RESUMEN
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and prognostic factors of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy as the first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA/M ESCC).Methods:A single-center, retrospective analysis was conducted for the recent efficacy, survival, prognostic factors, post-treatment failure modes, and treatment-related adverse reactions of 57 LA/M ESCC patients eligible for enrollment.Results:The entire group of patients had 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) of 86.0%, 57.5%, and 53.9%, respectively and 1-, 2-, and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 61.4%, 31.0%, and 31.0%, respectively. The median OS was not reached, and the median PFS was 15.0 (95% CI: 10.77-19.23) months. These patients had an overall response rate (ORR) of 80.7% (46/57) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 94.7% (54/57). As indicated by the result of the multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors affecting the OS of the patients included their age, clinical stage, number of immunotherapy cycles, and recent efficacy ( HR = 0.25, 2.58, 0.35, 4.05, P < 0.05), and the independent factors influencing the PFS of the patients included their clinical stage and recent efficacy ( HR = 2.27, 1.97, P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the effects of irradiation ranges and the combination modes of immunologic drugs and chemoradiotherapy on both OS and PFS of the patients ( P > 0.05). A total of 32 patients suffered post-treatment failure. After the second treatment, they had 1- and 2-year OS of 55.7% and 25.3%, respectively, with median OS of 14.0 (95% CI: 5.17-22.83) months. A total of 26 cases experienced treatment-associated adverse reactions of grades 2 or higher during and after treatment. Conclusions:The combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy is effective and safe as the first-line treatment for LA/M ESCC patients. The post-treatment failure modes still include local recurrence and distant metastasis. Therefore, such combination merits further investigation.
RESUMEN
Objective:To analyze whether involved-field irradiation (IFI) was associated with improved survival and reduced treatment-related adverse events compared with elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in Chinese patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving radiotherapy.Methods:Literature review was conducted from CNKI, Wanfang Data, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central databases (until July 31, 2022). Relevant data were collected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) rate and treatment-related adverse events. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) rate and local control rate (LCR). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The quality of the results was assessed by using the meta analysis of Evidence Evaluation and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methods.Results:A total of 7 articles with 918 patients were included of which 465 received IFI and 453 received ENI. The 1-, 2-, 3-and 5-year OS rates in the IFI group were not significantly different from those in the ENI group (1-year OS rate: RR=1.00, 95% CI=0.94-1.07, P=0.97, high certainty; 2-year OS rate: RR=1.01, 95% CI=0.90-1.13, P=0.90, high certainty; 3-year OS rate: RR=0.86, 95% CI=0.71-1.05, P=0.14, high certainty; 5-year OS rate: RR=0.76, 95% CI=0.42-1.37, P=0.36, low certainty). In the IFI group, patients with ≥grade 2 acute radiation esophagitis ( RR=0.71, 95% CI=0.58-0.87, P=0.001, high certainty), ≥grade 3 acute radiation esophagitis ( RR=0.39, 95% CI=0.24-0.64, P<0.001, high certainty) and ≥grade 2 acute radiation pneumonitis ( RR=0.72, 95% CI=0.52-0.99, P=0.04, high certainty) were significantly lower compared with those in the ENI group. However, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of ≥grade 3 late radiation esophagitis, ≥grade 3 acute radiation pneumonitis and ≥grade 3 late radiation pneumonitis between two groups. No significant differences were noted in the 1-, 2-, 3-PFS rates and LCR between two groups. Conclusions:For Chinese patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, IFI and ENI yield similar efficacy in terms of OS, PFS and LCR. However, IFI has a lower incidence of ≥grade 2 acute radiation esophagitis, ≥grade 3 acute radiation esophagitis and ≥grade 2 acute radiation pneumonitis than ENI.
RESUMEN
Objective:To investigate the effects of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII)on the long-term survival in esophageal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.Methods:Aretrospective review was conducted for the clinical data of 303 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC)who received radical radiotherapy in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2011 to 2017. These patients were divided into a high-SII group and a low-SII group according to their SII before radiotherapy. The correlation between SII and survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce bias from measured confounding.Results:The SII of patients before radiotherapy was correlated significantly with T stage ( χ2=8.015, P=0.018) and TNM stage ( χ2=8.619, P=0.013). The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in the high-SII group were 64.9%, 27.1%, and 19.4%, respectively. They were significantly lower than those in the low-SII group, which were 84.9%, 43.9%, and 30.5%, respectively (χ 2=13.443, P<0.001). The 1-, 3-, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates in the high-SII group were 46.4%, 20.3%, and 13.3%, respectively. They were significantly lower than those in the low-SII group, which were 67.8%, 34.8%, and 26.5%, respectively (χ 2=12.383, P<0.001). The multivariate analysis indicated that the independent factors influencing the OS and PFS included T stage, lymph node metastasis, chemotherapy, and SII.After PSM was applied, the OS and PFS in the high-SII group were still lower than those in the low-SII group(χ 2OS=4.264, P=0.039; χ 2PFS=5.376, P=0.020), and the multivariate analysis showed that SII was a significant predictor for OS and PFS( HROS=1.357, P=0.037; HRPFS=1.393, P=0.022). Conclusions:SII is a significant independent influencing factor of the OS and PFS inESCC patients treated with received radiotherapy. Based on simple and inexpensive standard laboratory measurements, SII can be a promising marker for ESCC patients.
RESUMEN
Objective:To investigate the long-term prognosis and failure mode of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieved clinical complete remission (cCR) after receiving radical radio (chemo) therapy.Methods:Clinical data of 183 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma eligible for inclusion criteria who received treatment in our hospital from January 2009 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The factors that affected the long-term prognosis of patients were identified, and the failure mode of cCR patients and the prognosis after failure were analyzed. SPSS 19.0 statistical software was used for data analysis.Results:As of the follow-up date, the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of the entire group were 83.1%, 53.4%, 36.2%, 12.8% and 68.9%, 45.9%, 30.5%, 12.0%, respectively. The median OS and DFS were 41.3 months and 33.4 months. The results of multivariate analysis showed that cT staging, cN staging and prescribed dose were the independent factors affecting the OS ( P=0.001, <0.001, 0.003); hoarseness, lesion length, cT staging, cN staging and prescribed dose were the independent factors that affected the DFS ( P=0.002, 0.033, 0.009, <0.001, 0.003). In the whole group, 72 cases (39.3%) had local regional recurrence, 58 cases (31.7%) had distant metastasis, and 26 cases (14.2%) had local regional recurrence with distant metastasis. Among 104 patients after treatment failure, the prognosis of patients receiving salvage treatment was significantly better than that of their counterparts receiving maintenance treatment ( χ2=39.153, P<0.001). Conclusions:The long-term prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieved cCR after receiving radical radio (chemo) therapy is still unsatisfactory. Clinically, it is necessary to strengthen the clinical observation and follow-up of these patients. The main treatment failure mode of cCR patients is local regional recurrence. Active salvage treatment can significantly improve clinical prognosis of these patients.
RESUMEN
Objective:To study the prognostic impact of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) before radiotherapy in clinical stage Ⅲ esophageal cancer patients.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed 125 esophageal cancer patients with clinical stage Ⅲ undergoing definitive radiotherapy in Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2013 to 2017. The PNI and nutritional risk index (NRI) were calculated before radiotherapy. The optimal cutoff value of PNI was determined by time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC) at 49.925.The patients were divided into low PNI group(PNI<49.925) and high PNI group (PNI≥49.925). Based on NRI, the patients were divided into normal NRI group (NRI≥100) and abnormal NRI group (NRI<100). Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and to perform univariate analysis. The mutlivariate analysis was performed by Cox regression model.Results:PNI was positively correlated with hemoglobin ( r=0.505, P<0.001) and NRI ( r=0.594, P<0.001). The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates in the low PNI group were significantly lower than those of the high PNI group (67.5%, 27.3%, 11.4% vs. 85.4%, 45.8%, 27.4%, respectively, χ2=8.569, P<0.05). Moreover, the 1-, 3- and 5-year PFS rates in the low PNI group were obviously higher than those in the high PNI group (59.7%, 23.2%, 4.9% vs. 79.2%, 35.4%, 24.9%, respectively, χ2=6.715, P<0.05). Univariate analysis showed that GTV, radiotherapy dose, chemotherapy, albumin, NRI and PNI were significantly correlated with OS and PFS (OS: χ2=6.822, 4.326, 4.474, 13.123, 8.846, 8.569, P<0.05: PFS: χ2=7.869, 4.636, 5.874, 10.911, 8.544, 6.715, P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that GTV, radiotherapy dose and PNI were independent prognostic factors for OS ( P<0.05). And GTV, radiotherapy dose, chemotherapy and PNI were independent prognostic factors for PFS ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The PNI before radiotherapy is a significant and independent predictor for survival of clinical stage Ⅲ esophageal cancer patients. Based on simple and inexpensive standard laboratory measurements, PNI could be a promising prognostic biomarker for esophageal cancer patients.
RESUMEN
Objective:To analyze the therapeutic effects and prognosis after radiotherapy (chemotherapy) of patients with postoperative recurrent esophageal cancer.Methods:This study analyzed 501 patients with postoperative recurrent esophageal cancer who were treated in the Radiotherapy Department of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University and met enrollment conditions. Among them, 274 patients received concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The analyses in this study focused on the survival after the retreatment, postoperative recurrence patterns, prognosis of retreatment, and prognostic factors affecting the retreatment. Meanwhile, statistical analysis was conducted using the software SPSS Statistics 19.0.Results:The time of postoperative recurrence was 0.3-87.4 months, with a median number of 11.6 months. The median survival time was 12.1 months after the retreatment. Among all the patients, 344 patients suffered from only local recurrence, while the remaining 157 patients experienced distant metastasis. According to multivariate analysis result, independent prognostic factors included gender, pN stage, lymph node positive logarithmic ratio (LODDS), the number of chemotherapy cycles, time of recurrence, and distant metastasis ( P < 0.05). Meanwhile, prognostic factors affecting the 344 patients with only local recurrence included the time of recurrence, the number of chemotherapy cycles, and prescription dose ( χ2=22.605, 13.957, 10.446; P< 0.05). The remaining 157 patients suffered from distant metastasis. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of them were 43.3%, 9.1%, and 5.5%, respectively, and those of the patients with only local recurrence were 53.6%, 22.6%, and 16.4%, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (χ 2=10.786, P< 0.05). Conclusions:Radiotherapy (chemotherapy) is safe and effective for the treatment of recurrent esophageal cancer. However, it features poor prognosis for male patients with a late pN stage, a high LODDS, the number of chemotherapy cycles ≤ 2, the time of recurrence≤ 24 months, and distant metastasis.
RESUMEN
Objective:To evaluate the effects of different irradiation doses on postoperative local recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer after radio (chemo) therapy.Methods:Clinical data of 331 esophageal cancer patients presenting with postoperative local recurrence admitted to our hospital from 2009 to 2014 were collected. The recurrence site, the effects of different radiotherapy doses on the prognosis of patients and the independent prognostic factors were retrospectively analyzed. The survival rate was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate prognostic analysis was performed by log-rank test. Multivariate prognostic analysis was conducted by Cox proportional hazard regression model.Results:The 1-, 3-and 5-year overall survival rates were 54.3%, 23.2% and 16.6%, respectively. The median overall survival was 13.4 months (95% CI: 11.7-15.0). The median survival of patients with radiotherapy doses< 60 Gy and ≥60 Gy was 10.8 and 13.9 months ( P=0.013). Stratified analysis showed that patients with age< 60 years, no smoking history, no drinking history, no family history, upper thoracic segment, left thoracotomy, N 0 staging, log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS)< 0.030, recurrence time ≥ 13.1 months and recurrence site ≥ 2 had better prognosis when receiving radiotherapy dose ≥ 60 Gy ( P=0.038, 0.033, 0.001, 0.003, 0.018, 0.010, 0.041, 0.039, 0.043 and 0.007). Moreover, the short-term clinical efficacy of patients treated with ≥60 Gy dose was significantly better than that of those with<60 Gy dose ( P<0.001), which did not increase the incidence of ≥grade 2 radiation-induced gastritis ( P=0.977) or radiation-induced pneumonitis ( P=0.444). Cox multivariate analysis showed that the LODDS size, prescription dose and short-term efficacy were the independent factors affecting clinical prognosis of patients ( P=0.006, 0.008 and<0.001). Conclusions:The recommended dose for esophageal cancer patients with local recurrence after radiotherapy (chemotherapy) is greater than or equal to 60 Gy. The results of this study need to be confirmed by prospective studies with a large sample size.
RESUMEN
Objective@#To study the relationship between the dose-volume indexes and acute toxicity of intrathoracic stomach in esophageal cancer patients receiving radiotherapy after esophagectomy.@*Methods@#A total of 104 patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy followed by radical esophagectomy were enrolled. The dose-volume indexes of intrathoracic stomach were collected from treatment planning system. The ROC curve and logistic regression were performed to analyze the relationship between acute toxicity of intrathoracic stomach and clinical parameters, dose-volume indexes.@*Results@#A total of 29 patients (27.88 %) suffered from grade 2 or above acute toxicity. The ROC curve analysis showed that the dose-volume indexes including Dmax, Dmean, L5-L45 and V5-V50were associated with occurrence of grade 2 or above acute toxicity. The univariate analysis showed that location, Dmax, Dmean, L5-L45 and V5-V50 were significantly correlated with the incidence of grade 2 or above acute toxicity (P<0.05). The multivariate analysis showed that location, L5 and V35 were independent factors for incidence of grade 2 or above acute toxicity. The ROC curve analysis showed that cut-off values of L5 and V35 were 14.00 cm and 44.00%, respectively. And the rates of Grade 2 or above acute toxicity were 20.00% for L5>14.00 cm and 38.64% for L5≥14.00 cm (χ2=4.473, P<0.05), 14.08% for V35<44.00% and 57.58% for V35≥44.00% (χ2=7.263, P<0.05), respectively. The incidence of grade 2 or above acute toxicity was significantly higher in post-mediastinum stomach group than the other two groups (χ2=12.881, P<0.05).@*Conclusions@#Dose-volume index may be indicator to predict acute toxicity of intrathoracic stomach. It is recommended that post-mediastinum stomach should be chosen carefully if esophageal cancer patients require postoperative radiotherapy.
RESUMEN
Objective: To analyze the predictive value of postoperative lymph node status for adjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer patients after radical resection. Methods: The indexes related to postoperative lymph node of 354 patients with esophageal carcinoma, who underwent radical surgery during a period between January 2007 and December 2010, were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate analysis was performed by Log-rank test and multivariate analysis by a Cox regression model. Results: The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 84.46%, 64.12% and 54.06%, respectively, and the median survival time was 86.49 months. The 5-year OS rate of N0, N1, N2 and N3 stage patients were 93.13%, 55.50%, 19.80% and 3.45%, respectively. And it is obviously different from each other in PN stage (χ2=225.161, P8.51% were 81.63% and 23.40%, respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups (χ2=143.504, P8.51% groups with adjuvant therapy showed a significantly better survival than those with surgery alone and without adjuvant therapy (χ2=12.609, P8.51% who had undergone adjuvant therapy showed a significantly better survival than those with simple surgery and without adjuvant therapy (χ2=12.609, P<0.001). Conclusions: The combination of PN stage and LNR as a better factor for predicting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer after radical resection can predict the value of adjuvant therapy. The patients with PN2 stage and higher LNR should choose postoperative adjuvant therapy.
RESUMEN
Objective To study the relationship between the dose-volume indexes and acute toxicity of intrathoracic stomach in esophageal cancer patients receiving radiotherapy after esophagectomy.Methods A total of 104 patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy followed by radical esophagectomy were enrolled.The dose-volume indexes of intrathoracic stomach were collected from treatment planning system.The ROC curve and logistic regression were performed to analyze the relationship between acute toxicity of intrathoracic stomach and clinical parameters,dose-volume indexes.Results A total of 29 patients (27.88 %) suffered from grade 2 or above acute toxicity.The ROC curve analysis showed that the dose-volume indexes including D D L5-L45 and V5-V50were associated with occurrence of grade 2 or above acute toxicity,The univariate analysis showed that location,D D L5-L45 and V5-V50 were significantly correlated with the incidence of grade 2 or above acute toxicity (P<0.05).The multivariate analysis showed that location,L5 and V35 were independent factors for incidence of grade 2 or above acute toxicity.The ROC curve analysis showed that cut-off values of L5 and V35 were 14.00 cm and 44.00%,respectively.And the rates of Grade 2 or above acute toxicity were 20.00% for L5> 14.00 cm and 38.64% for L5 ≥ 14.00 cm (x2 =4.473,P<0.05),14.08% for V35<44.00% and 57.58% for V35 ≥44.00% (x2 =7.263,P<0.05),respectively.The incidence of grade 2 or above acute toxicity was significantly higher in post-mediastinum stomach group than the other two groups (x2 =12.881,P<0.05).Conclusions Dosevolume index may be indicator to predict acute toxicity of intrathoracic stomach.It is recommended that post-mediastinum stomach should be chosen carefully if esophageal cancer patients require postoperative radiotherapy.
