RESUMEN
Objective:To evaluate the value of the ROX index [blood oxygen saturation (SpO 2)/fraction of inspiration O 2 (FiO 2)/respiratory rate (RR)], ROX-heart rate (HR) index (ROX index/HR × 100), modified ROX (mROX) index [partial pressure of oxygen in the blood (PaO 2)/FiO 2/RR], and mROX-HR index (mROX index/HR × 100) in predicting prognosis for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC). Methods:The clinical data of 100 patients with ARDS who received HFNC between January 2018 and December 2022 at The Third People's Hospital of Hubei Province, Jianghan University, were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into two groups based on whether HFNC treatment was successful or not: a success group with 65 patients and a failure group with 35 patients. The differences in the ROX index, ROX-HR index, mROX index, and mROX-HR index in the observation group were observed at the designated time points: 2, 12, and 24 hours after HFNC treatment. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to evaluate the value of ROX index, ROX-HR index, mROX index, and mROX-HR index in predicting the success or failure of HFNC treatment at 2, 12, and 24 hours. Cutoff values were determined.Results:There were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, or the proportions of underlying diseases and pulmonary causes between the success and failure groups (all P > 0.05). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in baseline HR, RR, FiO 2, SpO 2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO 2), PaO 2, pH, lactate, oxygenation index, ROX index, mROX index, ROX-HR index, or mROX-HR index between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The ROX index in the success group at 2, 12, and 24 hours after HFNC treatment was 6.86 ± 1.09, 6.31 ± 1.61, and 8.24 ± 2.29, respectively. These values were significantly higher than those in the failure group (6.36 ± 0.67, 5.65 ± 1.44, and 5.41 ± 0.84) at the corresponding time points ( F = 5.97, 4.04, 49.40, all P < 0.05). At 2, 12, and 24 hours after HFNC treatment, the mROX index in the success group was 5.94 ± 1.28, 5.74 ± 1.23, and 8.51 ± 2.64, respectively. These values were significantly higher than those in the failure group (5.26 ± 0.74, 4.80 ± 0.97, 4.81 ± 1.17) at the corresponding time points ( F = 8.23, 15.38, 61.79, all P < 0.05). At 2, 12, and 24 hours after HFNC treatment, the ROX-HR index in the success group was 6.53 ± 1.32, 6.85 ± 1.44, and 7.57 ± 1.47, respectively. These values were significantly higher than those in the failure group (5.79 ± 1.04, 5.87 ± 1.03, 5.57 ± 0.63) at the corresponding time points ( F = 8.28, 12.61, 58.34, all P < 0.05). At 2, 12, and 24 hours after HFNC treatment, the mROX-HR index in the success group was 6.11 ± 1.30, 6.86 ± 1.13, and 7.79 ± 1.79, respectively. These values were significantly higher than those in the failure group (5.20 ± 1.06, 5.66 ± 1.46, 4.92 ± 0.90) at the corresponding time points ( F = 12.60, 20.87, 78.56, all P < 0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the optimal thresholds were 6.56, 6.02, 6.24, and 5.25 for the ROX index, mROX index, ROX-HR index, and mROX-HR index, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.63, 0.66, 0.68, and 0.72, with sensitivity of 55.4%, 47.7%, 56.9%, and 76.9%, and specificity of 71.4%, 91.4%, 77.1%, and 62.9%, respectively. At 12 hours after treatment, the optimal thresholds were 6.09, 5.53, 6.52, and 5.99, with AUC values of 0.62, 0.70, 0.67, and 0.80, sensitivity of 55.4%, 53.8%, 61.5%, and 80.0%, and specificity of 74.3%, 77.1%, 71.4%, and 74.3%, respectively. At 24 hours after treatment, the optimal thresholds were 6.23, 6.4, 5.99, and 6.22, with AUC values of 0.88, 0.90, 0.91, and 0.93, sensitivity of 81.5%, 80.0%, 87.7%, and 83.1%, and specificity of 91.4%, 94.3%, 80.0%, and 91.4%, respectively. Conclusion:The use of the ROX index, mROX index, ROX-HR index, and mROX-HR index can aid in predicting the prognosis of ARDS patients. The predictive value of these indices increases as treatment time progresses. The mROX-HR index offers marked advantages during the initial stages of treatment and could serve as a reliable early predictor.
