The outcome of sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection for obstructive azoospermia.

OBJECTIVES: To study the outcome of sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) from obstructive azoospermic men. METHOD: Overall, 50 sperm retrieval procedures were performed in 45 obstructive azoospermic men, followed by 57 ICSI procedures with fresh epididymal spermatozoa (n=40), fresh testicular spermatozoa (n=4) or frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa (n=13). RESULTS: Sperm retrieval was accomplished via percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) in 42 cases, testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) in 1 case and testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in 2 cases. TESA and TESE were only applied when PESA failed to produce enough spermatozoa for simultaneous ICSI. PESA was successful in 92 per cent of cases. Fertilization rate after ICSI was 79.6 per cent of the metaphase II oocytes. Seventy one embryo transfers were performed using both fresh and frozen thawed embryos resulting in clinical pregnancy in 39.4 per cent. Ongoing pregnancy was achieved in 35.2 per cent. CONCLUSION: ICSI has been shown to give a high fertilization and pregnancy rate with epididymal and testicular spermatozoa retrieved from obstructive azoospermic men. PESA is a noninvasive and simple technique for retrieving spermatozoa from obstructive azoospermic men. Therefore, it is suitable as the primary sperm recovery technique in patients with obstructive azoospermia.

Comparison of the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection using fresh and frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa obtained by percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration.

The study was conducted to compare the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) between fresh and frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa retrieved by percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) from obstructive azoospermic men. Overall, 53 PESA procedures were performed in 42 obstructive azoospermic men, followed by ICSI procedures with either fresh (n = 40) or frozen-thawed (n = 13) epididymal spermatozoa. Comparing all ICSI cycles with fresh and frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa, the fertilization rates (77.4 vs 86.8%) and the cleavage rate (91.3 vs 95.1%) were not statistically different. A total of 64 embryo transfers were performed: 48 embryo transfers after the use of fresh epididymal spermatozoa and 16 embryo transfers after the use of frozen-thawed spermatozoa. The overall pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was also similar between both groups (40.8 vs 40%). The implantation rate per embryo (18.2 vs 12.7%), clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer (36.7 vs 33.3%) and delivery/ongoing pregnancy rate (36.7 vs 33.3%) were not statistically different. In conclusion, there were no significant differences of the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection using fresh and frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa obtained by PESA.

Comparison of the fertilization rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using ejaculated sperms, epididymal sperms and testicular sperms.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been successfully used to achieve fertilization and pregnancies for patients with extreme oligoastheno-zoospermia using ejaculated sperms or patients with azoospermia using epididymal or testicular sperms. The aim of this study was to compare the fertilization rate after ICSI using ejaculated, epididymal and testicular sperms. Between January and September 1997, 10 azoospermic men underwent percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) or testicular sperm extraction (TESE) to recover sperm for ICSI. A total of 5 PESA cases and 5 TESE cases were performed at the Center for Assisted Reproduction & Embryology. Thirty-one patients performed ICSI using ejaculated sperms during the same period of time were used as a control group. ICSI using ejaculated sperms, epididymal sperms from PESA and testicular sperms from TESE was a highly successful technique, achieving fertilization rates of 78.5 per cent, 83.3 per cent and 80.8 per cent, respectively. Good fertilization rates were achieved without significant differences among the various sperm sources.