RESUMEN
Objective:To study the effects of immunity index and blood inflammatory markers pre- and post-radiotherapy on prognosis of esophageal cancer patients with clinical stage Ⅲ.Methods:A total of 84 esophageal cancer patients with clinical stage Ⅲ (T 4N 1M 0) in Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University were analyzed, from May 2010 to April 2012. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was delivered with a dose of 56-66 Gy/1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction. Flow cytometry was used to analyze the distribution of T-lymphocyte subsets (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD4/CD8) and natural killer cells (CD56) in the peripheral blood pre- and post- radiotherapy. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) pre- and post- radiotherapy were also tested. The correlation of immunity index and blood inflammatory markers with prognosis was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results:For all patients, the 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 78.57%, 34.52% and 19.59%, respectively. The median OS time was 22.60 months. The 1-, 3- and 5-year progression free survival (PFS) rates were 69.05%, 27.38% and 12.09%, respectively. The median PFS time was 21.20 months. The objective response rate was 61.90%, with 11 patients of complete remission (CR) and 41 patients of partial remission (PR). Univariate analysis revealed that NLR before radiotherapy, T-lymphocyte subsets (CD3, CD4 and CD4/CD8) after radiotherapy were significantly associated with OS and PFS (OS: χ 2=7.851, 4.443, 8.381, 5.972, P<0.05, PFS: χ 2= 7.475, 6.290, 9.659, 8.738, P<0.05). Multivariate COX regression analysis showed that NLR before radiotherapy, T-lymphocyte subsets (CD4, CD4/CD8) after radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS (χ 2=10.464, 4.292, 5.507, P<0.05). The NLR before radiotherapy and CD4/CD8 after radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors for PFS (χ 2=10.835, 8.545, P<0.05). Conclusions:Radiotherapy may influence the immune function. NLR before radiotherapy and CD4/CD8 after radiotherapy are of great value in predicting the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients.
RESUMEN
Objective:To analyze the effect of positive lymph node log ratio (LODDS) on the prognosis of postoperative patients with esophageal cancer, and analyze the effect of LODDS on the evaluation of the efficacy of patients receiving different postoperative adjuvant treatment.Methods:A total of 1 546 patients with esophageal cancer treated in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. The effect of LODDS on the prognosis of patients was retrospectively analyzed. The significance of LODDS in choosing different treatment options for patients after operation was further analyzed.Results:The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 87.5%, 61.7% and 52.2%, respectively. The result of area under curve(ROC)curve analysis show that -1.354 1 is the best cut-off point for LODDS. Multivariate analysis showed that gender, age, lesion location, degree of adhesion, adjuvant therapy, pTNM stage and LODDS were the independent factors affecting the patients ( P<0.05). After propensity-matched analysis(PSM)analysis, there were 205 patients in each group. Multivariate analysis showed that gender, degree of adhesion, adjuvant therapy, pTNM stage and LODDS were independent prognostic factors ( P<0.05). The result of stratified analysis showed that patients with small LODDS values had better prognosis (OS) in patients undergoing postoperative adjuvant therapy than patients in the surgery alone ( χ2=81.470, 5.182, P<0.05), but postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) and postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy (POCRT) had no significant difference in the OS of patients ( P>0.05). However, in the larger LODDS group, the OS of patients in the POCRT group was significantly better than the other two groups ( χ2=4.151, 24.020, P<0.05), and there was also a significant difference between the POCT and POCRT groups ( χ2=8.728, P<0.05). Conclusions:LODDS is an independent prognostic factor for postoperative patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and can guide the choice of postoperative adjuvant therapy to a certain extent. This conclusion needs further clinical research to confirm.
