Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 31: e93, 2017. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-952098

RESUMEN

Abstract: Poor description of oral lesions jeopardize the prioritization of appointments in Oral Medicine. The present study investigated whether the use of support tools changes the quality of descriptions focusing on health care prioritization. Two oral lesions (A and B) were described by 64 dental students and 48 dentists using three methods: (a) without support tools (free); (b) using the oral examination form from the Specialties Manual in Oral Health/Brazilian Ministry of Health (SMOH form); and (c) using the OralDESC guideline. The descriptions were compared with a gold standard and percentage of agreement was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests (p<0.05). Descriptions with the OralDESC presented higher information quality. Considering items essential for prioritization, the OralDESC demonstrated better performance for lesion A; for lesion B, free descriptions and descriptions using the OralDESC were of higher quality than those using SMOH form. Therefore, the OralDESC offered greater support for the description of oral lesions for health care prioritization in Oral Medicine.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Derivación y Consulta/normas , Registros Odontológicos/normas , Medicina Oral/normas , Intercambio de Información en Salud/normas , Enfermedades de la Boca/patología , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Estándares de Referencia , Valores de Referencia , Estudiantes de Odontología/estadística & datos numéricos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Odontólogos/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA