosed branches. In the PLC patients, all PA were shown clearly with normal morphological image though crossing over the masses in 54 patients; In 25 PLC patients, the PA being essentially intact, was pushed around and surrounded the mass, giving the "hold ball" sign; In 40 other PLC patients, PA being also intact, the mass surrounded and buried the PA from the outside, crushing the PA flat resulting in an eccentric or centrifugal shrinkage, forming the "dead branch" sign; In the rest 28 patients, the PA was surrounded and even compressed, forming the "residual root" sign.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Primary lung cancer patient shows dilated bronchial arteries and increased bronchial artery blood flow, whereas pulmonary arteries just pass through the mass or are compressed by the mass. It is further demonstrated that the bronchial artery, instead of the pulmonary artery, is the main vessel of blood supply to the primary lung cancer as shown by MSCT angiography of bronchial artery and pulmonary artery.</p>
Asunto(s)
Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenocarcinoma , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Angiografía , Métodos , Arterias Bronquiales , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Arteria Pulmonar , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Tomografía Computarizada Espiral , MétodosRESUMEN
Objective:To optimize the injection protocol of contrast medium for contrast-enhanced MRA (CEMRA) of pulmonary artery and to evaluate the diagnostic value of CEMRA and pulmonary perfusion imaging (PPI) in an experimental model of acute pulmonary embolism. Methods:CEMRA and PPI were performed in 6 normal pigs with different doses of gadolinium contrast agent (5ml, 10ml, 15ml, 20ml and 25ml) at an injection rate of 3ml/s, and 3 pulmonary embolism models were injected with 20 ml contrast agent at 3 ml/s. DSA was also performed for comparison. Results:The signal intensities and the signal to noise ratios of the pulmonary arteries kept increasing with the dose increase of the contrast agent, but the best angio-pulmonary contrast dose was 10-15ml (0.25-0.375mmol/kg), while the optimal dose for PPI was 15-20ml (0.375-0.5mmol/kg). Although CEMRA demonstrated less obstructed pulmonary arteries than DSA (5/10 vs 8/10)did, it detected all obstructions when combined with PPI. The pulmonary infarction zones showed wedge-shaped perfusion defects on the PPI images, with the signal intensities lower than those of the normal areas (137.86±45.32 vs 330.14±46.52, P<0.001). Conclusion:It is suggested that the optimal dose of the contrast agent is 0.25mmol/kg to 0.375mmol/kg for CEMRA, and 0.375mmol/kg to 0.5mmol/kg for lung perfusion. CEMRA combined with PPI may be better than DSA in demonstrating pulmonary embolism.
RESUMEN
Objective:To optimize the injection protocol of contrast medium for contrast-enhanced MRA (CEMRA) of pulmonary artery and to evaluate the diagnostic value of CEMRA and pulmonary perfusion imaging (PPI) in an experimental model of acute pulmonary embolism. Methods:CEMRA and PPI were performed in 6 normal pigs with different doses of gadolinium contrast agent (5ml, 10ml, 15ml, 20ml and 25ml) at an injection rate of 3ml/s, and 3 pulmonary embolism models were injected with 20 ml contrast agent at 3 ml/s. DSA was also performed for comparison. Results:The signal intensities and the signal to noise ratios of the pulmonary arteries kept increasing with the dose increase of the contrast agent, but the best angio-pulmonary contrast dose was 10-15ml (0.25-0.375mmol/kg), while the optimal dose for PPI was 15-20ml (0.375-0.5mmol/kg). Although CEMRA demonstrated less obstructed pulmonary arteries than DSA (5/10 vs 8/10)did, it detected all obstructions when combined with PPI. The pulmonary infarction zones showed wedge-shaped perfusion defects on the PPI images, with the signal intensities lower than those of the normal areas (137.86±45.32 vs 330.14±46.52, P<0.001). Conclusion:It is suggested that the optimal dose of the contrast agent is 0.25mmol/kg to 0.375mmol/kg for CEMRA, and 0.375mmol/kg to 0.5mmol/kg for lung perfusion. CEMRA combined with PPI may be better than DSA in demonstrating pulmonary embolism.