RESUMEN
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of target area of radical radiotherapy for inoperable esophageal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 564 Ⅰ-Ⅳ non-surgical esophageal cancer who received definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone in our hospital from 2006 to 2015. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to identify well-balanced patients for comparison. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate local-regional failure-free survival (LRFFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) rates and univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis of prognostic factors were tested by COX proportional hazard model.Results:The last follow-up time was December 2018, the median follow-up time was 99.7 (95% CI: 77.5-122.1) months. Follow-up rate was 95.9%. For the 564 patients, the 1-, 3-, 5- year LRFFS were 61.5%, 26.5%, 14.3%, PFS were 56.7%, 25.0%, 13.4%, OS were 73.0%, 31.1%, 16.8%. After PSM, for the elective-nodal irradiation (ENI) ( n=141) and involved-nodal irradiation (IFI) ( n=141) groups, the 1-, 3-, 5- year LRFFS were 68.8%, 34.2%, 19.1% vs. 65.2%, 32.1%, 17.9% ( P>0.05), PFS were 63.1%, 31.0%, 16.6% vs. 60.3%, 29.3%, 16.6% ( P>0.05), OS were 80.9%, 41.5%, 23.3% vs. 80.1%, 35.0%, 20.2% ( P>0.05). In multivariate analysis, tumor volume≤37 cm 3 and Ⅰ+ Ⅱ stage were independent factors for LRFFS, PFS and OS. Subgroup analysis showed that there were no significant differences in the survival rates between the ENI group and IFI group ( P>0.05). Comparing to the IFI group, ENI reduced the local-regional failure rate ( P=0.048). Conclusions:Using intensity-modulated radiation therapy alone for inoperable esophageal carcinoma, ENI can significantly reduce the local-regional failure rate, but not improve survival rates compared to the IFI.
RESUMEN
Objective:To evaluate the recurrence patterns of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after radical surgery and analyze the predictors of post-recurrence survival (PRS).Methods:A total of 382 ESCC patients who developed recurrence after radical surgery were retrospectively reviewed from January 2007 to December 2011. All of them received salvage treatment after recurrence. The Univariate analysis was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate prognostic analysis was determined using the Cox proportional hazard model.Results:The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 80.9%, 35.6% and 20.4%, respectively. The median survival time and recurrence time were 29.2 months and 15.0 months. The 1-, 3-, 5-year PRS rates were 37.7%, 14.6% and 11.9%, respectively. The median PRS time was 10.2 months. Locoregional recurrence was noted at 462 sites among 382 patients including 20.5% (95/462) of sites in supraclavicular LN (lymph node), 10.0% (46/462) in anastomosis, 56.1% (259/462) in mediastinal regional LN and 13.4% (62/462) in upper abdominal LN. There were 156, 43, 82 and 101 patients treated with salvage radiotherapy, chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy and palliative care after recurrence, respectively. The univariate analysis showed that T stage, N stage, TNM stage, recurrence site, number of recurrent regions and treatment regimen after recurrence were significantly correlated with PRS ( χ2=5.336, 4.292, 8.067, 7.482, 4.093, 76.426, P<0.05). Patients receiving salvage radiotherapy with the median dose of 60 Gy, were divided into <60 Gy group and ≥ 60 Gy group. The ≥60 Gy group had a better PRS than <60 Gy group ( χ2=8.320, P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that number of recurrent regions and treatment regimen were independent prognostic factors of PRS. Conclusions:Mediastinal and supraclavicular regions were the most common sites of recurrence in ESCC patients after radical surgery. Salvage radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy could significantly improve PRS in recurrent ESCC patients.