RESUMEN
Objective:To investigate the value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) combined with small airway function test to replace bronchial provocation test and induced sputum test in differentiating cough variant asthma (CVA) from eosinophilic bronchitis (EB).Methods:The clinical data of 105 patients with chronic cough admitted to The Third People's Hospital of Hubei, Jianghan University from January 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. These patients consisted of 40 patients with CVA (CVA group), 25 patients with EB (EB group), and 40 patients with other chronic coughs (other chronic cough group). FeNO and lung function were compared between groups. The value of FeNO, small airway function, and their combination in differentiating CVA from EB were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic curves.Results:FeNO level was the highest in the CVA group [33.0 (30.0, 37.8) ppb], followed by the EB group [28.0 (25.5, 32.0) ppb], and the lowest in other chronic cough group [13.0 (11.0, 15.0) ppb]. There was significant difference in FeNO level between groups ( H value = 79.00, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1), FEV 1/FVC, peak expiratory flow (PEF) between groups (all P > 0.05). Maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) [74 (66.0, 77.4) in the CVA group, 80 (79.0, 83.3) in the EB group, 88.0 (86.4, 90.0) in other chronic coughs group], FEF25 (%) [70.0 (60.3, 75.1) in the CVA group, 78.0 (74.1, 85.0) in the EB group, 81.7 (78.9, 86.3) in other chronic coughs group], FEF50 (%) [75.2 (67.1, 80.8) in the CVA group, 80.6 (75.7, 85.9) in the EB group, 89.4 (87.0, 90.5) in other chronic coughs group], FEF75 (%) [76.4 (68.7, 85.8) in the CVA group, 80.9 (77.4, 89.7) in the EB group, 90.8 (87.2, 94.2) in other chronic coughs group] were significantly lower in the CVA group than those in other chronic coughs group. With the exception of FEF25 (%), MMEF (%), FEF50 (%), and FEF75 (%) were significantly lower in the EB group compared with other chronic coughs group. MMEF (%) and FEF25 (%) in the CVA group were significantly lower compared with the EB group. There were significant differences in MMEF (%), FEF50 (%), and FEF75 (%) between groups ( H = 62.82, 47.04, 47.41, 49.11, all P < 0.01). There were significant differences in FEF50 (%) and FEF75 (%) between CVA and EB groups (both P > 0.05). In binary logistic regression equation, FeNO and MMEF (%) were important indexes to distinguish CVA from EB ( P < 0.05). Bronchial provocation test and induced sputum test were used as the gold standard to distinguish CVA from EB. When FeNO and MMEF (%) were used separately to distinguish CVA from EB, the optimal threshold value was 30.0 ppb and 77.7 respectively, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.77 and 0.82 respectively, the diagnostic sensitivity was 70% and 77.5% respectively, and the diagnostic specificity was 72% and 88% respectively. When FeNO and MMEF (%) were used in combination to distinguish CVA from EB, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89, and the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity was 75% and 96% respectively. Conclusion:FeNO and MMEF (%) can be used to distinguish CVA from EB. FeNO combined with MMEF (%) has a higher value in distinguishing CVA from EB than FeNO and MMEF alone.
RESUMEN
Objective To analyze the risk factors of early renal damage in children with Henoch Schonlein purpura(HSP).Methods The clinical data of 196 children with HSP admitted to our hospital from April 2012 to January 2016 were analyzed retrospectively.They were divided into the renal damage group and non-renal damage group within 90 d after confirmed diagnosis.The related clinical data such as serum immunoglobulin and urinary microalbumin were compared between the two groups,and the risk factors of early renal damage in children with HSP were screened.Results There were significant differences between the two groups on age,joint symptoms,recurrent purpura,persistent rash,gastrointestinal bleeding and abdominal pain(with χ2 or t of 11.345,16.223,11.275,43.211,12.592,17.771,P<0.05).The white blood cell count,platelet count,immunoglobulin A(IgA) level and urinary albumin level also showed significant differences between the two groups(t=33.750,60.442,9.451,8.458,P<0.05).The multivariate regression analysis showed that the independent risk factors for early renal damage in children with HSP included age(OR=2.703),recurrent purpura(OR=2.721),persistent skin rash(OR=1.782),gastrointestinal bleeding(OR=11.472),abdominal pain(OR=2.046),IgA level(OR=1.221) and urine microalbumin(OR=3.214).Conclusion Age,recurrent purpura,persistent skin rash,gastrointestinal bleeding,abdominal pain,IgA level and urine microalbumin are closely related to early renal damage in children with HSP.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the value of urinary calprotectin in differential diagnosis between prerenal and intrinsic pediatric acute renal injury(AKI).Methods A total of 68 cases with AKI were enrolled in this study,and they were divided into prerenal AKI group(25 cases) and intrinsic AKI group(43 cases) according to their tissue perfusion.The general data was collected,and the blood urea nitrogen(BUN),serum creatinie(Scr),BUN/Scr,potassium,fractional excretion of filtrated sodium(FENa),urine osmotic pressure,B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP),urinary calprotectin,neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL),kidney injury molecule 1 (Kim-1) were recorded and compared between the 2 groups.Results There were significant differences between prerenal AKI group and intrinsic AKI group in Scr[(439.0 ± 278.0) μmol/L vs.(603.0 ± 286.0) μmol/L,t =2.30,P ＜ 0.05],BUN/Scr (20.58 ±5.62 vs.14.93 ±4.32,t =4.65,P＜0.05),FENa[(1.5 ±0.6)％ vs.(8.1 ±2.6)％,t =12.46,P＜ 0.05],BNP[95.6(54.0,109.4) ng/L vs.512.3(320.1,520.3) ng/L,Z =2.21,P ＜0.05],urinary calprotectin [20.7(4.3,42.4) μg/L vs.402.4(60.1,498.7) μg/L,Z=3.13,P＜0.05] and NGAL[74.9(14.5,365.5) μg/L vs.684.2(56.2,1 502.5) μg/L,Z =2.35,P ＜0.05].Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that urinary calprotectin[area under the curve(AUC) =0.940] and BNP(AUC =0.909) both had higher value in differential diagnosis.When the cut off value of calprotectin was 240.6 μg/L,its specificity was 96.0％ and the sensitivity was 86.0％.When the cut off value of BNP was 120.6 ng/L,its specificity was 92.0％ and the sensitivity was 90.7％.The diagnostic accuracy was low in Scr,but moderate in BUN,Scr,FENa and NGAL.BUN,potassium,urine osmotic pressure and Kim-1 had no diagnostic value.Conclusions Urinary calprotectin may have higher diagnostic value in the differential diagnosis between prerenal and intrinsic pediatric AKT.It can be used in the clinical diagnosis as a reference index.