RESUMEN
Purpose: The aim of this study is to explore and compare the prevailing practice patterns in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma among subspecialists and general ophthalmologists in India. Materials and Methods: This is an interactive audience response system (ARS) based poll of ophthalmologists attending the annual conference of the Glaucoma Society of India in 2013. Results: The information was obtained from 379 ophthalmologists (146 glaucoma specialists, 54 nonglaucoma subspecialists, and 179 general ophthalmologists). The majority of polled ophthalmologists (236; 62%) had 10 or more years of experience in ophthalmology. The glaucoma specialists differed from nonglaucomatologists in their preference for Goldmann applanation tonometer (P < 0.01), four‑mirror gonioscope (P < 0.01), Humphrey perimeter (P < 0.01), laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure disease (P = 0.03), postiridotomy gonioscopy (P < 0.01), and usage of antifibrotic agents during filtering surgery (P < 0.01). Optical coherence tomography was the most preferred imaging modality and was utilized more often by the subspecialists than general ophthalmologists. The ophthalmologists also differed in their choice of antiglaucoma medications. More glaucoma specialists were performing surgery on children with congenital glaucoma (P < 0.01), implanting glaucoma drainage devices (P < 0.01), and using scientific journals to upgrade knowledge (P = 0.03) than the other ophthalmologists. Conclusions: This poll is the first of its kind in India, in its usage of the ARS, and in comparing the practice patterns of care for glaucoma among subspecialists and general ophthalmologists. It has revealed substantial diversity in a few areas among those who did and did not receive specialty training in glaucoma.
RESUMEN
Background: To describe the use of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) in the management of intractable glaucoma in eyes with a preexisting episcleral encircling element. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective, consecutive, noncomparative study. The study included 12 eyes of 12 patients with a preexisting episcleral encircling element that underwent implantation of silicone AGV to treat intractable glaucoma during January 2009 to September 2010. Results: The mean patient age was 25.6 (standard deviation 17.1) years. Five (41.6%) patients were monocular. The indications for AGV were varied. The mean duration between placement of episcleral encircling element and implantation of AGV was 30.5 (33.8) months. The mean follow-up was 37.4 (22.9) weeks. Preoperatively, the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was 31.4 (7.9) mmHg and the mean antiglaucoma medications were 2.8. At the fi nal postoperative follow-up, the mean IOP was 12.5 (3.5) mmHg and the mean number of antiglaucoma medications was 0.8 (P < 0.001). The complications observed over the follow-up period did include corneal graft failure in three eyes, tube erosion in two eyes and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in one eye. Conclusion: AGV is an eff ective option in the management of intractable glaucoma in eyes with a preexisting episcleral encircling element keeping in mind the possibility of signifi cant postoperative complications.
RESUMEN
Congenital anterior staphyloma entails grave visual prognosis. The majority of reported patients have undergone enucleation. We report a promising result of staphylectomy with implantation of a keratoprosthesis and a glaucoma drainage device in a seven-month-old child with a large, congenital anterior staphyloma.