RESUMEN
Objective:To evaluate the effects of different irradiation ranges in definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with chemotherapy on the survival of esophageal cancer patients.Methods:Clinical data of 360 esophageal cancer patients who received definitive chemoradiotherapy in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2006 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 131 patients received elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and 229 patients underwent involved-field irradiation (IFI). Platinum-based chemotherapy was adopted. The overall survival (OS) rate was analyzed by Kaplan- Meier method and Logrank test. Results:Until the final follow-up at the end of December 2018, the follow-up rate was 96%. The median follow-up time was 64 months (95% CI: 53-76). The median survival time was 24 months (95% CI: 20-28). The 1-, 3-, 5-year OS rates were 76.1%, 38.7% and 21.0%, respectively. After propensity score matching, the 1-, 3-, 5-year OS rates were 83.9%, 48.6%, 26.8% vs. 74.0%, 33.8%, 17.5% between the ENI ( n=131) and IFI groups ( n=131)( P=0.011), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with male, aged≤66 years, cervical and upper-thoracic location, tumor length≤7 cm, tumor volume≤50 cm 3, T 1-3 stage, dosage>60 Gy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy obtained better OS rates in the ENI group than their counterparts in the IFI group (all P<0.05). In the ENI group, the total failure rate, locoregional failure rate and distant metastasis rate were significantly lower, whereas the incidence of ≥Grade Ⅲ myelosuppression was remarkably higher than those in the IFI group (all P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with IFI, ENI can significantly improve the survival for patients with early-stage and cervical and upper-thoracic esophageal cancer receiving definitive IMRT combined with chemotherapy.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the prognostic effects and failure patterns of different clinical target volumes of IMRT in definitive chemoradiotherapy for cervical and upper-thoracic esophageal cancer,in order to provide a reference for radiotherapy target area delineation.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 132 patients with cervical and upper-thoracic esophageal cancer who received definitive IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy in our hospital from 2010 to 2014.Seventy-one patients received elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and the other 61 patients received involvedfield irradiation (IFI).The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate local control (LC),progressionfree survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates.The significant difference was evaluated by the logrank test.The prognostic factors were determined by Cox univariate and multivariate analyses.Results The last follow-up time was December 2017,the median follow-up time was 59.5 (14.2-95.8) months.Follow-up rate was 99.2%.For the ENI and IFI groups,the 1-,3-,5-year LC were 77.5%,58.8%,48.8% vs.64.3%,29.1%,26.2% (x2=9.68,P=0.002),PFS were 68.6%,37.7%,25.9% vs.47.5%,17.2%,3.6% (x2=11.39,P=0.001),OS were 81.7%,53.9%,31.3% vs.70.5%,31.9%,16.3% (x2=7.70,P =0.006),respectively.In multivariate analysis,T stage,N stage,and RT field were independent factors for LC,PFS and OS(P<0.05).The total failure rates,local-regional recurrent rate in ENI group were lower than those in IFI group (x2 =13.23,5.24,P<0.05).No significant differences were found in acute radiation esophagitis,pneumonitis and myelosuppression (Grades ≥ 3) between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions Compared with IFI,ENI can significantly reduce local-regional recurrence and distant metastasis and improve the long-term survival for cervical and upper-thoracic esophageal cancer patients who received definitive chemoradiotherapy.
RESUMEN
Objective To observe the variation trend of the peripheral blood lymphocyte-tomonocyte ratio (LMR) during radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer and analyze the relationship between LMR and the radiation-induced injury,aiming to provide parameters for accurate evaluation of radiotherapy responses and clinical efficacy.Methods Clinical data of 248 eligible patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy in our department from January 2013 to December 2015,248 were retrospectively analyzed.The routine peripheral blood examination was performed weekly before,during and at the end of radiotherapy.The absolute number of lymphocyte and monocyte was recorded to calculate the LMR.The standard classification of LMR value was conducted based on the median value of each parameter.All data including the lesion length,lesion location,clinical stage and LMR were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier,cox and logistic regression methods,respectively.Results LMR displayed an exponential decline during radiotherapy.Univariate analysis showed that the average LMR value was the influential factor of overall survival (P=0.011) and progression-free survival (P=0.017).The mean LMR value almost exerted significant effect upon local control rate (P=0.053).No significant correlation was observed between the mean LMR value and radioactive esophagitis and pneumonitis.Stratified analysis based on the results of multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients with higher average LMR value still had longer survival.Logistic regression model revealed that the length of esophageal lesion and irradiation pattern were the influential factors of the mean LMR value.Conclusions LMR value displays an exponential decline during radiotherapy.The greater amplitude prompts the worse prognosis.The wider the irradiation field and the greater decrease in LMR exert more obvious impact on the prognosis.
RESUMEN
Objective@#To observe the variation trend of the peripheral blood lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) during radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer and analyze the relationship between LMR and the radiation-induced injury, aiming to provide parameters for accurate evaluation of radiotherapy responses and clinical efficacy.@*Methods@#Clinical data of 248 eligible patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy in our department from January 2013 to December 2015, 248 were retrospectively analyzed. The routine peripheral blood examination was performed weekly before, during and at the end of radiotherapy. The absolute number of lymphocyte and monocyte was recorded to calculate the LMR. The standard classification of LMR value was conducted based on the median value of each parameter. All data including the lesion length, lesion location, clinical stage and LMR were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier, cox and logistic regression methods, respectively.@*Results@#LMR displayed an exponential decline during radiotherapy. Univariate analysis showed that the average LMR value was the influential factor of overall survival (P=0.011) and progression-free survival (P=0.017). The mean LMR value almost exerted significant effect upon local control rate (P=0.053). No significant correlation was observed between the mean LMR value and radioactive esophagitis and pneumonitis. Stratified analysis based on the results of multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients with higher average LMR value still had longer survival. Logistic regression model revealed that the length of esophageal lesion and irradiation pattern were the influential factors of the mean LMR value.@*Conclusions@#LMR value displays an exponential decline during radiotherapy. The greater amplitude prompts the worse prognosis. The wider the irradiation field and the greater decrease in LMR exert more obvious impact on the prognosis.
RESUMEN
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and sequential boost (SB) using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT),and investigate the long-term clinical efficacy and adverse events of SIB-IMRT in combination with chemotherapy in the treatment of esophageal cancer.Methods Clinical data of 330 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer undergoing radical chemoradiotherapy in Fourth Hospital of Hebei University from January 2006 to December 2015 were respectively analyzed.All patients were assigned into the SIB-IMRT (n=135) and SB-IMRT groups (n=195).All patients received definitive radiotherapy with elective nodal irradiation (ENI).After the propensity score matching (PSM),105 patients were enrolled in each group.Kaplan-Meier method was used to survival analysis.Cox model was used to multivariate prognostic analysis.Results Prior to PSM,the 1-,3-and 5-year local control rates were 80.1%,58.3%,46.7% and 72.1%,44.9%,40.5% in the SIB-IMRT and SB-IMRT groups (P=0.050),and the 1-,3-and 5-year OS rates were 81.4%,51.9%,43.5% and 80.5%,37.9%,22.3%(P=0.014),respectively.After the PSM,the 1-,3-and 5-year LC rates were 80.2%,54.2%,43.9% and 75.5%,47.2%,41.2% (P=0.264),and the 1-,3-and 5-year OS rates were 78.9%,49.0%,40.8% and 83.3%,41.7%,24.8% (P=0.265),respectively.Multivariate analysis demonstrated that TNM staging was an independent prognostic factor in the SIB-IMRT group,whereas TNM staging and chemotherapy served as the independent prognostic factors in the SB-IMRT group.Stratified analysis revealed that the LC rate in the SIB-IMRT was significantly higher than that in the SB-IMRT group when radiotherapy alone was performed (P =0.018).The OS rate in the SIB-IMRT group was equally higher compared with that in the SBIMRT group.Conclusions The LC and OS rates are almost identical after SB-IMRT and SIB-IMRT in the treatment of esophageal cancer,whereas the prognostic survival in the SIB-IMRT group is significantly longer compared with that in the SB-IMRT group during radiotherapy alone.The findings remain to be validated by multi-center investigations with a large sample size.
RESUMEN
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognosis of resection followed by chemotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer .Methods The clinical data of 230 limited-stage small cell lung cancer patients with curative treatment between January 2006 and December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed .All patients divided to two group: the resection plus chemotherapy ( S +C ) and chemoradiotherapy ( R +C ) .And the prognostic factors were further analyzed with limited stage small cell lung cancer .The Kaplan-Meier method was used for the survival analysis.Results The overall survival rates of 1-year, 3-year and 5-year were 87.0%, 38.9%, 25.4%, respectively and the media survival time ( MST) 26.0 months.When patients were stratified by clinical stageⅠ+Ⅱ, the 1-year , 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates of S +C group and R +C group were 92.6%, 63.2%, 47.3%and 76.2%, 42.9%, 30.6%, respectively (χ2 =7.851, P0.05).In univariate analysis, tumor location, tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, the cycle of chemotherapy , treatment modalities were significantly associated with survival ( RR=1.735, P<0.05).The multivariate analysis only showed TNM stage were independent factors of prognosis .Conclusions The results suggested that resection plus chemotherapy could improve the prognosis of early-stage(stageⅠ+Ⅱ) small cell lung cancer, but patients in ⅢA stage should received the definitive chemoradiotherapy .The TNM stage was still the independent factor of prognosis .